Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Calendar Register FAQDonate Members List Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-14-2017, 11:36 AM   #1
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,726
Thanks: 752
Thanked 1,457 Times in 1,014 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ishoot308 View Post
99% of the beach closings on winni are do to "fecal bacteria" only where people swim. Samples taken elsewhere on the lake are perfectly clear... What does that tell you?....
I don't know. Could it tell you they only test the beaches where a lot of people swim?
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2017, 12:06 PM   #2
ishoot308
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gilford, NH / Welch Island
Posts: 6,249
Thanks: 2,391
Thanked 5,283 Times in 2,055 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tis View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ishoot308 View Post
99% of the beach closings on winni are do to "fecal bacteria" only where people swim. Samples taken elsewhere on the lake are perfectly clear... What does that tell you?....

I don't know. Could it tell you they only test the beaches where a lot of people swim?
Tis;

Water samples are drawn and tested in many different areas of the lake, not to mention the many islanders that monitor and test their water quality once or twice per season. I don't know of anyone who has had a "fecal bacteria" test sample return...

Dan
__________________
It's Always Sunny On Welch Island!!
ishoot308 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2017, 08:01 AM   #3
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,938
Thanks: 2,205
Thanked 776 Times in 553 Posts
Wink Latest Poop...

Quote:
Originally Posted by tis View Post
I don't know. Could it tell you they only test the beaches where a lot of people swim?
Private beaches frequented by waterfowl would likely test positive for fecal bacteria.

Fecal bacteria is deposited from every living thing, including Geese and other waterfowl. Seagulls scrounge through litter at beaches and, like Mallards, "dabble" surface waters for edibles—perhaps mostly floating insects.

Cormorants and Loons leave an impressive "cloud" when they dive or take to the air.

As a likely contributor to fecal bacteria counts, should resources be expended to reduce waterfowl from visiting public beaches? Only a presumptive test for waterfowl DNA would determine some resolution.

NHDES has, however, "covered their bases" in their announcements:
Attached Images
 
__________________
Is it
"Common Sense" isn't.
ApS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.18455 seconds