Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Calendar Register FAQDonate Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-06-2024, 01:36 PM   #1
Lake Winnipesaukee Assoc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Gilford
Posts: 104
Thanks: 25
Thanked 163 Times in 52 Posts
Default Sununu Vetoes Fertilizer Bill

Disappointed, but not defeated. Lake folks concerned about cyanobacteria packed the Moultonborough Town Library last Wednesday night for a presentation by Pat Tarpey, president of the Lake Winnipesaukee Association. During the meeting, attendees were told Governor Chris Sununu vetoed a bill that sought to regulate the use of certain fertilizers on lawn turf. Click the link below to read Paula Tracy's coverage from InDepthNH.

https://indepthnh.org/2024/08/01/at-...rtilizer-bill/

*This meeting was not able to be recorded or streamed.

More Info on the Veto

Copy of Bill Passed by House/Senate
__________________
The Lake Winnipesaukee Association (LWA) is a non-profit organization dedicated to protecting the water quality and natural resources of Lake Winnipesaukee and its watershed. Through monitoring, education, stewardship, and science guided approaches for lake management, LWA works to ensure Winnipesaukee’s scenic beauty, wildlife habitat, water quality and recreational potential continues to provide enjoyment long into the future.

http://www.winnipesaukee.org/
Lake Winnipesaukee Assoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2024, 01:52 PM   #2
Biggd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Waltham Ma./Meredith NH
Posts: 3,900
Thanks: 2,087
Thanked 1,126 Times in 711 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lake Winnipesaukee Assoc View Post
Disappointed, but not defeated. Lake folks concerned about cyanobacteria packed the Moultonborough Town Library last Wednesday night for a presentation by Pat Tarpey, president of the Lake Winnipesaukee Association. During the meeting, attendees were told Governor Chris Sununu vetoed a bill that sought to regulate the use of certain fertilizers on lawn turf. Click the link below to read Paula Tracy's coverage from InDepthNH.

https://indepthnh.org/2024/08/01/at-...rtilizer-bill/

*This meeting was not able to be recorded or streamed.

More Info on the Veto

Copy of Bill Passed by House/Senate
Not surprised.
Biggd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2024, 04:32 PM   #3
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,186
Thanks: 2
Thanked 564 Times in 463 Posts
Default

Some of this we can get done without a law.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to John Mercier For This Useful Post:
ACME on the Broads (08-21-2024), BroadHopper (08-07-2024), CTYankee (08-10-2024)
Old 08-11-2024, 06:33 AM   #4
swnoel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 529
Thanks: 83
Thanked 194 Times in 118 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mercier View Post
Some of this we can get done without a law.
It always amazes me how many people need a law to stop them from doing something harmful. Course laws won't stop it either...
swnoel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2024, 07:25 AM   #5
BroadHopper
Senior Member
 
BroadHopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Laconia NH
Posts: 5,547
Thanks: 3,160
Thanked 1,094 Times in 788 Posts
Default

I snitched on a few of my McMansion neighbors. Nothing became of it. Maybe law enforcement should do their job. Better yet, go after the landscapers instead of the landowners. Oh, wait! Some of the landscapers came from outside the region! I guess we can't win!
__________________
Someday may never be an actual day.
BroadHopper is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 08-11-2024, 07:29 AM   #6
secondcurve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,102
Thanks: 1,299
Thanked 558 Times in 287 Posts
Default

I agree that most people will do the right thing. However, there are individuals who are uninformed and don’t realize what they are doing. And then there is a cohort who doesn’t give a damn and will do what they want. On top of all this is substantial population growth. The result of these factors is a lake whose water quality is in severe decline. I think a huge percentage of the population wants to protect the lake so why not put in place laws, regulations, fines and heavy messaging?
secondcurve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2024, 07:33 AM   #7
secondcurve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,102
Thanks: 1,299
Thanked 558 Times in 287 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadHopper View Post
I snitched on a few of my McMansion neighbors. Nothing became of it. Maybe law enforcement should do their job. Better yet, go after the landscapers instead of the landowners. Oh, wait! Some of the landscapers came from outside the region! I guess we can't win!
Maybe we need to handle it like Singapore handles littering? Public a55 whippings. It’s amazing how clean Singapore is and how everyone knows the law!
secondcurve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2024, 07:40 AM   #8
SAMIAM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 2,877
Thanks: 332
Thanked 1,662 Times in 581 Posts
Default

I’m willing to bet that bet that there would be voluntary compliance if someone who represents the various lakes organizations approached all the major landscapers such as Belknap,Stephans,Miracle Farms etc. and asked to limit the use of fertilizers on lake front properties….and perhaps remind them how many of our members use their services.
Waterfront owners are a big part of their business and I think they would see the value of helping out
SAMIAM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SAMIAM For This Useful Post:
KPW (08-13-2024)
Old 08-11-2024, 07:53 AM   #9
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,563
Thanks: 742
Thanked 1,437 Times in 989 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SAMIAM View Post
I’m willing to bet that bet that there would be voluntary compliance if someone who represents the various lakes organizations approached all the major landscapers such as Belknap,Stephans,Miracle Farms etc. and asked to limit the use of fertilizers on lake front properties….and perhaps remind them how many of our members use their services.
Waterfront owners are a big part of their business and I think they would see the value of helping out
The landscapers that I know already use the lake safe fertilizer. I thought there was already a law that they had to.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2024, 12:34 PM   #10
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,186
Thanks: 2
Thanked 564 Times in 463 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SAMIAM View Post
I’m willing to bet that bet that there would be voluntary compliance if someone who represents the various lakes organizations approached all the major landscapers such as Belknap,Stephans,Miracle Farms etc. and asked to limit the use of fertilizers on lake front properties….and perhaps remind them how many of our members use their services.
Waterfront owners are a big part of their business and I think they would see the value of helping out
I was thinking more of them reaching out to us in the local retail industry.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2024, 05:11 PM   #11
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,889
Thanks: 2,154
Thanked 768 Times in 549 Posts
Wink Lime to Lemon...

Quote:
Originally Posted by tis View Post
The landscapers that I know already use the lake safe fertilizer. I thought there was already a law that they had to.
There is a law that fertilizers are not to be used within 50-feet of the water.

Haven't you noticed how emerald-green lawns fade to yellow near the shoreline?

Me neither...

ApS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2024, 06:36 PM   #12
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 2,307
Thanks: 1,211
Thanked 974 Times in 602 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mercier View Post
I was thinking more of them reaching out to us in the local retail industry.
Last week at their Wolfeboro cyanobacteria talk LWA said they had reached out to retailers, but with limited success. Most fertilizer in stores still includes phosphorous. They said they were still working on this, but the veto makes it a lot tougher.

I know from your posts that you work at a hardware (or building?) store. Do you carry fertilizer with phosphorous? How does it sell compared to non-phosphorous fertilizer?
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlyingScot For This Useful Post:
Susie Cougar (08-11-2024)
Old 08-11-2024, 10:16 PM   #13
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,186
Thanks: 2
Thanked 564 Times in 463 Posts
Default

We sell nearly no fertilizer in Bristol.
We do have Scotts Triple Builder Seed Starter on the shelf, and some Scotts Fall (Step 4) which have high phosphorus levels... along with small packages of repair seed (those generally have fertilizer premixed with them for starter).

For Bristol we are more likely to see 10-10-10 or 5-5-5 transferred from our Newport store for starting pasture.

We do many years sell a lot of pasture seed (uncoated) for overseeding in the fall; but no one adds fertilizer to that.

Meredith should have Bonide, with the phosphorous-free version for the winterizer (Fall Step 4); and soil test kits to check and see if you even need seed starter.

But we don't have anything for consistent signage that consumers could rely on to make a choice.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2024, 03:08 AM   #14
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,889
Thanks: 2,154
Thanked 768 Times in 549 Posts
Cool Need Stickers...

Quote:
Originally Posted by swnoel View Post
It always amazes me how many people need a law to stop them from doing something harmful. Course laws won't stop it either...
1) Speaking of pasture, the initial cyanobacteria warning included Tuftonboro Neck and perhaps Cow Island.

Certain insects encountered around Tuftonboro Neck suggest that farmland for hooved animals reside there, and may contribute to the problem of cyanobacteria.

2) Nearly everything sold has a California tag that reads, "This product is made from chemicals that may cause cancer".

Annoying, but NH could pass a law requiring a large sticker be placed on fertilizers sold in NH--warning that employment near lakeshores is environmentally unsafe.

3) While they are at it, require a large-font printing of relevant and unique NH laws be placed on the back of all PFDs (life preservers) sold in NH. It could catch on with other states.

Maybe such an alert could convey the laws violated to a banana-yellow oversized ocean-racer who bombed both ways through the four miles of dense boat traffic in Winter Harbor on Sunday?

__________________
Is it
"Common Sense" isn't.
ApS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2024, 05:09 AM   #15
SAB1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Tuftonboro
Posts: 1,204
Thanks: 184
Thanked 310 Times in 227 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ApS View Post
1) Speaking of pasture, the initial cyanobacteria warning included Tuftonboro Neck and perhaps Cow Island.


Certain insects encountered around Tuftonboro Neck suggest that farmland for hooved animals reside there, and may contribute to the problem of cyanobacteria.

2) Nearly everything sold has a California tag that reads, "This product is made from chemicals that may cause cancer".

Annoying, but NH could pass a law requiring a large sticker be placed on fertilizers sold in NH--warning that employment near lakeshores is environmentally unsafe.

3) While they are at it, require a large-font printing of relevant and unique NH laws be placed on the back of all PFDs (life preservers) sold in NH. It could catch on with other states.

Maybe such an alert could convey the laws violated to a banana-yellow oversized ocean-racer who bombed both ways through the four miles of dense boat traffic in Winter Harbor on Sunday?

That would require people to read the label and most wouldn't bother.....we live in the instant gratification world now people grab what they need and move on. If there's a label with warnings on it and the store doesn't have the correct alternative you know what's being grabbed. Sounds negative but there are alot folks that don't really care.
SAB1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2024, 06:39 AM   #16
Blyblvrd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Londonderry & Moultonborough
Posts: 148
Thanks: 85
Thanked 26 Times in 20 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SAMIAM View Post
I’m willing to bet that bet that there would be voluntary compliance if someone who represents the various lakes organizations approached all the major landscapers such as Belknap,Stephans,Miracle Farms etc. and asked to limit the use of fertilizers on lake front properties….and perhaps remind them how many of our members use their services.

Waterfront owners are a big part of their business and I think they would see the value of helping out
We use Stephens and at an LWA talk last year I inquired about our house and the effect it has on Winnipesaukee and their response was that Stephen’s is a great landscaper that designs, implements and maintains properties that protect the lake.


Sent from my iPad using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
Blyblvrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2024, 07:11 AM   #17
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,563
Thanks: 742
Thanked 1,437 Times in 989 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ApS View Post
1) Speaking of pasture, the initial cyanobacteria warning included Tuftonboro Neck and perhaps Cow Island.

Certain insects encountered around Tuftonboro Neck suggest that farmland for hooved animals reside there, and may contribute to the problem of cyanobacteria.

2) Nearly everything sold has a California tag that reads, "This product is made from chemicals that may cause cancer".

Annoying, but NH could pass a law requiring a large sticker be placed on fertilizers sold in NH--warning that employment near lakeshores is environmentally unsafe.

3) While they are at it, require a large-font printing of relevant and unique NH laws be placed on the back of all PFDs (life preservers) sold in NH. It could catch on with other states.

Maybe such an alert could convey the laws violated to a banana-yellow oversized ocean-racer who bombed both ways through the four miles of dense boat traffic in Winter Harbor on Sunday?

Did you hear the exact location of the cyanobacteria present before the 4th on Tuftonboro Neck and Winter Harbor?
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2024, 06:27 AM   #18
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,889
Thanks: 2,154
Thanked 768 Times in 549 Posts
Arrow Site From Other Cyanobacteria Thread...

This site shows the huge area--including Rattlesnake Island--affected on the "quiet side" of Lake Winnipesaukee:

https://www.arcgis.com/apps/dashboar...571b222c78447b

Alton Bay is also an "area of concern".
ApS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.26098 seconds