|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Calendar | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-27-2018, 10:18 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Loudon, Tennessee, foothills of the Great Smoky Mountains
Posts: 283
Thanks: 340
Thanked 41 Times in 33 Posts
|
Navigation Display
I am new to boating and I am looking for some advice from my boating forum friends on a GPS chart plotter. To lean about the navigation hazards on Lake Winnipesaukee I used the Bizer chart of the lake and the Navionics app on my smart phone. For next year I would like to purchase a GPS chart plotter with about a 6 inch display which I can mount on my console. I am looking for advice on the best navigation display to purchase and the best navigational software for Lake Winnipesaukee. Thanks in advice for your recommendations.
__________________
Moose Tracks |
09-27-2018, 10:50 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 3,530
Thanks: 1,570
Thanked 1,601 Times in 821 Posts
|
I use a Raymarine Dragonfly 7 using the Navionics charts and highly recommend both! https://www.bing.com/aclick?ld=e3Qma...186f93427a39a7
|
The Following User Says Thank You to VitaBene For This Useful Post: | ||
moose tracks (09-27-2018) |
09-27-2018, 11:08 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Loudon, Tennessee, foothills of the Great Smoky Mountains
Posts: 283
Thanks: 340
Thanked 41 Times in 33 Posts
|
Do I need the sonar feature if I am not going to be using it for fishing? Is the transducer easy to mount?
__________________
Moose Tracks |
09-27-2018, 12:02 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin, Ma / Gilford
Posts: 1,931
Thanks: 445
Thanked 604 Times in 340 Posts
|
For a different brand -- we have the Garmin53CV and have had great luck with it -- when loaded with the Lakes chip (add$150)
https://www.amazon.com/Garmin-echoMA...+echomap&psc=1 and to answer your question about the transducer -- if your not fishing, we find a bottom view quite useless on this Lake as the contour changes so drastically and rapidly. Cool to look at periodically -- but can also scare the crap out of ya too... using it for boating is not wise as by the time it traces on the screen you've probably hit it !!
__________________
A bad day on the Big Lake (although I've never had one) - Still beats a day at the office!! |
The Following User Says Thank You to Phantom For This Useful Post: | ||
moose tracks (09-27-2018) |
09-27-2018, 01:47 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 23 Times in 12 Posts
|
I would disagree that knowing your depth is unimportant on lake Winnipesaukee.
It's nice to know if you're going to toss an anchor, you can actually hit the bottom. Going thru channels that you are staying in safe water. Know right where your depth is when bellying up to a sand bar. And chart plotters do fail. If you decide to add a depth transducer, there are two kinds that we deal with. The thru-hull which requires you to drill a hole in the bottom of your boat. However I find they work best. The other is a transom mounted transducer. It is mounted on the rear of your boat. This is the easiest to install. |
The Following User Says Thank You to BrunoSR For This Useful Post: | ||
moose tracks (09-27-2018) |
Sponsored Links |
|
09-27-2018, 01:53 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,943
Thanks: 1,153
Thanked 1,962 Times in 1,212 Posts
|
I also agree that depth is important. I use it to know how much rode I need--I have my rope marked in ten foot sections. Also, when I'm at a sandbar, I need to know depth so my ladder doesn't hit bottom in the waves. I use depth all the time.
Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk |
The Following User Says Thank You to thinkxingu For This Useful Post: | ||
moose tracks (09-27-2018) |
09-27-2018, 01:56 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Merrimack and Welch Island
Posts: 4,030
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,509 Times in 982 Posts
|
Navionics
If you already use and like the Navionics app, I would expect the chartplotter display to look the same. A convenience to me as opposed to working with two different displays.
I took my old (2002) chartplotter to the Raymarine folks in Nashua and within a couple of days they had upgraded some internals and software. Don't remember the cost but it didn't stick in my mind as expensive. They did the same for me many years ago with a problem on my handheld VHF. Nice guys to work with and I'd guess they get a fair number of walk-ins. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Descant For This Useful Post: | ||
moose tracks (09-27-2018) |
09-27-2018, 02:02 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Tilton/Paugus Bay
Posts: 234
Thanks: 13
Thanked 61 Times in 43 Posts
|
"we have the Garmin53CV and have had great luck with it -- when loaded with the Lakes chip (add$150)"
I have the exact same setup, but the 73CV (7-inch screen vs 5) I only use the transducer for depth and the periodic looking at the bottom before I drop (or snag) anchor. The biggest thing I use a LOT with this setup up and the 'chip'. I get auto guidance. Not autopilot, more like MapQuest for boats. Just use the cursor, put in home location and tell it to auto-navigate there. Because you define in setup your height, beam, and draught it knows what bridges I can go under and it knows how shallow I can go (the chip also gives you auto lake depth). Then I have a purple line on the chart to follow. I could be in Moultonboro at 11PM with no moon and get to Paugus or Alton with no worries. Or, I can hand the helm to my wife and say, follow the purple line, I have to hit the head I try to keep a line on the map from where I am to home also just in case something happens and I can not navigate (bonk on the head, attacked by bears,,, ) basically just in case I have to tell anyone how to get back home. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Patofnaud For This Useful Post: | ||
moose tracks (09-28-2018) |
09-27-2018, 03:26 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 3,530
Thanks: 1,570
Thanked 1,601 Times in 821 Posts
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to VitaBene For This Useful Post: | ||
moose tracks (09-29-2018) |
09-27-2018, 03:47 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 564
Thanks: 46
Thanked 104 Times in 75 Posts
|
I have always had transom transducers and they do have their idiosyncracies.
Always wondered about the in hull units and how well they work. ------------------------------------------------------ I am a retired workaholic and continuing aquaholic |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Woody38 For This Useful Post: | ||
Hillcountry (09-27-2018), moose tracks (09-29-2018) |
09-28-2018, 06:21 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin, Ma / Gilford
Posts: 1,931
Thanks: 445
Thanked 604 Times in 340 Posts
|
Gentlemen -- you are crossing up a "depth finder" with the Sonar Transducer!
Although the side benefit of the Sonar is acting as a depth finder the designed purpose is to "paint a picture" of the bottoms contour. Most boats today come equipped with a straight forward (thru Hull) depth finder. My point was that when driving around -- although it is rather cool to look at for the first few trips - it gets rather distracting to watch the contour of the bottom, when in reality by the time it "paints it" / your past it ! I was simply trying to save Moose Tracks some money as he investigates the options --- all said & done (with installation included) the Sonar transducer is NOT worth the expense (in my humble opinion) as a non fisher. Moose Tracks original question was do I NEED the Sonar feature
__________________
A bad day on the Big Lake (although I've never had one) - Still beats a day at the office!! |
The Following User Says Thank You to Phantom For This Useful Post: | ||
moose tracks (09-28-2018) |
09-28-2018, 12:47 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,943
Thanks: 1,153
Thanked 1,962 Times in 1,212 Posts
|
Quote:
Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to thinkxingu For This Useful Post: | ||
Phantom (10-01-2018) |
09-28-2018, 10:46 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 674
Thanks: 1,535
Thanked 714 Times in 431 Posts
|
First few words of original post.
Second reply / post in thread. Quote:
The transducers IMHO are a pain in the ass to mount if you want maximum performance. (Just a personal opinion.) Yes the instructions make it look easy and the process is just drilling a few holes and installing a few screws. But again (IMHO) getting the thru hull transducer works better and will do less permanent visible damage to the hull and eliminates having wires going over the transom. However not all boats can use thru hull transducers but most can. From personal experience I can't imagine having one without the other in the same unit and have had just better overall luck with an epoxied thru hull transducer. (No drilling at all) (However often they don't come with some units standard but can often be acquired free/no cost as an even exchange from the manufacturer in a few days.) |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Top-Water For This Useful Post: | ||
moose tracks (09-29-2018) |
09-28-2018, 11:09 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 674
Thanks: 1,535
Thanked 714 Times in 431 Posts
|
Quote:
Done correctly you get no surface clutter in rough water and constant bottom contact all the time at all speeds and different water conditions. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Top-Water For This Useful Post: | ||
moose tracks (09-29-2018) |
09-30-2018, 07:16 AM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: In the hills
Posts: 2,346
Thanks: 1,590
Thanked 763 Times in 457 Posts
|
Quote:
The old adage applies...why not have it and not need it than need it and not have it? |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Hillcountry For This Useful Post: | ||
moose tracks (09-30-2018) |
10-01-2018, 03:37 PM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV and Moultonborough, NH
Posts: 361
Thanks: 24
Thanked 84 Times in 70 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DesertDweller For This Useful Post: | ||
moose tracks (10-02-2018) |
10-01-2018, 05:22 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: In the hills
Posts: 2,346
Thanks: 1,590
Thanked 763 Times in 457 Posts
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Hillcountry For This Useful Post: | ||
moose tracks (10-02-2018) |
10-01-2018, 08:16 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Milford, NH
Posts: 159
Thanks: 42
Thanked 16 Times in 14 Posts
|
6" display
Garmin also has "Garmin ECHOMAP Plus 63cv" which comes preloaded with LakeView. I have a Lowrance with Navonics and have looked at the Garmin and in my opinion the Garmin LakeView is better then the Navonics.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to JPC For This Useful Post: | ||
moose tracks (10-02-2018) |
10-01-2018, 08:49 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: In the hills
Posts: 2,346
Thanks: 1,590
Thanked 763 Times in 457 Posts
|
That’s the one I have...Echomap 5xx something or other. Nice little unit
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Hillcountry For This Useful Post: | ||
moose tracks (10-02-2018) |
10-04-2018, 08:38 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 204
Thanks: 8
Thanked 82 Times in 47 Posts
|
I just got a Dragonfly 7 Pro with Navioncs for my boat. I just installed it in lat august so have only been out with it twice, but it works great! The install took me a few hours being extremely picky with the install.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Juiced06GTO For This Useful Post: | ||
moose tracks (10-05-2018) |
Bookmarks |
|
|