Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Calendar Register FAQDonate Members List Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-11-2023, 10:19 AM   #1
welch100
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Welch Island, Gilford
Posts: 49
Thanks: 34
Thanked 12 Times in 5 Posts
Default Cyanobacteria - State Plan

In 2022, the New Hampshire Legislature mandated the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services to prepare a statewide strategy to address increasing blooms of toxic cyanobacteria in our waters. The plan has just been published.

https://www.des.nh.gov/sites/g/files...r-wd-23-12.pdf
welch100 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to welch100 For This Useful Post:
Descant (11-11-2023), longislander (11-11-2023)
Old 11-11-2023, 03:17 PM   #2
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 2,983
Thanks: 2
Thanked 529 Times in 435 Posts
Default

I knew about the advisory committee.
We do a lot of advisory committees.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2023, 03:18 PM   #3
ishoot308
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gilford, NH / Welch Island
Posts: 5,932
Thanks: 2,290
Thanked 4,943 Times in 1,918 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mercier View Post
I knew about the advisory committee.
We do a lot of advisory committees.
Who is “we”….just curious.

Thanks!

Dan
__________________
It's Always Sunny On Welch Island!!
ishoot308 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2023, 04:13 PM   #4
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 2,983
Thanks: 2
Thanked 529 Times in 435 Posts
Default

NH.
We the People are supposedly controlling the Legislature.

The most common action for anything seems to be another study with an attached advisory committee.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2023, 06:20 PM   #5
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,411
Thanks: 719
Thanked 1,381 Times in 957 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mercier View Post
NH.
We the People are supposedly controlling the Legislature.

The most common action for anything seems to be another study with an attached advisory committee.
I agree. It seems towns and cities as well as the state spend more on studies and advisory committees than on a solution.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to tis For This Useful Post:
wobbelbill (11-12-2023)
Sponsored Links
Old 11-11-2023, 08:16 PM   #6
Lakegeezer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 1,657
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 342
Thanked 618 Times in 278 Posts
Default

Thanks for the link! NH's Cyanobacteria Plan is eighty-nine pages and looks comprehensive. I look forward to reading it. My first take is, I like the index. It lists four strategies that make sense.

1) Prevention through Policies: It emphasizes the development of best practices and policies to address the core issues.
2) Education and Outreach: The report advocates for programs that teach recognition, reporting, and understanding of prevention strategies.
3) Monitoring and Reporting: By collecting data, this strategy aims to help researchers develop insight and alert people where cyanobacteria is found.
4) Protecting Drinking Water: Linking prevention, education and monitoring treatment protocols to ensure our water's safety.

At first glance, this plan should bring the state closer to a solution. It is possible our lakes have passed a tipping point and the discussion has moved from "this is what could happen" to "there it is". Prevention, education and reporting activity is already in place and there are increasing blooms to exercise and improve the processes. Getting new regulations right and accepted is always a challenge, but the realtors and developers seem to be more on board with additional regulations this time.
__________________
-lg

Last edited by Lakegeezer; 11-12-2023 at 06:17 AM.
Lakegeezer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2023, 09:31 PM   #7
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 2,983
Thanks: 2
Thanked 529 Times in 435 Posts
Default

A developer expects to build a septic system up to code or attached to a public service (more often). Even a smaller builder working on a new private home would expect they would have to do that.

The realtors are either selling newly built product (existing is harder to come by each day), or expect that the mortgage company/buyer inspection would take care of it. Most realtors suggest inspections, but leave it up to the buyer to contract it as a contingency.

So they have never been opposed to working septic systems.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.29057 seconds