Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Links Calendar Register FAQDonate Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-02-2019, 07:37 AM   #1
clementine
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default Farm Island

Some of you may know that Farm Island in 19 Mile Bay is on the market. Farm Island is one of the few remaining undeveloped islands on Winnipesaukee.The Abenaki used to fish and hunt there, and there is a historic camp in the center of the island that goes back to when livestock spent the summer grazing there. Camp Belknap currently owns roughly 1/3 of the island and that portion is not on the market. There is a buyer interested in subdividing the 13+ acres into 12 buildable lots while preserving the historic camp. There is a hearing on July 18th at 7:00 at the Tuftonboro Town Hall at which this proposal to subdivide will be discussed. If you are interested in the future of Farm Island, come to the hearing on the 18th to learn more.
clementine is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to clementine For This Useful Post:
steve c (07-02-2019), Stevebvt (07-05-2019)
Old 07-02-2019, 10:09 AM   #2
hemlock
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 7 Posts
Default Farm Island

Back in 1965 my grandfather was looking at property on Cow Island. As he was boating over to Cow from 19 mile bay the real estate broker said he could buy the entirety of Farm Island for 5000 dollars. My grandfather said he wasnt interested in pursuing it because at the time it had no electricity. He ended up buying a lot on Cow for 3500 dollars that October. I am not sure if Farm Island was really for sale then but that is the story I was told.
hemlock is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to hemlock For This Useful Post:
Top-Water (07-02-2019)
Old 07-02-2019, 05:39 PM   #3
Top-Water
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Derry-Belmont
Posts: 619
Thanks: 386
Thanked 245 Times in 133 Posts
Default

Thanks for the little 1965 history story about your grandfather.
Top-Water is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Top-Water For This Useful Post:
MBNeckguy (07-02-2019)
Old 07-02-2019, 06:07 PM   #4
Pineedles
Senior Member
 
Pineedles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Moultonborough & CT
Posts: 2,448
Thanks: 962
Thanked 597 Times in 335 Posts
Default

Anything you buy on Winnipesaukee for storefront, will appreciate in value. Will it beat the market? Who knows. But it will go up in value.


Sent from my iPad using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
Pineedles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2019, 08:34 PM   #5
dickiej
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Newburyport, MA
Posts: 119
Thanks: 5
Thanked 64 Times in 31 Posts
Default

I think you meant shore front. Don't you all miss the days of the big dig in Boston when all that stolen money was used to buy million dollar homes with cash?
dickiej is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 07-02-2019, 08:51 PM   #6
TiltonBB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gilford, NH and Florida
Posts: 1,460
Thanks: 223
Thanked 818 Times in 337 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dickiej View Post
i think you meant shore front. Don't you all miss the days of the big dig in boston when all that stolen money was used to buy million dollar homes with cash?
Huh???????
TiltonBB is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TiltonBB For This Useful Post:
chasedawg (07-02-2019)
Old 07-18-2019, 07:37 AM   #7
chasedawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melvin village
Posts: 362
Thanks: 352
Thanked 183 Times in 94 Posts
Default Farm Island

Quote:
Originally Posted by clementine View Post
Some of you may know that Farm Island in 19 Mile Bay is on the market. Farm Island is one of the few remaining undeveloped islands on Winnipesaukee.The Abenaki used to fish and hunt there, and there is a historic camp in the center of the island that goes back to when livestock spent the summer grazing there. Camp Belknap currently owns roughly 1/3 of the island and that portion is not on the market. There is a buyer interested in subdividing the 13+ acres into 12 buildable lots while preserving the historic camp. There is a hearing on July 18th at 7:00 at the Tuftonboro Town Hall at which this proposal to subdivide will be discussed. If you are interested in the future of Farm Island, come to the hearing on the 18th to learn more.

It will be interesting to see how this turns out. Last remaining private undeveloped island on the lake. I heard that a large turn out is expected.
chasedawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2019, 12:38 PM   #8
Pineedles
Senior Member
 
Pineedles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Moultonborough & CT
Posts: 2,448
Thanks: 962
Thanked 597 Times in 335 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pineedles View Post
Anything you buy on Winnipesaukee with shorefrontage, will appreciate in value. Will it beat the market? Who knows. But it will go up in value.


Sent from my iPad using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app

Sent from my iPad using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
Pineedles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2019, 12:50 PM   #9
fatlazyless
Senior Member
 
fatlazyless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,345
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 193
Thanked 492 Times in 366 Posts
Default

Probably 99.9% of all Winnipesaukee island homes are second homes with local property taxes costing from $3,000-8,000/yr and going up every year.

So's with the new, (2018 tax year) federal income tax deduction limited to $10,000 ..... this new limit totally, totally, totally hits the second home owner very very very hard ..... regardless what anyone says ..... you understand!
__________________
Down & out, livn that Walmart side of the lake!
fatlazyless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2019, 09:43 AM   #10
DEJ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 323
Thanks: 240
Thanked 177 Times in 79 Posts
Default

How did the planning board meeting go regarding this proposed subdivision?
DEJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2019, 03:58 PM   #11
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Winnipesaukee & Florida
Posts: 4,420
Thanks: 886
Thanked 424 Times in 308 Posts
Exclamation 2k...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pineedles View Post
Anything you buy on Winnipesaukee for storefront, will appreciate in value. Will it beat the market? Who knows. But it will go up in value.
Maxfield Realty is listing Farm Island for $2,000,000.
__________________
.Sailing—Good for you and good for the world...
...and you won't stink...!
ApS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2019, 10:35 PM   #12
JEEPONLY
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 127
Thanks: 1
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dickiej View Post
I think you meant shore front. Don't you all miss the days of the big dig in Boston when all that stolen money was used to buy million dollar homes with cash?
Back in those days I sold boats during the Summer. Many Massachusetts trades guys from "The Dig"came in, with cash, to buy their formally elusive dream.
JEEPONLY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2019, 04:52 AM   #13
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,602
Thanks: 457
Thanked 807 Times in 558 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JEEPONLY View Post
Back in those days I sold boats during the Summer. Many Massachusetts trades guys from "The Dig"came in, with cash, to buy their formally elusive dream.
True story??
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2019, 08:12 AM   #14
JEEPONLY
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 127
Thanks: 1
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Default

True.

Many trades people came in, with cash, not just from "The Dig"

Face it, under the table income has been around for a long, long time, and it was very noticeable in the boat business back then.
JEEPONLY is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JEEPONLY For This Useful Post:
MBNeckguy (07-20-2019), tis (07-20-2019)
Old 07-20-2019, 10:28 AM   #15
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 502
Thanks: 264
Thanked 137 Times in 86 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JEEPONLY View Post
Back in those days I sold boats during the Summer. Many Massachusetts trades guys from "The Dig"came in, with cash, to buy their formally elusive dream.
"Trades guys" with cash stolen from Big Dig? C'mon. The project may have been over budget, and some money might have been misappropriated/stolen (I can't remember the latter), but it's pretty tough to see how money stolen from a government construction project in Massachusetts is stolen in cash by the guys swinging the hammers.
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2019, 10:47 AM   #16
Hillcountry
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: In the hills
Posts: 1,540
Thanks: 781
Thanked 355 Times in 230 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingScot View Post
"Trades guys" with cash stolen from Big Dig? C'mon. The project may have been over budget, and some money might have been misappropriated/stolen (I can't remember the latter), but it's pretty tough to see how money stolen from a government construction project in Massachusetts is stolen in cash by the guys swinging the hammers.
I think the tradesmen may have capitalized on the big dig by working insane overtime hours...make hay while the sun shines!
Between the trades and the cop details there was lots of cash to be had.
Maybe some worked out deals for under the table, pay.
There are always ways to beat the system...especially when big city funds are involved.
Hillcountry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2019, 11:06 AM   #17
joey2665
Senior Member
 
joey2665's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 2,090
Thanks: 412
Thanked 517 Times in 348 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hillcountry View Post
I think the tradesmen may have capitalized on the big dig by working insane overtime hours...make hay while the sun shines!

Between the trades and the cop details there was lots of cash to be had.

Maybe some worked out deals for under the table, pay.

There are always ways to beat the system...especially when big city funds are involved.
Agreed as someone that supplied ready mix concrete to many public jobs in nyc, I have seen a lot but converting I’ll gotten gains into cash on a public project is not likely.


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
joey2665 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to joey2665 For This Useful Post:
Hillcountry (07-20-2019)
Old 07-20-2019, 12:55 PM   #18
ishoot308
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gilford, NH / Welch Island
Posts: 4,204
Thanks: 1,479
Thanked 3,004 Times in 1,148 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hillcountry View Post
I think the tradesmen may have capitalized on the big dig by working insane overtime hours.
I’m not sure about the “working” aspect of those overtime hours but many many contractors took advantage of “no show hours” and putting additional “mannequins” on payroll. Pretty common occurrence on larger projects in Boston and NYC....ever watch the Sopranos?...it was spot on!
__________________
It's Always Sunny On Welch Island!!
ishoot308 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ishoot308 For This Useful Post:
Hillcountry (07-20-2019)
Old 07-20-2019, 03:19 PM   #19
chasedawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melvin village
Posts: 362
Thanks: 352
Thanked 183 Times in 94 Posts
Default Farm Island .....not the Big dig

Quote:
Originally Posted by DEJ View Post
How did the planning board meeting go regarding this proposed subdivision?
The Farm Island hearing was packed standing room only. There were so many people that the Fire Chief had to cut off the number of people. Everyone was totally against the subdivision. Only one person in that large group said "let it go through".

Over 20 people spoke why it should not be allowed to happen. The Planning Board was presented with many documents and studies to review. They have a difficult and challenging job.

Nearly 300 people sighed a petition against the subdivision development. Channel 9 WMUR was there with cameras. It was shown on TV Thursday evening.

Next hearing is scheduled for August 1 at the Tuftonboro Elementary School up town. This will allow for even more people to attend.
chasedawg is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to chasedawg For This Useful Post:
DEJ (07-20-2019), Grant (07-21-2019), Just Sold (07-20-2019)
Old 07-20-2019, 05:19 PM   #20
JEEPONLY
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 127
Thanks: 1
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingScot View Post
"Trades guys" with cash stolen from Big Dig? C'mon.
You are a cherry picker. I never said the workers stole money (although I bet a lot of it ended up being tax free!)

Hillcountry hit the nail on the head- some of these guys were getting 2-3-4 times overtime pay- why wouldn't they take it? It was the people who were late meeting their "friendly" government contracts who, all of a sudden had to pay through their noses to complete the job (s), that were stealing the money to over pay.

You wouldn't have believed the number of weekly/bi-weekly boat rentals that went out on cash. The costs would seem moderate, by today's standards, but they couldn't spend the money fast enough to enjoy themselves- I said good for them!!!
JEEPONLY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2019, 06:12 PM   #21
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 502
Thanks: 264
Thanked 137 Times in 86 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JEEPONLY View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingScot View Post
"Trades guys" with cash stolen from Big Dig? C'mon.
You are a cherry picker. I never said the workers stole money (although I bet a lot of it ended up being tax free!)
No need for name calling. But as I reread your original post, I see the confusion--Dickie referred to stolen money, you quoted and replied with under the table, and I connected the two. Sorry
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2019, 06:12 PM   #22
dickiej
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Newburyport, MA
Posts: 119
Thanks: 5
Thanked 64 Times in 31 Posts
Default

My brother in law was a tradesman on the big dig and he said anything that wasn't bolted to the ground was stolen... that's where alot of the Ill gotten money used to buy houses and boats came from.
dickiej is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dickiej For This Useful Post:
FlyingScot (07-20-2019)
Old 07-20-2019, 06:30 PM   #23
MAXUM
Senior Member
 
MAXUM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hooksett, NH & Bear Island, NH
Posts: 2,112
Thanks: 189
Thanked 1,360 Times in 546 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chasedawg View Post
The Farm Island hearing was packed standing room only. There were so many people that the Fire Chief had to cut off the number of people. Everyone was totally against the subdivision. Only one person in that large group said "let it go through".

Over 20 people spoke why it should not be allowed to happen. The Planning Board was presented with many documents and studies to review. They have a difficult and challenging job.

Nearly 300 people sighed a petition against the subdivision development. Channel 9 WMUR was there with cameras. It was shown on TV Thursday evening.

Next hearing is scheduled for August 1 at the Tuftonboro Elementary School up town. This will allow for even more people to attend.
So just curious as to what the objection is to allowing the property to be subdivided?

If all the requirements are met neither the citizens nor the town can say no just because we don't want it to be done. That is completely unfair. Do I personally like it, no, however that is no reason to prevent this from happening. If there are 300 people who don't like it and so concerned... then they can all pitch in about $6700 bucks a piece buy the property and turn it into conservation land.
MAXUM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to MAXUM For This Useful Post:
NH.Solar (07-23-2019), Seaplane Pilot (07-20-2019), Waterbaby (08-05-2019)
Old 07-20-2019, 06:53 PM   #24
kawishiwi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 468
Thanks: 182
Thanked 123 Times in 84 Posts
Default Isn't it obvious?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MAXUM View Post
So just curious as to what the objection is to allowing the property to be subdivided?

If all the requirements are met neither the citizens nor the town can say no just because we don't want it to be done. That is completely unfair. Do I personally like it, no, however that is no reason to prevent this from happening. If there are 300 people who don't like it and so concerned... then they can all pitch in about $6700 bucks a piece buy the property and turn it into conservation land.
I think just the fact that the town is asking for public input shows that the subdivision requires town consent & approval that has not yet been granted.
__________________
"In and around the lake...
Mountains come out of the sky and they stand there
One mile over we'll be there and we'll see you
Ten true summers we'll be there and laughing too"
kawishiwi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2019, 08:37 PM   #25
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 502
Thanks: 264
Thanked 137 Times in 86 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MAXUM View Post
If there are 300 people who don't like it and so concerned... then they can all pitch in about $6700 bucks a piece buy the property and turn it into conservation land.
That's exactly what has happened. Camp Belknap has asserted that they can raise the money to buy the land.
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2019, 08:46 PM   #26
SAB1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rowley MA / Tuftonboro
Posts: 713
Thanks: 103
Thanked 166 Times in 121 Posts
Default

Variety of issues exist regarding the development. Do any have legs...maybe not. I think the biggest issue is 1/3 of the island was sold a few years back to the ymca and many feel the rest of the island could be preserved in its current state by selling the remainder to the ymca camp. The ymca has made an offer to purchase the remainder at the same price as the developer. It has been turned down.
SAB1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2019, 12:00 AM   #27
chasedawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melvin village
Posts: 362
Thanks: 352
Thanked 183 Times in 94 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SAB1 View Post
Variety of issues exist regarding the development. Do any have legs...maybe not. I think the biggest issue is 1/3 of the island was sold a few years back to the ymca and many feel the rest of the island could be preserved in its current state by selling the remainder to the ymca camp. The ymca has made an offer to purchase the remainder at the same price as the developer. It has been turned down.
Does any one know why the offer by Camp Belknap to write a check for $1.5M to the Winchesters with no contengencies, no planning board meetings, not one of the 250+ signing a petition has been turned down since the offer was made to the owner Winchester's back in January 2019?

The Winchester keep giving extensions for the last 7 months since the P&S was signed back in October, 2018. Yet the Winchesters sold 1/3 of the island to Camp Belknap back in 2010. This does not make sense. Something is really going wrong in any kind of logic. WMUR and other local news outlets are starting to ask the same questions

How and why would anyone want to go through the trouble of all the pain of permitting and cost of development with 300 local folks saying... NO!!

This whole deal is really need to be investigated further. There are so many questions about what is going on here.
chasedawg is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to chasedawg For This Useful Post:
ApS (07-21-2019), FlyingScot (07-21-2019), Grant (07-21-2019)
Old 07-21-2019, 03:20 AM   #28
WinnisquamZ
Senior Member
 
WinnisquamZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 194
Thanks: 66
Thanked 38 Times in 27 Posts
Default

Follow the money. If the YMCA was to purchase the remaining piece it would come off the local tax haul as they are tax exempt.


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
WinnisquamZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2019, 04:43 AM   #29
joey2665
Senior Member
 
joey2665's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 2,090
Thanks: 412
Thanked 517 Times in 348 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WinnisquamZ View Post
Follow the money. If the YMCA was to purchase the remaining piece it would come off the local tax haul as they are tax exempt.


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
Ding ding ding...... you win the prize.


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
joey2665 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2019, 06:46 AM   #30
fatlazyless
Senior Member
 
fatlazyless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,345
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 193
Thanked 492 Times in 366 Posts
Default ...... way to go, Tuftonboro!

Across the 19-Mile Bay, a close boat ride away, there's Camp Winaukee with its' summer camp campus situated on both the main land neck, and on an island as well. Does Camp Winaukee pay property taxes to Moultonborough for using their mainland/island properties as a summer camp? Yes, Camp Winaukee pays property taxes.

So, why does the YMCA Camp Belknap get to be property tax exempt in nearby Tuftonboro? Is most gracious that Tuftonboro will agree to their tax exempt, summer camp status. Way to go ....... Tuftonboro!
__________________
Down & out, livn that Walmart side of the lake!
fatlazyless is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to fatlazyless For This Useful Post:
Wifi-1 (07-21-2019)
Old 07-21-2019, 07:03 AM   #31
WinnisquamZ
Senior Member
 
WinnisquamZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 194
Thanks: 66
Thanked 38 Times in 27 Posts
Default

Camp Winaukee is a private owned camp as the YMCA Is a nonprofit organization, but I am positive you knew this before writing


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
WinnisquamZ is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to WinnisquamZ For This Useful Post:
Wifi-1 (07-21-2019)
Old 07-21-2019, 07:16 AM   #32
joey2665
Senior Member
 
joey2665's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 2,090
Thanks: 412
Thanked 517 Times in 348 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WinnisquamZ View Post
Camp Winaukee is a private owned camp as the YMCA Is a nonprofit organization, but I am positive you knew this before writing


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
Why bother?


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
joey2665 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2019, 08:21 AM   #33
chasedawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melvin village
Posts: 362
Thanks: 352
Thanked 183 Times in 94 Posts
Default Farm Island article

Quote:
Originally Posted by chasedawg View Post
Does any one know why the offer by Camp Belknap to write a check for $1.5M to the Winchesters with no contengencies, no planning board meetings, not one of the 250+ signing a petition has been turned down since the offer was made to the owner Winchester's back in January 2019?

The Winchester keep giving extensions for the last 7 months since the P&S was signed back in October, 2018. Yet the Winchesters sold 1/3 of the island to Camp Belknap back in 2010. This does not make sense. Something is really going wrong in any kind of logic. WMUR and other local news outlets are starting to ask the same questions

How and why would anyone want to go through the trouble of all the pain of permitting and cost of development with 300 local folks saying... NO!!

This whole deal is really need to be investigated further. There are so many questions about what is going on here.
Check this out....Great article.....has all the facts correct. But there is even more to the story! Stay tuned.

https://www.concordmonitor.com/Savin...sland-26937008
chasedawg is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to chasedawg For This Useful Post:
DEJ (07-21-2019)
Old 07-21-2019, 08:34 AM   #34
fatlazyless
Senior Member
 
fatlazyless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,345
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 193
Thanked 492 Times in 366 Posts
Default

Ahoy there Mate ...... am blocked from reading this .... due to 5-articles/month limit ..... someone do me a favor and post this Concord Monitor article so it can be read .... thanks in advance ..... must be many others in this same boat! Hey, I don't want to buy it, I just want to read it!
__________________
Down & out, livn that Walmart side of the lake!
fatlazyless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2019, 08:39 AM   #35
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,315
Thanks: 622
Thanked 644 Times in 371 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chasedawg View Post
Check this out....Great article.....has all the facts correct. But there is even more to the story! Stay tuned.

https://www.concordmonitor.com/Savin...sland-26937008
So is the current P&S between the Winchesters and the development company or the Winchesters and YMCA? Above comments suggest the Y, the article suggests the developers.

And if both the Y and the developers offered the same money, why did the Winchesters take the developers over the Y? Other than straight $, it appears pretty clear that the Y's ownership would be much better for the region (see past discussions about dwindling summer camps/public access vs. affluent acquisition).

Sent from my SM-G950U using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
thinkxingu is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2019, 08:47 AM   #36
DEJ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 323
Thanks: 240
Thanked 177 Times in 79 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
And if both the Y and the developers offered the same money, why did the Winchesters take the developers over the Y? Other than straight $, it appears pretty clear that the Y's ownership would be much better for the region (see past discussions about dwindling summer camps/public access vs. affluent acquisition).
There is bad blood between the Winchesters and the camp. Like Chasedawg has said there is much more to this story.
DEJ is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DEJ For This Useful Post:
thinkxingu (07-21-2019)
Old 07-21-2019, 08:48 AM   #37
MAXUM
Senior Member
 
MAXUM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hooksett, NH & Bear Island, NH
Posts: 2,112
Thanks: 189
Thanked 1,360 Times in 546 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chasedawg View Post
Does any one know why the offer by Camp Belknap to write a check for $1.5M to the Winchesters with no contengencies, no planning board meetings, not one of the 250+ signing a petition has been turned down since the offer was made to the owner Winchester's back in January 2019?

The Winchester keep giving extensions for the last 7 months since the P&S was signed back in October, 2018. Yet the Winchesters sold 1/3 of the island to Camp Belknap back in 2010. This does not make sense. Something is really going wrong in any kind of logic. WMUR and other local news outlets are starting to ask the same questions

How and why would anyone want to go through the trouble of all the pain of permitting and cost of development with 300 local folks saying... NO!!

This whole deal is really need to be investigated further. There are so many questions about what is going on here.
You make it sound as if it's a big conspiracy here, bottom line is 12 lots all water front developed have huge profit potential. Now not that I know the exact details of the P&S, but I would think that there is a contingency on the purchase of the property pending successful acceptance of subdivision and lot development. Could very well be that agreement has some financial benefit to the current owners to allow the interested party the allotted time to attempt to get all that done. That is the sellers right to make a contractual agreement with such stipulations. So what would you do if you owned this property and there was a few hundred thousand or more on the table if you allowed extra time the process go through?

While it's noble that lots of people may not want this to happen - in typical not in my back yard fashion, mob rule doesn't or shouldn't come into play here. I'm sure a bunch of so called objectors already own property that probably have the same sketchy "historical" value, may have been a place loons could have nested as well, yet how many sleep well at night knowing they have destroyed loon habitat or plowed under some place the Indians used to camp out on (maybe) hundreds of years ago so common that's just grasping at whatever they can to stop this, none of the objections I have read have any reasonable rational behind them.

Far as I'm concerned the owners have every right if they so choose to get what they can out of that property.

Finally the town has zero right to steer via legislative power the proposed sale of any property without due cause. It's got nothing to do with additional tax revenue although as noted the end result is beneficial to both the town and tax payers.

Any one who wants to preserve this property should appeal directly to the current owners.
MAXUM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MAXUM For This Useful Post:
Seaplane Pilot (07-21-2019)
Old 07-21-2019, 09:59 AM   #38
DEJ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 323
Thanks: 240
Thanked 177 Times in 79 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MAXUM View Post
Finally the town has zero right to steer via legislative power the proposed sale of any property without due cause. It's got nothing to do with additional tax revenue although as noted the end result is beneficial to both the town and tax payers.

Any one who wants to preserve this property should appeal directly to the current owners.
The town of Tuftonboro has every right to steer via legislative power the proposed sale of any property based on the mission statement of the planning board of town of Tuftonboro which I post below.

Mission Statement

The Planning Board mission is to promote the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the population of the Town of Tuftonboro, to protect and conserve the rural and recreational value of property, to encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the Town, and to promote the efficiency and economy in the process of development.

Also to your comment regarding "Any one who wants to preserve this property should appeal directly to the current owners"

That has indeed happened. The camp is offering the exact same money as the prospective developer and will preserve it if allowed to purchase it.
DEJ is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DEJ For This Useful Post:
chasedawg (07-21-2019)
Old 07-21-2019, 10:53 AM   #39
joey2665
Senior Member
 
joey2665's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 2,090
Thanks: 412
Thanked 517 Times in 348 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MAXUM View Post
You make it sound as if it's a big conspiracy here, bottom line is 12 lots all water front developed have huge profit potential. Now not that I know the exact details of the P&S, but I would think that there is a contingency on the purchase of the property pending successful acceptance of subdivision and lot development. Could very well be that agreement has some financial benefit to the current owners to allow the interested party the allotted time to attempt to get all that done. That is the sellers right to make a contractual agreement with such stipulations. So what would you do if you owned this property and there was a few hundred thousand or more on the table if you allowed extra time the process go through?

While it's noble that lots of people may not want this to happen - in typical not in my back yard fashion, mob rule doesn't or shouldn't come into play here. I'm sure a bunch of so called objectors already own property that probably have the same sketchy "historical" value, may have been a place loons could have nested as well, yet how many sleep well at night knowing they have destroyed loon habitat or plowed under some place the Indians used to camp out on (maybe) hundreds of years ago so common that's just grasping at whatever they can to stop this, none of the objections I have read have any reasonable rational behind them.

Far as I'm concerned the owners have every right if they so choose to get what they can out of that property.

Finally the town has zero right to steer via legislative power the proposed sale of any property without due cause. It's got nothing to do with additional tax revenue although as noted the end result is beneficial to both the town and tax payers.

Any one who wants to preserve this property should appeal directly to the current owners.
They may be overstretch if with their legislative power per the mission statement above but in the end the developer with need rezoning and permits to build on the 12 lots which I am sure the new owner will try to receive a commitment on before the sale.

This case has similarities to the people that were looking to rezone Big Island on Paugus were the governments are doing everything in their power to keep these islands as is


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
joey2665 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2019, 11:08 AM   #40
JEEPONLY
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 127
Thanks: 1
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingScot View Post
No need for name calling. But as I reread your original post, I see the confusion--Dickie referred to stolen money, you quoted and replied with under the table, and I connected the two. Sorry
Fair enough- sorry for the slight.
JEEPONLY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2019, 11:15 AM   #41
TiltonBB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gilford, NH and Florida
Posts: 1,460
Thanks: 223
Thanked 818 Times in 337 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fatlazyless View Post
Ahoy there Mate ...... am blocked from reading this .... due to 5-articles/month limit ..... someone do me a favor and post this Concord Monitor article so it can be read .... thanks in advance ..... must be many others in this same boat! Hey, I don't want to buy it, I just want to read it!
Check around. Maybe you can get up before a neighbor and get the paper from their driveway.
TiltonBB is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TiltonBB For This Useful Post:
joey2665 (07-21-2019), Wifi-1 (07-21-2019)
Old 07-21-2019, 02:12 PM   #42
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 502
Thanks: 264
Thanked 137 Times in 86 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MAXUM View Post
You make it sound as if it's a big conspiracy here, bottom line is 12 lots all water front developed have huge profit potential. Now not that I know the exact details of the P&S, but I would think that there is a contingency on the purchase of the property pending successful acceptance of subdivision and lot development. Could very well be that agreement has some financial benefit to the current owners to allow the interested party the allotted time to attempt to get all that done. That is the sellers right to make a contractual agreement with such stipulations. So what would you do if you owned this property and there was a few hundred thousand or more on the table if you allowed extra time the process go through?

While it's noble that lots of people may not want this to happen - in typical not in my back yard fashion, mob rule doesn't or shouldn't come into play here. I'm sure a bunch of so called objectors already own property that probably have the same sketchy "historical" value, may have been a place loons could have nested as well, yet how many sleep well at night knowing they have destroyed loon habitat or plowed under some place the Indians used to camp out on (maybe) hundreds of years ago so common that's just grasping at whatever they can to stop this, none of the objections I have read have any reasonable rational behind them.

Far as I'm concerned the owners have every right if they so choose to get what they can out of that property.

Finally the town has zero right to steer via legislative power the proposed sale of any property without due cause. It's got nothing to do with additional tax revenue although as noted the end result is beneficial to both the town and tax payers.

Any one who wants to preserve this property should appeal directly to the current owners.
Even if this is 100% true (a couple of posters have suggested there may still be legal hurdles), that does not mean it is right for the Winchesters to sell to the developer.

An owner is presented with identical prices from two bidders for their land. One bidder will build houses for 12 families, increasing the environmental impact significantly. Another will grant low impact access to hundreds of kids every year, and protect the land forever.

If I were the Winchesters, I think I'd know how I'd want to be remembered.
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlyingScot For This Useful Post:
chasedawg (07-22-2019)
Old 07-21-2019, 02:25 PM   #43
TheTimeTraveler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 177
Thanks: 28
Thanked 26 Times in 18 Posts
Default

I'm actually surprised that the Town of Tuftonboro and/or the State of NH doesn't buy it and preserve it as conservation land......
TheTimeTraveler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2019, 08:17 PM   #44
8gv
Senior Member
 
8gv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,100
Thanks: 21
Thanked 322 Times in 197 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TiltonBB View Post
Check around. Maybe you can get up before a neighbor and get the paper from their driveway.
I actually understood that one!
8gv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2019, 09:56 PM   #45
MAXUM
Senior Member
 
MAXUM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hooksett, NH & Bear Island, NH
Posts: 2,112
Thanks: 189
Thanked 1,360 Times in 546 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingScot View Post
Even if this is 100% true (a couple of posters have suggested there may still be legal hurdles), that does not mean it is right for the Winchesters to sell to the developer.

An owner is presented with identical prices from two bidders for their land. One bidder will build houses for 12 families, increasing the environmental impact significantly. Another will grant low impact access to hundreds of kids every year, and protect the land forever.

If I were the Winchesters, I think I'd know how I'd want to be remembered.
Whether it is "right" or not is a matter of an emotional measure of right or wrong and while I get that it is still the owner's decision who they sell to. It would be no different than holding prejudice against one party because you simply don't like them or what they are interested in doing with property they one day could own.

Far as the mission statement of the town goes... that's all well and good but read the language carefully, words such as promote, and encourage they can certainly do and when it comes to say allowing special exceptions for development, these ideals can certainly play a part but they cannot just say you can't build a house there because the neighbors don't like it. Nor can they just inject themselves into a legal transaction between two parties just because. This is a serious overreach and I don't believe they have the authority to do so.

Keep in mind I am not taking sides on this just saying if all the requirements are met the town cannot come along and say no without just cause. The owner of the property has rights too. And not for nothing, ANY waterfront lot development creates an impact of some sort so using that as an argument then sets the precedence of what? No more waterfront lot development? Or is it just ok for some but not for others?
MAXUM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2019, 10:18 PM   #46
Sue Doe-Nym
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 366
Thanks: 239
Thanked 93 Times in 57 Posts
Default

How is it known that the owners were presented with identical offers? Have you seen the offers? It appears that the YMCA offer was contingent on raising funds.

Last edited by Sue Doe-Nym; 07-22-2019 at 06:48 AM.
Sue Doe-Nym is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2019, 08:07 AM   #47
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 502
Thanks: 264
Thanked 137 Times in 86 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sue Doe-Nym View Post
How is it known that the owners were presented with identical offers? Have you seen the offers? It appears that the YMCA offer was contingent on raising funds.
This is a fair point. Similarly, it appears the developer's offer is contingent on gaining town approval.

The bigger point, perhaps not articulated clearly enough--it's nice if someone can reap a windfall on property from their own hard work or their grandparents. It would also be nice if that person didn't feel the need to get every last dime and instead thought a bit about what's best for the community long term.
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2019, 10:11 AM   #48
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Winnipesaukee & Florida
Posts: 4,420
Thanks: 886
Thanked 424 Times in 308 Posts
Question Hershey?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheTimeTraveler View Post
I'm actually surprised that the Town of Tuftonboro and/or the State of NH doesn't buy it and preserve it as conservation land......
In the last few years, Tuftonboro bought a huge farm "for conservation". Wasn't that the Hershey Farm?
__________________
.Sailing—Good for you and good for the world...
...and you won't stink...!
ApS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2019, 11:32 AM   #49
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,602
Thanks: 457
Thanked 807 Times in 558 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ApS View Post
In the last few years, Tuftonboro bought a huge farm "for conservation". Wasn't that the Hershey Farm?
The Cheney Farm.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2019, 01:08 PM   #50
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Winnipesaukee & Florida
Posts: 4,420
Thanks: 886
Thanked 424 Times in 308 Posts
Wink Cheney Farm...

That's the one--thanks!
ApS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2019, 05:48 AM   #51
TiltonBB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gilford, NH and Florida
Posts: 1,460
Thanks: 223
Thanked 818 Times in 337 Posts
Default

Opponents to Farm Island development packed a public hearing before the Tuftonboro Planning Board on July 18.

The board will again hear opinions on the proposal at a meeting on Aug. 1, which will take place at Tuftonboro Elementary School in anticipation of a heavier turnout than normal. However, the board is not likely to vote on the matter until a later date.

From the Laconia Sun:

https://www.laconiadailysun.com/news...ntent=headline
TiltonBB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2019, 06:10 AM   #52
Garcia
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 193
Thanks: 37
Thanked 81 Times in 52 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TiltonBB View Post
Opponents to Farm Island development packed a public hearing before the Tuftonboro Planning Board on July 18.

The board will again hear opinions on the proposal at a meeting on Aug. 1, which will take place at Tuftonboro Elementary School in anticipation of a heavier turnout than normal. However, the board is not likely to vote on the matter until a later date.

From the Laconia Sun:

https://www.laconiadailysun.com/news...ntent=headline
The article was an interesting read. It sounds to me like many people became used to a non-developed island and incorrectly assumed it would always stay that way. From the article, it seems the current owners tried to sell it to an entity that would preserve it, but the funds/interest isn't there.

Sometimes people forget that all the waterfront homes we enjoy were once un-developed, pristine shoreline. Privately owned land should be able to be developed, as long as current zoning and rules are followed.

I would love to see all future development stopped, a limit on the size, speed, sound, and number of boats, free parking and access for island property owners, lower property taxes, and more, but that's not going to happen, nor should it.

I'll be curious as to how this all works out.
Garcia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2019, 10:23 AM   #53
BroadHopper
Senior Member
 
BroadHopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Laconia NH / Bozeman MO
Posts: 4,776
Thanks: 2,301
Thanked 840 Times in 583 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garcia View Post
I would love to see all future development stopped, a limit on the size, speed, sound, and number of boats, free parking and access for island property owners, lower property taxes, and more, but that's not going to happen, nor should it.
And yet there are people that think it can still happen! Greed is our worst enemy!

These folks should move to Squam Lake, instead of rattling our cage!
__________________
Someday may never be an actual day.
BroadHopper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2019, 02:46 PM   #54
DEJ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 323
Thanks: 240
Thanked 177 Times in 79 Posts
Default

My opinion has changed. Looks like camp Belknap had a few opportunities to purchase this property and for several reasons could not at the time pull the trigger. According to the article it appears the Winchesters tried to sell to the camp but it did not work out. The NIMBY crowd has no standing here, I wish the new owners well.
DEJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2019, 06:23 PM   #55
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 502
Thanks: 264
Thanked 137 Times in 86 Posts
Default

Good article in LDS. If the buyers are sincere that they do not wish to develop the island beyond one simple home and only need a security blanket of sorts, then the solution is pretty obvious--in a 3-way deal, Camp Belknap could buy the development rights to the island from the current buyers for $500K to $1MM (I leave the exact number to the principals). The current buyers could pocket a big slug of cash today, dramatically reducing their risk; and Belknap could insure its tranquility for a lower price than would otherwise be possible.

https://www.laconiadailysun.com/news...6e83059d7.html
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlyingScot For This Useful Post:
Roy_Hobbs (07-27-2019)
Old 07-27-2019, 08:29 PM   #56
chasedawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melvin village
Posts: 362
Thanks: 352
Thanked 183 Times in 94 Posts
Default Farm Island

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingScot View Post
Good article in LDS. If the buyers are sincere that they do not wish to develop the island beyond one simple home and only need a security blanket of sorts, then the solution is pretty obvious--in a 3-way deal, Camp Belknap could buy the development rights to the island from the current buyers for $500K to $1MM (I leave the exact number to the principals). The current buyers could pocket a big slug of cash today, dramatically reducing their risk; and Belknap could insure its tranquility for a lower price than would otherwise be possible.

https://www.laconiadailysun.com/news...6e83059d7.html

Flying Scout ding ding ding...you hit the target...but in reality it won't work. The developer has said flat out I will not sell any part of the island to the camp. They have said "I don't want any part of the camp functions and activities near my development". Yet Camp Belknap owes 1/3 of the island and the boundary lines between the homestead home to be restored and camp owned property is only 25' feet away. So go figure!!
chasedawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2019, 09:33 PM   #57
ursa minor
Senior Member
 
ursa minor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Tuftonborough & Franklin MA
Posts: 220
Thanks: 59
Thanked 120 Times in 50 Posts
Default

I’ve heard that the property may be in “current use” tax status. From my understanding that would mean either the seller or the potential buyer would need to come up with the difference between the reduced current use tax rate and the residential rate from the time the current use variance was granted. Depending on how long the island has been in “current use” that could be a tidy sum.
__________________
" Any day with a boat ride in it is a good day"
ursa minor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2019, 09:45 PM   #58
chasedawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melvin village
Posts: 362
Thanks: 352
Thanked 183 Times in 94 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ursa minor View Post
I’ve heard that the property may be in “current use” tax status. From my understanding that would mean either the seller or the potential buyer would need to come up with the difference between the reduced current use tax rate and the residential rate from the time the current use variance was granted. Depending on how long the island has been in “current use” that could be a tidy sum.
Good thought....The potential buyer is going to continue with the "current use" status. From what I understand it will be a tree farm to gain "current use" status. Many trees will be removed especially the umbrella trees that have been there for 90 years.
chasedawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2019, 03:37 AM   #59
SAB1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rowley MA / Tuftonboro
Posts: 713
Thanks: 103
Thanked 166 Times in 121 Posts
Default

Lot of rumors out there. Who knows if half are true but I have heard there are tax issues ie. back taxes owed. I’m sure the town wants it developed for the tax revenue. Don’t believe the camp pays taxes.
SAB1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2019, 04:13 AM   #60
Wifi-1
Member
 
Wifi-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 48
Thanks: 50
Thanked 20 Times in 15 Posts
Default

According to my sources, there is no back taxes owed on the land, and hasn't been.
Wifi-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Wifi-1 For This Useful Post:
LoveLakeLife (07-28-2019)
Old 07-28-2019, 02:54 PM   #61
Outdoorsman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 680
Thanks: 76
Thanked 161 Times in 109 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingScot View Post
Good article in LDS. If the buyers are sincere that they do not wish to develop the island beyond one simple home and only need a security blanket of sorts, then the solution is pretty obvious--in a 3-way deal, Camp Belknap could buy the development rights to the island from the current buyers for $500K to $1MM (I leave the exact number to the principals). The current buyers could pocket a big slug of cash today, dramatically reducing their risk; and Belknap could insure its tranquility for a lower price than would otherwise be possible.

https://www.laconiadailysun.com/news...6e83059d7.html
These "feel good" propositions always make me laugh.

How about letting the OWNER decide? or...... BUY IT and divide it your way and make that "3way" deal!
Outdoorsman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2019, 05:33 PM   #62
SAB1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rowley MA / Tuftonboro
Posts: 713
Thanks: 103
Thanked 166 Times in 121 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wifi-1 View Post
According to my sources, there is no back taxes owed on the land, and hasn't been.
Good. I found it hard to believe since it wasn’t long ago the camp bought part of the island.
SAB1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2019, 06:15 PM   #63
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 502
Thanks: 264
Thanked 137 Times in 86 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Outdoorsman View Post
These "feel good" propositions always make me laugh.

How about letting the OWNER decide? or...... BUY IT and divide it your way and make that "3way" deal!
You have confused a proposition that will make people feel good with a "feel good proposition". It is NOT a feel good proposition, it's a business deal. Obviously, all 3 parties would have to agree it was in their best interest. These types of transactions happen regularly. Here's a recent example of a current owner getting cold hard cash to forego development, it's an especially apt one because the developer had no emotions or town pressure

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/22/n...ir-rights.html
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2019, 04:57 AM   #64
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,602
Thanks: 457
Thanked 807 Times in 558 Posts
Default

I hate to see Farm Island developed too but I keep wondering why didn't Camp Belknap didn't buy the whole thing, or why somebody else didn't buy it to save it if they want it saved. It has been for sale for quite a while.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2019, 06:35 AM   #65
SAB1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rowley MA / Tuftonboro
Posts: 713
Thanks: 103
Thanked 166 Times in 121 Posts
Default

At the time they purchased the one third they didn’t have the money I believe. Lot changes going on there in past couple years to make needed improvements.
SAB1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2019, 03:44 PM   #66
hemlock
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 7 Posts
Default current use

Quote:
Originally Posted by chasedawg View Post
Good thought....The potential buyer is going to continue with the "current use" status. From what I understand it will be a tree farm to gain "current use" status. Many trees will be removed especially the umbrella trees that have been there for 90 years.
The way current use works is that the owner gets a reduced tax rate for keeping the property in its current use as farmland ,woodland, unproductive land etc. Once the property is developed it is considered a change in use and a tax penalty is applied in the amount of 10 percent of the ad valorem value of the land. So 12 house lots at 300k each equals a penalty paid to Tuftonboro of 360000. Current use is only applicable if the property is at least 10 acres in size. Subdivision below that size triggers the penalty.

The only way to avoid the penalty is to not develop the property
hemlock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2019, 04:41 PM   #67
camp guy
Senior Member
 
camp guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: formerly Winter Harbor, still Wolfeboro
Posts: 792
Thanks: 158
Thanked 265 Times in 159 Posts
Default Farm Island

You are so right, WinnisquamZ , that is why so many of the private, independent camps are no longer operating. The tax bite got so large that private camps were forced to either significantly raise their summer tuition rates and run the risk of pricing themselves out of business, or, re-organize themselves within the protection of an existing non-profit organization and enjoy the financial relief afforded therewith. If the government 'tinkers' with the tax Code and makes changes to the non-profit qualifications or the amount an individual may deduct with respect to non-profits, then these camps will disappear, also.
camp guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2019, 03:51 PM   #68
chasedawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melvin village
Posts: 362
Thanks: 352
Thanked 183 Times in 94 Posts
Default 2nd tuftonboro hearing is tonight 7:00 Tuftonboro elementary school

Quote:
Originally Posted by clementine View Post
Some of you may know that Farm Island in 19 Mile Bay is on the market. Farm Island is one of the few remaining undeveloped islands on Winnipesaukee.The Abenaki used to fish and hunt there, and there is a historic camp in the center of the island that goes back to when livestock spent the summer grazing there. Camp Belknap currently owns roughly 1/3 of the island and that portion is not on the market. There is a buyer interested in subdividing the 13+ acres into 12 buildable lots while preserving the historic camp. There is a hearing on July 18th at 7:00 at the Tuftonboro Town Hall at which this proposal to subdivide will be discussed. If you are interested in the future of Farm Island, come to the hearing on the 18th to learn more.
2nd Tuftonboro Planning Board hearing is tonight at 7:00 PM location has changed to Tuftonboro Elementary school to accommodate a larger crowd.

See you there...
chasedawg is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to chasedawg For This Useful Post:
Descant (08-01-2019)
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.21501 seconds