Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Calendar Register FAQDonate Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-31-2017, 07:04 AM   #1
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,939
Thanks: 1,152
Thanked 1,959 Times in 1,210 Posts
Default NPR Red Cross Piece

There have been some posts here about the best places to donate resources, and some major organizations often get slammed for their donations-to-spending ratios (The Red Cross and Goodwill are two I've seen). There was a piece on NPR about the changes Red Cross has been making to address the issue and thought people here might be interested.

Sent from my XT1528 using Tapatalk

Last edited by thinkxingu; 08-31-2017 at 12:28 PM.
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2017, 07:55 AM   #2
feb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Meredith (Winnisquam) & Nashua, NH
Posts: 209
Thanks: 25
Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts
Default 91%

During WMUR's telethon yesterday a rep from the Red Cross said 91% of every dollar goes to the cause. If that is true, that sounds pretty efficient.
feb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2017, 08:12 AM   #3
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,939
Thanks: 1,152
Thanked 1,959 Times in 1,210 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by feb View Post
During WMUR's telethon yesterday a rep from the Red Cross said 91% of every dollar goes to the cause. If that is true, that sounds pretty efficient.
Feb, one of the things the NPR piece brought up is how numbers can be manipulative. For example, 91% can refer to post-administrative costs (which can be exorbitant) or any of a number of different manipulations. Also, that money could be being spent driving empty trucks around for publicity, which a few investigative reports claim to have happened in a few of the past disasters.

Sent from my XT1528 using Tapatalk
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2017, 09:56 AM   #4
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 2,208
Thanks: 1,108
Thanked 934 Times in 576 Posts
Wink No excuses!

One important issue though is that we not let ourselves off the hook when we find a particular charity is not as efficient as we would like.

It's great if we decide that a particular charity is inefficient, and then we find a better group to help. But too often people decide a particular group is inefficient, and then smugly sit back and do nothing. Much better to send $100 to a group that spends "only" x% on direct services than to do nothing.
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2017, 10:12 AM   #5
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 2,208
Thanks: 1,108
Thanked 934 Times in 576 Posts
Wink No excuses!

One important issue though is that we not let ourselves off the hook when we find a particular charity is not as efficient as we would like.

It's great if we decide that a particular charity is inefficient, and then we find a better group to help. But too often people decide a particular group is inefficient, and then smugly sit back and do nothing. Much better to send $100 to a group that spends "only" x% on direct services than to do nothing.
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 08-31-2017, 10:42 AM   #6
Kamper
Senior Member
 
Kamper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Thornton's Ferry
Posts: 1,295
Thanks: 67
Thanked 165 Times in 125 Posts
Default

The Salvation Army actually has the best ratio of donations received to services provided.
Kamper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2017, 10:56 AM   #7
Merrymeeting
Senior Member
 
Merrymeeting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Merrymeeting Lake, New Durham
Posts: 2,216
Thanks: 299
Thanked 795 Times in 365 Posts
Default

You can find a lot of data and information on these websites. Great for debunking some of the urban folk lore that floats around the internet about some of these charities.

https://www.charitynavigator.org/

https://www.charitywatch.org/home
Merrymeeting is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2017, 12:26 PM   #8
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,939
Thanks: 1,152
Thanked 1,959 Times in 1,210 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kamper View Post
The Salvation Army actually has the best ratio of donations received to services provided.
Yup, meant Goodwill--updated to reflect.

Sent from my XT1528 using Tapatalk
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2017, 04:18 PM   #9
ursa minor
Senior Member
 
ursa minor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Tuftonborough & Franklin MA
Posts: 265
Thanks: 99
Thanked 143 Times in 64 Posts
Default

The Red Cross issue is complicated. They are a large charity and are always available to respond whether it's a local event (fires that displace families for example) or a large disaster such as Harvey. They have always been the "go to" charity when horrible events like this occur and for a lot of good reasons. Because they are large, nationwide and always available, it's reasonable (to a degree) that they would have higher overhead costs than a smaller, local organization.

That said, there's no such thing as a perfect organization and it sounds like the Red Cross is no exception. The 91% number referenced above is in relation to the dollars spent on relief. That's not the same as the percentage of funds donated in relation to dollars spent on relief, it's somewhat modified. I heard a discussion on this today, sounds like more information will be forthcoming.

I can't remember specific details at this point but they got quite a black eye in the aftermath of Katrina about some of their spending choices; we were among the many donors to the Red Cross for that disaster and I recall making a mental note to pay more attention in the future. They may well have revised their overhead and non disaster relief spending since then, I certainly hope so.

There are any number of legitimate local charities in the greater Houston area that can be located and checked out on line. (Food banks for example). We've made donations to several, I'm sure we're not in the minority by a long shot. Let's hope and pray those affected by this have better days ahead soon. They need all the help they can get.
__________________
" Any day with a boat ride in it is a good day"
ursa minor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2017, 05:28 PM   #10
TiltonBB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gilford, NH and Florida
Posts: 2,882
Thanks: 637
Thanked 2,147 Times in 894 Posts
Default Big Salaries!

As you open your pockets for your next charitable contribution, please keep these facts in mind:

· The American Red Cross President and CEO Marsha J. Evans'
salary for the year was $651,957 plus expenses.

· The United Way President Brian Gallagher receives a $375,000 base salary along with numerous expense benefits.

UNICEF CEO Caryl M. Stern receives $1,200,000 per year (100k per month) plus all expenses including a ROLLS ROYCE . Less than 5 cents of your donated dollar goes to the cause.

So the message is: Be careful where you send your money!
TiltonBB is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2017, 07:24 PM   #11
Woody38
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 564
Thanks: 46
Thanked 104 Times in 75 Posts
Default Aarp

I am under the impression that AARP is matching donations and EVERY penny is going to Texas. Got this from an impeccable source, my wife.

I am a retired workaholic and continuing aquaholic.
Woody38 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2017, 07:35 PM   #12
Merrymeeting
Senior Member
 
Merrymeeting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Merrymeeting Lake, New Durham
Posts: 2,216
Thanks: 299
Thanked 795 Times in 365 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TiltonBB View Post
As you open your pockets for your next charitable contribution, please keep these facts in mind:

· The American Red Cross President and CEO Marsha J. Evans'
salary for the year was $651,957 plus expenses.

· The United Way President Brian Gallagher receives a $375,000 base salary along with numerous expense benefits.

UNICEF CEO Caryl M. Stern receives $1,200,000 per year (100k per month) plus all expenses including a ROLLS ROYCE . Less than 5 cents of your donated dollar goes to the cause.

So the message is: Be careful where you send your money!
I struggle with messages like this one. All the organizations mentioned above would be extremely large, complex, businesses if they were for-profit, private companies. The salaries mentioned are not out of line when you consider similar CEO positions (except perhaps for the UNICEF one)

Just like in sports, while you can argue that the salaries are outrageous, they are what the market will bear, and what you need to spend for a talented CEO. Otherwise, like the sports star, they move to another team.

So, the question becomes, would these charities be better off with a lower paid, inexperienced CEO to run multi-million/billion dollar business?

I don't have an answer, but I wouldn't dismiss a charity out of hand just because the CEO makes big bucks. If the overall scorecard of the charity is top notch, they have earned it.
Merrymeeting is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2017, 08:02 PM   #13
KPW
Senior Member
 
KPW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 378
Thanks: 708
Thanked 116 Times in 58 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Merrymeeting View Post
I struggle with messages like this one. All the organizations mentioned above would be extremely large, complex, businesses if they were for-profit, private companies. The salaries mentioned are not out of line when you consider similar CEO positions (except perhaps for the UNICEF one)

Just like in sports, while you can argue that the salaries are outrageous, they are what the market will bear, and what you need to spend for a talented CEO. Otherwise, like the sports star, they move to another team.

So, the question becomes, would these charities be better off with a lower paid, inexperienced CEO to run multi-million/billion dollar business?

I don't have an answer, but I wouldn't dismiss a charity out of hand just because the CEO makes big bucks. If the overall scorecard of the charity is top notch, they have earned it.

I completely agree!
KPW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2017, 09:01 PM   #14
MAXUM
Senior Member
 
MAXUM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kuna ID
Posts: 2,755
Thanks: 246
Thanked 1,942 Times in 802 Posts
Default

Samaritan’s Purse is an outstanding organization with an impeccable reputation and very low admin overhead. They are actively engaged in relief efforts in TX.

Nothing wrong with being selective in who you choose to donate to, it defeats the purpose to donate funds to help those in need only to find out a large percentage never makes it to the intended target. Do your homework but as already mentioned no charity can run without some overhead - but there is no doubt some are better run than others. Choose wisely but there is no excuse to sit on the sidelines and do nothing when so many are hurting right now.
MAXUM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2017, 04:35 AM   #15
Newbiesaukee
Senior Member
 
Newbiesaukee's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Coral Gables, winter; Long Island, summer
Posts: 1,349
Thanks: 921
Thanked 569 Times in 295 Posts
Default

This is a complex issue. I, too, donated through AARP which matches donation. AARP does say that 100% of the funds go to relief organizations working directly working in Texas but, no info on the way those organizations distribute funds. I still donated through AARP, only point is, it is a complex situation.
__________________


"You're only young once, but you can be immature forever."
Newbiesaukee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2017, 03:25 PM   #16
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 2,208
Thanks: 1,108
Thanked 934 Times in 576 Posts
Default

TiltonBB--Any thoughts on what charities we should support to help folks in Houston or others in need?
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2017, 06:26 AM   #17
TiltonBB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gilford, NH and Florida
Posts: 2,882
Thanks: 637
Thanked 2,147 Times in 894 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterG View Post
TiltonBB--Any thoughts on what charities we should support to help folks in Houston or others in need?
To answer your question: I am not sure. I haven't spent any time looking into it.

It is sad, but it seems that every time there is money available from disasters ranging from September 11th to Katrina the fraudsters and phonies come out of the woodwork. There are a lot of articles written about this. I have attached links to a couple of them.

In the aftermath of the Gulf oil spill there were so many fraudulent claims filed that BP hired Louis Freeh, the former FBI director, to investigate claims. He hired numerous retired FBI agents to work full time investigating claims. So far over 300 people have been convicted, and that was BP's money with the FBI investigating. The total claims thus far are in excess of $20 billion.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...no19uDBWcg425A

If the link doesn't work Google this: More than 100 jailed for fake BP oil spill claims

When it is private money without the oversight of law enforcement I am sure the amount of fraud is huge. It is a sad comment on society that so many people are looking for a free ride.

Another article related to Harvey:

Don't get duped: How to avoid post-Harvey charity scams - Aug. 30, 2017

http://money.cnn.com/2017/08/30/news...aud/index.html

Last edited by TiltonBB; 09-02-2017 at 11:14 AM. Reason: Fix Link
TiltonBB is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2017, 08:04 AM   #18
Hillcountry
Senior Member
 
Hillcountry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: In the hills
Posts: 2,342
Thanks: 1,580
Thanked 761 Times in 456 Posts
Default

Today's news: Muslim "activist" Linda sarsour ( i cringe even to mention this POS name...I see her as a dangerous person to our country)
Created a fraudulent fund in the name of hurricane Harvey relief to fund her own PAC group.
Our beautiful USA is eroding quickly with all the crap going on...sad.
Hillcountry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2017, 08:07 AM   #19
joey2665
Senior Member
 
joey2665's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,220
Thanks: 1,205
Thanked 1,007 Times in 648 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hillcountry View Post
Today's news: Muslim "activist" Linda sarsour ( i cringe even to mention this POS name...I see her as a dangerous person to our country)
Created a fraudulent fund in the name of hurricane Harvey relief to fund her own PAC group.
Our beautiful USA is eroding quickly with all the crap going on...sad.
Really don't want to get into a political discussion on the forum so I will just say I whole heartedly AGREE!!!!
joey2665 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2017, 08:40 AM   #20
Cobalt 25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 213
Thanks: 219
Thanked 36 Times in 20 Posts
Default

Hillcountry, could you please provide the name of the fraudulent fund for Harvey relief Linda Sarsour created?
Cobalt 25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2017, 08:51 AM   #21
Hillcountry
Senior Member
 
Hillcountry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: In the hills
Posts: 2,342
Thanks: 1,580
Thanked 761 Times in 456 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobalt 25 View Post
Hillcountry, could you please provide the name of the fraudulent fund for Harvey relief Linda Sarsour created?
Just google "LINDA SARSOUR FRAUDULENT FUND"
All the stories from different news organizations come up.
Hillcountry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2017, 10:04 AM   #22
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 2,208
Thanks: 1,108
Thanked 934 Times in 576 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hillcountry View Post
Just google "LINDA SARSOUR FRAUDULENT FUND"
All the stories from different news organizations come up.
It's cold and rainy, and I hadn't heard of Linda Sarsour, so I did Google it. I'm sure I would disagree with her on MANY things, and I don't think it's right to piggy back politics on storm relief.

But this is not fraud. Maybe irritating clickbait at worse--she was accurate in where the money is going.

Also, my Google search did not produce many "news organizations", it was more like right wing political action websites that often distort the truth or just make stuff up. Just because there are a bunch of them, it does not mean they are accurate. Like Sarsour's pitch, they masquerade as something they are not.
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2017, 11:00 AM   #23
Hillcountry
Senior Member
 
Hillcountry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: In the hills
Posts: 2,342
Thanks: 1,580
Thanked 761 Times in 456 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterG View Post
It's cold and rainy, and I hadn't heard of Linda Sarsour, so I did Google it. I'm sure I would disagree with her on MANY things, and I don't think it's right to piggy back politics on storm relief.

But this is not fraud. Maybe irritating clickbait at worse--she was accurate in where the money is going.

Also, my Google search did not produce many "news organizations", it was more like right wing political action websites that often distort the truth or just make stuff up. Just because there are a bunch of them, it does not mean they are accurate. Like Sarsour's pitch, they masquerade as something they are not.
Still fraud in my opinion...
Hillcountry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2017, 11:12 AM   #24
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,939
Thanks: 1,152
Thanked 1,959 Times in 1,210 Posts
Default



Sent from my XT1528 using Tapatalk
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2017, 11:33 AM   #25
Hillcountry
Senior Member
 
Hillcountry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: In the hills
Posts: 2,342
Thanks: 1,580
Thanked 761 Times in 456 Posts
Default

Believe whatever floats your boats...if she indeed used a link to a "community organizing website" that had NOTHING to do with true RELIEF for victims of Harvey and only channeled funds to themselves, this, in my opinion, is a scam to fund her own beliefs which are to bring down the USA as I know and love it.
Period.
Hillcountry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2017, 04:16 PM   #26
Music Man
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 104
Thanks: 37
Thanked 25 Times in 16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
Feb, one of the things the NPR piece brought up is how numbers can be manipulative. For example, 91% can refer to post-administrative costs (which can be exorbitant) or any of a number of different manipulations. Also, that money could be being spent driving empty trucks around for publicity, which a few investigative reports claim to have happened in a few of the past disasters.
Exactly. That's why I only donate to local groups that I've gotten to know. (and by local, I mean working locally, not just local to NH - for example, the Gospel Rescue Mission in Tucson: I volunteered there when I lived there and know the folks and the work they do).

The Red Cross is definitely off my list after a few episodes with personal friends. One family, whose house was struck by lightning and burned to the ground, was denied ANY assistance from the Red Cross "because they had insurance". It didn't matter that they lost everything except one car and the cash one of the kids had in their pocket - they were told to simply "figure it out".

Another friend, who was a volunteer medical doctor, quit working with the Red Cross after discovering that ALL donations go into a single fund and are used wherever the Red Cross decides (a process she found quite alarming as well), regardless of the donation's designation. Which is to say, the $100 you donate for "Harvey victims" may not go there at all, ever.

So, unfortunately, caveat emptor applies to charity as well.
Music Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.19264 seconds