![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Calendar | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 1,618
Thanked 1,638 Times in 842 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
"Elchase, there is no question that the lake is saner this year. Unfortunately, a great many, myself included, believe that the real reason is the poor economy. We have all seen many boats that have never even been uncovered for the season- the owners just decided to leave them winterized. I think when the economy improves, we will see a return of most of the craziness. I do disagree with your point about last summer- gas on the lake was pushing or exceeded $5/gallon, virtually everyone became more thrifty and boated less- I believe there was even a poll regarding it. Many of us who are percieved as anti-speed limit don't even own or want to own boats that can break it (I almost got lapped by a pontoon boat a few weeks ago!). Most of us own and use canoes and sailboats (Lazer in our case). When not sailing, my 14 year old son and his 11 year old sister can often be found in his 12 foot skiff with an 8 horse Merc patrolling the Greens Basin end of the lake. I have a vested interest in keeping the lake as safe as possible. The real us versus them needs to become the safe boater versus the bonehead boater, not slow versus fast. The answer is to rid the lake of bad boaters. There is no way that many boaters on the lake studied for and passed their boating certificate course. Even though my son is not old enough to take his safety course, I had him study and pass the practice test prior to allowing him to boat alone. I was sincere in my comment about sharing the lake- I want to do so with good boaters, slow and fast. I want to eradicate bad boaters, slow and fast. I apologize if I misread your original post and hope you enjoy the fabulous weather we are supposed to have today." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kuna ID
Posts: 2,755
Thanks: 246
Thanked 1,942 Times in 802 Posts
|
![]()
To all the nay sayers.... REALLY!?! You can't be serious....
I'm curious as to why there is such an outcry over this. The whole point of the boater education course is to educate people of ALL ages. I fail to understand why being educated is a bad thing? I'm trying to distill what possible harmful affects the boater education class may have and at the moment I see no down side at all. Matter of fact I see a whole lot of benefit from this as most kids probably don't fully comprehend the responsibilty of operating a boat no matter the size or HP. They may not also know the basic rules of the road or understand what manditory equipment they should have on board when out on the water. No I see this as a few people getting thier panties in a bunch all because SBONH happens to endorse the idea and has nothing to do with the public benefit that could result. |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to MAXUM For This Useful Post: | ||
BroadHopper (12-01-2010) |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bear Island
Posts: 1,764
Thanks: 32
Thanked 441 Times in 207 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
This legislation would also take the privilege of operating a boat away from everyone under the age of 12. And this not only applies to Winni but all over New Hampshire. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kuna ID
Posts: 2,755
Thanks: 246
Thanked 1,942 Times in 802 Posts
|
![]()
Without a certified adult onboard, and only for motorized vessels. Look at the overall maturity level of say the average 12< year old today. Better yet let me put it to you this way, as a parent myself there is no way I would ever let my kid go out on the lake unsupervised or without an expereinced boater period. Why you may ask, because I feel it's my responsibility to ensure not only my kid's well being, but the general public as well no matter how much I think my kid may know what they are doing. What scares me is the parent that thinks this is OK to do, bringing into question thier own lack of prudent judgement which inherently will be reflected in thier children's lackthereof. Is a law necessary to "fix" this, well that I can't answer. If it is in fact a problem that needs to be addressed legislativly fine, but only as a last resort. I'm simply stating that I don't find this idea offensive at face value. What I do find offensive is that people are to stupid to police themselves so laws like this end up being proposed and sometimes adopted or being opposed to an idea not on the merits, but who's idea it is.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 61
Thanks: 22
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
It is important to note that as BI mentioned, this is all over NH, not just on Winnipesaukee.
There are different safety risks depending on the body of water. That should be taken into consideration when a law like this goes into effect. |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
|
![]()
Sorry APS, someone mentioned that you posted at odd hours, I post at odd hours when I travel, I remembered your affection for middle east training centers, so I put a guess together. I guess I was wrong?
In short, more training is always good, all boaters should be trained at somepoint. Restricting lake access to a class of people just because some of them are not mature enough to use it safety is a bad idea. Obviously parent need to be resposible for the children and be responsible if they make a mistake. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
It seems to be pretty standard everywhere, including those wonderful states with speed limits.
Massachusetts: Who May Operate a Motorboat: The restrictions below apply to boats propelled by any type of motor, whether or not the motor is the principal source of propulsion. Persons under 12 years of age may operate a motorboat on Massachusetts waters only if accompanied on board and directly supervised by a competent person 18 years of age or older. Persons 12 through 15 years of age may operate a motorboat on Massachusetts waters only if they: Have passed an approved boating education course or … Are accompanied on board and directly supervised by a competent person 18 years of age or older. Persons 16 years of age or older may operate a motorboat on Massachusetts waters without age restrictions. Vermont Age Restrictions: Persons less than 16 years of age shall not operate a Personal Watercraft. Persons less than 12 years of age are restricted to motorboats of 6 hp or less. Anyone born after January 1, 1974 must successfully complete an approved boating safety course prior to operating any motorized vessel. This online Basic Boating Safety Course meets this requirement. I personally prefer the 6 HP limit. My first little boat had a 5 hp outboard. It was still very powerful and fast for a boat ![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to VtSteve For This Useful Post: | ||
Ryan (12-01-2010) |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to hazelnut For This Useful Post: | ||
AllAbourdon (12-02-2010) |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bear Island
Posts: 1,764
Thanks: 32
Thanked 441 Times in 207 Posts
|
![]()
Hazelnut and VtSteve - At last we agree!
6 HP is ok by me. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Squam
Posts: 52
Thanks: 25
Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]()
Plus..... 1
__________________
rangercanoe.com ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
First, since I haven't looked at outboards in many years, I think it's prudent to see what small outboards are sold now. I'd hate to pass a law that had a meaningless HP rating. Let's say under 10 hp for now.
The outboard guys can look it up. Sounds like a deal ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kuna ID
Posts: 2,755
Thanks: 246
Thanked 1,942 Times in 802 Posts
|
![]()
I took a brief look at just about every manufacturer I could think of and all make several models in the 4-6 HP range, most are long shafts for use on the back of sailboats, the next jump is typically to 9.9 HP.
Honestly after reading the suggestion of capping this at 10HP it seems like a very reasonable compromise. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
Thanks for the lookup Maxum.
I'm sure, as Scott says, this may be a simple thing to change when they get it into that position. It's not the end of the world, amendments happen all the time. And, as Scott says, this was not an SBONH proposal, so the parties that did draft it are responsible for it. This was one of the best, and most civil discussions of lake laws yet. It's nice to be around a group that has respect for one another isn't it? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kuna ID
Posts: 2,755
Thanks: 246
Thanked 1,942 Times in 802 Posts
|
![]()
I agree, matter of fact a little disagreement fuels great debate. In discussing possible pending legislation like this having a few ideas thrown out on the table for everyone to weigh in on **in a responsible fashion** in theory should result in something that meets the stated objective without being to far over reaching. Trouble today is that there are to many who are not mature enough to leave the personal axe in the closet and be able to look at things objectively. For those that can't participate like that are well known and have lost any and all credibility.
All that said I hope that our newly elected leaders in Concord set thier priorities appropriately, our state faces some very serious problems least of them being amendments to current boating laws. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,938
Thanks: 2,205
Thanked 776 Times in 553 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|