Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Calendar Register FAQDonate Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-31-2016, 05:48 PM   #1
secondcurve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,117
Thanks: 1,328
Thanked 559 Times in 288 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ApS View Post
MAXUM is correct about silt.

"Silt" is inorganic in origin:



Dense forest growth (especially pine) reduces the amount of silt washed downslope by heavy rains everywhere in the Winnipesaukee Basin.

Last week, I checked out the source of a loud wood-chipper sound nearby. It was a new neighbor who had cut down eight huge White Pines from his shorefront. The nearest stump to be seen was about 30-inches across. (The width of a typical refrigerator). The "trimmer's" name? "Urban Tree Service".

Wave actions—but especially large boat wakes—wash heavier silt from shorefronts. While some "silt" washed downslope introduces "sand"—where it didn't appear before—the finer particles can be expected to coat the lake's bottom locally.

For example, three decades of construction on The Broads side of Wolfeboro Neck—and Rattlesnake Island—has changed those locales. By kayak, I remember seeing a kaleidoscope of colors and textures on every rock on the bottom. Presently, they all appear similarly-textured and "olive" in color. 'Wonder why?



In some states, a "Rain Tax" would have been imposed on the abutters!

Is "Rain Tax" another name for "View Tax"?

________________________

Canada Geese may be getting a "bad rap" for Gilford's waters. DNA examinations—which may be in process presently—can determine if the source of E. coli is mammal, fish, vegetable, or (foul) fowl. Presently, the entire state of New Hampshire is affected by an outbreak: http://www.ecoliblog.com/e-coli-outb...9#.V53iO-RTF-w

While FLL's referenced article has expired for non-subscribers, The Citizen newspaper has published many E. coli articles just for the year 2016: http://www.citizen.com/search/node/coli

Also remember that Canada Geese are "invited" to the area by maintaining green-grass lawns. The nutrients of Phosphorus and Nitrogen from lawn fertilizers "grow" the lake's algae—and the algae "grow" the snails that produce Duck Itch.

.
Where is Shorethings? The state is great at creating laws but not so great at enforcing them.
secondcurve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2016, 07:18 PM   #2
Woody38
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 578
Thanks: 46
Thanked 110 Times in 81 Posts
Post

There was a problem with Canada Geese at an business park in Massachusetts at one time. Someone erected several posters of a coyote on the lawn and the geese disappeared
Woody38 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2016, 10:10 AM   #3
Onshore
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 502
Thanks: 12
Thanked 423 Times in 145 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by secondcurve View Post
Where is Shorethings? The state is great at creating laws but not so great at enforcing them.
May I infer that you would like to know why we would allow the project seen in the photos or in the alternative, why we are not taking enforcement against it? If so, then let me say I am familiar with the site in question. It was not someone's project nor does it currently look as it does in those photographs. The damage seen was a natural slope failure that occurred on the Broads side of Wolfeboro Neck following a major rain event. I believe it was about 8 years ago. Emergency approvals to stabilize the site were issued to prevent further damage while formal restoration/ stabilization plans were completed.

If this does not answer your concerns please respond with a more specific question so we can attempt provide a meaningful answer.
Onshore is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Onshore For This Useful Post:
Barney Bear (08-01-2016)
Old 08-01-2016, 11:36 AM   #4
VitaBene
Senior Member
 
VitaBene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 3,587
Thanks: 1,622
Thanked 1,639 Times in 843 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shore things View Post
May I infer that you would like to know why we would allow the project seen in the photos or in the alternative, why we are not taking enforcement against it? If so, then let me say I am familiar with the site in question. It was not someone's project nor does it currently look as it does in those photographs. The damage seen was a natural slope failure that occurred on the Broads side of Wolfeboro Neck following a major rain event. I believe it was about 8 years ago. Emergency approvals to stabilize the site were issued to prevent further damage while formal restoration/ stabilization plans were completed.

If this does not answer your concerns please respond with a more specific question so we can attempt provide a meaningful answer.
Shore things, surely you are not implying that APS used an inaccurate, out of date photo to prove a point, are you?
VitaBene is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to VitaBene For This Useful Post:
DEJ (08-01-2016), gillygirl (08-01-2016), ishoot308 (08-01-2016), thinkxingu (08-01-2016)
Old 08-01-2016, 11:57 AM   #5
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,726
Thanks: 752
Thanked 1,457 Times in 1,014 Posts
Default

"—can determine if the source of E. coli is mammal, fish, vegetable, or (foul) fowl. Presently, the entire state of New Hampshire is affected by an outbreak: http://www.ecoliblog.com"

I would love to know the cause of all this fecal bacteria. I never remember issues at Albee, 19 Mile and Carry Beach all about the same time.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 08-01-2016, 12:25 PM   #6
Onshore
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 502
Thanks: 12
Thanked 423 Times in 145 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tis View Post
"—can determine if the source of E. coli is mammal, fish, vegetable, or (foul) fowl. Presently, the entire state of New Hampshire is affected by an outbreak: http://www.ecoliblog.com"

I would love to know the cause of all this fecal bacteria. I never remember issues at Albee, 19 Mile and Carry Beach all about the same time.
I can't read the blog in question due to our firewall settings so I cannot address its contents. It's been hot and the water is warm, if Friday traffic on 93 is any indication we seem to have an increase in visitors, we haven't had much rain to flush things out, we have a fat happy resident goose population, and I'm sure there's something else I'm missing... I tend to think it is no one issue but rather the sum of many factors.

For those who are interested DES has released a new website with links to lake water quality studies and management plans. You can check it out from here: http://des.nh.gov/media/pr/2016/2016...nfo-mapper.htm
Onshore is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Onshore For This Useful Post:
Barney Bear (08-01-2016)
Old 08-01-2016, 03:19 PM   #7
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,726
Thanks: 752
Thanked 1,457 Times in 1,014 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shore things View Post
I can't read the blog in question due to our firewall settings so I cannot address its contents. It's been hot and the water is warm, if Friday traffic on 93 is any indication we seem to have an increase in visitors, we haven't had much rain to flush things out, we have a fat happy resident goose population, and I'm sure there's something else I'm missing... I tend to think it is no one issue but rather the sum of many factors.

For those who are interested DES has released a new website with links to lake water quality studies and management plans. You can check it out from here: http://des.nh.gov/media/pr/2016/2016...nfo-mapper.htm
Shore things, he just said there is a way to test to see what is causing the high levels, whether it is mammal, fish,vegetable or fowl. Just wondering if this is true and if the state would test for this? But thanks for your opinion thinking it is a combination.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2016, 03:36 PM   #8
Onshore
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 502
Thanks: 12
Thanked 423 Times in 145 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tis View Post
Shore things, he just said there is a way to test to see what is causing the high levels, whether it is mammal, fish,vegetable or fowl. Just wondering if this is true and if the state would test for this? But thanks for your opinion thinking it is a combination.
I brought your question to the folks the do our water quality sampling and testing. Certain strains of e. coli are better adapted to different hosts and you can differentiate between those strains. This works well testing in a controlled or limited system but not in an open lake environment. The problem is that the test can tell us that some is from goose, some is from humans, and some is from dogs, but it doesn't tell us what percentage of the e. coli found is from each source. The test doesn't have practical value if it doesn't reveal the percentage of contribution. On top of this DNA testing is extremely expensive. So for reasons of cost and reliability DES chooses not to do DNA testing.
Onshore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2016, 06:24 PM   #9
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,726
Thanks: 752
Thanked 1,457 Times in 1,014 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shore things View Post
I brought your question to the folks the do our water quality sampling and testing. Certain strains of e. coli are better adapted to different hosts and you can differentiate between those strains. This works well testing in a controlled or limited system but not in an open lake environment. The problem is that the test can tell us that some is from goose, some is from humans, and some is from dogs, but it doesn't tell us what percentage of the e. coli found is from each source. The test doesn't have practical value if it doesn't reveal the percentage of contribution. On top of this DNA testing is extremely expensive. So for reasons of cost and reliability DES chooses not to do DNA testing.
Thank you so much for that reply. It's too bad because it would certainly be nice to know to try to eliminate the cause.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2016, 01:02 PM   #10
Onshore
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 502
Thanks: 12
Thanked 423 Times in 145 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VitaBene View Post
Shore things, surely you are not implying that APS used an inaccurate, out of date photo to prove a point, are you?
I have been unable to ascertain what point he was trying to prove thus I cannot make any such implication...
Onshore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2016, 02:12 PM   #11
SIKSUKR
Senior Member
 
SIKSUKR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shore things View Post
I have been unable to ascertain what point he was trying to prove thus I cannot make any such implication...
I can tell you from his many years of posts including these pics. He is insinuating that either development or big boat wave action has done this damage and/or are the reason the Canada Geese are so prevelant here.
__________________
SIKSUKR
SIKSUKR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2016, 06:24 AM   #12
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,938
Thanks: 2,205
Thanked 776 Times in 553 Posts
Red face It's Still Drizzly Outside...

Quote:
Originally Posted by VitaBene View Post
Shore things, surely you are not implying that APS used an inaccurate, out of date photo to prove a point, are you?
I have an older, and even-more-inaccurate photo, that shows the dock-box sitting 20 feet higher on that same lot. It must be out-of-date, as well

For accuracy, I'll mark with an asterisk (*) the photos that are "inaccurate and out of date".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie T View Post
I have to say if I were "Shorethings" I'd probably take offense with this comment. Your post makes it sound like you feel Shorethings is personally responsible for this situation. Shorethings posts here to be helpful and informative, it appears that their postings are made in a somehwhat "unofficial" capacity. I don't think it's necessary or fair to be pointing any fingers at someone who has always been helpful to the Winni.com community. I for one appreciate her postings ( I believe Shorethings is a female) as I always learn something from them. I find it refreshing to have a Govt. official who goes out of her or his way to be helpful for no other reason than to be helpful...... If we had more of them the world would be a better place.
Charlie T
Yes, I agree: secondcurve tried, in one seemingly-harsh sentence, to put too much into my post. The late State Limnologist Jody Connor and I spoke regularly by telephone, but it was Shorethings who has patiently responded to my many frustrations about the health of the Big Lake.

In short:

DNA can determine the specific source of E. coli contamination.

Silt does not originate from waterfowl, but from erosion.

Grass does not sufficiently retard runoff, and introduces nutrients that accelerate "eutrophication" of the lake from waterfowl and fertilizers.

"Impervious surfaces" are the reason for those two different sites experiencing the effects of rapid rain runoff. (Not just driveways, but roofs).

Erosion on Rattlesnake Island is even worse. (Photo 1*, below)

• Nearby, a 20-year-abandoned "Trust" property (ice-eaters operating in July—now sold) has seen erosion that is casting its trees into the lake. (Photo 2*, below). The abutting lot was visited by "Urban Tree Service" last week.

• And yes, increasingly-large boat wakes are responsible. (Photo 3*, below). Nature's waves haven't washed over my dock like these.

.
Attached Images
   
ApS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2016, 03:36 PM   #13
Hillcountry
Senior Member
 
Hillcountry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: In the hills
Posts: 2,420
Thanks: 1,677
Thanked 786 Times in 466 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ApS View Post
I have an older, and even-more-inaccurate photo, that shows the dock-box sitting 20 feet higher on that same lot. It must be out-of-date, as well

For accuracy, I'll mark with an asterisk (*) the photos that are "inaccurate and out of date".


Yes, I agree: secondcurve tried, in one seemingly-harsh sentence, to put too much into my post. The late State Limnologist Jody Connor and I spoke regularly by telephone, but it was Shorethings who has patiently responded to my many frustrations about the health of the Big Lake.

In short:

DNA can determine the specific source of E. coli contamination.

Silt does not originate from waterfowl, but from erosion.

Grass does not sufficiently retard runoff, and introduces nutrients that accelerate "eutrophication" of the lake from waterfowl and fertilizers.

"Impervious surfaces" are the reason for those two different sites experiencing the effects of rapid rain runoff. (Not just driveways, but roofs).

Erosion on Rattlesnake Island is even worse. (Photo 1*, below)

• Nearby, a 20-year-abandoned "Trust" property (ice-eaters operating in July—now sold) has seen erosion that is casting its trees into the lake. (Photo 2*, below). The abutting lot was visited by "Urban Tree Service" last week.

• And yes, increasingly-large boat wakes are responsible. (Photo 3*, below). Nature's waves haven't washed over my dock like these.

.
Sooo...it's nature taking it's course...
I believe we, as humans can do little to alter the ebb and flow of mother nature...just as the Earth is going through a cycle of warmer climate, I will not be here long enough to see any difference in one lifetime. Someday we'll be in the deep freeze again too. How old is Mother Earth?
Hillcountry is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hillcountry For This Useful Post:
trfour (08-02-2016)
Old 08-02-2016, 04:05 PM   #14
Onshore
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 502
Thanks: 12
Thanked 423 Times in 145 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hillcountry View Post
Sooo...it's nature taking it's course...
I believe we, as humans can do little to alter the ebb and flow of mother nature...just as the Earth is going through a cycle of warmer climate, I will not be here long enough to see any difference in one lifetime. Someday we'll be in the deep freeze again too. How old is Mother Earth?
Yes, nature taking it's course... like natural selection. Those individuals that cannot recognize and adapt to changing environmental conditions die off. Those that can persist.
Onshore is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Onshore For This Useful Post:
gillygirl (08-02-2016), ishoot308 (08-02-2016), noreast (08-02-2016)
Old 08-02-2016, 06:04 PM   #15
MAXUM
Senior Member
 
MAXUM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kuna ID
Posts: 2,755
Thanks: 246
Thanked 1,942 Times in 802 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shore things View Post
Yes, nature taking it's course... like natural selection. Those individuals that cannot recognize and adapt to changing environmental conditions die off. Those that can persist.
An unfortunate reality is sometimes natural selection takes way to long.
MAXUM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2016, 01:00 PM   #16
Hillcountry
Senior Member
 
Hillcountry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: In the hills
Posts: 2,420
Thanks: 1,677
Thanked 786 Times in 466 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shore things View Post
Yes, nature taking it's course... like natural selection. Those individuals that cannot recognize and adapt to changing environmental conditions die off. Those that can persist.
As a "race" yes, but as individuals, we have about 80 years to "adapt" (and I would say most of us have higher priorities)
Hillcountry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2016, 03:36 PM   #17
Onshore
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 502
Thanks: 12
Thanked 423 Times in 145 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hillcountry View Post
As a "race" yes, but as individuals, we have about 80 years to "adapt" (and I would say most of us have higher priorities)
Yup... natural selection...
Onshore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2016, 11:33 AM   #18
Charlie T
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 312
Thanks: 257
Thanked 183 Times in 88 Posts
Default Lighten up

Quote:
Originally Posted by secondcurve View Post
Where is Shorethings? The state is great at creating laws but not so great at enforcing them.

I have to say if I were "Shorethings" I'd probably take offense with this comment. Your post makes it sound like you feel Shorethings is personally responsible for this situation. Shorethings posts here to be helpful and informative, it appears that their postings are made in a somehwhat "unofficial" capacity. I don't think it's necessary or fair to be pointing any fingers at someone who has always been helpful to the Winni.com community. I for one appreciate her postings ( I believe Shorethings is a female) as I always learn something from them. I find it refreshing to have a Govt. official who goes out of her or his way to be helpful for no other reason than to be helpful...... If we had more of them the world would be a better place.

Charlie T
Charlie T is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Charlie T For This Useful Post:
ApS (08-01-2016), Barney Bear (08-01-2016), FlyingScot (08-02-2016), Pine Island Guy (08-04-2016), SteveO123 (08-01-2016), thinkxingu (08-01-2016)
Old 08-01-2016, 12:50 PM   #19
Onshore
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 502
Thanks: 12
Thanked 423 Times in 145 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie T View Post
I have to say if I were "Shorethings" I'd probably take offense with this comment. Your post makes it sound like you feel Shorethings is personally responsible for this situation. Shorethings posts here to be helpful and informative, it appears that their postings are made in a somehwhat "unofficial" capacity. I don't think it's necessary or fair to be pointing any fingers at someone who has always been helpful to the Winni.com community. I for one appreciate her postings ( I believe Shorethings is a female) as I always learn something from them. I find it refreshing to have a Govt. official who goes out of her or his way to be helpful for no other reason than to be helpful...... If we had more of them the world would be a better place.

Charlie T
Thanks, I do appreciate the concern, but it's ok. 2nd curve voiced his opinion that the State does not enforce things well. He could have said "she" (yes your are correct) but he didn't. I have been doing this for long time and have had the "pleasure" of completing a couple of wetlands applications. I understand where the frustration comes from. The single most important thing to remember is that I am not the State, I am only employed by it. The day that line seems to be blurry I'll need to be moving on.
Onshore is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Onshore For This Useful Post:
noreast (08-01-2016), tummyman (08-01-2016)
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.27064 seconds