![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Today's Posts | Search |
| View Poll Results: What do you feel the ideal Speed Limit Compromise would be? | |||
| Unlimited (as in the past) |
|
78 | 29.66% |
| Current Law (25 night, 45 day) |
|
46 | 17.49% |
| Current Law - Broads Unlimited |
|
52 | 19.77% |
| Compromised MPH example 65 Day, 30 night |
|
69 | 26.24% |
| Distance rule. Example: unlimited over 300ft, 500, 1000 etc. |
|
18 | 6.84% |
| Voters: 263. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#34 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Hudson - NH
Posts: 408
Thanks: 233
Thanked 212 Times in 88 Posts
|
I do not think that making a law to control every action possible to protect the lowest common denominator creates long term benefit. The nature of competition inspires research, action, and winners. The converse is "be careful you may get hurt" so don't do anything. IMO - This in not a very stimulating or enjoyable way to live.
We no longer have competitive manufacturing, our educational system is at the bottom of the industrial countries, everyone gets a trophy as to not have anyone feel embarrased, don't use grades because poor preformers will feel "bad", and so on. You can not legislate common sense! Everyone will go mad trying to do it. It will hurt 95% of the population for the 5% of Darwin Award candidates. |
|
|
| The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to NoRegrets For This Useful Post: | ||
BroadHopper (08-25-2009), DoTheMath (08-28-2009), hazelnut (08-25-2009), Kracken (08-25-2009), NoBozo (08-26-2009), OCDACTIVE (08-25-2009), PC31 (09-03-2009), Senter Cove Guy (08-25-2009), tis (08-26-2009), trfour (08-25-2009), Wolfeboro_Baja (08-26-2009) | ||
| Bookmarks |
|
|