Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Calendar Register FAQDonate Members List Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-19-2010, 11:20 AM   #1
Lucky1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Moultonborough and FL
Posts: 459
Thanks: 318
Thanked 123 Times in 53 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by classic22 View Post
While just the uttering of the words shore line protection act sounds like something admirable on the surface, the truth is that there are some major issues with this law as written with over stepping property owner rights, as well as over regulation, and over priced onerous fees to name a few. This law is ripe for reform and will most likely be repealed or reformed. Dont look at this as some evil republican wanting to ruin the environment, look at it as wanting to reasonably balance the needs of the property owner with that of the environment.
I wasn't around at the time they did this act as I was out of the area that year. However, when I did return the first think I noticed was that many had cleared their lots as there were new tree cutting provisions and other had hastily built HUGE NEW HOMES THAT COVERED THE ENTIRE LOT OR AT LEAST MOST OF THE LOT!! When I purchased my small home it was with the understanding that it might one day be a larger home there. Who knows now? Think the reason for so man larger homes being built was the SPA or shoreline protection act.
Lucky1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2010, 05:37 PM   #2
Heaven
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 523
Thanks: 128
Thanked 95 Times in 67 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucky1 View Post
Think the reason for so man larger homes being built was the SPA or shoreline protection act.
I doubt it. There aren't too many property owners that panicked and spent a couple of million just to beat the change in the act, which was not very additionally restrictive.
Heaven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2010, 06:39 PM   #3
jmen24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,139
Thanks: 223
Thanked 319 Times in 181 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heaven View Post
I doubt it. There aren't too many property owners that panicked and spent a couple of million just to beat the change in the act, which was not very additionally restrictive.
Agreed, and most towns (at least around Sunapee) already had tree provisions prior to CSPA as well.


Mostly the problem is that most folks think that bigger is the only way to have a home that flows. I ask anyone that feels that way to read the series of books by Sarah Susanka, they all relate to the waste of space that is common in modern residential architecture. Its all about the hang up on square footage.

If you get a chance to meet her in person, it is a treat. She has some great ideas and is really easy to talk to.
http://www.notsobighouse.com/
jmen24 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jmen24 For This Useful Post:
Heaven (12-19-2010)
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.11569 seconds