![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South Down Shores
Posts: 1,944
Thanks: 544
Thanked 570 Times in 335 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
You are correct that NH permits unconcealed open carry, and is basically a shall-issue concealed carry state. Where this incident seems to get into a gray area is when Bird went from *carry* to *brandish*. I think that he is being overly prosecuted for this incident, and the punishment does not seem to fit the crime. And of course, none of us were there, so we are all speculating... My personal speculation though is that he might have over-reacted a bit. I am not sure that he truly felt reasonably threatened by this trespassing woman to warrant actually displaying a firearm. FWIW, I've been in a similar situation to him on my own property a couple of times, including once when a couple of FBI special agents showed up looking for a previous owner of this property shortly after I purchased it. I was armed when I met them on the porch, and knew that these two guys in a big sedan didn't belong on my property, but did not immediately resort to brandishing the .45 (H&K USP-C) that was on my person. As a gun owner and daily carryer you have (IMO) a responsibility to both brandish and use the weapon responsibly. Overall, I support Bird and do not think a trespasser such as this woman has any case to file a claim as she did, but I also think that he would be wise in the future to not display any firearm unless he or another person on his property was being clearly threatened.
__________________
[insert witty phrase here] |
|
![]() |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to brk-lnt For This Useful Post: | ||
Bookmarks |
|
|