Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQDonate Members List Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-04-2025, 04:08 PM   #1
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,394
Thanks: 3
Thanked 598 Times in 494 Posts
Default

Are you sure you have the decimal point in the right spot?
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to John Mercier For This Useful Post:
Descant (02-04-2025)
Old 02-04-2025, 04:13 PM   #2
C-Bass
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 157
Thanks: 1
Thanked 34 Times in 17 Posts
Default

$550k sounds more like it
C-Bass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2025, 05:29 PM   #3
hemlock
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 62
Thanks: 1
Thanked 37 Times in 17 Posts
Default Measuring shorefront

So DES came up with a complicated formula to measure shorefront because in their opinion too many people were measuring every rock angle spit and indent to come up with actual frontage to allow them more docks.
So in a recent shoreland protection application for a family island camp this is how it went.

Deed from 1965 says 100 feet frontage. Surveyor measured 102 actual along the shoreline. Pin to pin was 73 feet (lot included a point of land).

DES calculation was this. 73+102=175/2=87.5 feet of frontage.

So the fee proposal is to use tax card info from the towns for invoicing. Tax card says 100 feet. I assume thats what we get taxed. Now who to I go to for an abatement? DES? The Town? BTLA? Superior Court? Is there even a process to abate fees? Talk about a can of worms!
hemlock is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to hemlock For This Useful Post:
WinnisquamZ (02-04-2025)
Old 02-04-2025, 06:13 PM   #4
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,394
Thanks: 3
Thanked 598 Times in 494 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hemlock View Post
So DES came up with a complicated formula to measure shorefront because in their opinion too many people were measuring every rock angle spit and indent to come up with actual frontage to allow them more docks.
So in a recent shoreland protection application for a family island camp this is how it went.

Deed from 1965 says 100 feet frontage. Surveyor measured 102 actual along the shoreline. Pin to pin was 73 feet (lot included a point of land).

DES calculation was this. 73+102=175/2=87.5 feet of frontage.

So the fee proposal is to use tax card info from the towns for invoicing. Tax card says 100 feet. I assume thats what we get taxed. Now who to I go to for an abatement? DES? The Town? BTLA? Superior Court? Is there even a process to abate fees? Talk about a can of worms!
Town. The town controls the tax card.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2025, 06:27 PM   #5
KPW
Senior Member
 
KPW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 398
Thanks: 735
Thanked 118 Times in 59 Posts
Default I oppose

https://gc.nh.gov/house/committees/r...y/default.aspx

Flood it! Pun intended.
KPW is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 02-04-2025, 10:18 PM   #6
AC2717
Senior Member
 
AC2717's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maynard, MA & Paugus Bay
Posts: 2,577
Thanks: 755
Thanked 355 Times in 267 Posts
Default

so even better, there is no land tax on condo/home associations, so how does their water frontage work??
__________________
Capt. of the "No Worries"
AC2717 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2025, 07:53 AM   #7
Biggd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Waltham Ma./Meredith NH
Posts: 4,135
Thanks: 2,232
Thanked 1,193 Times in 759 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AC2717 View Post
so even better, there is no land tax on condo/home associations, so how does their water frontage work??
It is taxed, each owner in the association gets a portion on their bill.
I remember being in an association with a large waterfront lot on Winnisquam, in Sanbornton many years ago. The waterfront tax bill went to the association, but they eventually had it changed because the association had such a hard time collecting the money. So, it got divided up on each member's tax bill. I can't remember if it was listed separately on the bill, but the increase was there.
Biggd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2025, 09:44 AM   #8
VitaBene
Senior Member
 
VitaBene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 3,587
Thanks: 1,625
Thanked 1,640 Times in 843 Posts
Default

The rich people bought many old school family camps and built McMansions. Now the ultra rich are here and they will buy the rich people out.
VitaBene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2025, 10:15 AM   #9
AC2717
Senior Member
 
AC2717's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maynard, MA & Paugus Bay
Posts: 2,577
Thanks: 755
Thanked 355 Times in 267 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggd View Post
It is taxed, each owner in the association gets a portion on their bill.
I remember being in an association with a large waterfront lot on Winnisquam, in Sanbornton many years ago. The waterfront tax bill went to the association, but they eventually had it changed because the association had such a hard time collecting the money. So, it got divided up on each member's tax bill. I can't remember if it was listed separately on the bill, but the increase was there.
I know there is a formula in Laconia and its built into your building/unit tax, but it is based on area you cover so to speak.
__________________
Capt. of the "No Worries"
AC2717 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2025, 11:19 AM   #10
P-3 Guy
Senior Member
 
P-3 Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Under the former KNHZ bounce pattern
Posts: 501
Thanks: 4
Thanked 212 Times in 115 Posts
Default

The hearing is scheduled for 1:30 this afternoon.

If you are interested enough and have the time, hearings are livestreamed on YouTube.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxq...oWRL_5vyaQDtvQ

You want House Resources, Recreation and Development.
P-3 Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2025, 05:53 PM   #11
DickR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 751
Thanks: 4
Thanked 259 Times in 171 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mercier View Post
Are you sure you have the decimal point in the right spot?
Hoo Boy, is this embarrassing. What a mis-read from the calculator! Three orders of magnitude off, and this from an ex-engineer!
DickR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2025, 06:10 PM   #12
fatlazyless
Senior Member
 
fatlazyless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,759
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 300
Thanked 1,013 Times in 738 Posts
Arrow N.H. gets serious with fixing its' aging dam infastructure

Ya know ...... when you consider the long time N.H. interest and dividend tax ..... http://www.revenue.nh.gov/news-and-m...tax-now-effect ..... was eliminated, effective January 1, 2025 ..... this newly proposed HB-629-FN for repairing the state's aging dams should be totally welcome and appreciated by everyone. ......
__________________
... down and out, liv'n that Walmart side of the lake!
fatlazyless is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.19497 seconds