![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Calendar | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: I'm right here!
Posts: 1,153
Thanks: 9
Thanked 102 Times in 37 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Headway speed is NOT 6 MPH. Headway speed is "...the slowest speed that a boat can be operated and maintain steerage way." You are correct that the additional language in the law is provided for vessels that headway speed is not 6 MPH...UP OR DOWN! To be truthful with you, I have never seen signs on Winnipesaukee or the other NH waterways that I have boated on that state "HEADWAY SPEED - 6MPH". The signs I have seen say "NO WAKE" but it doesn't matter since under NH law they mean one and the same. As you have pointed out on any number of occasions during various debates, just because a boating booklet, on in this case a sign, does or does not say "Headway Speed - 6 MPH" it is only a guide. The RSA is the LAW. You misunderstand my interpretation of the law if you think that I say your friend with the Egg Harbor is violating the law by going headway speed at 9 MPH. Certainly not! If the Egg Harbor can not maintain steerage at a speed below 9 mhp then the speed that the Egg Harbor CAN MAINTAIN STEERAGE is the Egg Harbor's headway speed. If on the other hand a boat, say a displacement hull with twin screws and bow and stern thrusters, can maintain steerage at under 6 MPH then whatever that speed below 6 mph is, that is the vessel's headway speed. A displacement hull boat traveling at 6 mph can certainly kick up an impressive wake! The law was written to make sure that boats are operated at the slowest possible speed when required to go headway speed in order to leave the least possible wake. Quote:
What is so hard about this? Last edited by Airwaves; 08-24-2008 at 06:32 PM. Reason: Bolded the different postings |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Moultonborough & CT
Posts: 2,542
Thanks: 1,072
Thanked 667 Times in 366 Posts
|
![]()
All I know is that when I get pulled over for exceeding the NO WAKE ZONE because my PWC can not be manuvered without power, and I might be a little heavy on the throttle and exceed 6 mph when I try and make a course correction, then I want legal beagels like you guys to argue my case.
![]() Last edited by Pineedles; 08-24-2008 at 06:29 PM. Reason: spelling |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I'm still not convinced on the 6 mph. I think it is a hard limit. Headway speed is any speed 6 mph or less. So let's take an example. A canoe can maintain steerage at less than 1 mph, so by Airwaves interpretation, they could not exceed 1 mph in a No Wake Zone. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,724
Thanks: 752
Thanked 1,457 Times in 1,014 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I don't think there are too many boats on the lake these days that can't maintain steerage at 6 MPH, are there? I was watching MP stop people for No Wake and was surprised as some were just making an almost invisible wake. I asked him about it and he said no wake is no wake. If it was very small he just warned them though. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: I'm right here!
Posts: 1,153
Thanks: 9
Thanked 102 Times in 37 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I have a full tank of gas. A full complement of adults on board so the boat is heavy in the water and I am traveling at 6 MPH. Under your "hard limit" headway speed, I would be in compliance with the headway speed/no wake zone even though with the weight, displacement and speed of my boat I am going to be kicking up a foot or more wake, and even though I can maintain control of my boat at a lesser speed than 6 MPH? Now, on the other hand, You and I are on board Skip's Egg Harbor and we come to a no wake zone. Skip can not control the vessel at 6 mph. Does he violate the law if it kicks it up to a speed where he can control the boat? No, that's fine. Quote:
The NHMP will make the call about what is headway speed and no wake. I have been yelled at going through the Weirs Channel by a drunk on the shore because I was making a "wake". I looked, there was a small wake and I was traveling less than 6 MPH. So....what I am saying? The law was written to require boats travel the slowest possible speed in order NOT TO MAKE A WAKE in the designated areas. Read the wording of the law again, carefully read it and then tell me you think it sets a limit at 6mph in a no wake zone. Or after you read it do you think that it REQUIRES you to operate at the slowest speed possible be that above or below 6 MPH? Last edited by Airwaves; 08-24-2008 at 08:08 PM. Reason: last paragraph |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gilford, NH / Welch Island
Posts: 6,245
Thanks: 2,390
Thanked 5,283 Times in 2,055 Posts
|
![]()
From the Marine Patrol Website: http://www.nh.gov/safety/divisions/s...l/faq.html#A19
"What is headway speed? Headway speed is 6 mph or the slowest speed to travel and still maintain steerage." Dan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: I'm right here!
Posts: 1,153
Thanks: 9
Thanked 102 Times in 37 Posts
|
![]()
Yep, that's the law, and that's what Skip and I have both said. The question is....
who wants to say it??? I'm waiting...... I guess that depends of what the definition of OR is! ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gilford, NH / Welch Island
Posts: 6,245
Thanks: 2,390
Thanked 5,283 Times in 2,055 Posts
|
![]()
If its a "no wake area" you are required to go a slow as possible to the point where your boat causes no wake BUT maintains steering capabilities. You are however allowed to cause a minor wake if your boat must maintain a higher speed for steering.
If you are in a "headway speed area" (I.E. 50' from another boat) you can go up to 6 MPH, wake or not, as long as your boat can maintain steering, if not, you can go faster but be ready to explain if stopped. Airwaves, "headway speed areas" and "no wake areas" are not the same. Being 50' from another boat does not constitute a no wake area, it is a headway speed area. You are allowed to cause a wake in a headway speed area as long as your not exceeding 6 MPH or the minimum speed for steering capabilities. Wow that hurt to write! ![]() Dan Last edited by ishoot308; 08-24-2008 at 10:23 PM. Reason: Spelling |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
|
![]()
Saf-C 401.08 "Headway speed" means 6 miles per hour or the slowest speed that a boat can be operated and maintain steerage way.
So I can go 6 MPH, I don't need the "OR" and I've complied with the law. I was just hoping for a definitive answer to clear up a campfire "discussion". I have no plans to hot rod around Smith Cove with 500 other boats going 6 MPH. ![]() ![]() ![]() There so many "old wives tales" about the lake, sometimes it boggles the mind. The other day a experienced (old) laker told me it was a law to carry an anchor with enough rode to reach the bottom of the lake. My new boat only has 150' of rode. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cow Island
Posts: 914
Thanks: 602
Thanked 193 Times in 91 Posts
|
![]()
6 mph is 6 mph. It's enforceable.
The minimum speed to maintain steerage in no wind is 0. I can keep my boat in a fixed position with no problem, as can most boats. Under Airwaves definition, if I want to go through a "no-wake" zone, I'd have to slip it in and out of gear (or paddle it) to barely perceptably move my boat through the area with no ripples. What is a wake? My canoe makes a wake. Is the wake the sign talking about 1", 2", 4", 6", 2 feet? I guarantee no boat on this lake makes 1' waves at 6 mph. There is a wake at 6 mph, but nothing that would cause any harm. I still stand by the interpretation that "or" is to cover hard to control situations and as skip said, better have a good defense. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,938
Thanks: 2,205
Thanked 776 Times in 553 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Winnipesaukee Motor Craft was bought out to build condo apartments: even though the structures, dry storage and gas pumps are gone, the condos keep it busier yet! (Probably off to buy gasoline!) ![]() ![]() My recollection is that the "Headway-Speed" sign was hand-made and had black and white lettering: It was anchored about 500' before reaching the marina. Residents along muddied homes in that area asked for some respite from Director Flynn, but were denied a NWZ—perhaps more often than the one hearing that I attended. I didn't speak up because about 20 people had spoken with one voice in the matter—with nobody in opposition. It was a "slam-dunk" as we departed the hearing. ![]() Quote:
Edited to add: Five knots IS nearly six MPH; however, the state rounded off to 6-MPH, rather than using the customary 5-MPH of speedometers (and the customary 5-MPH for roadway speed limits), giving freshwater boaters a break. Quote:
![]()
__________________
Is it ![]() ![]() Last edited by ApS; 09-04-2008 at 03:58 AM. Reason: Explain "break" |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dover, NH
Posts: 1,615
Thanks: 256
Thanked 514 Times in 182 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Therefore, for all practical purposes, 5 knots does equal 6 MPH, and if I remember correctly the State chose to use MPH for inland waterway RSAs as virtually all pleasurecraft that ply these water (at least at the time) utilized factory installed speedometers that generally read in the MPH range. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Moultonborough & CT
Posts: 2,542
Thanks: 1,072
Thanked 667 Times in 366 Posts
|
![]()
"Jet-Skis are poorly manuvered at slow speeds, so this "driver" will agree with you!"
Actually APS, its not slow speeds that make for poor manuvering on Jet-Skis, its no throttle that makes them non-steering at all. As I found out many years ago when I headed towards shore, released the throttle and expected to steer to port just before I hit the shoreline. Yes, I know about the 150' rule now but I didn't then. What a close call, I jumped off the Jet-Ski and held on to the seat handle and avoided serious injury to both me and my Jet-Ski. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|