Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Links Calendar Register FAQDonate Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-23-2019, 10:08 PM   #1
BIguy
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Cell Phone Service on Lake

Verizon is my current cell phone carrier but I want to change providers because Verizon is expensive. I looking to switch to a cheaper alternative like Sprint or T-Mobile but I am concerned about reliable service at the lake. Does anyone have experience with Sprint or T-Mobile at the lake? Any other suggestions for a cell phone service provider at the lake?
BIguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2019, 10:15 PM   #2
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,188
Thanks: 603
Thanked 609 Times in 351 Posts
Default

This question gets posted all the time here and on the Winni Facebook page, and the answer is always the same: either Verizon or a Verizon MVNO (though the latter isn't as confirmed). Every other provider is weak in the Lakes Region.

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to thinkxingu For This Useful Post:
debbyi64 (06-08-2019)
Old 02-24-2019, 01:15 AM   #3
welch-time
Senior Member
 
welch-time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Welch Island
Posts: 79
Thanks: 2
Thanked 46 Times in 22 Posts
Default

Checkout the Xfinity mobile plan. They use the same Verizon cell network you already use. I just switched from AT&T and was able to use my old iPhone 6S. I was able to unlock it fairly easily, then Xfinity gives you a new sim card. The only catch is you need to be an Xfinity customer (cable/internet). I now pay $12 a month with a 1gb limit. Additional data is $12 per gig. Their unlimited data plan is $45 per month.

Last edited by welch-time; 02-24-2019 at 10:42 AM.
welch-time is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to welch-time For This Useful Post:
Bernie Girl (02-24-2019)
Old 02-24-2019, 06:25 AM   #4
TheProfessor
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 476
Thanks: 16
Thanked 122 Times in 75 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BIguy View Post
Verizon is my current cell phone carrier but I want to change providers because Verizon is expensive.
TracFone.
You can purchase a new Samsung smartphone and one year of service for $109.00.
Android 8 - the latest OS. LINK

If you use a lot of data then Strait Talk at Walmart. $45.00 per month unlimited (well a lot of data).

Both use Verizon.


Page Plus and a whole bunch of other names - that use Verizon for less money.
TheProfessor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2019, 07:47 AM   #5
BroadHopper
Senior Member
 
BroadHopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Laconia NH / Bozeman MO
Posts: 4,754
Thanks: 2,280
Thanked 835 Times in 579 Posts
Default Verizon 55+ Plan

$80 @ month for 2 lines of unlimited data. It's not advertised so you need to ask!

Verizon been my choice in NH since I switched from AT&T decades ago. The old CDMA network had the best coverage as well is 3G. Now 4G coverage is a bit spotty but still better than GSM.
There was a talk from an environmentalist about his view of 5G. Much more damaging radiation than 4G to our brains. Radio waves are more direct and therefore less coverage over the terrain unless they build more towers.
__________________
Someday may never be an actual day.
BroadHopper is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 02-24-2019, 08:19 AM   #6
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,188
Thanks: 603
Thanked 609 Times in 351 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadHopper View Post
$80 @ month for 2 lines of unlimited data. It's not advertised so you need to ask!



Verizon been my choice in NH since I switched from AT&T decades ago. The old CDMA network had the best coverage as well is 3G. Now 4G coverage is a bit spotty but still better than GSM.

There was a talk from an environmentalist about his view of 5G. Much more damaging radiation than 4G to our brains. Radio waves are more direct and therefore less coverage over the terrain unless they build more towers.
Best I know, the $80 2-line is for 55+ peeps.

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2019, 08:43 AM   #7
upthesaukee
Senior Member
 
upthesaukee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alton Bay
Posts: 4,699
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 1,411
Thanked 1,429 Times in 774 Posts
Default Mentioned in the subject line

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
Best I know, the $80 2-line is for 55+ peeps.

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk
Broadhopper did mention it is a 55÷ program in the subject area. Unfortunately, you didn't see that on your Tapatalk app. That app doesn't show the subject of each post.

For that reason, I use the full version for this site on my tablet. If I put pertinent info in the subject line, I try to put it in the body of the post as well to help out those who use Tapatalk (like me on my phone )

Dave
__________________
I Live Here... I am always UPTHESAUKEE !!!!
upthesaukee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2019, 08:47 AM   #8
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,188
Thanks: 603
Thanked 609 Times in 351 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by upthesaukee View Post
Broadhopper did mention it is a 55÷ program in the subject area. Unfortunately, you didn't see that on your Tapatalk app. That app doesn't show the subject of each post.



For that reason, I use the full version for this site on my tablet. If I put pertinent info in the subject line, I try to put it in the body of the post as well to help out those who use Tapatalk (like me on my phone )



Dave
Gotcha, thanks! Tapatalk is sometimes limiting, but it's nice having all my forums on one app. (Though recently it's gotten wonky with rewards and other junk)

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2019, 11:45 AM   #9
Descant
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Merrimack and Welch Island
Posts: 1,559
Thanks: 480
Thanked 450 Times in 288 Posts
Default Rewards are unreliable

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
Gotcha, thanks! Tapatalk is sometimes limiting, but it's nice having all my forums on one app. (Though recently it's gotten wonky with rewards and other junk)
Rewards can be nice, but I hesitate to sign up because they can change at any time. I'd rather see just a lower price. I seem to recall when people had two phones, one for home, one for camp because of erratic coverage. It's nice now that most systems have good coverage and we now can easily switch companies, for a better price. And we seem to be getting away from the two+ year contract. I'll be switching to Xfinity for cell phones. Switching landlines saved about $80 month. The cell change will save about $40. I'm close to giving up cable TV and just using Roku, but I haven't given up on watching live local government/school TV yet and that's not available on Roku. Maybe the next elections will change that?
I recall from last summer that cell phone service is still pretty spotty in the WMNF and adjacent hiking areas. I don't think that will change as there isn't a population base to support new towers. Someday we'll get away from all these towers and just go satellite.
Descant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2019, 12:59 PM   #10
The Real BigGuy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 519
Thanks: 15
Thanked 147 Times in 93 Posts
Default

Read recently that a company is testing a blimp that is tethered at 800 ft that they say covers the equivalent area as 25 cell towers. It is set up to automatically retract to ground level in bad weather that it isn’t designed to handle. They originally designed it as a floating wind turbine but when the price of oil dropped it wasn’t economical so the repurposed the design.


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
The Real BigGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2019, 02:35 PM   #11
Descant
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Merrimack and Welch Island
Posts: 1,559
Thanks: 480
Thanked 450 Times in 288 Posts
Default Cell range

I'm no expert, but that seems incredible to me. If cell service were long range, we would only need an antenna on top[ of Mount Washington to serve ME, NH and VT, right?
Descant is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Descant For This Useful Post:
BroadHopper (02-24-2019), Top-Water (02-24-2019)
Old 02-24-2019, 02:51 PM   #12
Top-Water
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Derry-Belmont
Posts: 588
Thanks: 358
Thanked 233 Times in 125 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Descant View Post
I'm no expert, but that seems incredible to me. If cell service were long range, we would only need an antenna on top[ of Mount Washington to serve ME, NH and VT, right?
Neither am I ...... story sounds a little like what the mooring mast on top of the Empire State Building was going to be used for.


TRUE or FALSE ??
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wimlrgwhgg
Top-Water is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2019, 02:55 PM   #13
Outdoorsman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 661
Thanks: 71
Thanked 161 Times in 109 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Real BigGuy View Post
Read recently that a company is testing a blimp that is tethered at 800 ft that they say covers the equivalent area as 25 cell towers. It is set up to automatically retract to ground level in bad weather that it isn’t designed to handle. They originally designed it as a floating wind turbine but when the price of oil dropped it wasn’t economical so the repurposed the design.
This sounded so bizarre that I had to google it. They tested one in Fremont, NH (Between Manchester and Portsmouth) a few months ago.

https://www.unionleader.com/news/bus...505aeeb6a.html
Outdoorsman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Outdoorsman For This Useful Post:
Top-Water (02-24-2019)
Old 02-24-2019, 03:46 PM   #14
BroadHopper
Senior Member
 
BroadHopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Laconia NH / Bozeman MO
Posts: 4,754
Thanks: 2,280
Thanked 835 Times in 579 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Descant View Post
I'm no expert, but that seems incredible to me. If cell service were long range, we would only need an antenna on top[ of Mount Washington to serve ME, NH and VT, right?
Once upon a time WMTW use to broadcast from Mt Washington and 95.9 the classic radio station. Other stations complained to FCC about it being not fare and that it infringed on their 'market'. This results in a market regulation, and WMTW and 95.5 cannot broadcast from Mt Washington, just from their market area.

What came to mind, what if everyone broadcast from Mt Washington to be fair?

Probably the reason why there isn't a mega cell tower atop the mountain?
__________________
Someday may never be an actual day.
BroadHopper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2019, 04:57 PM   #15
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,569
Thanks: 455
Thanked 800 Times in 553 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadHopper View Post
Once upon a time WMTW use to broadcast from Mt Washington and 95.9 the classic radio station. Other stations complained to FCC about it being not fare and that it infringed on their 'market'. This results in a market regulation, and WMTW and 95.5 cannot broadcast from Mt Washington, just from their market area.

What came to mind, what if everyone broadcast from Mt Washington to be fair?

Probably the reason why there isn't a mega cell tower atop the mountain?
Is that why they stopped broadcasting from there? I always wondered that!
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2019, 08:00 PM   #16
Slickcraft
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Welch Island and West Alton
Posts: 2,499
Thanks: 786
Thanked 1,353 Times in 621 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Descant View Post
I'm no expert, but that seems incredible to me. If cell service were long range, we would only need an antenna on top[ of Mount Washington to serve ME, NH and VT, right?

Right. There are some limits. Physics and the fact that radio wave propagation intensity falls off as a factor of 1/R squared, R being the distance from your phone to the cell tower.

Ok a tower on top of Martha could broadcast at a few mega watts and have the vast number of receivers and computational power and spectrum allocation (not likely) to handle tens of thousands of calls at a time. And what about your "hand held" cell phone being able to transmit voice and data for a hundred plus miles? If your current phone is good for 10 miles, it would take 100 times the transmit power from your phone to be good at 100 miles. Now a 20 lb battery pack is possible I guess as long as you could recharge a few times a day..............
Slickcraft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2019, 07:47 AM   #17
Skip
Senior Member
 
Skip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dover, NH
Posts: 1,602
Thanks: 247
Thanked 503 Times in 175 Posts
Default Actual reason WMTW moved.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by tis View Post
Is that why they stopped broadcasting from there? I always wondered that!
Actually Tis that is incorrect. WMTW-TV was broadcasting on an assigned analog channel that was being eliminated when the FCC mandated the conversion to digital channels a number of years ago. Their new assigned digital channel (45) did not have the same reach as their older higher powered analog channel, and would have been severely attenuated in the greater Portland area, their largest market. The owner chose to build a new tower in southwestern Maine that would allow the proper penetration into the Portland market.

Sorry for the long winded explanation!
Skip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2019, 08:07 AM   #18
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,569
Thanks: 455
Thanked 800 Times in 553 Posts
Default

Well, thanks, Skip. I do remember when they changed over. They are in Falmouth or someplace close to that right?
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2019, 08:20 AM   #19
The Real BigGuy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 519
Thanks: 15
Thanked 147 Times in 93 Posts
Default

My bad. Altaeros’s website says one of its “Super Towers” will replace 15 regular cell towers. Here is their website:

http://www.altaeros.com/solutions.html


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
The Real BigGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2019, 08:28 AM   #20
Skip
Senior Member
 
Skip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dover, NH
Posts: 1,602
Thanks: 247
Thanked 503 Times in 175 Posts
Default West Baldwin, Maine....

Quote:
Originally Posted by tis View Post
Well, thanks, Skip. I do remember when they changed over. They are in Falmouth or someplace close to that right?
Actually they build a large tower is West Baldwin, Maine. You can see it from many spots in NH along the 16 corridor in the Ossipee/West Ossipee area.....
Skip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2019, 09:38 AM   #21
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,569
Thanks: 455
Thanked 800 Times in 553 Posts
Default

Ok, the tower. But I meant where did they move the studio? Now I am thinking Westbrook.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2019, 10:32 AM   #22
Skip
Senior Member
 
Skip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dover, NH
Posts: 1,602
Thanks: 247
Thanked 503 Times in 175 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tis View Post
Ok, the tower. But I meant where did they move the studio? Now I am thinking Westbrook.
You are correct young lady....the studio is in Westbrook.....
Skip is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Skip For This Useful Post:
tis (02-25-2019)
Old 06-05-2019, 09:22 AM   #23
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,188
Thanks: 603
Thanked 609 Times in 351 Posts
Default

So...I posted above that the answer is always Verizon, but I'm hearing a lot of talk--and experiencing myself--of Verizon's service being very much reduced this last year.

I posted on I Boat looking for feedback, and there were a few takeaways:
1. Verizon is working on tower changes to eliminate 3G and replace with 4G and 5G, but there's little info on timeline or progress.

2. T-Mobile is 50/50. Some people have said it's awesome (and their map shows great coverage), others say there are too many dead spots.

3. ATT seems to be the next best service.

My Verizon has been weak at camp, and there have been days I can't use it at all--this started last summer/fall, which stinks because for 20 years, I've not had an issue (including camp).

Thoughts welcome.

PS A former student of mine found a map that shows a (the only?) 5G tower being tested on Moultonborough Neck. Screenshot attached. Also, some info out there about 5G rotting brains.
Attached Images
 
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2019, 09:35 AM   #24
Taz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 220
Thanks: 1
Thanked 39 Times in 24 Posts
Default cell service

I have had Verizon for several years. Never had any issues. Great service all around the lake and in the white mountains, North Conway area. May get a dead spot but very seldom and does not last long. A lot say Verizon is expensive. My monthly bill is $58.61 total including taxes and fees for unlimited talk and text, 5 GB of data and if the 5 GB is not used up one month it will carry to the next month. I think that is very reasonable, not expensive at all and its the best coverage anywhere I go. I don't think T-Mobile, Sprint, ATT, whoever is much cheaper if at all. I have talked to people who have other carriers and its spotty at best and lousy at worst.
Taz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2019, 09:36 AM   #25
Wifi-1
Member
 
Wifi-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 28
Thanks: 28
Thanked 14 Times in 9 Posts
Default

-> LTE-A is a higher speed LTE, it is not 5G.

-> The "brain rotting" will happen (allegedly) when they start using (much higher) GHz freqs.
Wifi-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2019, 10:14 AM   #26
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,188
Thanks: 603
Thanked 609 Times in 351 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wifi-1 View Post
-> LTE-A is a higher speed LTE, it is not 5G.

-> The "brain rotting" will happen (allegedly) when they start using (much higher) GHz freqs.
Thanks for the clarification--if that tower is there, any idea why I get horrible service in Hanson Cove, just north?

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2019, 11:17 AM   #27
SAB1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rowley MA / Tuftonboro
Posts: 699
Thanks: 99
Thanked 164 Times in 120 Posts
Default

Cant add much to comment on resolving the issue but I have the same experience, sometime last fall/winter the service went way downhill at our house. Used to have great service now it sucks. Dropped calls are frequent. Sometimes cant even make them. Texting works but sometimes I will get 4 or 5 all at once that people sent me and hour or two ago. Trying to send a text with a picture attached wont work.
SAB1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2019, 04:25 PM   #28
mishman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 96
Thanks: 4
Thanked 27 Times in 15 Posts
Default compared verizon with spectrum

I went through an analysis of leaving Verizon for Spectrum mobile since I had Spectrum for internet and cable (and phone but I never use it as we need a landline to connect to our security system). Wish I could drop the land line but the extra equipment the security company would need to install would not pay back for 2.5 years).

So back to Verizon wireless vs. Spectrum. I was about to switch our two phones for the 4 gig plan (4x$14/g x 2 phones). I called Verizon back one last time and said I was about to switch and they told me about the 55+yr plan mentioned above. Decided to stay with Verizon but saved about $35/month over what I was previously paying Verizon. Amazing that they don't advertise this plan since NH is the third oldest state in age.
mishman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mishman For This Useful Post:
trfour (06-06-2019), WinnisquamZ (06-05-2019)
Old 06-06-2019, 07:58 PM   #29
Wifi-1
Member
 
Wifi-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 28
Thanks: 28
Thanked 14 Times in 9 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
Thanks for the clarification--if that tower is there, any idea why I get horrible service in Hanson Cove, just north?

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk
Sorry, had some local problems, back to your answer. I corrected the cell tower locations for Verizon in NH, see the attached image.

There are three Vzn towers in Mboro, one behind A&B lumber, their sectors cover rt 25 from Center harbor to Fox hollow. The second is on the rise across from Fox hollow on Rt 25, that covers from Greens to the Sandwich line, Rt 25 only. There is nothing on Red Hill. Caution here, the fire tower is owned by LRCT which won't allow commercial use, the RH tower is on a lower ridge east of the fire tower and sheltered by the ridge looking out towards MBoro neck, so it is great looking into Sandwich, but not Mboro. Curious point, there are no providers on that tower that aim sectors to Sandwich, lol.

So, the third and main tower is at 781 Mboro neck road, which is the old Bell System microwave tower which relayed from Laconia. It is obvious as you drive down there. Looking at the attached (corrected) map, Hanson cove is covered by three sectors: Green, Pink and White (or more, considering where you exactly where you consider the definition). From the description of these sectors (can't determine the color on the map and relate it), the sectors that face west are: West 288 degrees 700Mhz & W 288 Degrees, 1.9GHz. The defined sectors don't really match the map, but it is crowd sourced based on samples from cell phones in the area.

Notice the only one that really counts on penetration is the 700Mhz; the 1.9G is like your wifi router (lower band), you really wouldn't expect much penetration. The other thing is these are what Verizon CAN transmit on and don't necessarily have to be (due to maintenance, or what ever). Would be great if they took the other two towers and added antennas, but it is all economies.

Wifi-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Wifi-1 For This Useful Post:
trfour (06-06-2019)
Old 06-06-2019, 09:08 PM   #30
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,188
Thanks: 603
Thanked 609 Times in 351 Posts
Default

Sooo...why don't I get great service at Hanson Cove?

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2019, 08:23 AM   #31
Hillcountry
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: In the hills
Posts: 1,441
Thanks: 734
Thanked 310 Times in 204 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
Sooo...why don't I get great service at Hanson Cove?

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk
Maybe there's a "cellphone signal N***"

"NO SIGNAL FOR YOU!"
Hillcountry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2019, 08:34 AM   #32
cowislander
Senior Member
 
cowislander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Topsfield
Posts: 52
Thanks: 3
Thanked 9 Times in 2 Posts
Default PagePlus

I've been on the Verizon tower system for years, good coverage all around the lake, IMO. Check out PagePlus. They are a Mobile Virtual Network Operator (MVNO) that rents "space" on Verizon's tower network. They have a variety of plans, the one I have is unlimited talk/text and 3gb data each month. $29. I cant find a better deal using the Verizon system. The only caveat....their customer service leaves much to be desired.
cowislander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2019, 05:27 AM   #33
Wifi-1
Member
 
Wifi-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 28
Thanks: 28
Thanked 14 Times in 9 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
Sooo...why don't I get great service at Hanson Cove?

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk
This is going to take a little bit of work. I don't have Verizon, but I fixed up the map so the towers are where they should be. Look at the following page:

https://www.signalbooster.com/pages/...-in-usa-canada

In particular:
====
Verizon Wireless 3G : 850 MHz, Band 0 (CDMA). 1900 MHz PCS, Band 1 (CDMA). 4G : 700 MHz Block C, Band 13 (LTE). 1900 MHz PCS, Band 1 (1xRTT/ EV-DO/ eHRPD). 1900 MHz PCS, Band 2 (LTE). 1700/ 2100 MHz AWS, Band 4 (LTE).
====

Does your phone support ALL of these ?

Download the cellmapper.net app to your phone, get an account (it's free) and leave it running as you drive around. It will show you what towers/freq you are connecting to in real time. (have someone else drive or watch the screen) Where are you, or are you not, connecting to? While you have the app scanning, you are contributing to their database. You can also load:

https://www.cellmapper.net/map

Select provider (USA/Verizon), the map starts over in Africa, so you will have to reposition, lol. This will produce the above map showing the (corrected) towers. Between what your phone plots and what the map shows, should be able to figure out what you are missing. Say, the northwest sector of the neck tower. Besides fixing Verizon's towers, I have also done TMobile for the area. A Red tower is a computed location and a Green tower is one someone has located (hopefully) correctly.

While you are at it, there is another nice app, Network Signal Info(pro) (KAIBITS), similar to the above, but you will have to initially move the towers to the correct location yourself.

====

This should be the start of the discovery of what is going wrong. Connecting to the tower off Mt Rowe? (lol), that could be the problem. It is also a fun, educational tool to the marvel of what is happening in that little box of yours.

Last edited by Wifi-1; 06-08-2019 at 06:19 AM.
Wifi-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Wifi-1 For This Useful Post:
BroadHopper (06-18-2019), trfour (06-09-2019)
Old 06-15-2019, 04:46 AM   #34
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,188
Thanks: 603
Thanked 609 Times in 351 Posts
Default

Just a note that I called Verizon from camp last night when I was getting horrible service--dropped a few calls for the first time in forever.

They instructed me to: power down, pull SIM, reinsert SIM, wait 5 minutes, power up. Since doing that, I've had MUCH better service. Before, I was dropping calls and losing Spotify every few seconds. Now I can post updates on Winni forum from my toilet!

Anyone explain what changed and if I'll have to do this every time I come up?

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2019, 06:22 AM   #35
Top-Water
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Derry-Belmont
Posts: 588
Thanks: 358
Thanked 233 Times in 125 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
Now I can post updates on Winni forum from my toilet!

Signs and Symptoms of Cell Phone Addiction
https://www.psychguides.com/behavior...-and-symptoms/

Should be on this list if it is not.
Top-Water is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Top-Water For This Useful Post:
LoveLakeLife (06-15-2019)
Old 06-15-2019, 06:36 AM   #36
Top-Water
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Derry-Belmont
Posts: 588
Thanks: 358
Thanked 233 Times in 125 Posts
Default

Correction: It is

About half way down the page.
Physical Effects of Addiction

Under illnesses

1 in 6 cell phones has fecal matter on it.
Top-Water is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2019, 09:22 AM   #37
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,188
Thanks: 603
Thanked 609 Times in 351 Posts
Default

I wear gloves.

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2019, 11:11 AM   #38
Top-Water
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Derry-Belmont
Posts: 588
Thanks: 358
Thanked 233 Times in 125 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
I wear gloves.
Thank you .....That's reassuring just let us know what restaurants you and your cell phone frequent in advance that have a salad bar or the complementary bowl of mints in advance.

Thanks
Top-Water is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2019, 11:15 AM   #39
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,188
Thanks: 603
Thanked 609 Times in 351 Posts
Default

I wear gloves at restaurants, too.

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2019, 11:19 AM   #40
Top-Water
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Derry-Belmont
Posts: 588
Thanks: 358
Thanked 233 Times in 125 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
I wear gloves at restaurants, too.
In another four minutes your going to tell me you use a condom over the phone for our protection or does it have it's own glove.


Flagged
Top-Water is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2019, 01:11 PM   #41
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,188
Thanks: 603
Thanked 609 Times in 351 Posts
Default

That's absurd.

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2019, 05:26 AM   #42
Wifi-1
Member
 
Wifi-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 28
Thanks: 28
Thanked 14 Times in 9 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
Just a note that I called Verizon from camp last night when I was getting horrible service--dropped a few calls for the first time in forever.

They instructed me to: power down, pull SIM, reinsert SIM, wait 5 minutes, power up. Since doing that, I've had MUCH better service. Before, I was dropping calls and losing Spotify every few seconds. Now I can post updates on Winni forum from my toilet!

Anyone explain what changed and if I'll have to do this every time I come up?

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk
Sounds to me like it was Verizon's way to force a PRL update. You should be all set until the next time (lol...the PRL updates).

Verizon and US Cellular are roaming partners, just another variable to mix in, meaning you could have been on a USC tower and that is where the problem lies OR your new PRL added a USC tower and that is what improved your particular location.
Wifi-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2019, 06:29 AM   #43
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,188
Thanks: 603
Thanked 609 Times in 351 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wifi-1 View Post
Sounds to me like it was Verizon's way to force a PRL update. You should be all set until the next time (lol...the PRL updates).



Verizon and US Cellular are roaming partners, just another variable to mix in, meaning you could have been on a USC tower and that is where the problem lies OR your new PRL added a USC tower and that is what improved your particular location.
It appears the "fix" was short term. That night and yesterday, spotty service returned. Given my awesome service, I'm thinking it's either my phone or that I'm in-between towers getting conflicts or something.

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2019, 11:52 AM   #44
Menix711
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Post Cell Phone Service On & Around the Lake

Please let me apologize in advance for a somewhat lengthy post but if this issue is of concern to you the details might be useful:

Background: Over this last year I have experienced a marked decline in the signal strength and cell coverage in/around the New Hampshire lake region. Lots of dropped calls and problems getting and sending text messages, especially when sending something with a photo attached at locations we never had problems with in the past.

Verizon wireless (our cell carrier) doesn’t make it easy to contact them about cell service issues. In frustration I reached out to the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission with my issues. While the PUC got back to me right away, they let me know that they don’t have regulatory oversight authority over wireless carriers. They did forward my complaint to Verizon Wireless.

Much to my surprise a couple of days later I got a call from the Verizon corporate level office down in Maryland that deals with complaints. He informed me Verizon was beginning an extensive “technical” investigation of the issues. I received a couple of calls from technicians doing research and looking at call strength, dropped call problems, etc. To their credit in about a week I received a call back from the corporate representative outlining that they had verified that there was a transmitter down issue in our local area, particularly around the Weirs Beach area. He indicated that their technical review confirmed what I had reported, last summer I was consistently getting three, four and sometimes five bars at our camp location on Bear Island. Now we struggle to get two bars. He would not pin down the tower location but we have line of sight to Weirs Beach so I strongly suspect that is where at least one issue is centered.

The bad news was that there was no timetable set for resolving this issue impacting us in the lake region. The representative did say that if there were multiple trouble calls from subscribers within an area (he said usually 5 or so was enough) that the trouble tickets would be bundled into a much higher priority status for more immediate attention. Basically, he said to get friends and neighbors in my area to complain. Thus my post on this forum.

The take away is that while state Public Utilities Boards don’t regulate wireless carriers it is obvious to me that they scare the carriers more than we might imagine. If you have wireless carrier issues the most direct and but not necessarily simple approach is to call Customer Support (for Verizon Wireless it is 800.922.0204 and select “Technical Support”) to file a service complaint.

Don’t expect to get a direct answer. Be warned it is not easy to navigate their phone tree and once to get to technical support you will have to answer a lot of questions about locations and the specific issues. From what I am learning, the impact of a relatively small number of complaints coming subscribers from an area is enough to get attention.

In the lakes region, the PUC complaint route is via an online complaint form at https://www.puc.nh.gov/Consumer/complaint.htm , but be aware that they will let know that they can’t help, but will forward your complaint to the wireless carrier. If my experience is any indication, you will get a call from a corporate level representative for follow up. I subsequently got several follow up calls from technicians as well as text updates on my trouble ticket.

My advice is to be very specific about issues you are experiencing and press hard for them to address those issues. You are paying a lot of money for cell service and companies like Verizon Wireless are pretty tone deaf to routine complaints but when confronted with any government regulatory scrutiny or volumes of complaints they become much more “customer friendly”.

I hope this helps if you are experiencing a cell service problem around the Lakes Region.
Menix711 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Menix711 For This Useful Post:
C Tucker (07-11-2019)
Old 06-28-2019, 06:20 AM   #45
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,188
Thanks: 603
Thanked 609 Times in 351 Posts
Default

After a lot of playing around, I picked up a used Samsung S8 on Swappa on the recommendation of a former student who is into tech. Supposedly, Motorola's phones' antennas/modems aren't as high quality as they once were (Lenovo buyout).

I received the new (used) S8 yesterday and have had consistent service.

Verizon's map shows white on the edges of the lake, we're only a couple hundred feet away as the crow flies, so it makes sense that the signal is a bit weaker where I am.

It would appear that the better antennas in the S8 do a better job than the G5S+ I had. It's a shame, though, because I really like the G phones, and I can't stand financing/paying for expensive devices.

The S8 I got was practically new--no usage marks at all, and cost $208.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2019, 11:11 AM   #46
Weekend Pundit
Senior Member
 
Weekend Pundit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Gilford
Posts: 173
Thanks: 6
Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts
Default There's 5G And Then There's 5G

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wifi-1 View Post
-> LTE-A is a higher speed LTE, it is not 5G.

-> The "brain rotting" will happen (allegedly) when they start using (much higher) GHz freqs.
The millimeter wave bands for 5G are unlikely to be deployed here anytime in the near-to-middling future. As mentioned in another comment, 3G networks will start being phased out starting at the end of the year. 5G will subsume the the existing 3G/4G bands and make use of the new 3.7GHz band. The new coding/spectrum use formats will make more efficient use of the available bands. Much of 5G will exist there.

The new millimeter wave bands have very limited coverage, will require between 5 and 20 times the number of cell sites to provide similar coverage realized on the lower bands, and a lot of optical fiber to connect them all together. That makes sense in urban areas and thickly settled suburbs, but not out here. The customer density is a money loser.
Weekend Pundit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2019, 08:04 PM   #47
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,188
Thanks: 603
Thanked 609 Times in 351 Posts
Default

Just for some closure to this thread: Verizon continued to suck, and the week of the 4th was unusable.

Yesterday, my wife and I (after 19 years) jumped ship and signed up for AT&T prepaid. $70/mth. for two lines, both with 16GB.

So far, service and speed has smoked our previous Verizon experience. From Nashua to Arcadia, we had one small gap, for about 100 feet or so, in front of Heath Hardware in Center Harbor. Currently streaming Spotify while posting this, in the same place I stopped receiving Verizon service last fall.

Finally, thanks for all the input here--I even had a member offer an active T-Mobile SIM card for me to try out for a couple weeks--pretty awesome. Cheers!

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to thinkxingu For This Useful Post:
Den65 (07-10-2019)
Old 07-10-2019, 08:32 PM   #48
SAB1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rowley MA / Tuftonboro
Posts: 699
Thanks: 99
Thanked 164 Times in 120 Posts
Default

Agree last weekend sucked for service. Could only get texts out by standing in certain areas out in my yard. I’m ready to dump Verizon. Never had an issue until last fall. Now it’s barely useable.
SAB1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2019, 10:31 PM   #49
lakevet
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 23
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
Just for some closure to this thread: Verizon continued to suck, and the week of the 4th was unusable.

Yesterday, my wife and I (after 19 years) jumped ship and signed up for AT&T prepaid. $70/mth. for two lines, both with 16GB.

So far, service and speed has smoked our previous Verizon experience. From Nashua to Arcadia, we had one small gap, for about 100 feet or so, in front of Heath Hardware in Center Harbor. Currently streaming Spotify while posting this, in the same place I stopped receiving Verizon service last fall.

Finally, thanks for all the input here--I even had a member offer an active T-Mobile SIM card for me to try out for a couple weeks--pretty awesome. Cheers!

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
Just for some closure to this thread: Verizon continued to suck, and the week of the 4th was unusable.

Yesterday, my wife and I (after 19 years) jumped ship and signed up for AT&T prepaid. $70/mth. for two lines, both with 16GB.

So far, service and speed has smoked our previous Verizon experience. From Nashua to Arcadia, we had one small gap, for about 100 feet or so, in front of Heath Hardware in Center Harbor. Currently streaming Spotify while posting this, in the same place I stopped receiving Verizon service last fall.

Finally, thanks for all the input here--I even had a member offer an active T-Mobile SIM card for me to try out for a couple weeks--pretty awesome. Cheers!

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
I have also been very happy with my att service up in moultonborough (raouls cove). We don't even have a land line.


Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
lakevet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2019, 06:18 AM   #50
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,188
Thanks: 603
Thanked 609 Times in 351 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lakevet View Post
I have also been very happy with my att service up in moultonborough (raouls cove). We don't even have a land line.


Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
You're right next to us. When in the store, the ATT dude brought up some maps to show coverage, and he said we should be "saturated." I've got almost full bars inside my camp, where Verizon was unusable, so I'm pretty happy!

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2019, 06:44 AM   #51
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,569
Thanks: 455
Thanked 800 Times in 553 Posts
Default

I would think Verizon is going to have to do something about this or they will lose all their customers to ATT.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2019, 06:52 AM   #52
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,188
Thanks: 603
Thanked 609 Times in 351 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tis View Post
I would think Verizon is going to have to do something about this or they will lose all their customers to ATT.
It'll be interesting to see, for sure. Though, I gotta say that "network loyalty" is interesting because, after 19 years of good service with Verizon, it took a lot longer than it should have to switch, and I was still hesitant until we did!

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2019, 07:20 AM   #53
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,569
Thanks: 455
Thanked 800 Times in 553 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
It'll be interesting to see, for sure. Though, I gotta say that "network loyalty" is interesting because, after 19 years of good service with Verizon, it took a lot longer than it should have to switch, and I was still hesitant until we did!

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
I agree. We've always had Verizon too. Of course it was the only thing that worked up here and until they built the tower in Wolfeboro it was still spotty. Now we have a choice I guess.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.20611 seconds