![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southern CT
Posts: 169
Thanks: 19
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Charging for a rescue may sound good on the surface, but where does it start or end. I agree that there seems to be something wrong with the public having to bear the expense for the poor judgement of others, but I think there is a social contract here that all states adhere to; that is to provide aid to those in distress, no matter what actions initiated the problem. Are we going to charge swimmers who swim out over their head, or pilots that crash in the mountains or skiers caught in an avalanche and the list goes on an on. Kinda gives a new meaning to "Live Free or Die."
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Weirs Beach, NH
Posts: 1,067
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Unfortunately it starts with things like outlawing skimming. Whether you agree with nightrider or not, he does use that as a point in his argument, and the slippery slope goes down hill from there.
__________________
Is it bikeweek yet? Now? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,939
Thanks: 2,209
Thanked 776 Times in 553 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]() It's to named "The Britney Spears Law" in her honor. ![]() http://www.inform.com/Britney+Spears |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|