Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Links Calendar Register FAQDonate Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-11-2021, 12:34 PM   #101
rsmlp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 432
Thanks: 5
Thanked 155 Times in 76 Posts
Default bidding war

Quote:
Originally Posted by SAMIAM View Post
True...no one is even applying for jobs that pay $15 and up.
No one in the business that I know of is offering $7.25....it's almost a bidding war in the industry
How about raising your prices accordingly and see what happens? Price of EVERYTHING way up this year. Might as well include a great dinner at VK! Besides if you raise prices say 15% it's still a "wicked bahgain".
rsmlp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2021, 01:25 PM   #102
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Winnipesaukee & Florida
Posts: 5,245
Thanks: 1,568
Thanked 622 Times in 445 Posts
Unhappy Russian Hackers with Ransomware...

Quote:
Originally Posted by rsmlp View Post
How about raising your prices accordingly and see what happens? Price of EVERYTHING way up this year. Might as well include a great dinner at VK! Besides if you raise prices say 15% it's still a "wicked bahgain".
Some gas stations have run out of gasoline already.
Makes commuting less attractive.
ApS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2021, 01:32 PM   #103
MotorHead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 279
Thanks: 49
Thanked 84 Times in 63 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SAMIAM View Post
True...no one is even applying for jobs that pay $15 and up.
No one in the business that I know of is offering $7.25....it's almost a bidding war in the industry
I know nothing about restaurant business, I have never owned one, would never start one. Best of luck to you and all others.

I am just trying to compare your comments to what I saw in Sawyers and Jon's roast beef the other day. How is it that they can find adults/kids to work at their place where others can not. Just curious.
MotorHead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2021, 01:59 PM   #104
joey2665
Senior Member
 
joey2665's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 2,937
Thanks: 913
Thanked 864 Times in 567 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MotorHead View Post
I know nothing about restaurant business, I have never owned one, would never start one. Best of luck to you and all others.

I am just trying to compare your comments to what I saw in Sawyers and Jon's roast beef the other day. How is it that they can find adults/kids to work at their place where others can not. Just curious.
If you follow back you will see the issue really isnt wait staff but kitchen staff. I do know, because my ex works at Jon's, that the "kitchen help" there is mainly family and more preparation than cooking like in a restaurant.
joey2665 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2021, 02:11 PM   #105
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,387
Thanks: 579
Thanked 1,111 Times in 758 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MotorHead View Post
I know nothing about restaurant business, I have never owned one, would never start one. Best of luck to you and all others.

I am just trying to compare your comments to what I saw in Sawyers and Jon's roast beef the other day. How is it that they can find adults/kids to work at their place where others can not. Just curious.
I would be willing to bet they are short of help too. I don't know if there is any business in any industry that is full staffed. It is terrible to get qualified help no matter the pay.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 05-11-2021, 02:14 PM   #106
MotorHead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 279
Thanks: 49
Thanked 84 Times in 63 Posts
Default

I found this interesting article on CNN

Restaurant workers say industry is facing a wage shortage, not a labor shortage

https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/10/econo...ps/index.html/
MotorHead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2021, 02:41 PM   #107
Biggd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Waltham Ma./Meredith NH
Posts: 3,090
Thanks: 1,431
Thanked 895 Times in 560 Posts
Default

Well we all know CNN leans far left and fox leans far right so I'm sure the answer is somehwere in the middle.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MotorHead View Post
I found this interesting article on CNN

Restaurant workers say industry is facing a wage shortage, not a labor shortage

https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/10/econo...ps/index.html/
Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
Biggd is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Biggd For This Useful Post:
TiltonBB (05-11-2021)
Old 05-11-2021, 03:04 PM   #108
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,275
Thanks: 1,069
Thanked 1,378 Times in 826 Posts
Default

NPR went deep into this yesterday and claimed three reasons for people not returning to work: 1. Low wages and/or hours/flexibility—that the closures through the pandemic opened people's eyes to their situations. They gave people with children who struggled to pay for childcare as the prime example. 2. Remaining fear—people with health issues or who remain unvaccinated are still hesitant to return. 3. People using this opportunity to investigate different paths forward.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2021, 07:04 PM   #109
Seaplane Pilot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,058
Thanks: 503
Thanked 799 Times in 299 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
NPR went deep into this yesterday and claimed three reasons for people not returning to work: 1. Low wages and/or hours/flexibility—that the closures through the pandemic opened people's eyes to their situations. They gave people with children who struggled to pay for childcare as the prime example. 2. Remaining fear—people with health issues or who remain unvaccinated are still hesitant to return. 3. People using this opportunity to investigate different paths forward.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
# 4 = laziness / feeding at the government trough. But NPR won’t go that far.
Seaplane Pilot is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Seaplane Pilot For This Useful Post:
ApS (05-12-2021), camp guy (05-21-2021), Charlie T (05-12-2021), CK5 Truck (05-29-2021), DEJ (05-11-2021), DougNH (05-11-2021), farechofisherman (05-24-2021), harbor guy (05-29-2021), MAXUM (05-14-2021), mhtranger (05-12-2021), SAMIAM (05-12-2021), Top-Water (05-11-2021), VitaBene (05-12-2021), winterh (05-22-2021)
Old 05-11-2021, 07:15 PM   #110
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,275
Thanks: 1,069
Thanked 1,378 Times in 826 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaplane Pilot View Post
# 4 = laziness / feeding at the government trough. But NPR won’t go that far.
They cited a few reports that said that even though people want to believe that narrative, it's not what they found on the whole.

We know where you stand with confirmation bias, so it probably doesn't matter, but these reports are based on facts and data:

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/04/rese...g-to-work.html

https://tobin.yale.edu/sites/default...tion_vF(1).pdf

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to thinkxingu For This Useful Post:
ApS (05-12-2021), MotorHead (05-11-2021)
Old 05-11-2021, 07:18 PM   #111
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,275
Thanks: 1,069
Thanked 1,378 Times in 826 Posts
Default

And in case you don't feel like reading the Yale study:

"We find that that the workers who experi-

enced larger increases in UI generosity did not experience larger declines in employment when

the benefits expansion went into effect. Additionally, we find that workers facing larger ex-

pansions in UI benefits have returned to their previous jobs over time at similar rates as others."

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to thinkxingu For This Useful Post:
MotorHead (05-11-2021)
Old 05-11-2021, 07:38 PM   #112
Sue Doe-Nym
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,117
Thanks: 585
Thanked 603 Times in 299 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
They cited a few reports that said that even though people want to believe that narrative, it's not what they found on the whole.

We know where you stand with confirmation bias, so it probably doesn't matter, but these reports are based on facts and data:

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/04/rese...g-to-work.html

https://tobin.yale.edu/sites/default...tion_vF(1).pdf

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
I believe that it’s necessary to consider the reports “based on facts and data” with a healthy dose of skepticism. Sad to say, I believe that we are being given incomplete information and half truths. It gives me zero satisfaction to say this, and it’s painful to realize that this is undoubtedly widespread.
P.S. I don’t believe that your #3 has merit; people should not be rediscovering themselves at taxpayer expense!

Last edited by Sue Doe-Nym; 05-11-2021 at 08:23 PM. Reason: Additions
Sue Doe-Nym is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Sue Doe-Nym For This Useful Post:
Charlie T (05-12-2021), CK5 Truck (05-29-2021), DEJ (05-11-2021), Seaplane Pilot (05-11-2021), Top-Water (05-11-2021)
Old 05-11-2021, 07:51 PM   #113
Seaplane Pilot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,058
Thanks: 503
Thanked 799 Times in 299 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
And in case you don't feel like reading the Yale study:

"We find that that the workers who experi-

enced larger increases in UI generosity did not experience larger declines in employment when

the benefits expansion went into effect. Additionally, we find that workers facing larger ex-

pansions in UI benefits have returned to their previous jobs over time at similar rates as others."

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
Yale study….is this unbiased? The chickens are on the move now, and will soon be coming home to roost. Food, lumber and now fuel prices are headed to the moon. Anyone that wants to work is working, for the most part. The rest of them are sitting around making excuses as to why they don’t want to or “can’t” work, based on today’s climate.
Seaplane Pilot is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Seaplane Pilot For This Useful Post:
ApS (05-12-2021), Charlie T (05-12-2021), CK5 Truck (05-29-2021), DEJ (05-11-2021), mhtranger (05-12-2021), SAMIAM (05-12-2021), Sue Doe-Nym (05-11-2021), TiltonBB (05-12-2021), Top-Water (05-11-2021)
Old 05-12-2021, 07:42 AM   #114
SAMIAM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 2,627
Thanks: 244
Thanked 1,376 Times in 471 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaplane Pilot View Post
Yale study….is this unbiased? The chickens are on the move now, and will soon be coming home to roost. Food, lumber and now fuel prices are headed to the moon. Anyone that wants to work is working, for the most part. The rest of them are sitting around making excuses as to why they don’t want to or “can’t” work, based on today’s climate.
Just wanted to elaborate on Seaplanes comment about food prices.
Our suppliers are saying they've never seen anything like it.
They can not fill orders for chicken,cooking oils such as canola have tripled in price.Shucked clams and lobster meat are double last years prices.Some red meats have nearly doubled and any products related to corn will be scarce and expensive due to loss of crops in South America from drought.
At least fish has not gone through the roof yet.......guess it's just the times we're in.
SAMIAM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SAMIAM For This Useful Post:
Charlie T (05-12-2021), farechofisherman (05-12-2021), Seaplane Pilot (05-12-2021)
Old 05-12-2021, 07:56 AM   #115
Seaplane Pilot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,058
Thanks: 503
Thanked 799 Times in 299 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SAMIAM View Post
Just wanted to elaborate on Seaplanes comment about food prices.
Our suppliers are saying they've never seen anything like it.
They can not fill orders for chicken,cooking oils such as canola have tripled in price.Shucked clams and lobster meat are double last years prices.Some red meats have nearly doubled and any products related to corn will be scarce and expensive due to loss of crops in South America from drought.
At least fish has not gone through the roof yet.......guess it's just the times we're in.
I don’t know about anyone else, but I’m starting to feel like the frog in the “boil the frog” parable…. The water is getting warmer by the day!
Seaplane Pilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2021, 08:42 AM   #116
MotorHead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 279
Thanks: 49
Thanked 84 Times in 63 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaplane Pilot View Post
Yale study….is this unbiased? The chickens are on the move now, and will soon be coming home to roost. Food, lumber and now fuel prices are headed to the moon. Anyone that wants to work is working, for the most part. The rest of them are sitting around making excuses as to why they don’t want to or “can’t” work, based on today’s climate.
How did we get into this mess?
Who made the stupid decisions to get us into this inflation.

Maybe someone can provide answers.
MotorHead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2021, 08:56 AM   #117
fatlazyless
Senior Member
 
fatlazyless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,478
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 240
Thanked 772 Times in 548 Posts
Default

Local restaurants, just like everyone else, get high quality - low prices by making the drive to Market Basket in Plymouth and loading up the car/suv/pickup.

Like ...... quality food supply is quality food supply ..... so, why not and a good restaurant meal is all about the food preparation and presentation. No one really seems to care where the restaurant supply came from ...... whether it was delivered by www.Sysco.com or purchased at http://www.shopmarketbasket.com/stor...rket-basket-86.
__________________
Down & out, livn that Walmart side of the lake!
fatlazyless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2021, 09:47 AM   #118
Seaplane Pilot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,058
Thanks: 503
Thanked 799 Times in 299 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MotorHead View Post
How did we get into this mess?
Who made the stupid decisions to get us into this inflation.

Maybe someone can provide answers.
That is an excellent question.
Seaplane Pilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2021, 10:07 AM   #119
MotorHead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 279
Thanks: 49
Thanked 84 Times in 63 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fatlazyless View Post
Local restaurants, just like everyone else, get high quality - low prices by making the drive to Market Basket in Plymouth and loading up the car/suv/pickup.

Like ...... quality food supply is quality food supply ..... so, why not and a good restaurant meal is all about the food preparation and presentation. No one really seems to care where the restaurant supply came from ...... whether it was delivered by www.Sysco.com or purchased at http://www.shopmarketbasket.com/stor...rket-basket-86.
While I know nothing about running a restaurant or even a sub shop, I can not imagine a restaurant owner going to Market Basket or Shaws or wherever.
MotorHead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2021, 11:10 AM   #120
phoenix
Senior Member
 
phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: phoenix and moultonboro
Posts: 1,246
Thanks: 22
Thanked 166 Times in 125 Posts
Default

always find it interesting but not surprising that many economist will find a study that will support their ideology ( Paul Krugman is an example) . There are a record number of job opening over 8m right now. As SAMIAM said kitchen help can make 15 per hour working or 15 per hour not . Most people will make the logical decision . Business will have to make the rational decision which the VK did that is close for dinner. They know their customers and raising prices by a lot will drive customers away. By the way I am a graduate economist( certainly not bragging ) and very few economist have ever had to manage a payroll.
__________________
it's tough to make predictions specially about the future
phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to phoenix For This Useful Post:
VitaBene (05-12-2021)
Old 05-12-2021, 11:41 AM   #121
Pam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 58
Thanks: 22
Thanked 44 Times in 19 Posts
Default

Seeing all the help wanted signs everywhere I go, I read through this thread with interest. Something that no-one addresses is the fact that there are fewer teenagers and young adults today than there were in yesteryear. I worked until recently at a large university in Boston, and they started planning for the drop in college aged people back in the late 90's. Schools that depend on a large applicant pool noticed that the birthrate had begun to fall, and that they would need to strategize to remain competitive in the future. We just got confirmation of this fact in the 2020 census.

I don't know what this means for business owners who depend on the teenage/young adult labor force, but it's a definite factor.

For the people who like to speak of grazing at the public trough, etc., it seems that a large part of the labor shortage (though not entirely) is for seasonal workers. Those people are not getting unemployment.
Pam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2021, 11:42 AM   #122
fatlazyless
Senior Member
 
fatlazyless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,478
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 240
Thanked 772 Times in 548 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MotorHead View Post
While I know nothing about running a restaurant or even a sub shop, I can not imagine a restaurant owner going to Market Basket or Shaws or wherever.
Just off the top of my head, it seems entirely possible and reasonably doable to operate a restaurant in the Plymouth area where each and every food/restaurant item is sourced entirely, 100%, from the Plymouth Market Basket.

Running the business model 100% based on this rule that it comes from this Market Basket, or we do not have it or get it from any other source. It's Market Basket and no where else seems very doable for a restaurant.

Like .......... why not .......... said the inquisitive poster?
__________________
Down & out, livn that Walmart side of the lake!
fatlazyless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2021, 12:02 PM   #123
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 759
Thanked 586 Times in 353 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenix View Post
always find it interesting but not surprising that many economist will find a study that will support their ideology ( Paul Krugman is an example) . There are a record number of job opening over 8m right now. As SAMIAM said kitchen help can make 15 per hour working or 15 per hour not . Most people will make the logical decision . Business will have to make the rational decision which the VK did that is close for dinner. They know their customers and raising prices by a lot will drive customers away. By the way I am a graduate economist( certainly not bragging ) and very few economist have ever had to manage a payroll.
One thing that economists on both sides of the aisle have pushed for over the past 5 years has been higher bargaining power for working class Americans. Trump's immigration policies, Biden's covid relief, and stated objectives of both, have all included policies that put direct upward pressure on domestic wages. Setting aside whether this is a good thing or a bad thing in general, no economist should be surprised that Sam is having a tough time hiring this year (or next...)
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2021, 12:05 PM   #124
Biggd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Waltham Ma./Meredith NH
Posts: 3,090
Thanks: 1,431
Thanked 895 Times in 560 Posts
Default

It's the old supply and demand issue.. It was bound to happen. You close businesses up for over a year then the economy bounces back and there just isn't enough built up surplus to keep up with demand. It will take a while for businesses to catch up but it will.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MotorHead View Post
How did we get into this mess?
Who made the stupid decisions to get us into this inflation.

Maybe someone can provide answers.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
Biggd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2021, 12:16 PM   #125
Biggd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Waltham Ma./Meredith NH
Posts: 3,090
Thanks: 1,431
Thanked 895 Times in 560 Posts
Default

If they can't get enough help to man the restaurant how are they going to break away to go shopping at Market Basket?
You obviously have no clue what it takes to run a small business!
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatlazyless View Post
Just off the top of my head, it seems entirely possible and reasonably doable to operate a restaurant in the Plymouth area where each and every food/restaurant item is sourced entirely, 100%, from the Plymouth Market Basket.

Running the business model 100% based on this rule that it comes from this Market Basket, or we do not have it or get it from any other source. It's Market Basket and no where else seems very doable for a restaurant.

Like .......... why not .......... said the inquisitive poster?
Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app

Last edited by Biggd; 05-12-2021 at 02:34 PM.
Biggd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2021, 12:45 PM   #126
fatlazyless
Senior Member
 
fatlazyless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,478
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 240
Thanked 772 Times in 548 Posts
Default

Market Basket-Plymouth is open every single day, 7-days/week, from 7am to 8pm and open starting at 6am for seniors, age 60 and older.

For a restaurant business located, say, within a relative short drive away, it could be an advantage to have such a large food supply for running a restaurant always open seven days, and always available as opposed to getting deliveries from a restaurant supply like Sysco.

How do restaurant food items from a delivered food service like Sysco COST as compared to Market Basket and what is the difference between restaurant food service and buying at a super-market?

In the summer months, I have noticed what must have been summer camp dinning room customers at the Walmart with shopping carts very loaded with many items probably intended for feeding a lot of campers. Specifically, giant cans of tuna fish and mayonaisse.

Summer camp dining room food service is different than restaurant food service but the buyer made their decision to purchase at the Walmart so there's probably a number of reasons for where commercial dining gets its food supply. Is probably a very competitive business based on price, quality, choice, convenience.

Does Sysco hire extremely attractive restaurant sales ladies who are encouraged to dress provocatively as a design to help its restaurant sales to individual restaurants or do the Sysco truck drivers who deliver the items do the sales calls as well as driving and delivering the big semi tractor trailer truck?

What do you think? ......
__________________
Down & out, livn that Walmart side of the lake!
fatlazyless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2021, 01:21 PM   #127
MotorHead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 279
Thanks: 49
Thanked 84 Times in 63 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fatlazyless View Post
In the summer months, I have noticed what must have been summer camp dinning room customers at the Walmart with shopping carts very loaded with many items probably intended for feeding a lot of campers. Specifically, giant cans of tuna fish and mayonnaise.
Oh that was me, buying lunch for my sons.
MotorHead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2021, 01:52 PM   #128
fatlazyless
Senior Member
 
fatlazyless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,478
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 240
Thanked 772 Times in 548 Posts
Default

So many choices for where to buy for a restaurant business ..... a restaurant supplier that delivers ..... or a local super-market.

Could be the restaurants go to both depending on what they need and how fast they need to get it?

As far as I know, there's really not much difference in price between the two, with all three, Walmart, Hannaford, and Market Basket all lower priced than the restaurant suppliers ..... which seems surprising ..... but that's the way it supposedly is because these three stores all have to compete on prices to attract customers.
__________________
Down & out, livn that Walmart side of the lake!
fatlazyless is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to fatlazyless For This Useful Post:
DotRat (05-18-2021)
Old 05-13-2021, 11:07 AM   #129
MotorHead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 279
Thanks: 49
Thanked 84 Times in 63 Posts
Default McDonald's-owned U.S. restaurants boost pay to lure new workers

https://uk.sports.yahoo.com/news/mcd...-YRagtkbyuj9ym
MotorHead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2021, 11:28 AM   #130
phoenix
Senior Member
 
phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: phoenix and moultonboro
Posts: 1,246
Thanks: 22
Thanked 166 Times in 125 Posts
Default

most big companies are doing this. They have more pricing ability and name brand recognition . Tougher for a small mom and pop. This is free market at work . I was on a board of a residential brain injury company with a facility in Gilroy Cal, we were paying aids around 13 per hour and we found that Wendy's was paying $14 for a much easier job so we raised wages. Of course the insurance companies didn't allow us to raise prices regionally
__________________
it's tough to make predictions specially about the future
phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2021, 11:29 PM   #131
8gv
Senior Member
 
8gv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,595
Thanks: 48
Thanked 549 Times in 351 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MotorHead View Post
McD's has some major problems operating in a rising labor cost market.

First, there's the menu and its price structure. There is a "value" section of the menu and there is all the rest of the menu. When prices are increased on the rest of the menu the return from that increase is reduced by trade off to the value items.

This makes it harder to keep the value items priced low. Eventually "value" has to be redefined. You may recall the McD's "Dollar" menu. Now it is "$1, $2 and $3" value menu.

The second and in my view bigger problem, is the quality of execution when each labor hour costs so much. To provide fast, accurate and friendly service there needs to be adequate staffing. Herein lies the dilemma. Hourly pay that is too low can result in understaffing. Raising wages to an attractive level can bring in more bodies but there is no guarantee that the additional employees improve results. The cost to train them becomes higher and there is a temptation to minimize the hours spent doing so.

If the pool of available workers does not increase you just end up with the same tight staffing and mediocre execution but at greater cost.

This situation is worsened by the current government sponsored couch careers.
8gv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2021, 05:22 AM   #132
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,275
Thanks: 1,069
Thanked 1,378 Times in 826 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 8gv View Post
McD's has some major problems operating in a rising labor cost market.

First, there's the menu and its price structure. There is a "value" section of the menu and there is all the rest of the menu. When prices are increased on the rest of the menu the return from that increase is reduced by trade off to the value items.

This makes it harder to keep the value items priced low. Eventually "value" has to be redefined. You may recall the McD's "Dollar" menu. Now it is "$1, $2 and $3" value menu.

The second and in my view bigger problem, is the quality of execution when each labor hour costs so much. To provide fast, accurate and friendly service there needs to be adequate staffing. Herein lies the dilemma. Hourly pay that is too low can result in understaffing. Raising wages to an attractive level can bring in more bodies but there is no guarantee that the additional employees improve results. The cost to train them becomes higher and there is a temptation to minimize the hours spent doing so.

If the pool of available workers does not increase you just end up with the same tight staffing and mediocre execution but at greater cost.

This situation is worsened by the current government sponsored couch careers.
Full disclosure: I'm not an economics guy, but here goes:

Robert Reich, in his book The Common Good, delves into "Shareholder" capitalism and "Stockholder" capitalism. The former, he claims, exists when all three points of the capitalism triangle—consumer, worker, and owner—exist in a state that works equally for all. For example, workers get paid well, owners make a reasonable amount of money, and consumers are offered solid products at fair prices.

The latter, however, maximizes profit and pay for the owner/stockholders while adversely affecting product quality and price, worker pay, or both.

My basic question is this: why is it that worker pay and benefit questions always result in "costs of products will skyrocket" rather than "CEOs/stockholders/etc." might not make 320x what their employees make?

This is a serious question as, long before my father passed away, he watched this trend in his company and it always hurt him. In the 60's when he started, his bosses made five times what he made while in the '00s when he retired, they were making thirty times.

I looked this up not long ago, and though his numbers were probably off (low!), he wasn't wrong at all: https://www.epi.org/publication/ceo-...ypical-worker/

Thoughts? Why isn't this talked about more?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to thinkxingu For This Useful Post:
Biggd (05-14-2021), MRD (05-14-2021)
Old 05-14-2021, 07:24 AM   #133
Biggd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Waltham Ma./Meredith NH
Posts: 3,090
Thanks: 1,431
Thanked 895 Times in 560 Posts
Default

Only one reason, GREED.
Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
Full disclosure: I'm not an economics guy, but here goes:

Robert Reich, in his book The Common Good, delves into "Shareholder" capitalism and "Stockholder" capitalism. The former, he claims, exists when all three points of the capitalism triangle—consumer, worker, and owner—exist in a state that works equally for all. For example, workers get paid well, owners make a reasonable amount of money, and consumers are offered solid products at fair prices.

The latter, however, maximizes profit and pay for the owner/stockholders while adversely affecting product quality and price, worker pay, or both.

My basic question is this: why is it that worker pay and benefit questions always result in "costs of products will skyrocket" rather than "CEOs/stockholders/etc." might not make 320x what their employees make?

This is a serious question as, long before my father passed away, he watched this trend in his company and it always hurt him. In the 60's when he started, his bosses made five times what he made while in the '00s when he retired, they were making thirty times.

I looked this up not long ago, and though his numbers were probably off (low!), he wasn't wrong at all: https://www.epi.org/publication/ceo-...ypical-worker/

Thoughts? Why isn't this talked about more?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
Biggd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2021, 07:35 AM   #134
jeffk
Senior Member
 
jeffk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Center Harbor
Posts: 996
Thanks: 181
Thanked 325 Times in 186 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
Full disclosure: I'm not an economics guy, but here goes:

Robert Reich, in his book The Common Good, delves into "Shareholder" capitalism and "Stockholder" capitalism. The former, he claims, exists when all three points of the capitalism triangle—consumer, worker, and owner—exist in a state that works equally for all. For example, workers get paid well, owners make a reasonable amount of money, and consumers are offered solid products at fair prices.

The latter, however, maximizes profit and pay for the owner/stockholders while adversely affecting product quality and price, worker pay, or both.

My basic question is this: why is it that worker pay and benefit questions always result in "costs of products will skyrocket" rather than "CEOs/stockholders/etc." might not make 320x what their employees make?

This is a serious question as, long before my father passed away, he watched this trend in his company and it always hurt him. In the 60's when he started, his bosses made five times what he made while in the '00s when he retired, they were making thirty times.

I looked this up not long ago, and though his numbers were probably off (low!), he wasn't wrong at all: https://www.epi.org/publication/ceo-...ypical-worker/

Thoughts? Why isn't this talked about more?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
I'm not an economics guy either but :

"why is it that worker pay and benefit questions always result in "costs of products will skyrocket"" is NOT true if the individual workers EARN their pay and benefit increases through higher productivity via education/learning and good work practices. Such a worker returns more in profit to a company than their wage increases cost. Good companies HAPPILY pay such employees what they are worth.

On the other hand, unions often bargain for wages that exceed what productivity will justify. Or, set in place rising compensation based on longevity rather than productivity. These increases DO increase production costs but are tolerated by companies due to union pressure and the limited and predictable nature of the increases. However, that's a trap. Any non productivity based increases eventually corrode a business, i.e. the American auto industry. Auto unions controlled wages in the US but couldn't control competing wages in foreign countries. Nor could they control the growth of robotics that eliminated overly expensive workers.

""CEOs/stockholders/etc." might not make 320x what their employees make?"
It is the classic "the buck stops here" which implies that the RESPONSIBILITY (and the pay) accrues to the top. The CEO (and the Board) make the major decisions that guide the growth of a company. It the company is smart, a significant portion of the CEO's compensation is tied to profitability. The CEO is not only making sure that products get built but also predicting future needs for products and actions of competitors. Further, no one else is above the CEO making sure he doesn't mess things up. As an employee or even a manager makes decisions and take actions, others are overseeing their work. No one oversees the CEO. They walk a tightrope without a net. Employee mistakes might cost $100s. A CEO's mistakes could cost $billions. The top level people EARN their money by growing profit.

Further, it is not how many times the salary is of a CEO compared to one worker that has meaning. It is how many times the salary of a CEO is compared to the cumulative salary of ALL the workers in a company BECAUSE the CEO is in charge of ALL of them and ALL of their efforts. For example, Microsoft's CEO makes $44 million vs $4 billion in overall employee payments, about 1.1%, i.e. for each employee dollar paid the CEO gets 1 cent. OR how much the CEO makes as compared to the revenue of the company. For example, the Microsoft CEO's $44 million against a company revenue of about $160 billion or about .1% of revenue. Another way to think about it is when you buy a $2000 computer, the CEO makes $2. Of course this is a simplified example because CEO's also get performance bonuses and other perks. (Numbers were pulled from various public Microsoft reports and are not meant to be precise but as an example only.)

Without a competent CEO, products wouldn't get made at all, no workers would earn anything, and you wouldn't have your computer to purchase.

I won't say that all companies are well managed or that many CEOs aren't overpaid but such companies usually struggle or fail eventually. Smart management KNOWS how it is supposed to work and keeps compensation for EVERYONE in line with their productivity. The process is VERY dynamic and challenging as markets, competition, and the overall economy is always changing.
jeffk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to jeffk For This Useful Post:
Charlie T (05-14-2021), CK5 Truck (05-29-2021), Descant (05-14-2021), Leoskeys (05-17-2021), Sue Doe-Nym (05-14-2021)
Old 05-14-2021, 08:18 AM   #135
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,275
Thanks: 1,069
Thanked 1,378 Times in 826 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffk View Post
I'm not an economics guy either but :

"why is it that worker pay and benefit questions always result in "costs of products will skyrocket"" is NOT true if the individual workers EARN their pay and benefit increases through higher productivity via education/learning and good work practices. Such a worker returns more in profit to a company than their wage increases cost. Good companies HAPPILY pay such employees what they are worth.

On the other hand, unions often bargain for wages that exceed what productivity will justify. Or, set in place rising compensation based on longevity rather than productivity. These increases DO increase production costs but are tolerated by companies due to union pressure and the limited and predictable nature of the increases. However, that's a trap. Any non productivity based increases eventually corrode a business, i.e. the American auto industry. Auto unions controlled wages in the US but couldn't control competing wages in foreign countries. Nor could they control the growth of robotics that eliminated overly expensive workers.

""CEOs/stockholders/etc." might not make 320x what their employees make?"
It is the classic "the buck stops here" which implies that the RESPONSIBILITY (and the pay) accrues to the top. The CEO (and the Board) make the major decisions that guide the growth of a company. It the company is smart, a significant portion of the CEO's compensation is tied to profitability. The CEO is not only making sure that products get built but also predicting future needs for products and actions of competitors. Further, no one else is above the CEO making sure he doesn't mess things up. As an employee or even a manager makes decisions and take actions, others are overseeing their work. No one oversees the CEO. They walk a tightrope without a net. Employee mistakes might cost $100s. A CEO's mistakes could cost $billions. The top level people EARN their money by growing profit.

Further, it is not how many times the salary is of a CEO compared to one worker that has meaning. It is how many times the salary of a CEO is compared to the cumulative salary of ALL the workers in a company BECAUSE the CEO is in charge of ALL of them and ALL of their efforts. For example, Microsoft's CEO makes $44 million vs $4 billion in overall employee payments, about 1.1%, i.e. for each employee dollar paid the CEO gets 1 cent. OR how much the CEO makes as compared to the revenue of the company. For example, the Microsoft CEO's $44 million against a company revenue of about $160 billion or about .1% of revenue. Another way to think about it is when you buy a $2000 computer, the CEO makes $2. Of course this is a simplified example because CEO's also get performance bonuses and other perks. (Numbers were pulled from various public Microsoft reports and are not meant to be precise but as an example only.)

Without a competent CEO, products wouldn't get made at all, no workers would earn anything, and you wouldn't have your computer to purchase.

I won't say that all companies are well managed or that many CEOs aren't overpaid but such companies usually struggle or fail eventually. Smart management KNOWS how it is supposed to work and keeps compensation for EVERYONE in line with their productivity. The process is VERY dynamic and challenging as markets, competition, and the overall economy is always changing.
You just spent a few pages on justifying what I'm suggesting is a problem—essentially criticizing the low people on the totem and praising the high.

Unions exist BECAUSE owners weren't/aren't doing the right thing. My father lost a finger to a machine that he had told management to add safety gear to years earlier. Once OSHA moved in, guess which machine got a safety apparatus?

In the first decade I was a teacher, the highest raise was 1%. One contract had 0, 0, 1/2% raises, and those were WITH a union. Can you imagine what the district would've asked us to do/take without one?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2021, 08:44 AM   #136
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,387
Thanks: 579
Thanked 1,111 Times in 758 Posts
Default

Some people are willing to risk everything and start a business. Some people are willing to work from dawn to dusk while others don't work one minute extra. Some people stay awake at night making sure they have enough business to keep their employees who depend on them while others just show up for work (if they do) You think they should all get the same money? Robert Reich is full of crap.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to tis For This Useful Post:
ApS (05-15-2021), Charlie T (05-14-2021), Seaplane Pilot (05-14-2021), Shreddy (05-21-2021), SPT13 (05-14-2021), Sue Doe-Nym (05-14-2021), Top-Water (05-14-2021)
Old 05-14-2021, 08:48 AM   #137
Biggd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Waltham Ma./Meredith NH
Posts: 3,090
Thanks: 1,431
Thanked 895 Times in 560 Posts
Default

I don't think anyone is saying they should all make the same amount of money but we keep asking on here "why are we paying people more money not to work than to go to work"?
Maybe the answer is to pay people that want to work more money.
Biggd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2021, 09:22 AM   #138
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,275
Thanks: 1,069
Thanked 1,378 Times in 826 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tis View Post
Some people are willing to risk everything and start a business. Some people are willing to work from dawn to dusk while others don't work one minute extra. Some people stay awake at night making sure they have enough business to keep their employees who depend on them while others just show up for work (if they do) You think they should all get the same money? Robert Reich is full of crap.
Nobody's saying all people should make the same—that's you further justifying the system and skewing the discussion.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to thinkxingu For This Useful Post:
Biggd (05-14-2021)
Old 05-15-2021, 06:36 AM   #139
jeffk
Senior Member
 
jeffk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Center Harbor
Posts: 996
Thanks: 181
Thanked 325 Times in 186 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
You just spent a few pages on justifying what I'm suggesting is a problem—essentially criticizing the low people on the totem and praising the high.

Unions exist BECAUSE owners weren't/aren't doing the right thing. My father lost a finger to a machine that he had told management to add safety gear to years earlier. Once OSHA moved in, guess which machine got a safety apparatus?

In the first decade I was a teacher, the highest raise was 1%. One contract had 0, 0, 1/2% raises, and those were WITH a union. Can you imagine what the district would've asked us to do/take without one?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
Unions HAD a great purpose when they started. Conditions were bad and wages abusive. For the most part, that is no longer true. Most issues unions were created to address have been enshrined in law and federal and state watchdogs such as OSHA. Beyond that, most businessmen are MUCH more enlightened about employees and the relationship between good working conditions and productivity. To build the best, most profitable company, you need skilled and happy employees with an excellent work ethic.

You mention a contract with 0, 0, 1/2% raises and bemoan the small size of the increases. I would ask what individual employees did to EARN such increases? Show up? Keep breathing? What standards were in place to evaluate their efforts to justify their pay increases? Nothing! Because the best to the worst teacher got the same raises, per the contract. Sure, they might have had a yearly "evaluation" but it was mostly meaningless because nothing was tied to the outcome. Such raises are inflationary by their nature.

When the companies I worked for did evaluations they were measured against a uniform scale of expectations based on their current position. For example, new, recent grad employees were not expected to show much leadership skills. Their entry jobs did not give them much chance to do so. All employees ended up in various positions on a "ladder", the best at the top. Junior employees could be high on the ladder if they exceeded expectations for their job. All employees had full access to the evaluation form and it was made clear in the evaluation what areas might be substandard and what areas were room for growth. Growth opportunities were presented during the next year.

If slow times hit, the worst performing employees, the lowest on the ladder, were laid off, not the least senior as in many contract jobs. The most productive people were retained.

In summary, efforts were rewarded. Benefits were generous. There was no union to push the issue. In current times, skilled and focused workers are paid more and generally treated well. Skilled employees could easily change companies and the management knew it and respected it. I have no problem with unions protecting those in unfair situations but their focus on raises for all, no matter what, is not healthy. They should be focused on helping their workers build the best skills for their job and then making sure the employer has fair and uniform evaluations, a competitive wage scale for their industry, and fair working conditions.

I am NOT criticizing the "low people" on the totem pole. I am pointing out that THEY have the responsibility to improve their condition and raise their pay by working hard, learning new skills, showing initiative, and having a good work ethic. The company has the responsibility to recognize and reward such efforts that make the company stronger and more profitable. If the company does not, well, the skills the employee has mastered are portable to a new job. Unions COULD enhance the process but, IMO, as they currently act, they mostly do not.
jeffk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to jeffk For This Useful Post:
ApS (05-15-2021), Charlie T (05-15-2021), Descant (05-15-2021)
Old 05-15-2021, 07:53 AM   #140
gillygirl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 612
Thanks: 677
Thanked 262 Times in 168 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffk View Post
Unions HAD a great purpose when they started. Conditions were bad and wages abusive. For the most part, that is no longer true. Most issues unions were created to address have been enshrined in law and federal and state watchdogs such as OSHA. Beyond that, most businessmen are MUCH more enlightened about employees and the relationship between good working conditions and productivity. To build the best, most profitable company, you need skilled and happy employees with an excellent work ethic.

You mention a contract with 0, 0, 1/2% raises and bemoan the small size of the increases. I would ask what individual employees did to EARN such increases? Show up? Keep breathing? What standards were in place to evaluate their efforts to justify their pay increases? Nothing! Because the best to the worst teacher got the same raises, per the contract. Sure, they might have had a yearly "evaluation" but it was mostly meaningless because nothing was tied to the outcome. Such raises are inflationary by their nature.

When the companies I worked for did evaluations they were measured against a uniform scale of expectations based on their current position. For example, new, recent grad employees were not expected to show much leadership skills. Their entry jobs did not give them much chance to do so. All employees ended up in various positions on a "ladder", the best at the top. Junior employees could be high on the ladder if they exceeded expectations for their job. All employees had full access to the evaluation form and it was made clear in the evaluation what areas might be substandard and what areas were room for growth. Growth opportunities were presented during the next year.

If slow times hit, the worst performing employees, the lowest on the ladder, were laid off, not the least senior as in many contract jobs. The most productive people were retained.

In summary, efforts were rewarded. Benefits were generous. There was no union to push the issue. In current times, skilled and focused workers are paid more and generally treated well. Skilled employees could easily change companies and the management knew it and respected it. I have no problem with unions protecting those in unfair situations but their focus on raises for all, no matter what, is not healthy. They should be focused on helping their workers build the best skills for their job and then making sure the employer has fair and uniform evaluations, a competitive wage scale for their industry, and fair working conditions.

I am NOT criticizing the "low people" on the totem pole. I am pointing out that THEY have the responsibility to improve their condition and raise their pay by working hard, learning new skills, showing initiative, and having a good work ethic. The company has the responsibility to recognize and reward such efforts that make the company stronger and more profitable. If the company does not, well, the skills the employee has mastered are portable to a new job. Unions COULD enhance the process but, IMO, as they currently act, they mostly do not.
Well, laddering isn’t the be all, end all either. I worked at a place where the laddering was done, not by merit, but by favoritism. I watched my place on the ladder (which was not told to employees unless they went to HR) change based on which projects or group leaders were favored. For several years, I was laddered against my group leader’s sister-in-law. Had absolutely nothing to do with my job performance.


Sent from my iPad using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
__________________
GG
gillygirl is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to gillygirl For This Useful Post:
Biggd (05-15-2021), TheRoBoat (05-15-2021), WinnisquamZ (05-15-2021)
Old 05-15-2021, 10:55 AM   #141
LoveLakeLife
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 165
Thanks: 39
Thanked 69 Times in 39 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggd View Post
Only one reason, GREED.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
Greed is good. Greed is right. Greed works. . . .


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
LoveLakeLife is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to LoveLakeLife For This Useful Post:
ApS (05-15-2021), subaruliving (05-16-2021)
Old 05-15-2021, 11:14 AM   #142
Descant
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Merrimack and Welch Island
Posts: 2,805
Thanks: 809
Thanked 1,044 Times in 651 Posts
Default 0, 0, 1/2%

0, 0, 1/2%. I'm not clear when that was, but I do reacll a time in the 8's when things were bad all over and the local teachers union agreed to no pay raises. Things were tough all over and it was appreciated by the taxpayers. This is quite unlike the bad press the national unions are getting today. Two things in the background. The likelihood was that there would have been many layoffs had the payroll budget not been held steady. The other is that many public employee contracts include step increase just because you've been on the job another year.
Descant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2021, 11:39 AM   #143
Biggd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Waltham Ma./Meredith NH
Posts: 3,090
Thanks: 1,431
Thanked 895 Times in 560 Posts
Default

I expected nothing less from you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoveLakeLife View Post
Greed is good. Greed is right. Greed works. . . .


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
Biggd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2021, 06:15 PM   #144
TheTimeTraveler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 534
Thanks: 165
Thanked 170 Times in 95 Posts
Default Good News for the Restaurants (& others) in New Hampshire

Gov. Sununu has just signed an order that stops the Federal unemployment premium as of June 19th. State unemployment will STILL exist.

This may mean that some of these folks may have an incentive to return to work and help out the many New Hampshire businesses who are starving for employees.

Good news and let's hope it helps out!
TheTimeTraveler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2021, 06:22 PM   #145
joey2665
Senior Member
 
joey2665's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 2,937
Thanks: 913
Thanked 864 Times in 567 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheTimeTraveler View Post
Gov. Sununu has just signed an order that stops the Federal unemployment premium as of June 19th. State unemployment will STILL exist.

This may mean that some of these folks may have an incentive to return to work and help out the many New Hampshire businesses who are starving for employees.

Good news and let's hope it helps out!
If you come off unemployment for 8 consecutive weeks you can receive a 500 employment bonus for part time and 1000 for full time employment

Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
joey2665 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to joey2665 For This Useful Post:
ApS (05-19-2021)
Old 05-18-2021, 10:17 PM   #146
Descant
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Merrimack and Welch Island
Posts: 2,805
Thanks: 809
Thanked 1,044 Times in 651 Posts
Default

Bravo Gov. Sununu
Descant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2021, 06:33 AM   #147
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Winnipesaukee & Florida
Posts: 5,245
Thanks: 1,568
Thanked 622 Times in 445 Posts
Arrow Twenty-Nine States To Maintain Couch-Careers...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Descant View Post
Bravo Gov. Sununu
Twenty-one states involved:

https://www-forbes-com.cdn.ampprojec...nt-benefits%2F
ApS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2021, 09:25 AM   #148
LoveLakeLife
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 165
Thanks: 39
Thanked 69 Times in 39 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggd View Post
I expected nothing less from you.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app


haha I’m glad to have met your expectations. Before I posted, I was thinking “I hope I can meet Biggd’s expectations with this. I’d be crushed if I were to fall short. After all, his approval is my goal.”

Memorial Day is almost here. Everyone enjoy the lake and have fun.


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
LoveLakeLife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2021, 01:34 AM   #149
mswlogo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 339
Thanks: 122
Thanked 141 Times in 86 Posts
Default

Interesting interview with owners of Hart’s Turkey Farm regarding labor shortages


https://www.nhpr.org/post/nh-restaur...hange#stream/0
mswlogo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2021, 05:21 AM   #150
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,275
Thanks: 1,069
Thanked 1,378 Times in 826 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mswlogo View Post
Interesting interview with owners of Hart’s Turkey Farm regarding labor shortages


https://www.nhpr.org/post/nh-restaur...hange#stream/0
I addressed much of what the article suggests in post #108, followed up with studies that show no/little correlation between supplemental unemployment and returning to work.

One thing this article adds is the foreign worker situation—they mention Covid limitations, but Trump's policies began the process.

I'm interested to see what this summer will be like in terms of dining out. Perhaps my Ramseyan beans and rice, rice and beans combined with the need to keep my suburban dad bod in check has come at the right time!

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2021, 08:04 AM   #151
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,387
Thanks: 579
Thanked 1,111 Times in 758 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
I addressed much of what the article suggests in post #108, followed up with studies that show no/little correlation between supplemental unemployment and returning to work.

One thing this article adds is the foreign worker situation—they mention Covid limitations, but Trump's policies began the process.

I'm interested to see what this summer will be like in terms of dining out. Perhaps my Ramseyan beans and rice, rice and beans combined with the need to keep my suburban dad bod in check has come at the right time!

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
Think, I hate to disagree but I do. I am sure you don't believe every study you read. There is no question if some, and I do say SOME people, can be paid not to work they will take advantage of it. Some have pride and would not take tax money unless it was absolutely necessary but others have no problem with it.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2021, 08:11 AM   #152
steve-on-mark
Senior Member
 
steve-on-mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Epping, NH / Mark Island
Posts: 776
Thanks: 55
Thanked 380 Times in 192 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoveLakeLife View Post
haha I’m glad to have met your expectations. Before I posted, I was thinking “I hope I can meet Biggd’s expectations with this. I’d be crushed if I were to fall short. After all, his approval is my goal.”

Memorial Day is almost here. Everyone enjoy the lake and have fun.


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
There's meeting, then there's exceeding ...something to aspire to??

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
steve-on-mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2021, 08:26 AM   #153
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,275
Thanks: 1,069
Thanked 1,378 Times in 826 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tis View Post
Think, I hate to disagree but I do. I am sure you don't believe every study you read. There is no question if some, and I do say SOME people, can be paid not to work they will take advantage of it. Some have pride and would not take tax money unless it was absolutely necessary but others have no problem with it.
You can disagree all you want, but multiple studies have shown a much lower correlation between supplemental unemployment and returning to work than most would want the narrative to be. Multiple studies, not your or others' gut feelings.

Those studies show that it exists—and we'd be obtuse not to believe so given that *some* of the anecdotal stories are real—but not nearly at a level commensurate with the political narrative.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to thinkxingu For This Useful Post:
Heaven (05-21-2021)
Old 05-21-2021, 08:39 AM   #154
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,387
Thanks: 579
Thanked 1,111 Times in 758 Posts
Default

If that's true, how do you explain the millions of people in this country who are able bodied but make a career of collecting unemployment?
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2021, 08:54 AM   #155
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,275
Thanks: 1,069
Thanked 1,378 Times in 826 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tis View Post
If that's true, how do you explain the millions of people in this country who are able bodied but make a career of collecting unemployment?
You are talking about two different things here: people who "make a career of collecting unemployment" and people not returning to employment because of the supplemental unemployment benefits.

There have, and will always be, some of the former—that's not what we're discussing. It's the narrative that people aren't returning to work because they're "making more on unemployment" that has been shown (through studies and data) to be inaccurate.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2021, 09:32 AM   #156
phoenix
Senior Member
 
phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: phoenix and moultonboro
Posts: 1,246
Thanks: 22
Thanked 166 Times in 125 Posts
Default

maybe you could provide the links to these numerous studies so that we all can be enlightened
__________________
it's tough to make predictions specially about the future
phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to phoenix For This Useful Post:
Outdoorsman (05-21-2021)
Old 05-21-2021, 09:45 AM   #157
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,275
Thanks: 1,069
Thanked 1,378 Times in 826 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenix View Post
maybe you could provide the links to these numerous studies so that we all can be enlightened
I mean, other than the ones I already posted above?

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/04/rese...g-to-work.html

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/ma...it-11613075086

https://www.frbsf.org/economic-resea...scourage-work/

https://econofact.org/have-enhanced-...scouraged-work

https://www.wsj.com/articles/is-600-...rk-11596015000

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to thinkxingu For This Useful Post:
Heaven (05-21-2021)
Old 05-21-2021, 09:48 AM   #158
Seaplane Pilot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,058
Thanks: 503
Thanked 799 Times in 299 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
I mean, other than the ones I already posted above?

Google is your friend: https://www.google.com/search?q=corr...obile&ie=UTF-8

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
What’s that I keep hearing about??? Oh yeah, “Confirmation Bias”! It’s clear that “Couch Careers” are alive and well. No BS studies will convince me otherwise.
Seaplane Pilot is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Seaplane Pilot For This Useful Post:
Charlie T (05-21-2021), subaruliving (05-31-2021), tis (05-21-2021)
Old 05-21-2021, 09:53 AM   #159
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,275
Thanks: 1,069
Thanked 1,378 Times in 826 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaplane Pilot View Post
What’s that I keep hearing about??? Oh yeah, “Confirmation Bias”! It’s clear that “Couch Careers” are alive and well. No BS studies will convince me otherwise.
Coming from the guy who posted a clearly debunked article that literally flew in the face of EVERY scientific publication at the time and then was redacted everywhere?

A "study" literally picked up by an education program to teach how to spot false information?

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahaha!!!

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2021, 10:03 AM   #160
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,275
Thanks: 1,069
Thanked 1,378 Times in 826 Posts
Default

A line from one of those articles above sums up this discussion (paraphrased): the system of people returning to work or not in relation to supplemental unemployment is much more nuanced than the current narrative that people simply aren't returning to work because they can make more on unemployment.

In my original post, above, I referred to a few of the other variables NPR and others have added to the nuance.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2021, 10:25 AM   #161
phoenix
Senior Member
 
phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: phoenix and moultonboro
Posts: 1,246
Thanks: 22
Thanked 166 Times in 125 Posts
Default

well i guess we will get a good example soon as 21 states will eliminate the added benefit and offer a substantial bonus if they go back to work including NH
__________________
it's tough to make predictions specially about the future
phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to phoenix For This Useful Post:
tis (05-21-2021)
Old 05-21-2021, 11:03 AM   #162
Seaplane Pilot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,058
Thanks: 503
Thanked 799 Times in 299 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
Coming from the guy who posted a clearly debunked article that literally flew in the face of EVERY scientific publication at the time and then was redacted everywhere?

A "study" literally picked up by an education program to teach how to spot false information?

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahaha!!!

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
I see now….Whatever I reference constitutes “Confirmation Bias”, but whatever you post (including information from that left-wing cesspool called NPR) is not “Confirmation Bias”.
Seaplane Pilot is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Seaplane Pilot For This Useful Post:
DEJ (05-21-2021), subaruliving (05-31-2021), Top-Water (05-21-2021)
Old 05-21-2021, 11:33 AM   #163
gillygirl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 612
Thanks: 677
Thanked 262 Times in 168 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaplane Pilot View Post
I see now….Whatever I reference constitutes “Confirmation Bias”, but whatever you post (including information from that left-wing cesspool called NPR) is not “Confirmation Bias”.


NPR is rated with a left-center bias which provides highly factual information...hardly a cesspool in comparison to the source you provided.


Sent from my iPad using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
__________________
GG
gillygirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2021, 12:14 PM   #164
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,275
Thanks: 1,069
Thanked 1,378 Times in 826 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gillygirl View Post
NPR is rated with a left-center bias which provides highly factual information...hardly a cesspool in comparison to the source you provided.


Sent from my iPad using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
Agreed and, of course, there were more sources there than just NPR.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to thinkxingu For This Useful Post:
ApS (05-21-2021)
Old 05-21-2021, 12:41 PM   #165
Sue Doe-Nym
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,117
Thanks: 585
Thanked 603 Times in 299 Posts
Default Holiday today?

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
Agreed and, of course, there were more sources there than just NPR.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
Think.....today must be a day off for you because of the number of your posts on this thread. If not, what are your students up to?
Sue Doe-Nym is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sue Doe-Nym For This Useful Post:
Top-Water (05-21-2021)
Old 05-21-2021, 12:59 PM   #166
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,275
Thanks: 1,069
Thanked 1,378 Times in 826 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sue Doe-Nym View Post
Think.....today must be a day off for you because of the number of your posts on this thread. If not, what are your students up to?
Ok, so today is "senior skip day," and I've had one student all day (I teach all seniors, and they finish next week).

Interestingly, I used this thread when talking to that one student. His claim—accurately, I think—is that the current political polarization in America drives us to seek sides with our tribes rather than shared experiences and nuance.

He added that he'd recently come across an economics study that showed the correlation between unemployment wage percentages and the speed at which people return to jobs as a relationship between the job they are returning to, both in terms of pay AND emotional fulfillment. Specifically, that people who make great wages and enjoy their jobs will return EVEN IF they can "make more" with supplemental unemployment.

We finished the discussion with an appreciation of nuance and lamentation of its loss.

Good times!

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to thinkxingu For This Useful Post:
Heaven (05-21-2021)
Old 05-21-2021, 01:28 PM   #167
Sue Doe-Nym
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,117
Thanks: 585
Thanked 603 Times in 299 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
Ok, so today is "senior skip day," and I've had one student all day (I teach all seniors, and they finish next week).

Interestingly, I used this thread when talking to that one student. His claim—accurately, I think—is that the current political polarization in America drives us to seek sides with our tribes rather than shared experiences and nuance.

He added that he'd recently come across an economics study that showed the correlation between unemployment wage percentages and the speed at which people return to jobs as a relationship between the job they are returning to, both in terms of pay AND emotional fulfillment. Specifically, that people who make great wages and enjoy their jobs will return EVEN IF they can "make more" with supplemental unemployment.

We finished the discussion with an appreciation of nuance and lamentation of its loss.

Good times!

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
That’s fine, as far as it goes. It makes sense that people who are well paid and experience emotional fulfillment will return to their jobs. It is also possible that those who do not experience the same positive feelings toward their jobs might, but should not, opt to collect unemployment benefits for as long as they can. Now here is when the argument loses steam, at least for me: it should not be the taxpayers’ responsibility to supplement the incomes of people who CAN work but who choose not to because they can get paid for sitting on their derrières. Nobody can convince me that doing so is proper.
Sue Doe-Nym is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Sue Doe-Nym For This Useful Post:
ApS (05-21-2021), Charlie T (05-21-2021), jeffk (05-22-2021), tis (05-21-2021), Top-Water (05-21-2021)
Old 05-21-2021, 03:02 PM   #168
phoenix
Senior Member
 
phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: phoenix and moultonboro
Posts: 1,246
Thanks: 22
Thanked 166 Times in 125 Posts
Default

agree and not when there are 8.1M jobs available. most of those studies that were referenced were when most businesses were shut down in 2020 and there were far fewer jobs available. at least the hospitality business.
__________________
it's tough to make predictions specially about the future
phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2021, 03:06 PM   #169
mofn
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

A couple of thoughts not being addressed on the subject:
1) Towns in the lakes region have small year round population. Today the
family unit is 0 - 1.27654897 kids. Not when I grew up, I knew of X families w/ 7-8 kids. Local shortage right there.

2) Summer help from "away" teenagers or college students. If both can not use parents/grandparents place cost of housing is now a nonstarter from the get go.

3) The no.2's above, some posters have stated the difference in pay N.H. to Mass...ok. But by staying at home and working... your w/ friends, no food bill, mom does laundry, and someone has put a plate of leftovers in the reefer for you. What is that worth per week to this age group?
Plus do whole families still spend all summer now at the lake as in the past?
If you say no, then work pool is smaller than the past.

4) As for owners looking for help, the 1st principle of capitalism, you have to spend money to make money. You go cheap on proven qualified help you do so at your own risk!
mofn is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mofn For This Useful Post:
Heaven (05-21-2021)
Old 05-21-2021, 03:18 PM   #170
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 759
Thanked 586 Times in 353 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaplane Pilot View Post
What’s that I keep hearing about??? Oh yeah, “Confirmation Bias”! It’s clear that “Couch Careers” are alive and well. No BS studies will convince me otherwise.
It's nihilistic (and also unfair) to respond to half a dozen citations with nothing other than "it's clear...no studies will convince me...".

You should post some real studies with real data from real researchers. Otherwise, it's just BS
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2021, 06:02 PM   #171
Outdoorsman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 783
Thanks: 95
Thanked 191 Times in 123 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
Ok, so today is "senior skip day," and I've had one student all day (I teach all seniors, and they finish next week).

Interestingly, I used this thread when talking to that one student
Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
Senior Skip Day?
My god these kids have been out of school for MONTHS! Why a "Skip day"?
Outdoorsman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Outdoorsman For This Useful Post:
Sue Doe-Nym (05-22-2021)
Old 05-21-2021, 10:56 PM   #172
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Winnipesaukee & Florida
Posts: 5,245
Thanks: 1,568
Thanked 622 Times in 445 Posts
Unhappy Who Controls The Past, Controls the Future...Who Controls the Present, Controls the

Past...

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingScot View Post
It's nihilistic (and also unfair) to respond to half a dozen citations with nothing other than "it's clear...no studies will convince me...".

You should post some real studies with real data from real researchers. Otherwise, it's just BS
"Studies" from Universities slavish to grants? From Facebook, Wikipedia, Twitter, and Google, which practice "Cancel-Culture"? "Shadow-Banning"?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gillygirl View Post
NPR is rated with a left-center bias which provides highly factual information...hardly a cesspool in comparison to the source you provided.
"Rated left-center bias=highly factual information".

It is to laugh!

"Left-center" bias is strong. Not unlike "Full-Leftist" bias, NPR won't advise you of Tony Bobulinski and a certain laptop. 'Shame that I am forced to help pay for NPR's "facts" and "highly factual information".
https://art19.com/shows/the-dershow/...a-9a3c592868b5
ApS is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ApS For This Useful Post:
Seaplane Pilot (05-22-2021), subaruliving (05-30-2021)
Old 05-22-2021, 01:01 AM   #173
mswlogo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 339
Thanks: 122
Thanked 141 Times in 86 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tis View Post
Think, I hate to disagree but I do. I am sure you don't believe every study you read. There is no question if some, and I do say SOME people, can be paid not to work they will take advantage of it. Some have pride and would not take tax money unless it was absolutely necessary but others have no problem with it.
I suspect it has some impact too. But I think the shortage is a combination of a lot of things as discussed by the owners of Hart’s. Crack down on immigration, attractive unemployment, nervousness still to COVID, and reassessment of life, career, school etc.

Like for example some schools didn’t let the kids go hone for spring break because that just added exposure to the schools. There might be incentives to stay on campus at some colleges for the summer.

As far as nervousness goes, we are NOT out of the woods yet until India is solved. COVID could mutate (if it hasn’t already) and the whole thing could happen all over again in a few months. All countries need to step up and help India in any way they can.

Also the dopes that won’t get vaccinated in the USA puts things at risk too.

So a lot of the population knows that it’s still potentially risky working in public and can afford to stay self locked down until it’s really over.

Another good point made in the link was cost of housing. The owners already subsidized rent BEFORE COVID hit. And we all know how sky high property is getting around the lakes. It wasn’t all college kids filling these jobs. But the ones that are not college bound can’t afford to like in the area.

Last edited by mswlogo; 05-22-2021 at 08:34 AM.
mswlogo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2021, 08:03 AM   #174
gillygirl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 612
Thanks: 677
Thanked 262 Times in 168 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ApS View Post
Past...

"Studies" from Universities slavish to grants? From Facebook, Wikipedia, Twitter, and Google, which practice "Cancel-Culture"? "Shadow-Banning"?

"Rated left-center bias=highly factual information".

It is to laugh!

"Left-center" bias is strong. Not unlike "Full-Leftist" bias, NPR won't advise you of Tony Bobulinski and a certain laptop. 'Shame that I am forced to help pay for NPR's "facts" and "highly factual information".

https://art19.com/shows/the-dershow/...a-9a3c592868b5
Your response is Dershowitz and Carlson? Bwaaahaaahaaahaaa! Thanks for the laugh.


Sent from my iPad using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
__________________
GG
gillygirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2021, 08:08 AM   #175
Seaplane Pilot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,058
Thanks: 503
Thanked 799 Times in 299 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingScot View Post
It's nihilistic (and also unfair) to respond to half a dozen citations with nothing other than "it's clear...no studies will convince me...".

You should post some real studies with real data from real researchers. Otherwise, it's just BS
And I also believe the earth is flat….
Seaplane Pilot is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Seaplane Pilot For This Useful Post:
subaruliving (05-30-2021)
Old 05-22-2021, 07:10 PM   #176
Heaven
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 460
Thanks: 94
Thanked 87 Times in 61 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ApS View Post
Past...


"Studies" from Universities slavish to grants? From Facebook, Wikipedia, Twitter, and Google, which practice "Cancel-Culture"? "Shadow-Banning"?


"Rated left-center bias=highly factual information".

It is to laugh!

"Left-center" bias is strong. Not unlike "Full-Leftist" bias, NPR won't advise you of Tony Bobulinski and a certain laptop. 'Shame that I am forced to help pay for NPR's "facts" and "highly factual information".
https://art19.com/shows/the-dershow/...a-9a3c592868b5
Well I listened to the link you provided to the Dershow, because I generally think he is an intelligent guy, but I had to quit when he referred to the Tucker Carlton guest as "the witness". Now, maybe it was a slip of the tongue, or maybe it was a mindset. But he just blew up his credibility on this issue.
Heaven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2021, 08:56 PM   #177
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Winnipesaukee & Florida
Posts: 5,245
Thanks: 1,568
Thanked 622 Times in 445 Posts
Cool Class Dismissed...

Quote:
Originally Posted by gillygirl View Post
Your response is Dershowitz and Carlson? Bwaaahaaahaaahaaa! Thanks for the laugh.
It was not my intent to demonstrate "Confirmation-Bias", but thanks for doing so.
ApS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2021, 04:06 PM   #178
phoenix
Senior Member
 
phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: phoenix and moultonboro
Posts: 1,246
Thanks: 22
Thanked 166 Times in 125 Posts
Default

the town of Moultonboro has posted summer openings for things like cemetery mowing . I Will be interested if they get any bites as this is outdoors
__________________
it's tough to make predictions specially about the future
phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2021, 04:24 PM   #179
VitaBene
Senior Member
 
VitaBene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 3,353
Thanks: 1,455
Thanked 1,540 Times in 772 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenix View Post
the town of Moultonboro has posted summer openings for things like cemetery mowing . I Will be interested if they get any bites as this is outdoors
They will also be posting (if they have not already) two FT office positions.
VitaBene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2021, 07:27 PM   #180
gillygirl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 612
Thanks: 677
Thanked 262 Times in 168 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ApS View Post
It was not my intent to demonstrate "Confirmation-Bias", but thanks for doing so.
Not really. My sources are news organizations, not talking heads who are pandering to their base. Nice try though.


Sent from my iPad using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
__________________
GG
gillygirl is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gillygirl For This Useful Post:
ApS (05-25-2021)
Old 05-25-2021, 02:39 AM   #181
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Winnipesaukee & Florida
Posts: 5,245
Thanks: 1,568
Thanked 622 Times in 445 Posts
Arrow Wikipedia: Personalize = Assign Someone's Name to It...

Quote:
Originally Posted by gillygirl View Post
Not really. My sources are news organizations, not talking heads who are pandering to their base. Nice try though.
It was not my intent to illuminate the "personalize and polarize" portion of Rule #13, but thanks for doing so.
ApS is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ApS For This Useful Post:
subaruliving (05-30-2021)
Old 05-29-2021, 11:35 AM   #182
CatLady
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 6
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Housing

It is affordable work force housing that keeps more young people from working in our tourist industry. Where will they live that is anywhere near these jobs? How will they find any childcare, much less afford it, to be anywhere near work? It is not "lazy" young people; there are plenty of willing people to work, and there will always be those who will avoid work.
CatLady is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CatLady For This Useful Post:
Heaven (05-29-2021)
Old 05-29-2021, 11:38 AM   #183
CatLady
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 6
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Tradition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Outdoorsman View Post
Senior Skip Day?
My god these kids have been out of school for MONTHS! Why a "Skip day"?
Probably tradition, which these kids have had very little of for the last two years; A little rebellion as they go out into the world.
CatLady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2021, 12:22 PM   #184
CK5 Truck
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 14
Thanks: 8
Thanked 22 Times in 7 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggd View Post
I don't think anyone is saying they should all make the same amount of money but we keep asking on here "why are we paying people more money not to work than to go to work"?
Maybe the answer is to pay people that want to work more money.
Maybe the answer is to not pay people who dont want to work ANYTHING! Starvation and having their smartphone shut off for non payment might be just the motivation to get their lazy asses off the couch!
CK5 Truck is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to CK5 Truck For This Useful Post:
ApS (05-29-2021), subaruliving (05-30-2021), Top-Water (05-29-2021)
Old 05-29-2021, 12:29 PM   #185
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,275
Thanks: 1,069
Thanked 1,378 Times in 826 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Outdoorsman View Post
Senior Skip Day?
My god these kids have been out of school for MONTHS! Why a "Skip day"?
My students may not have been in the building full-time all year, but they certainly worked hard. In fact, in easily the most challenging year of my 16 years (so far), we only missed one unit of my curriculum. I was very pleased with this year's classes, so, yes, a skip day to hang out with schoolmates after most were vaccinated was perfect.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2021, 02:40 PM   #186
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 759
Thanked 586 Times in 353 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CatLady View Post
It is affordable work force housing that keeps more young people from working in our tourist industry. Where will they live that is anywhere near these jobs? How will they find any childcare, much less afford it, to be anywhere near work? It is not "lazy" young people; there are plenty of willing people to work, and there will always be those who will avoid work.
Exactly. The only housing available is people who own housing full time or have parents who own. Almost impossible to hire a kid from out of the area for a summer job. So with a small full time population, and a huge summer influx of labor demand...
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlyingScot For This Useful Post:
Heaven (05-29-2021)
Old 05-29-2021, 05:37 PM   #187
Biggd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Waltham Ma./Meredith NH
Posts: 3,090
Thanks: 1,431
Thanked 895 Times in 560 Posts
Default

You sound like a painter, one who paints everyone with the same brush.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CK5 Truck View Post
Maybe the answer is to not pay people who dont want to work ANYTHING! Starvation and having their smartphone shut off for non payment might be just the motivation to get their lazy asses off the couch!
Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
Biggd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2021, 05:55 PM   #188
CK5 Truck
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 14
Thanks: 8
Thanked 22 Times in 7 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingScot View Post
This is a great story, and I'm sure your daughter is terrific. But she is not working for minimum wage, she's working for minimum wage plus tips.

The minimum wage rules do not apply to people who earn tips. So when we're talking about the minimum wage going to $10/hour, we're talking about folks who work as untipped employees, such as cooks and dishwashers.

As I'm sure some of our restaurant pros have seen, waiters and waitresses have done pretty well over the years with income. Every time the price of meals goes up, their tips go up. But kitchen staff, who do not earn tips, have seen their earning power decline.
Point is make yourself more valuable, no matter what the position, no matter what the job. Im sure there are plenty of people in the waitstaff position that make minimum tips. People that walk in off the street with zero experience and a chip on their shoulders because they dont get offered a 6 figure salary are dillusional and a product of the "everyone deserves a trophy" generation...its the parents and in some cases lack of parenting that have caused these issues...prove me wrong...
CK5 Truck is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CK5 Truck For This Useful Post:
subaruliving (05-30-2021), Top-Water (05-29-2021)
Old 05-29-2021, 06:44 PM   #189
Biggd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Waltham Ma./Meredith NH
Posts: 3,090
Thanks: 1,431
Thanked 895 Times in 560 Posts
Default

Like I said, you paint everyone with the same brush. I'm 67 and I know many good parents that didn't coddle their kids. Some came out well rounded and some didn't so it's not anything the parents did wrong. You keep patting yourself on the back for being the perfect parent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CK5 Truck View Post
Point is make yourself more valuable, no matter what the position, no matter what the job. Im sure there are plenty of people in the waitstaff position that make minimum tips. People that walk in off the street with zero experience and a chip on their shoulders because they dont get offered a 6 figure salary are dillusional and a product of the "everyone deserves a trophy" generation...its the parents and in some cases lack of parenting that have caused these issues...prove me wrong...
Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
Biggd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2021, 07:18 PM   #190
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,275
Thanks: 1,069
Thanked 1,378 Times in 826 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggd View Post
Like I said, you paint everyone with the same brush. I'm 67 and I know many good parents that didn't coddle their kids. Some came out well rounded and some didn't so it's not anything the parents did wrong. You keep patting yourself on the back for being the perfect parent.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
Agreed. My 11-year-old spent most of today raking and weed whacking another site here at camp and almost every senior I teach comes in Monday AM with the lamest weekend stories because they all worked them away.

Like people not returning to work because they can "make more on unemployment," there are some lazy kids, but not nearly as many as the narrative.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2021, 08:49 AM   #191
phoenix
Senior Member
 
phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: phoenix and moultonboro
Posts: 1,246
Thanks: 22
Thanked 166 Times in 125 Posts
Default

interesting article in the Journal today. Northern New England ( Ver/ NH and Maine) has 3.6 job openings for every 1 job seeker.
__________________
it's tough to make predictions specially about the future
phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.98638 seconds