![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 991
Thanks: 256
Thanked 280 Times in 169 Posts
|
![]()
Sorry, everyone. Turns out my car does have a reset button. I'll write down the miles the next two times I fill up and compare the result to the mpg on the instrument panel. I think 31 mpg is too low for my conservative driving style. Some people claim 40 mpg with the Chevy Sonic, but I don't believe that at all.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 2,929
Thanks: 477
Thanked 691 Times in 387 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 751
Thanks: 4
Thanked 259 Times in 171 Posts
|
![]()
I have a Subaru Imprezza, with CVT for transmission ("continuously variable"). City/Highway estimated mpg was given as 34-37, about 3 mpg better than for the 5-speed manual transmission. I do get that 37, but mainly in warm weather driving, with a lot of long runs where the engine stays warm, and on roads that don't have a lot of steep hills. MPG gained on the downhills does not offset the loss going up the hill. Also, a lot of short runs starting with a cold engine really cuts the mpg. In winter, the mileage over a tank often is just in the low 30s. The sweet spot is summer driving on long country roads, with speed limits of 40-50, when I see mpg up in the low 40s over 40-50 miles. Trips at 65-70 mph show a notable drop in mpg.
I always fill the tank when refueling, rough out the miles/gallons mentally, then reset the trip odometer. This resets the running mpg indicated on the dash. What I see is that actual mileage runs on the order of 2 mpg lower than what the dash number shows. The latter is obtained by integrating what the instrument thinks is rate of fuel to the engine and dividing by accumulated miles, so it's easy to understand how accumulated error can result. Still, it's a good reading to have, as a measure of how things are going, as I can just subtract 2 for a "good enough" estimate of actual mpg. There is one display option that shows "instantaneous" mpg, updated every few seconds, which is interesting to watch, although fairly useless for any purpose. At constant speed over a level road, the instantaneous reading is a lot higher than the average shows. A stretch of road that appears to be level may be imperceptibly uphill or downhill, and that is seen on the instrument, and it doesn't take a super-steep hill for the reading to max out at 99.9 mpg. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 2,929
Thanks: 477
Thanked 691 Times in 387 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The difference in energy between summer and winter means your car will go further on a gallon of summer gas versus winter gas. Summer gas is also more expensive to make...... supposedly. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maynard, MA & Paugus Bay
Posts: 2,577
Thanks: 755
Thanked 355 Times in 267 Posts
|
![]()
If you never reset the tripometer, the vehicle calculates the average mileage per gallon based on the total on the tripometer. After 400 miles or so on that tripometer, it is very hard to move it off the average that it is currently sitting
you have to reset the tripomenter to get a new average calculated. Can do it the old fashioned way, fill up the tank, count the miles from that point until you fill up again. divide the miles traveled with how many gallons you put back in the tank
__________________
Capt. of the "No Worries" |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to AC2717 For This Useful Post: | ||
ApS (10-08-2022) |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 339
Thanks: 50
Thanked 92 Times in 66 Posts
|
![]()
If you truly are interested in your mpg, you need to hand calculate it like ITD said early in the thread. None of the onboard readouts are accurate, and in my experience are always slanted toward the high end, meaning if your dash says 25, you are probably getting 23 or 24 actual.
When I was really interested in accurate mpg numbers, I'd calculate over a series of tanks, maybe take 2 fillups before doing the calculation. That eliminates factors like one day caught in stop and go traffic lowering your mpg or one day with an unusual amount of 50 mph cruising raising your mpg. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,410
Thanks: 3
Thanked 598 Times in 494 Posts
|
![]()
My on-board seems to be right on the numbers when I do the manual.
Other than a splash here or there due to how the pumps handle the shut-off... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 6,280
Thanks: 1,174
Thanked 2,077 Times in 1,289 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Sent from my SM-G990U1 using Tapatalk |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|