|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Calendar | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-04-2006, 08:49 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 1,657
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 342
Thanked 618 Times in 278 Posts
|
Gender bias in the vote
The vote was very biased along gender lines.
Women reps voted 75% FOR the speed limit (85 to 28) Men reps voted 51% AGAINST the speed limit (110 to 106)
__________________
-lg |
02-04-2006, 09:22 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Littleton, NH
Posts: 382
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
And this actually surprises you?
Woman aren't macho (at least most aren't) - they don't feel the need to measure themselves by how fast their car, boat, snowmobile, or whatever goes. It's called testosterone. Thank goodness that a large percentage of the House are female!
__________________
"Boaters love boats . . . Kayakers love water."
|
02-04-2006, 09:33 AM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: West Alton, NH
Posts: 169
Thanks: 0
Thanked 25 Times in 11 Posts
|
Interesting . . .
Quote:
That is how it is suppose to work!
__________________
QL (Doing my best to encourage Global Warming ... one quilt at a time!) |
|
02-04-2006, 03:16 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Gilford NH
Posts: 112
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Quote:
Please look at the facts !! Slower boats make larger wakes then faster ones "Laws of hydrodynamics" Speed is well down the list of causes for fatalities. The lake is so large , putting a blanket speed limit on the entire thing at all times is REDICULOUS !! Wake up folks !! Big brother is watching |
|
02-04-2006, 03:24 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,943
Thanks: 23
Thanked 111 Times in 51 Posts
|
Different measuring stick
Quote:
Now leave me alone, I'm going to the basement to use some power tools to make the HPS ...
__________________
Mee'n'Mac "Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by simple stupidity or ignorance. The latter are a lot more common than the former." - RAH |
|
Sponsored Links |
|
02-04-2006, 04:22 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Wolfeboro
Posts: 521
Thanks: 10
Thanked 29 Times in 15 Posts
|
Pondering
QL I like your analysis.
Here is something to ponder. I guess that the gender bias can apply to anyone. Does that mean that females must drive boats slower? Does anyone know the age bias? Do seniors drive slower? How do these groups vote? This whole thing could add to another infinite thread. I am in both groups and have been know to drive a boat fast so where do I fit. I’m getting the Florida equivalent of cabin fever because I have been grounded by weather and tides so I ponder the speed limits on Winnie. Here we have a 25 limit until I get to the Gulf. People learn to get their boats on plane under 25.
__________________
Home Permanently in NH
|
02-04-2006, 04:23 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Littleton, NH
Posts: 382
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
My fear of being out on a lake among high speed powerboats is based on my own personal experience. I've had speeding boats come very close and it was obvious that they didn't even see me until the very last second. If they are going slower that will buy me a few more seconds. Speed is often not sited as the cause of an accident simply because of the lack of a speed limit, yet speed is still listed 4th on the USCG report for the cause of boating accidents. I also have brought this up before: Accidents with less than $2000 damage aren't even on the USCG report, unless a person suffered injuries that require medical treatment. So the report isn't even covering all boating accidents. And most kayaks and canoes cost less than $2000. Why is it that you guys are bringing up larger wakes as a reason for not having a speed limit? Most of us are not afraid of large wakes - we're afraid of being run over. Large wakes don't bother me a bit, in fact I enjoy surfing on them. And there isn't a "blanket speed limit" - there's a 45mph MAXIMUM speed - you still have to slow down to headway speed whenever you're within 150 feet of other vessels, or of the shore (including islands). Here's a basic law of physics for you: the faster a boat is traveling, the more distance it will cover in the time that it takes the operator to react to avoid another object. A boat traveling at 90 mph covers 132 feet in one second - at 45 mph it covers half that distance. Those extra 66 feet are very important to me and to others who supported this bill.
__________________
"Boaters love boats . . . Kayakers love water."
|
|
02-04-2006, 04:51 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alton Bay
Posts: 5,547
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 2,397
Thanked 1,918 Times in 1,061 Posts
|
I was curious, sooooooooo
I took a look at the roll call, and started making little hash marks for the voting (or not voting) by party. Remember, this bill was sponsored by Rep. Pilliod, R-Belknap 5th dist.
Democratic vote: Yea= 116 Nay= 14 Not voting= 20 Republican vote: Yea= 77 Nay=125 Not voting= 43 Presiding officer: Republican (did not vote - would only vote in case of a tie). I think that's 395 representatives, and I thought we had 400, and no, I'm not going back and check my figures . Quilt Lady stated that perhaps the legislators are listening to the voters. I'm not really sure. I looked at the representatives for Belknap dist 5, the Alton Gilford Belmont district (in part), which also happens to be the district for Rep. Pilliod. Now assuming (oh boy, there's that word!) that supporters and opponents would contact all 7 representatives and that they would be voting in concert with the predominant sides, it was interesting to see that the vote (all Republican, by the way) as Yea 2, Nay 4, and 1 not voting. Just glancing down the roll call, it did seem that there was not too much of a common thread in the voting except the strong Democratic support of the bill written by a Republican, and the strong (by almost 50 votes) rejection of the bill by Republicans. So much for Civics class 101...
__________________
I Live Here... I am always UPTHESAUKEE !!!! |
02-04-2006, 10:21 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
|
That's real interesting about how the woman reps voted. Seems reasonable to assume that woman would be less speedy and more safety. The Senate has 19 men and only 5 women and do not know what the Repub-Dem count is, so maybe the bill will get sunk in the Senate, but hope not.
|
02-04-2006, 10:49 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Gilmanton, NH
Posts: 754
Thanks: 136
Thanked 92 Times in 51 Posts
|
Quote:
4 of the Dem senators are women, 1 on the Rep side. |
|
02-05-2006, 12:33 AM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,325
Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
02-05-2006, 10:41 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 2,836
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,626 Times in 562 Posts
|
You can always count on democrats to vote for more government intusion.
|
02-06-2006, 07:55 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
|
less speedy/more safety!
How's that for a bumper sticker for an HB 162 campaign slogan as it zooms over to the State Senate for a thumbs up or thumbs down from the 24 NH State Senators?
Maybe this is a little off-topic from the gender bias issue but here's a link to how much one speeding (aka spending) ticket ends up costing you. http://www.moneycentral.msn.com/cont...car/p51288.asp Did you know that while auto insurance in NH is somewhat optional and is mandatory in Massachusetts, that NH drivers are in fact, more likely to have insurance coverage than Mass drivers. My source....some old Union Leader, or somewhere, article. How about that? Last edited by fatlazyless; 02-06-2006 at 11:09 AM. Reason: mispelled speeding |
02-06-2006, 10:51 AM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
SIKSUKR |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|