Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > Home, Cottage or Land Maintenance
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Calendar Register FAQDonate Members List Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-01-2017, 09:17 AM   #1
bigdog
Senior Member
 
bigdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Central MA-Gilford
Posts: 1,410
Thanks: 307
Thanked 117 Times in 94 Posts
Default Oil vs. Propane Heat ?

Oil vs. Propane Heat for heating house.

I plan to move out of my townhouse condo and purchasing a residential home in the Lakes Region..... (keeping Townhouse for income).

I would like to know the benefits and disadvantages between the two.
Costs ? Maintenance ? Efficiency ?

Thanks,
Bigdog
bigdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2017, 09:35 AM   #2
BroadHopper
Senior Member
 
BroadHopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Laconia NH
Posts: 5,512
Thanks: 3,116
Thanked 1,090 Times in 784 Posts
Default Heating Prices

Below is current price comparison between heating fuels in NH

http://www.nh.gov/oep/energy/energy-...ices/index.htm

If you can get natural gas, by all means use it! I have a condo heated with natural gas with the latest condensing boiler technology. I also replace my 60 gallon gas water heater with on demand. I save 30% on heating fuel from conventional to condensing technology, 70% from tank to on demand!

Propane may be twice the price of oil per mmbtu, maintenance is a lot less and if you have an electric hot water heater, the conversion to gas on demand will save you a lot of money.

Since the conversion my gas bill never went over $90 a month. Before my bill average $130 during the winter months.

The condo was built in 1977 and is about 1200 sg feet. baseboard heated.
__________________
Someday may never be an actual day.
BroadHopper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2017, 09:36 AM   #3
8gv
Senior Member
 
8gv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,009
Thanks: 61
Thanked 701 Times in 455 Posts
Default

There exists on the web, a chart that compares the cost of heating by various fuels using a common unit of heat output. It might be BTU's or Therms (which could be the same thing).

On that chart propane was the second most expensive, only to be beaten by electric resistance heat.

I have propane, forced hot air with a/c. My house has 2x6 walls and is well insulated having been built to 2010 codes. Coming from an electric heat house, I find it really inexpensive to heat and cool. The propane is negotiated en masse with my neighbors resulting in a really low price per gallon.

I suspect oil would be cheaper to burn but lately I haven't seen oil used in forced hot air systems. Going with a baseboard system means additional ductwork for a/c.

The mini-split systems can get a/c into a house without duct work.

I suggest that you find the chart I have referenced.
8gv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2017, 09:47 AM   #4
8gv
Senior Member
 
8gv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,009
Thanks: 61
Thanked 701 Times in 455 Posts
Default

The chart posted above is similar to the one I referenced in my post.

It is interesting to note that the propane price used for their analysis was

$3.40/gal

This year I paid

$1.48/gal

I suspect that nobody within earshot paid more than $2.50/gal this year.

The date of the analysis is March 2017 so it's current.

If the oil cost per gallon was $2.42 as stated in the chart AND you bought propane at the price I paid, propane beats oil.
8gv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2017, 10:22 AM   #5
SAMIAM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 2,836
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,626 Times in 562 Posts
Default

Paying $.97 for propane through our group so that chart is not accurate
SAMIAM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SAMIAM For This Useful Post:
Reilly (05-01-2017)
Sponsored Links
Old 05-01-2017, 10:42 AM   #6
thebix
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Down since 2009.
Posts: 97
Thanks: 2
Thanked 32 Times in 23 Posts
Default New Hampshire Climate Audit

New Hampshire Climate Audit has a cost compare web page.

http://www.nhclimateaudit.org/calculators.php

One can input their own costs and efficiencies to provide an accurate comparison for your situation.

My own propane group buy rate of 1.47 and a 90% efficient system yields propane cheaper than the tool's basic oil cost. That would change with a good group buy of oil, of course.
thebix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2017, 10:50 AM   #7
Biggd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Waltham Ma./Meredith NH
Posts: 3,749
Thanks: 1,961
Thanked 1,070 Times in 675 Posts
Default

Oil is cheaper. The past few years it's actually been cheaper than burning wood unless you are cutting and splitting it yourself.
Biggd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2017, 02:56 PM   #8
LakeTimes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: NA
Posts: 145
Thanks: 61
Thanked 40 Times in 19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggd View Post
Oil is cheaper. The past few years it's actually been cheaper than burning wood unless you are cutting and splitting it yourself.
Agreed - but then again I always ask myself what's my time worth.

I use propane with Minisplit. Works fantastic. If Natural Gas ever came by, I'd hook up to that in seconds! Also burn wood pellets in the basement, which is great, but not convinced it's cheaper in the long run with cleanings, maintenance etc. Easiest and favorite so far is the propane insert for the fireplace. Would recommend that to anyone!
LakeTimes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2017, 06:12 PM   #9
tummyman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 780
Thanks: 233
Thanked 631 Times in 228 Posts
Smile More calculations.....

One thing you need to consider is the BTU rating of various fuels. #2 oil generates 138,000 BTU's per gallon, propane generates 91,600 BTU's. So all gallons are not equal. You need to consider this in any calculation. efficiencies on oil can range in the 85% range while gas can get into the mid 90's IF you buy a VERY EFFICIENT system. Otherwise, they are in the high 80's/low 90's. You can use the following formula to get the cost per million BTU's for comparison purposes. All costs need to be expressed in cost per million BTU's to make the comparisons equal. For example, 138,000BTU/1,000,000=0.1380..... You need to now plug in the efficiency of the unit and the cost per gallon of the fuel.

Oil (in medium efficiency central heating system)
Heat Cost = $2.30 (price per gallon) ÷ [0.1380 × 0.85 (efficiency)] = $19.61 per million Btu.
Propane (in medium efficiency central heating system)
Heat Cost = $3.14 (price per gallon) ÷ [0.0916 × 0.85 (efficiency)] = $40.33 per million Btu.

One other thing you can include as an extra is the cost of maintenance. Oil needs annual cleaning, cost approx. $125 -$150. For gas, not needed. Both types of systems are mechanical so maintenance for mechanical items can be assumed to be equal. Oil requires a chimney or power vent. Gas, if using a modern condensing boiler, can be vented using regular Schedule 40 PVC directly through wall.

Hope this helps......
tummyman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to tummyman For This Useful Post:
bigdog (05-01-2017)
Old 05-02-2017, 11:16 AM   #10
NH.Solar
Senior Member
 
NH.Solar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Jackson Pond, New Hampton
Posts: 210
Thanks: 37
Thanked 128 Times in 69 Posts
Default

I can't let this thread slide by without chiming in ...why even consider fossil fuel heating when air source heat pumps (ie, "mini-splits") and solar have made them somewhat obsolete?
Installing or replacing a furnace and the periperal circulation systems is generally more expensive than a whole house air pump with individual handlers. Plus the current super efficient breed of air source heat pumps have the ability to heat, AC, and filter your air. Talk to someone that has one!
A matched solar system will provide the power to run a heat pump system and it only takes 5-8 years for the money saved in utility bills and/or fossil fuels to offset the cost of the solar system ...and from that point forward your power and heat will be coming to you virtually for free A solar system is nearly maintenance free and the expected life is generally thought to be fortyish years.
Will your new home eventually be a retirement home? Wouldn't it be a wonderful thing if you didn't have to worry about the cost of hvac and electricity during your golden years?
__________________
Peter
NH Solar
NH.Solar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2017, 11:33 AM   #11
Biggd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Waltham Ma./Meredith NH
Posts: 3,749
Thanks: 1,961
Thanked 1,070 Times in 675 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NH.Solar View Post
I can't let this thread slide by without chiming in ...why even consider fossil fuel heating when air source heat pumps (ie, "mini-splits") and solar have made them somewhat obsolete?
Installing or replacing a furnace and the periperal circulation systems is generally more expensive than a whole house air pump with individual handlers. Plus the current super efficient breed of air source heat pumps have the ability to heat, AC, and filter your air. Talk to someone that has one!
A matched solar system will provide the power to run a heat pump system and it only takes 5-8 years for the money saved in utility bills and/or fossil fuels to offset the cost of the solar system ...and from that point forward your power and heat will be coming to you virtually for free A solar system is nearly maintenance free and the expected life is generally thought to be fortyish years.
Will your new home eventually be a retirement home? Wouldn't it be a wonderful thing if you didn't have to worry about the cost of hvac and electricity during your golden years?
Great sales pitch! I'm a big fan of the new air heat pumps, not so much a fan of solar panels on my roof.
Biggd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2017, 03:02 PM   #12
winlessinnh
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 31
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Propane is much more versital

Propane is cleaner, no odor, can be used for fireplace, hot water, stove, grill, generator, etc. Oil can only be used to heat.
winlessinnh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2017, 03:12 PM   #13
ishoot308
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gilford, NH / Welch Island
Posts: 5,930
Thanks: 2,287
Thanked 4,939 Times in 1,915 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NH.Solar View Post
I can't let this thread slide by without chiming in ...why even consider fossil fuel heating when air source heat pumps (ie, "mini-splits") and solar have made them somewhat obsolete?
Installing or replacing a furnace and the periperal circulation systems is generally more expensive than a whole house air pump with individual handlers. Plus the current super efficient breed of air source heat pumps have the ability to heat, AC, and filter your air. Talk to someone that has one!
A matched solar system will provide the power to run a heat pump system and it only takes 5-8 years for the money saved in utility bills and/or fossil fuels to offset the cost of the solar system ...and from that point forward your power and heat will be coming to you virtually for free A solar system is nearly maintenance free and the expected life is generally thought to be fortyish years.
Will your new home eventually be a retirement home? Wouldn't it be a wonderful thing if you didn't have to worry about the cost of hvac and electricity during your golden years?
I will agree that if I was to build a new home, it definitely would have an air source heat pump like the Mitsubishi for its primary heating...

Dan
__________________
It's Always Sunny On Welch Island!!
ishoot308 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2017, 04:06 PM   #14
ITD
Senior Member
 
ITD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 2,860
Thanks: 461
Thanked 666 Times in 366 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NH.Solar View Post
I can't let this thread slide by without chiming in ...why even consider fossil fuel heating when air source heat pumps (ie, "mini-splits") and solar have made them somewhat obsolete?
Installing or replacing a furnace and the periperal circulation systems is generally more expensive than a whole house air pump with individual handlers. Plus the current super efficient breed of air source heat pumps have the ability to heat, AC, and filter your air. Talk to someone that has one!
A matched solar system will provide the power to run a heat pump system and it only takes 5-8 years for the money saved in utility bills and/or fossil fuels to offset the cost of the solar system ...and from that point forward your power and heat will be coming to you virtually for free A solar system is nearly maintenance free and the expected life is generally thought to be fortyish years.
Will your new home eventually be a retirement home? Wouldn't it be a wonderful thing if you didn't have to worry about the cost of hvac and electricity during your golden years?
I would love to see the supporting numbers for that for say a 3,000 square foot house built to today's code.
ITD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2017, 04:57 PM   #15
BroadHopper
Senior Member
 
BroadHopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Laconia NH
Posts: 5,512
Thanks: 3,116
Thanked 1,090 Times in 784 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NH.Solar View Post
I can't let this thread slide by without chiming in ...why even consider fossil fuel heating when air source heat pumps (ie, "mini-splits") and solar have made them somewhat obsolete?
Installing or replacing a furnace and the periperal circulation systems is generally more expensive than a whole house air pump with individual handlers. Plus the current super efficient breed of air source heat pumps have the ability to heat, AC, and filter your air. Talk to someone that has one!
A matched solar system will provide the power to run a heat pump system and it only takes 5-8 years for the money saved in utility bills and/or fossil fuels to offset the cost of the solar system ...and from that point forward your power and heat will be coming to you virtually for free A solar system is nearly maintenance free and the expected life is generally thought to be fortyish years.
Will your new home eventually be a retirement home? Wouldn't it be a wonderful thing if you didn't have to worry about the cost of hvac and electricity during your golden years?
This is great if you don't live in an HOA. Plus welands rules will make it difficult to trim trees for solar. Otherwise go for it!

When I had to replace my boiler, I look into the Mistibushi split system for best all around use. The dealer determined because of the energy efficiency of the unit, I may need auxiliary heat source. Bear that in mind.
__________________
Someday may never be an actual day.
BroadHopper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2017, 05:22 PM   #16
DickR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 735
Thanks: 4
Thanked 254 Times in 166 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ITD View Post
I would love to see the supporting numbers for that for say a 3,000 square foot house built to today's code.
First off, if we're talking about new construction, building just "to code" is a wasted opportunity. Remember, from an energy and comfort point of view, a house built just to code is the worst house you can legally build. For perhaps 5% extra the house can be in the realm of "superinsulated," and thus easy to heat or cool and very comfortable year round. For such a house, an air-source heat pump makes a great deal of sense, as it will be smaller and the heat introduced in a couple of locations will distribute easily, with no cold spots. For a house like that, of about 3000 sqft living space, the design heat loss ought to be less than 20,000 BTU/hr. Most of the time, the heat pump(s) will be loafing.
DickR is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DickR For This Useful Post:
ishoot308 (05-02-2017)
Old 05-02-2017, 05:48 PM   #17
ishoot308
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gilford, NH / Welch Island
Posts: 5,930
Thanks: 2,287
Thanked 4,939 Times in 1,915 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadHopper View Post
When I had to replace my boiler, I look into the Mistibushi split system for best all around use. The dealer determined because of the energy efficiency of the unit, I may need auxiliary heat source. Bear that in mind.
How long ago was it since you replaced your boiler? They (Mitsubishi) have come a long way in just the last few years with heat pump technology. Their newer hyper heat sysytems will throw heat at -13 degrees with 76% efficiency! How many days do we get that are lower than that...one maybe? I would have a cheap auxiliary heater or pellet stove as backup for that one day and save tons of money the rest of the winter. in my opinion they are the best and most efficient choice of heating for a New England winter and they are not bad with AC in the hot summer!

Edited to add: I don't know why but you do lose some cooling efficiency with the hyper heat units over a standard unit. The standard units have unbelievable cooling efficiency.

Dan
__________________
It's Always Sunny On Welch Island!!

Last edited by ishoot308; 05-02-2017 at 07:22 PM.
ishoot308 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2017, 07:57 AM   #18
BroadHopper
Senior Member
 
BroadHopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Laconia NH
Posts: 5,512
Thanks: 3,116
Thanked 1,090 Times in 784 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ishoot308 View Post
How long ago was it since you replaced your boiler? They (Mitsubishi) have come a long way in just the last few years with heat pump technology. Their newer hyper heat sysytems will throw heat at -13 degrees with 76% efficiency! How many days do we get that are lower than that...one maybe? I would have a cheap auxiliary heater or pellet stove as backup for that one day and save tons of money the rest of the winter. in my opinion they are the best and most efficient choice of heating for a New England winter and they are not bad with AC in the hot summer!

Edited to add: I don't know why but you do lose some cooling efficiency with the hyper heat units over a standard unit. The standard units have unbelievable cooling efficiency.

Dan
Two years ago. Bear in mind I have access to natural gas and I need hot water, The split can not do hot water. The dealer says you can't beat natural gas when the cost of electricity in NH is so high!

I heard that there are hot water tanks available that will heat your hot water using the same principle. I know of a home owner that ordered one on the internet but could not find someone to install it. He may need to hire a guy from Maine.

Is the Mitsi split greener than a condensing boiler? I don't think so. NH electricity is produced mostly from natural gas. Because of loss of transporting the electricity, total efficiency is low.
__________________
Someday may never be an actual day.
BroadHopper is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to BroadHopper For This Useful Post:
ishoot308 (05-04-2017)
Old 05-08-2017, 04:14 PM   #19
TheProfessor
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,062
Thanks: 17
Thanked 326 Times in 198 Posts
Default

The debate here is endless.
Do a search to read other posts about oil versus propane.
Endless debate.


Me, I will never ever ever ever ever ever go with propane again for primary heat.
TheProfessor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.34159 seconds