Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Calendar Register FAQDonate Members List Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-22-2010, 06:21 PM   #1
Lakegeezer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 1,678
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 354
Thanked 639 Times in 290 Posts
Default

One major reason for voters to fund the milfoil project is that it will help keep their property tax bills from growing as fast. As milfoil spreads down the neck, infested shorefront property values will be depressed when compared to those with clear water. Their property tax bill will go down, but they will be swimming in milfoil. Lower tax revenue from milfoil shoreline properties have to be made up across the tax base, including those without shorefront. Over 70% of Moultonborough's tax base is shorefront properties, yet a majority of voters are not shorefront property owners. It is a complicated argument, but one that makes sense. Nature brings us snow and we fund the plows. Nature (and careless boaters) bring us milfoil, and it must be removed. The state will help fund the work, but it is in Moultonborough's financial interest to gain a reputation for clear water.
__________________
-lg
Lakegeezer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.28823 seconds