|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Calendar | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
02-28-2007, 09:45 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 563
Thanks: 110
Thanked 239 Times in 128 Posts
|
Focus on the bigger problem - wakes
WMUR is reporting that a tragic accident in the Connecticut River was caused - among other things, by the rescue boat hitting a wake from a passing boater. "Investigators said that when the boat returned with Yates and an additional firefighter, it struck the wage (sic) from a passing motorboat."... "If the boat was larger, if she was placed in a different place, if there had not been a wake," Hathaway said."
http://www.wmur.com/news/11128705/detail.html This was a bad situation gone worse, but the fact is that a boat wake started the chain reaction. While the cry goes out by the kayakers, WINNFABS and the rest of the feel good crowd against go fast boats, the biggest problem remains the huge wakes caused by the big cruisers. Every day these monster waves cause property damage to the shorefront, boats, and docks, and may also be causing injury to swimmers and people being thrown around their 18' bowriders when they hit these monster waves. The fact is that the go fast boats are not making these huge waves and are involved in few accidents. I can tell you that I personally fear the huge cruiser waves, but don't worry one bit about the fast boats. Where is the outrage from WINNFABS about these huge cruisers compromising safety and destroying their quality of life? If they complained about this, I might actually lend credence to their argument about safety, but all they want is to get the fast boats off of the lake. |
02-28-2007, 10:00 AM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,376
Thanks: 213
Thanked 768 Times in 451 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
02-28-2007, 10:18 AM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 563
Thanks: 110
Thanked 239 Times in 128 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
02-28-2007, 03:34 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,974
Thanks: 246
Thanked 736 Times in 438 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
02-28-2007, 10:04 AM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Gilford NH
Posts: 112
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Here Here
Quote:
The only mention of wakes from the proponents side have been accusations of speedy boats making large wakes .."which is nonsence" Go Fast type boats are planing, not displacement hulls ..the faster you go the less water you displace which equals a smaller wake. Just an observation but if anyone is causing havoc on the lake its the Oerpaid, Overfed, (Rodney Dangerfield) types who feel "Ignorance is bliss. If I had a nickle for evey time ive been cut off or swamped by a 30+ foot summer cottage in excess of 10000 pounds id be a millionaire.. |
|
Sponsored Links |
|
02-28-2007, 03:32 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
|
Quote:
What you neglected to show on that report was that the operator of the rescue boat was inexperienced with that craft which is exactly what most of here against the speed limit sight as the problem.It's the inexperienced small boat operaters that we see all of the time driving like Capt. Bonehead.Thanks for making our point!
__________________
SIKSUKR |
|
02-28-2007, 03:38 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 563
Thanks: 110
Thanked 239 Times in 128 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
02-28-2007, 04:03 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Concord NH
Posts: 239
Thanks: 19
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
Town bought wrong boat
I believe it was also said in an interview aired on WMUR that the town was told by the boat manufacturer, prior to purchase, that that type of boat (air boat) was not designed to be used for purpose for which they were purchasing a boat.
__________________
"He who dies with the most toys wins" |
Bookmarks |
|
|