Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQDonate Members List Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-27-2008, 01:08 PM   #1
WeirsBeachBoater
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 709
Blog Entries: 9
Thanks: 39
Thanked 148 Times in 65 Posts
Default

I will admit there are flaws in the town meeting style, but there are more in SB2. The uninformed voter assumes that you just go to the polls to vote once SB is in place. Not true, what the supporters of SB2 aren't telling you is that it is more prone to corruption. There is a 2 part system, there is a deliberative session, and then a voting session. What happens in most of these towns that are new to SB2 is that the special interest groups that everyone so nicely points to at town meeting, now can go to the deliberative session, that the uninformed don't know exists. The facts show the turnout at these sessions is dramatically low. Then by the end of the session they have turned an article to restore the fire station into an article to improve the fire station by $1.00 !!! You want to see crooked politics at their best vote for SB2!
WeirsBeachBoater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 02:37 PM   #2
Irish mist
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 686
Thanks: 128
Thanked 85 Times in 49 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WeirsBeachBoater View Post
I will admit there are flaws in the town meeting style, but there are more in SB2. The uninformed voter assumes that you just go to the polls to vote once SB is in place. Not true, what the supporters of SB2 aren't telling you is that it is more prone to corruption. There is a 2 part system, there is a deliberative session, and then a voting session. What happens in most of these towns that are new to SB2 is that the special interest groups that everyone so nicely points to at town meeting, now can go to the deliberative session, that the uninformed don't know exists. The facts show the turnout at these sessions is dramatically low. Then by the end of the session they have turned an article to restore the fire station into an article to improve the fire station by $1.00 !!! You want to see crooked politics at their best vote for SB2!
I'll say it again: If SB-2 is so bad how come every town that has voted it in almost never votes it out ? It's very, very popular where ever it has been tried with the voting public.

Last edited by Irish mist; 02-27-2011 at 10:12 PM.
Irish mist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 05:35 PM   #3
WeirsBeachBoater
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 709
Blog Entries: 9
Thanks: 39
Thanked 148 Times in 65 Posts
Default

Because 90% of the voters are uninformed!
WeirsBeachBoater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 06:18 PM   #4
Irish mist
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 686
Thanks: 128
Thanked 85 Times in 49 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WeirsBeachBoater View Post
Because 90% of the voters are uninformed!
I see.....90% of the voters in NH are idiots becaue they don't agree with you. My, my, how do we all take care of ourselves out here without the likes of you to do it for us.

Last edited by Irish mist; 02-27-2011 at 10:12 PM.
Irish mist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 06:39 PM   #5
WeirsBeachBoater
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 709
Blog Entries: 9
Thanks: 39
Thanked 148 Times in 65 Posts
Default

Now you are twisting... you must have spent some time in the speed limit forum.
Let me rephrase, many voters believe what they are told, many pro sb2 people are painting a pretty picture of sb2. Now I am saying that there is a low percentage of the voters who will dig further to educate themselves. If you want you can compare this to town meeting, most voters know when it is, but what percentage (of able bodied residents who are in town that night) go! SB2 has some upside, but also has some downside!!! I wish the proponents would tell the whole story, thats all.
WeirsBeachBoater is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 02-27-2008, 07:03 PM   #6
Irish mist
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 686
Thanks: 128
Thanked 85 Times in 49 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WeirsBeachBoater View Post
Now you are twisting... you must have spent some time in the speed limit forum.
Let me rephrase, many voters believe what they are told, many pro sb2 people are painting a pretty picture of sb2. Now I am saying that there is a low percentage of the voters who will dig further to educate themselves. If you want you can compare this to town meeting, most voters know when it is, but what percentage (of able bodied residents who are in town that night) go! SB2 has some upside, but also has some downside!!! I wish the proponents would tell the whole story, thats all.
In general my experience with NH voters is that by & large most of them are intelligent, thoughtful, and care about their communities. SB-2 has been voted in small towns & large towns all over NH with very positive results. The citizens like it. They almost never vote it out. That's the reality of the situation. The SB-2 movement is thriving & expanding in NH because the citizens think it works better than town meeting in some cases.

You can see the same thing happening with the tax-cap movement that the city of Laconia just put in. Citizens want government to keep spending under control. There is no doubt that SB-2 will help control some of the spending issues that face our towns.

Last edited by Irish mist; 02-27-2011 at 10:12 PM.
Irish mist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 08:08 PM   #7
fatlazyless
Senior Member
 
fatlazyless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,769
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 300
Thanked 1,019 Times in 741 Posts
Default

Probably, Laconia passed a tax cap for some of the same reasons that Wolfeboro, Alton & Gilford passed SB-2. As a city and not a town, SB-2 is not an option for Laconia. It looks like SB-2 may be spreading and moving around the lake to Meredith and Moultonboro.

For a town with no school system,, no school administration unit, no town hall, no town roads, no library, no police dept, no fire dept, no community center, no public works dept, no budget, and no people; suggest you move to the very large and not too far away NH town of Livermore, and live happily ever after...........lol.
.........
Here's a letter to the editor in today's February 27, 2008, Laconia Daily Sun, from Meredith.
.........

SB-2 would allow people to vote their wallets. And that's bad?

To the editor:

Its time to take back Meredith, not to an earlier time, but from the special interest and the tax and spenders. Many of the taxpayers of Meredith - both natives and others - who have migrated here from the south seeking lower taxes and freedom are profoundly disappointed in the tax and spenders who have taken over the town and school system. It's time to rise up and empower the people and pass SB-2.

The founders of this great republic would be ecstatic that more voters would be participating in the voting in any form of government. The people in control ignore the falling property values, bad economy, high cost of fuels and other goods. Not everyone has unlimited income. The town of Meredith is used as an example of out of control spending by people from other towns.

One selectman made the statement that with SB-2, people would vote their wallets - not a good thing, well, ya!

If all you can afford is a Ford you don't buy a Lincoln. What's next, maybe an olympic swimming pool for the Inter-Lakes High School county club or the community center? People of Meredith and Meredith Center, rise up like our forefathers did with the British and take back Meredith. We can always go back to town meeting where 10-percent run the town. Hats off to Ms. Worsman and Mr. Lovett on the Selectboard but they need help. Elect Jim Waldron to the Selectboard.

George Horne
Meredith
.........


.........
__________________
... down and out, liv'n that Walmart side of the lake!

Last edited by fatlazyless; 02-29-2008 at 11:18 AM.
fatlazyless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 06:56 PM   #8
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,750
Thanks: 753
Thanked 1,459 Times in 1,016 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WeirsBeachBoater View Post
I will admit there are flaws in the town meeting style, but there are more in SB2. The uninformed voter assumes that you just go to the polls to vote once SB is in place. Not true, what the supporters of SB2 aren't telling you is that it is more prone to corruption. There is a 2 part system, there is a deliberative session, and then a voting session. What happens in most of these towns that are new to SB2 is that the special interest groups that everyone so nicely points to at town meeting, now can go to the deliberative session, that the uninformed don't know exists. The facts show the turnout at these sessions is dramatically low. Then by the end of the session they have turned an article to restore the fire station into an article to improve the fire station by $1.00 !!! You want to see crooked politics at their best vote for SB2!
That is nonsense.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.25584 seconds