|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Calendar | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-04-2009, 08:52 AM
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,117
Thanks: 1,325
Thanked 559 Times in 288 Posts
|
"All that said, I will make a guess that the BAC was over the limit, why bother to exclude evidence that doesn't hurt you? The BAC may get tossed out but the reality will remain."
The above sentence sums it up nicely. Why exclude the evidence if it doesn't implicate you? |
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode