|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Calendar | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
08-10-2018, 05:27 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gilford, NH and Florida
Posts: 2,897
Thanks: 644
Thanked 2,153 Times in 900 Posts
|
Laconia Council Proposes WOW Trail Study
Among other things, the study would determine the expense of extending the trail alongside the tracks, versus in place of the tracks. It would also look at the economic impact to the region and the state of the current trail, versus an extended trail.
https://www.laconiadailysun.com/news...ticle-nav-next |
08-15-2018, 05:52 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gilford, NH and Florida
Posts: 2,897
Thanks: 644
Thanked 2,153 Times in 900 Posts
|
$50,000 Study to happen.
The Laconia City Council approved the WOW Trail study.
https://www.laconiadailysun.com/news...6e9bcaa59.html |
08-15-2018, 07:19 AM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,220
Thanks: 1,206
Thanked 1,007 Times in 648 Posts
|
Quote:
Let’s the heated discussion commence again. The new and interesting part is now thinking of “replacing” the tracks with the trail instead of running it parallel to the trail. I have voiced my opinion many time and think the trail would be a great addition but now “not” at the sacrifice of the train. The train is well used by the tourists in the area and I believe will take away from the charm of the area. I love hearing and seeing the train go by. FYI I am a member of Akwa Vista and disagree with Richard Mailoux. Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app |
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to joey2665 For This Useful Post: | ||
greeleyhill (08-17-2018), jetskier (08-15-2018) |
08-15-2018, 07:21 AM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,946
Thanks: 1,154
Thanked 1,962 Times in 1,212 Posts
|
Quote:
Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to thinkxingu For This Useful Post: | ||
greeleyhill (08-17-2018) |
08-15-2018, 08:10 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
|
Can't bite my tongue
After reading today's article, I am amazed at the audacity of Mr Mailloux. For a man who stole away so many peoples view by building up his facility to turn around and say the train bothers his guests is appalling. He is certainly a What's in it for me, kinda guy. He built next to a, in use railroad, he knew what that meant, and for him to say it should go for his economic benefit really grinds my gears. Having grown up in a town that added a rail trail, and that rail trail is now some 20+ yrs old, I feel I can speak to the subject. Yes, these trails do attract riders, and walkers, however in my experience these people come to town, park their vehicles, and ride or walk, return to said vehicle and drive away. They don't find a place to change out of their spandex, and go visit the downtown, restaurants, or get a room for the night. They are day trippers at best. I think the trail as it exists in downtown (alongside the rail) does work, but we can't sit back and ignore the Graffiti and crime that has also occurred on the trail. I think the trail has run it's course, and stops exactly where it should.
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to WeirsBeachBoater For This Useful Post: | ||
greeleyhill (08-17-2018), HAMPTONS (08-16-2018), jetskier (08-15-2018), Longtimelurker (08-15-2018), pondguy (08-15-2018) |
Sponsored Links |
|
08-15-2018, 08:37 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,056
Thanks: 435
Thanked 1,000 Times in 415 Posts
|
WOW Trail
I thought the same thing about Mr. Mailloux. It reminded me of when we lived in RI, and people who bought cheap houses near TF Green would complain about airline traffic over their homes.
Full disclosure, I live in Long Bay and am against the WOW trail for many reasons. However, I am most against the City of Laconia investing in it. I don't have my numbers down, but I remember the City promising that the Colonial Theater would only cost the taxpayers $2-$3 Million Dollars, and now I read that the cost will exceed $17 Million Dollars. Who's going to pay for it?! The taxpayers! I feel hoodwinked. At least the $50,000 study is coming from the WOW Trail proponents, not the taxpayers. The City also lied to us about maintenance costs associated with Phase I and Phase II of the WOW Trail. We were told that the City would not pay for maintenance, but now it is a line item in the City's budget. The reason why WOW Trail proponents want to rip up the track is because this approach will lower the cost of Phase III. There are significant construction challenges in spots where there is a strip of land with water on both sides of the track. It would be easier to rip up the track and put the trail there. I hope the study honestly assesses the cost of constructing the trail and the economic impact. I doubt it will. Also, the City should reevaluate it's growth approach. It is clear the city intends to grow by greenlighting Section 8 housing. This approach seems inconsistent with spending large sums of money on a theater and a trail. |
08-15-2018, 08:38 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 527
Thanks: 83
Thanked 194 Times in 118 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to swnoel For This Useful Post: | ||
WeirsBeachBoater (08-15-2018) |
08-15-2018, 08:48 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maynard, MA & Paugus Bay
Posts: 2,522
Thanks: 747
Thanked 344 Times in 257 Posts
|
I still do not understand why they are not looking at the cheapest/least invasive alternative for everyone, if they really want this thing done
From where it dumps out at the Meredith Center road near Fratellos send it up Union ave, then make a wider sidewalk/trail way up rt 3/weirs blvd, right up to Weirs beach, the view will be the same, and will not take away from businesses, homeowners, the train. And if they are playing the businesses get a boost card, then those on Union Ave will increase There! pay me the $50k, just solved it in 3 minutes, like I have been saying to option this for years.
__________________
Capt. of the "No Worries" |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to AC2717 For This Useful Post: | ||
HAMPTONS (08-16-2018), jetskier (08-15-2018), Longtimelurker (08-15-2018), Major (08-15-2018), SPT13 (08-15-2018) |
08-15-2018, 09:06 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,949
Thanks: 80
Thanked 969 Times in 432 Posts
|
Not a fan of paying $50K for a study that is basically trying to prove we will be better off by putting someone else out of business.....
I like the WOW trail.... I like the concept. I am OK with it being extended to Weirs Beach. BUT.. it needs to COEXIST with the railroad, not replace the railroad. I am with WeirsBeachBoater.... that guy from Akwa has some set of balls on him.. He has a very checkered past. The train was there when he built up the property.... Of course this all being pushed by Rusty & the Common Man group. Woodsy
__________________
The only way to eliminate ignorant behavior is through education. You can't fix stupid. |
08-15-2018, 07:04 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Reading, MA and South Down Shores
Posts: 850
Thanks: 57
Thanked 183 Times in 114 Posts
|
Foregone Conclusion
It is interesting to see that the city and WOW Org now believe that their cause has more value than the existing railroad which is clearly a revenue producing entity, directly creates jobs and is a long term asset of merit.
A full engineering study will cost significantly more than $50k...so, this study is going to be cursory and it will say two things when the day is done:
So, now a few data points:
The state is considering building a sports center at the existing prison property on route 106. Doesn't it make much more sense to have a route that connects to that? The WOW Trail prohibits motorized vehicles which will make it very interesting relative to the fact that this is also part of the snow mobile trail system. There are alternative routes that allow the railroad to continue operating, could connect to the sports center (presuming it moves forward) and be of reasonable cost. The city and WOW Org is casting a deaf ear to alternative proposals. Just my 2 cents Jetskier |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jetskier For This Useful Post: | ||
Longtimelurker (08-15-2018), Major (08-16-2018) |
08-15-2018, 08:02 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,220
Thanks: 1,206
Thanked 1,007 Times in 648 Posts
|
Quote:
Jetskier I know we are on opposite ends on this topic but I am strongly against abandoning the railroad for the WOW Trail. I do have a question, you stated the rail line is also used for freight. In my 12 years here I have never seen a freight line go though this area. Am I wrong or just have not seen it? Just curious as I said I do not want the rail to be abandoned. Thanks. Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app |
|
08-16-2018, 05:37 AM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gilford, NH and Florida
Posts: 2,897
Thanks: 644
Thanked 2,153 Times in 900 Posts
|
Quote:
Pete Dearness, owner and manager of New England Southern Railroad, uses the tracks for freight operations. “I have no objection to the trail per se,” he said. “Trails are OK. My position is that our concern is both with respect to freight and the tourist potential on the line, and that it would be fine if somehow the committee could find a way to get the funding and to build the trail with the rail. "We strongly object to any idea of taking up the rail.” |
|
08-16-2018, 05:41 AM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,220
Thanks: 1,206
Thanked 1,007 Times in 648 Posts
|
Quote:
Tilton which stretch is used for freight? I’m just curious because I have never seen an active freight train. Is it more towards Belmont? Thanks Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app |
|
08-16-2018, 05:54 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gilford, NH and Florida
Posts: 2,897
Thanks: 644
Thanked 2,153 Times in 900 Posts
|
All of it
From their website:
Founded in 1981, the New England Southern Railroad serves your shipping needs in central New Hampshire, operating on the State of New Hampshire owned, White Mountain Branch, with common carrier obligations between Concord and Lincoln. Our interchange with Pan Am Railways in Concord connects your shipments to the nationwide railroad network. Freight service north of Lochmere, when warranted, requires coordination with the Winnipesaukee Scenic Railroad, Hobo Railroad and Cafe Lafayette Dinner Train operations. |
08-16-2018, 06:17 AM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,220
Thanks: 1,206
Thanked 1,007 Times in 648 Posts
|
Quote:
Very interesting, did not know this. Thanks for the research. Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app |
|
08-16-2018, 08:35 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Welch Island and West Alton
Posts: 3,218
Thanks: 1,173
Thanked 2,002 Times in 915 Posts
|
We enjoy rail trails including the WOW and the connected trail section in Belmont. We would like the see the expansion but not at the expense of existing rail use.
There is one example of mixed rail and trail use: the Cotton Valley Rail Trail in Wolfeboro. https://www.conwaydailysun.com/outdo...53054b50c.html http://www.cottonvalley.org/index.php In this case the rail use is limited to small private rail cars. As both types of users support maintenance of the rail trail it appears to be a peaceful cooperative coexistence. Walkers and bicyclers at times have to go between the rails which in these spots is filled in with packed gravel. In the winter most of the trail is open to snowmobiles and there are connections with state corridors. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Slickcraft For This Useful Post: | ||
fatlazyless (08-16-2018) |
08-16-2018, 09:18 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,949
Thanks: 80
Thanked 969 Times in 432 Posts
|
Slickcraft.... there could be peaceful coexistence. But...
The WOW trail will require a fence... Southdown doesn't want the WOW trail or the fence. They have an uphill argument as the rail trail was part of their planning documents. Not sure how well they would do in court. The WOW people don't want to spend the $$ to build the causeways & walkways beside the narrow portions of the rail corridor. So if they can somehow get the state to pull the tracks.... The upside is, State law favors the railroads... and I think the HOBO has a renewal clause in their lease that gives them until 2029 or something. So the WOW trail spending the $$ on this study is STUPID. Woodsy
__________________
The only way to eliminate ignorant behavior is through education. You can't fix stupid. |
08-16-2018, 10:43 AM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Reading, MA and South Down Shores
Posts: 850
Thanks: 57
Thanked 183 Times in 114 Posts
|
Quote:
I am not against the WOW Trail in general...just against removing the tracks or usurping the frontage of the homes along the lake....anyhow...this is an active freight line which is coordinated with the scenic railroad. I have not seen freight activity either, but I am guessing that it is relatively limited. Please see the attached link. Jetskier http://www.newenglandsouthernrailroad.com/ |
|
08-16-2018, 10:48 AM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,220
Thanks: 1,206
Thanked 1,007 Times in 648 Posts
|
Quote:
Thanks Jetskier. Would you be happy with the use of split rail fencing along South Down and Long Bay as they have now near the Belmont Laconia line with access points to the beach’s and boat club? Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app |
|
08-16-2018, 02:46 PM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Reading, MA and South Down Shores
Posts: 850
Thanks: 57
Thanked 183 Times in 114 Posts
|
Quote:
There are way too many issues with the trail even as an adjacency to the operating railway (with split rail).
As you probably know, there are alternative routes that don't require ripping up the tracks or costs, issues, disruption of building adjacent to the existing railway. It is frustrating that the city and WOW org view this as a preemptive initiative and want to literally bulldoze it through. As an alternative, a WOW trail connecting to a premier sports center would make eminent sense. Jetskier |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jetskier For This Useful Post: | ||
AC2717 (08-16-2018) |
08-16-2018, 03:24 PM | #21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,946
Thanks: 1,154
Thanked 1,962 Times in 1,212 Posts
|
Quote:
What do you think is the answer to the fact that most of what you pointed to are issues that SD, etc. should have planned for given that the trail was part of the expectations when those associations were incorporated? (I'm serious, not being snarky) Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk |
|
08-16-2018, 08:43 PM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Reading, MA and South Down Shores
Posts: 850
Thanks: 57
Thanked 183 Times in 114 Posts
|
No formal documents supporting this that I know of
Quote:
If someone can point me to any original documents - plans showing that the actual formal approval of the two associations had the trail as a condition, please provide them. Jetskier |
|
08-16-2018, 09:09 PM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,946
Thanks: 1,154
Thanked 1,962 Times in 1,212 Posts
|
Interesting. Many people have referenced it, which is why I was asking.
Quote:
|
|
08-15-2018, 08:20 PM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 818
Thanks: 258
Thanked 259 Times in 157 Posts
|
Quote:
I'm not sure that is correct as I believe the line going to Wolfboro was abandoned in the 1980's as well as a connection going to Vermont that branched off the Concord to Lincoln line...... Additionally, I think there was a Manchester Branch that ran West which was abandoned in the 1970's. |
|
08-16-2018, 10:46 AM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Reading, MA and South Down Shores
Posts: 850
Thanks: 57
Thanked 183 Times in 114 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
08-15-2018, 09:12 AM | #26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maynard, MA & Paugus Bay
Posts: 2,522
Thanks: 747
Thanked 344 Times in 257 Posts
|
Quote:
seems like they could link that up as well. (I've got No dog in the fight) Never seems something so badly being jammed down people's throats when there are multiple different options
__________________
Capt. of the "No Worries" |
|
08-15-2018, 09:17 AM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,949
Thanks: 80
Thanked 969 Times in 432 Posts
|
AC2717....
It has to be a 'Rail Trail" to qualify for Federal funding.... so diverting it off the railroad row doesn't work. I won't even get into how bad this will be for snowmobilers! Woodsy
__________________
The only way to eliminate ignorant behavior is through education. You can't fix stupid. |
08-16-2018, 08:15 PM | #28 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 2,836
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,626 Times in 562 Posts
|
Quote:
We've walked and biked the trail several times and only saw 6 or 8 people from Lakeport to Laconia during nice weather in the spring. Saw some pretty creepy people hanging out in the woods just south of the old Scott and Williams buildings. It's no wonder that people are concerned in Southdown. But, aside from that, I have to ask why any reasonable person would want to build a fence on all of that beautiful shoreline. BTW...we are Rails to Trails members and have used other trails around the country such as the one that runs down Gasparilla Island Florida but does not encroach on any of the shorefront. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to SAMIAM For This Useful Post: | ||
jetskier (08-16-2018) |
08-17-2018, 09:00 AM | #29 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Welch Island and West Alton
Posts: 3,218
Thanks: 1,173
Thanked 2,002 Times in 915 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
08-17-2018, 10:17 AM | #30 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South Down Shores
Posts: 1,937
Thanks: 532
Thanked 568 Times in 334 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
[insert witty phrase here] |
|
08-18-2018, 08:28 AM | #31 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 2,836
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,626 Times in 562 Posts
|
Quote:
If you happen to look at the pictures of the men that were arrested Friday in todays laconia Sun,I think you migjt agree that they are a little "creepy" |
|
08-19-2018, 05:59 PM | #32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Boston, MA & Laconia, NH
Posts: 148
Thanks: 14
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
|
Quote:
I live in Paugus Bay and the train goes by my cottage. Its not a nuisance and I disagree with Mr. Mailoux. He wants to sacrifice the train to line his pockets... |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Tank151 For This Useful Post: | ||
pondguy (08-21-2018) |
08-20-2018, 10:35 PM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: New Durham
Posts: 165
Thanks: 116
Thanked 95 Times in 56 Posts
|
The WOW folks are going to learn a hard lesson real quickly on railroading 101. Hopefully whoever they hire to conduct this study, can articulate in the report that this railroad corridor is not abandoned and was not when the state purchased it from the railroad. The rail line is still under common carrier status and before the state arbitrarily pulls up the rails (if they ever want to go that route) they will have to apply before the Surface Transportation Board to abandon the line. They state may own the line but they still have to get approval at the federal level if they wish to turn it into a rail trail only. How can they do that when you have two active railroads using the line? It's simple, "you can't". Now had the line been abandoned before they purchased it, then the state could do as they please, they can allow a tourist railroad to operate or not, the line is no longer under common carrier status and therefore does not exist under the STB's governing body.
|
08-21-2018, 05:15 PM | #34 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 815
Thanks: 113
Thanked 193 Times in 126 Posts
|
Quote:
BTW, Nice 1st post.... I would guess you live in SD or LB... NO? |
|
08-21-2018, 07:34 PM | #35 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Reading, MA and South Down Shores
Posts: 850
Thanks: 57
Thanked 183 Times in 114 Posts
|
Stated in the Resolution
Quote:
I don't know Trail Goer, but Outdoorsman, a little common courtesy OK? Jetskier Last edited by jetskier; 08-21-2018 at 07:34 PM. Reason: Adding Title |
|
08-21-2018, 07:46 PM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,009
Thanks: 61
Thanked 701 Times in 455 Posts
|
Can somebody help me understand this statement from the above linked pdf?
"WHEREAS, the state-owned corridor would be maintained in perpetuity for NH DOT" It is maintained "FOR" the NH DOT? Could they have meant to write "BY" the NH DOT? Another point of interest in the pdf is this: "with the understanding that rail would be reinstalled at a future date if it was determined that rail was a better and higher use." Restarting the scenic train service seems as likely as flipping the switch to get a moth balled steel mill running again. |
08-21-2018, 10:31 PM | #37 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: New Durham
Posts: 165
Thanks: 116
Thanked 95 Times in 56 Posts
|
Quote:
The purpose of my post was to inform people that this railroad corridor is not abandoned, it's still under common carrier status and still part of the national railroad network. Example, the Conway Scenic Railroad is operating on tracks that were abandoned by the railroad before the state purchased the line. That railroad corridor is no longer part of the national railroad network and is not governed by the STB. Back to the line in question, in order for the state to apply for abandonment, the operating railroads have to first apply for a discontinuance with the STB and because this is an active rail line, the state would have to put this line up for bid. For the WOW Trail leaders to ask the state to simply deny the current railroads the right to do business in order to shut the line down for their rail-trail is in violation of federal law (railroads are exempt from local and state oversight, when dealing with interstate commerce). The Plymouth & Lincoln Railroad, the New England Southern Railroad, the Cafe Lafayette Dinner Train and the Lincoln Shops (which is a year round railroad car and locomotive repair shop) could potentially bring this issue before the board, if the WOW leaders and organizers, go too far. |
|
10-16-2018, 11:36 AM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: New Durham
Posts: 165
Thanks: 116
Thanked 95 Times in 56 Posts
|
Anyone know who will be undertaking this study and when it will start?
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Trail Goer For This Useful Post: | ||
beantownbaby (10-20-2018) |
08-16-2018, 11:34 AM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,946
Thanks: 1,154
Thanked 1,962 Times in 1,212 Posts
|
To me, it's all about the money. South Down, etc. all knew/should have known the trail could/would probably happen. Who will pay for it vs. the benefits is my bigger concern.
Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk |
08-18-2018, 09:32 AM | #40 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 59
Thanks: 192
Thanked 16 Times in 12 Posts
|
Quote:
I’m late to the WOW party. I have many questions to those in the know after reading the following paragraph in the article. “The City Council decided unanimously on Monday evening to commission a study to examine the pros and cons of extending the WOW Trail next to the railroad tracks along Paugus Bay, or in place of those tracks.” One could interpret this as the city council is executing the tax payers direction that this trail is wanted and this is where it must be. Could anybody articulate with city hall facts (omitting personal opinions) how this situation has evolved? I know opinions are far more entertaining. Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|