|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Calendar | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-19-2007, 04:09 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,254
Thanks: 423
Thanked 366 Times in 175 Posts
|
Stand on Boat Question
In the category of two wrongs don't make a right, RG and I had an unusual one today and are not sure if we were correct or not. We tried to look up the situation in the rules but could not find the combination. We need the collective expertise of the group to rule on this one.
We were traveling about a 100 feet from shore looking at various architectural aspects of lake front homes as many people do. We were at headway speed being within a 150 feet of shore. Land on our left. We noticed a boat on plane coming straight at us 90 degrees on on the right. I put my boat in neutral and watched the other boat with keen interest. As the boat broke the 150 foot barrier to us, RG picked up the camera to start documenting the situation. The boat fell off plane at about 75 from us. As the boat passed behind us, the driver and Gal exchanged rule interpretations at an elevated level. I think the picture taking was not appreciated and we were informed that she was the stand on boat. That we were of very questionable intellect and we should look up the law. RG explained that she needed to maintain 150 feet from our boat. I tried to convey that I was not moving fast. I admit that I was not paying attention to the boats that were moving quickly around the open water and did not yield to the boat that came to shore just as I was passing her dock. I am not sure how much I could have corrected my path at the speed I was traveling relative to hers. I know she violated the 150 foot rule but, can someone explain if the "stand on give way rules" are the same if one or both boats are at headway speed? It would make sense to me that with the precedent of the overtaking boat having to yield to the overtaken boat, a boat on plane should adjust it's course when encountering a boat that is stopped or moving slowly. But I have been wrong more times than I can remember. Thanks for your judicial rulings. |
08-19-2007, 04:19 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bow
Posts: 1,874
Thanks: 521
Thanked 308 Times in 162 Posts
|
Sorry, I have no judicial ruling, but why wouldn't the other operator just slow down a couple seconds later, and go into their dock behind you?
|
08-19-2007, 04:24 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Thornton's Ferry
Posts: 1,296
Thanks: 67
Thanked 166 Times in 126 Posts
|
Bad manners aside, I believe they were the stand-on vessel. They key is they were coming in from your right side. If they were overtaking you from either side then you would have been stand-on. Overtaking is coming at you from astern. I think there is some degre of arc that deterines when you are being overtaken Vs aproached from the side but 90degrees is not being overtaken.
Rules of the road apply at any speed. I have even been told they apply if you are just drifiting. The term I was given is "Under weigh, not making weigh." They should have reduced speed to head-way when within 150ft but that's a different situation. Your friend was correct to take pictures since they were in a public place and he had every right to do so. Hope your next trip is more enjoyable! |
08-19-2007, 06:26 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 281
Thanks: 3
Thanked 21 Times in 11 Posts
|
I'm looking forward to the discussion on this one, too, but I'll give you my opinion. While the boat approaching you at 90 degrees to your right was the stand on vessel, that you were already at headway speed and then in neutral makes the other boat the give-way vessel because... every operator is responsible for taking the necessary action to avoid a collision. There's little more you can do in Neutral other than turn into shore, or back up.
By your description, I think the other operator was just being a puke -- being the stand-on vessel does not exempt the operator from the safe passage rule. |
08-19-2007, 06:26 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
|
Give way vs stand on.
I believe that you were the give way vessel. I do not think speed has anything to do in this case. If they were approaching from your starboard side, you would be the give way and they the stand on.
|
Sponsored Links |
|
08-19-2007, 07:06 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 2,860
Thanks: 461
Thanked 666 Times in 366 Posts
|
I think the key point here is that you were still moving whether in neutral or not you still had the responsibility to alter your course to avoid a collision. That being said, it sounds as though the other party should have gone to headway speed sooner. I don't agree with the "picture taking" idea to prove one is right. It really proves nothing as it is impossible to judge distance in a photo and in this case it would just prove that you were the give way boat. Worst case, is someone is trying to take a picture and drive the boat, that's just idiotic if you ask me. ( I understand you weren't taking the pictures.)
Kudos to you Rattlesnake Guy for trying to sort this out though, Good Luck. |
08-19-2007, 07:11 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,254
Thanks: 423
Thanked 366 Times in 175 Posts
|
Quote:
Sincerely not trying to be defensive. OK, if I concede that I am the give way boat, what should I do. Anticipate the plans of boats approaching me at 25 mph? Back up? Illegally go fast so close to shore to get out of the way? If the person had slowed to headway speed then I would have been out of the way before they would have uneventfully passed behind me. I don't think we have to have any specific distance between us at headway speed. Your answer points out the problem. I am the give way boat but am at head way speed. If I am traveling at 4mph and she at 25mph, I would have to decide weather or not to move into her way (assuming I knew where she was going) while she is at a distance of over 900 feet from me. I am trying to balance the law with the physics. I do appreciate any opinions on the subject. Just glad it does not happen very often. I know when I come into my dock and a fishing boat is slowly moving past I don't rush up to it expecting him to get out of the way. |
|
08-19-2007, 07:38 PM | #8 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 193
Thanks: 21
Thanked 19 Times in 11 Posts
|
According to NH regulations, you are required to stop or reverse to avoid a collision. It's NH shorthand for this Coast Guard rule:
Quote:
Rattlesnake Guy wrote: Quote:
|
||
08-19-2007, 07:44 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
|
This is a case of two wrongs make two wrongs
Obviously, the other boat broke the 150' rule. But those offenses don't allow you to break the crossing rule. 270-D:2 ... III. When vessels are crossing courses or approaching each other in an oblique direction which may involve risk of collision, the vessel which has the other on its starboard side shall keep out of the way of the other, allowing the latter vessel to keep its course and speed. You can't just stop and make them go around you. You have to keep out of their way. That means you may have to speed-up or even reverse to get out of their way. Now if you make the argument that if they had slowed to headway speed as they were required, then the the crossing situation would have been different... Maybe if they slowed in time you would have been well clear before they arrived. |
08-19-2007, 10:11 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 233
Thanks: 14
Thanked 16 Times in 12 Posts
|
In my opinion, he was in the wrong. You were at headway speed as required. He was operating over headway speed within your 300 foot radius.
I am neither a MP or a lawyer nor do I pretend to play one on TV. The rule on Winnipesaukee: You are ALWAYS the give-way vessel and EVERYONE else is ALWAYS the stand-on vessel. You can also do what I do: stop the boat, shut off the engine, and step away from the helm. Bingo: vessel not under command. Kidding. Kind of. I teach sailing on a small lake in MA where the rules are never followed. Whenever out in the motorboat, I always carry my camera and take pictures of the crazies. I'll post them up here sometime.
__________________
Sail fast, live slow! |
08-19-2007, 10:15 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
|
Can't believe this?!?!?!
Seriously RG you guys were in no way at all in the wrong. Anyone who believes that RG should have altered their actions is out of their minds here. RG was at headway speed!!!! Essentially a boat at headway or idle becomes the obstacle to be avoided meaning the boat on plane has the obligation to avoid coming within 150 feet of the idle/off plane boat. This case is so clear cut and simple I can not believe there is a debate here. RG you were 100% correct and the offending operator was incorrect, ignorant and rude.
|
08-20-2007, 01:39 AM | #12 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bear Island
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Did you feel Danger for your life?
Are you sure that was her dock? Or was she dropping someone off? I think by telling her you were filming or taking pictures or whatever you fueled the situation. Now maybe I'm wrong I wasn't there. All I'm saying is no one likes a snitch! Was she coming after you or just showing off. Man if I had I dollar for all the jerks that almost hit me over the years I could buy you property! HA HA!!! And is there a forum where I can bitch about every MASSHOLE car driver that cuts me off? Just sayin' boat safely and love the lake!
|
08-20-2007, 05:46 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 1,657
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 342
Thanked 618 Times in 278 Posts
|
slow is what it is
Since you were going slow, you could only have altered course to a small degree. I've never heard anything about requiring the stand-off boat to change speed - just direction. No matter what direction you moved in, your movement would not have significantly altered the passage distance between you. All stand-off means (to me at least) is that you are responsible to alter course so that there is at least 150 feet on passage. There are often fishing boats near the shore (or even in traffic lanes such as the graveyard) moving as you describe, and there is no way they are expected to move out of the way quickly. Now - if you are trolling slowly out in the broads and the Mt. Washington is bearing down on you - you might want to remember the "might makes right" rule and get out of the way.
This next comment does not apply to this situation, but is related. There are narrow places on the lake where boats can pass at speed, as long as there is no activity going on near the shoreline which changes the location of the 150 bubble - such as kayaks, fishing boats, swimmers, etc. When there is, the two passing boats must slow down - but of course, often don't. Those along the shoreline that are creating the hazard are fully in their rights to be there - but rules of courtesy suggests that they should be aware of the hazard they are creating - and its impact - and consider moving along - especially if the lake traffic is high.
__________________
-lg |
08-20-2007, 07:10 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,974
Thanks: 246
Thanked 736 Times in 438 Posts
|
Since the other vessel was indeed the stand-on vessel, that vessel was required to maintain course and speed (conditions permitting). Since it was approaching shore, we all know that mainatining speed was not possible. That fact makes it very difficult for RG to determine if he was actually on a collision course or not.
That said, the proper thing to do in this situation is to turn hard to starboard and aim directly at the stand-on boat, then maintain that course until the stand-on boat has passed the "150 foot from you" mark. This gives the stand-on boat a strong visual clue that you see them, are giving way, and intend to pass behind them at more than 150 feet. It also puts you on a good heading to hit their wake. |
08-20-2007, 07:48 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Moultonborough, NH
Posts: 484
Thanks: 89
Thanked 138 Times in 72 Posts
|
Having taken the CG Aux course many years ago and being a former ocean boater, I am very aware of the "rules of the road". That being said, I know that the other vessel was the "stand on" vessel. What this reminds me of is a crossing situation I have routinely encountered in the past where a sailboat is involved. This is because RG's boat was traveling at headway speed, a speed similar to that traveled by a sailboat.
All rules aside, the other vessel could easily have chosen to pass behind your stern and the problem is solved. Its a case of common courtesy, and the other vessel chose to stick to the "i have the right of way" attitude. Another similarity comes to mind when driving in a car. If we are driving along at the speed limit or below in traffic, we don't have to stop or slow to let someone on a side street pull out into traffic because we have the right of way. It is however common courtesy, to do just that, especially if we notice they are having a difficult time doing so. RG's boat could have taken evasive action to stick to the rules even though it would have been difficult and the other vessel had broken one rule already. The courteous thing to do would have been to let RG's boat continue on their way and go behind their stern thus leaving little or no wake to contend with for either vessel, and it could have easily been done. Very few operators of boats these days take into account their wake and what impact on another vessel it will have. If I have the option I will always go behind a boat traveling at headway speed, whether its a fishing boat, sailboat, or just a powerboat enjoy a slow cruise, it's just the right thing to do. Reminds me of the old and quickly forgotten saying in Mass, "A little courtesy won't kill you". |
08-20-2007, 08:10 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Nashua,Meredith
Posts: 951
Thanks: 213
Thanked 106 Times in 81 Posts
|
I have always given way to other vessels because who knows at that point weather they actually know the rules. I don't believe RG was at fault in this situation
|
08-20-2007, 08:34 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Central NH
Posts: 5,252
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 1,451
Thanked 1,349 Times in 475 Posts
|
Common Courtesy
When I first spotted her boat heading our way, my thought was she was heading toward the island to get shelter from the wind and waves as many boaters do on choppy, windy days like yesterday. When her intentions became apparent we had little time, if at all, to do anything as she was heading toward us so fast. We were traveling at headway speed on a leisurely cruise enjoying the sights of Rattlesnake Island and that was certainly obvious from her vantage point.
As you might imagine, over the years we have yielded to countless boats as we were trying to get to our dock, never once giving thought to the fact that we were the stand-on boat. We call it common courtesy. My snapping pictures definitely fueled this situation and given the same scenario, I would take them again. I’m not sure that I would put both arms in the air and call that they were within 150’ of us though. I hope that point would be obvious. |
08-20-2007, 09:29 AM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 1,657
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 342
Thanked 618 Times in 278 Posts
|
Isn't this wrong?
Quote:
It all comes down to understanding the situation, being considerate and trusting the other captain. On a lake that is mostly recreational boaters, all three aspects are sometimes lacking. I find though that if I trust the other boater to do the right thing - they usually do - and while I still have to make too many last minute course corrections, there is always time to avoid a collision.
__________________
-lg |
|
08-20-2007, 09:39 AM | #19 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 45
Thanks: 8
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
|
Very good question
Quote:
You were already at fast headway speed to keep control in heavy wind and chop. You say you saw the boat coming at you from 90 degrees and you started to notice them BEFORE they got within 150 feet of you. In my mind I would expect you to keep going because by the time the offender got to where you were you wouldn't be there. Maybe they saw you long before you noticed them. They passed behind you as they might have expected to do. And they probably expected you to keep moving rather than stopping and blocking their way. It's the straight at you at 90 degrees further out than 150 feet that has me thinking that way. In any case, both boaters have an obligation to go slow according to conditions and the 150 feet rule.
__________________
The Commodore |
|
08-20-2007, 10:43 AM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,788
Thanks: 2,085
Thanked 742 Times in 532 Posts
|
It's in the Book...
Quote:
__________________
Every MP who enters Winter Harbor will pass by my porch of 67 years... |
|
08-20-2007, 12:52 PM | #21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 262
Thanks: 0
Thanked 23 Times in 11 Posts
|
Quote:
I disagree. I think taking pictures is an excellent tactic. 1} The mere presence/sight of the camera will cause most people to think about and correct their actions. 2} Giving thought to foreground (e.g. get some of your own boat in the frame), I believe it’s not a problem to discern a rough distance estimate from a photo. If you’re trying to show someone is 100ft away, maybe not. But if someone is really in violation, say 50ft, a photo would clearly show they are nowhere near 150ft. |
|
08-20-2007, 10:47 PM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,943
Thanks: 23
Thanked 111 Times in 51 Posts
|
RoW applies even at NWS
Quote:
However if you had anticipated them to slow to NWS at the proper point and then projected their resulting course and speed to carry them clearly behind you, I could see some confusion as to what the proper action should be. This said I'm not sure how clear it would have been that any potential collision would have been moot. The point is that you must be "well clear" as the give-way vessel. We need to see the pictures ! (or perhaps a diagram) FWIW: Overtaking, as opposed to crossing, happens when your course is more that 112.5 deg off the other guy's course. Or more than 22.5 deg aft of being directly on beam. When your course is an overtaking one, you are the give-way vessel.
__________________
Mee'n'Mac "Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by simple stupidity or ignorance. The latter are a lot more common than the former." - RAH |
|
08-21-2007, 07:53 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Mountonboro
Posts: 200
Thanks: 12
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
tough without seeing it
Very tough to say without actually seeing the exact situation. But since the other boat passed behind you, your putting it into neutral probably made the situation worse. Had you kept going you may have been well out of the way before they reached 150 ft behind you. The other boater probably was not anticipating your stopping (or slowing down) and therefore came closer than they thought.
Was the other boat headed directly at you, or headed in front of you? If in front (to cross your bow) then you should have changed direction to travel behind the other. Headed directly at you, nudge up the speed a bit to clear the area before they get there. You had little option beyond that as you are close to shore and can only change direction to close the distance quicker. They should have slowed before they "broke" the 150 foot zone and common sense says they slow down approaching shore and just motor behind you. |
08-21-2007, 09:28 AM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,254
Thanks: 423
Thanked 366 Times in 175 Posts
|
CSI Diagram
Quote:
RG and I went back and took a look at the two pictures she took and then attempted to prepare as honest a drawing as possible. If we have it right, it should convince half of us that I was wrong and half that she was wrong. The other half will think we were both wrong and the rest will think that RGal and RGuy are the same person as we sometimes use the same IP. In preparing the drawing it does not appear that my switching to neutral had much impact on my forward speed. The inertia and tail wind probably only slowed me for a short time. Once she was behind me, I put the boat back in gear to avoid being an obstacle. The drawing shows our best reconstruction of the passage in 5 second increments. (Watching way too much CSI) (Next on CSI Wolfeboro….) If I had it to do over, and fully realized what was happening, I would have reversed or turned to the right. My thoughts were that this was just a 150 foot violation and not a crossing situation. Remember my title (two wrongs). I must admit that I can’t help but wonder if she had slowed to NWS at my 150 foot boundary, she would have passed uneventfully a 100 feet behind me. I hope the conversation is at least educational and I thank everyone for the contributions. |
|
08-21-2007, 11:37 AM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,325
Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Wonder if their ice cream made it to the Island before it melted or was their cottage on fire?
__________________
[Assume funny, clever sig is here. Laugh and reflect... ] |
08-21-2007, 12:09 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 2,860
Thanks: 461
Thanked 666 Times in 366 Posts
|
This thread reminds me of a little limerick I once heard, don't know who the author is:
Here lay the grave of Micheal O'Day Who died maintaining his right of way. His right was clear, his will was strong But he is just as dead, As if he were wrong. Boat safely. |
08-21-2007, 12:24 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Mountonboro
Posts: 200
Thanks: 12
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
great drawing
IF ??
1. They had come off plane a little earlier, then pass with never a second thought. 2. You had made hard right to go behind, they still would have had to come off plane earlier. My bet is that they were focused on the dock and did not notice you (as you did not notice them) until they were in the zone. Now, they must blame someone else for the transgression. |
08-21-2007, 12:28 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rattlesnake Isl. - Simsbury, CT
Posts: 271
Thanks: 90
Thanked 44 Times in 26 Posts
|
Great Diagram!
I have to say, that is a great diagram! I agree with your title - "Two Wrongs." This seems like a situation though that needn't have escalated as much as it seems to have. While you clearly did not have the right of way, it appears from the drawing that the stand on boat should have seen you, and been mildly inconvenienced by about 10 seconds in landing at their dock by slowing earlier and letting you pass. But who knows what was happening in the other boat??? Maybe she was worried about landing in strong wind and had her dander up... Maybe she was distracted by a dog running in the boat and didn't see you... Neither of which are excuses, but I think everyone can relate to a similar situation. As I was recently taught in another thread, the word is empathize... or is it sympathize? Anyway...
Unfortunately, it seems lots of people are not leaving their anger & stress at the dock, and are bringing it with them on the lake. This is manifesting itself by yelling at strangers in situations where nobody intended to cause harm and taking pictures of people with the intent to provoke emotion. I think that these emotions are the root of most of the problems being discussed on this forum, and I hope people can step back, take a deep breath, and say to themselves, "I am on vacation, and it isn't worth the hassel to get all worked up." I know I need to do that too, and my wife reminds me when Capt' Bonehead gets close! |
08-21-2007, 10:34 PM | #29 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,943
Thanks: 23
Thanked 111 Times in 51 Posts
|
Nice Diagram
Quote:
FWIW : I had a similar situation coming out of the Wiers during bike week. We were headed out from the Weirs and I, as usual, avoid the Eagle - Governor I channel like the plague. Sadly, now a lot of people do the zig-zag past the Eagle I #3 black marker and Pitchwood. As I approached, there were 4 or so boats coming through the channel (or so I thought) the opposite way and 1 guy in front of me, though coming more from the Spindle Pt direction. I slowed to allow the crowd to sort itself out and pass when I noticed that boat #2 wasn't going to follow #1 and round the last black marker. Nooo, he was going to pass #1 boat by slotting between the 2'nd and 3'rd black markers (out from Eagle I). I popped it into neutral and then reverse to stop motion and allow him to pass in front of me unhindered. I just didn't expect him (and the boat following him) to take that precarious route. Moral of the story; don't get complacent.
__________________
Mee'n'Mac "Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by simple stupidity or ignorance. The latter are a lot more common than the former." - RAH |
|
08-22-2007, 07:04 AM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Moultonborough, NH
Posts: 484
Thanks: 89
Thanked 138 Times in 72 Posts
|
Two wrongs, not really
Great picture! After looking at the picture, and given the fact that the other boat should have slowed down at the 150' mark, I now know I would have given a little throttle and scooted a little more quickly in front on the other boat anticipating a capt. bonehead/lack of courtesy move on their part.
They very easily could have let you continue on course and speed by adjusting their speed slightly and been courteous boater. I like the melting ice cream comment. There is just no reason to exert their right of way in this situation and toss a wake in your direction. Never mind the fact the right of way was gained by breaking the 150' rule. |
08-22-2007, 08:38 AM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bristol
Posts: 119
Thanks: 0
Thanked 19 Times in 15 Posts
|
You were the stand off boat but she didn't come to NWS out side the 150' distance, she is also required to take evasive action regardless of who is the stand on boat, you don't know which direction she might turn and a slow moving boat may not respond as quickly. I'm with Al, she didn't see you until the last minute and wanted to be sure you were at fault for her lack of attention. There are more horses rears than horses.
|
08-22-2007, 09:51 AM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
|
I'm not sure I agree with the boat that that is going headway speed intercepting a boat that is up on plane being classified as the giveway boat.I might be wrong but I would always yield and change course to a boat that is at headway speed when I'm at speed.Then again,I have a 10 ft boat so I yield to pretty much everyone.
__________________
SIKSUKR |
08-22-2007, 05:17 PM | #33 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,254
Thanks: 423
Thanked 366 Times in 175 Posts
|
Quote:
You remind us of the original question. If we were both going NWS I was wrong. If we were both on plane then I was wrong. The difficulty is in the differential in speed. Imagine approaching a fishing boat plugging along and expecting him to get out of your way? Thank you for the perspective. I yield to slower boats as well. (It really seems like the only choice) |
|
08-22-2007, 06:24 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
|
I think its a matter of courtesy
I often give way to slower boats, even when I am definitely by the book a stand on vessel. It comes down to common sense and courtesy. So in that context RG should have been avoided by the faster boat. Even if he was by definition the give way vessel. But as it has been noted, that is what the lake is lacking, common sense and courtesy.
|
08-22-2007, 09:42 PM | #35 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alton Bay
Posts: 5,548
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 2,399
Thanked 1,918 Times in 1,061 Posts
|
Quote:
And ITD...as a former air traffic controller, I learned early on that pilots could apply their right of way over other airplanes right up to the point of impact !!!! Boating is the same way. Hopefully a lesson learned will benefit all.
__________________
I Live Here... I am always UPTHESAUKEE !!!! |
|
08-23-2007, 09:53 PM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 233
Thanks: 14
Thanked 16 Times in 12 Posts
|
You might be able to pull off being a vessel of "restricted mobility" due to your speed, but I would rather not test it with MP myself.
__________________
Sail fast, live slow! |
08-28-2007, 02:19 AM | #37 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Long Island, not that one, the one on Winnipesaukee
Posts: 2,827
Thanks: 1,017
Thanked 882 Times in 516 Posts
|
This is what it all comes down too
Quote:
Education has been a wonderful thing but now too many people think they are experts and love to state there inturpretations of the laws..... example this lady spurting out the 150' rule.... other then she invaded it.... it wasn't the real problem.... now if she had come at RG with the stand-on giveway laws that would have been impressive and correct.... Does any body have the time to present this case to the Marine Patrol to see what thier take on the matter would be? I don't mean to cause any problems for anyone involved, but the MP interpration might be insightful......
__________________
Life is about how much time you can spend relaxing... I do it on an island that isn't really an island..... |
|
08-28-2007, 10:00 AM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Center Harbor
Posts: 1,130
Thanks: 201
Thanked 421 Times in 239 Posts
|
RG had limited options
Being within 100 ft of shore RG could not have increased speed by very much and still been at "headway" speed. He could have stopped completely and let the other boat pass ahead of him. Since RG was give way this was probably the correct "legal" choice. It also avoids a collision, also a "legal" choice.
On the other hand the incoming boat KNEW that he was going to have to slow down as he approached the island 150' zone. RG's presence meant that he might have to slow down sooner and it should have been obvious that RG wasn't going to be able to completely get out of his way. Even if RG had stopped to let him through it looks as though he would have penetrated RG's 150' circle and therefore he should have "legally" slowed down sooner than he did. If he had done so, RG would have probably passed well ahead of his path. For both courtesy and cautions sake he should have slowed down well ahead of time. Just because you have ROW doesn't mean you must bear down on someone at speed, especially when it looks like it might cause a collision. All that said, if on the spur of the moment I was placed in RG's position, I would have expected the incoming boat to have slowed down and pulled behind me, simply because he had more maneuvering options that I did, "legal" or not. Suppose RG had been sitting still in the water but not at anchor? Legally RG would have to give way but I don't imagine most boaters would expect him to. Most boaters would slow down and maneuver around him. As to the picture taking, I really like the idea of photographing boneheads, however as in most boating situations, this one was not clear cut. Photographing someone will obviously imply they are in the wrong and the natural reaction will be to become annoyed. Even complete boneheads will resist taking responsibility for their actions. |
08-28-2007, 12:53 PM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Gilford
Posts: 291
Thanks: 19
Thanked 51 Times in 31 Posts
|
150-foot rule overrides right-of-way this time
I have to agree with Jeffk.
Right of way was less the issue than the 150' rule. And, like many others, I will try to steer clear of slower moving or stopped vessels regardless whether I am the stand on vessel or not. If I can't maintain 150' feet of clearance I drop down to headway until I can get clear. After all, it's not like I'm in a hurry to get anywhere when I'm on the lake. Kinda defeats the purpose of being out there in the first place, doesn't it? |
08-28-2007, 02:00 PM | #40 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: In the Beautiful Lakes Region of course!
Posts: 130
Thanks: 1
Thanked 9 Times in 4 Posts
|
On the topic of Right of Way...
This link is one of my favorite for explaining right of way to people (note that the NH rule book makes mention of "right of way" though there is truly no such thing when each boat has a duty):
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/mwv/navrules/Arcs.htm If a boat is approaching you in your "green" zone, then you are the give way vessel because the other boat has the green light to go (and therefore it must maintain course and speed). Likewise, if a boat is in your "red" zone, it has the red light and must give way to you. You are then the stand-on boat and must maintain course and speed. If a boat is approaching you from the remaining arc (encompasing the stern light in the diagram), then you are being overtaken. In an overtaking situation, the boat being passed must maintain course and speed (stand-on); the boat doing the overtaking must give way. Hope that helps. |
08-28-2007, 02:37 PM | #41 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
|
Quote:
If you come to a yield sign indicating the car on the other road has the right of way, can you ignore it if the car is speeding? |
|
08-28-2007, 09:16 PM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fairfield, CT & island vacation
Posts: 97
Thanks: 8
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Treat them like a stop light
I learned to do what the oncoming boat's light told me. If I saw the green light, that meant I GO. If a red light, well, then STOP. If both red and green, then I was being approached head-on so slow down and proceed with caution. I would try to pass starboard to starboard to starboard. This would give both helmsmen the GREEN light. I found it confusing to try to figure out if the oncoming craft was in MY green zone that means slow down because they have right of way, etc.
Is this over simplified? And potentially a dangerous assumption? |
08-29-2007, 06:55 AM | #43 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Thornton's Ferry
Posts: 1,296
Thanks: 67
Thanked 166 Times in 126 Posts
|
Quote:
I know it's actually just semantics but that's the mnemonic that I was taught. Additionaly, when you are in a channel you are expected to stay to the right. Your action would require crossing a channel and possibly going too far to the edge for your own safety. Of course, in open waters nobody should force a meneuver to pass to either side if there is ample clearance to avoid an accident no matter what their relative headings. After all, R-O-R only really applies between vessels only when the possibility of a collision exists or may arise. Good luck! |
|
08-29-2007, 07:36 AM | #44 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
|
I'm with Kamper on passing port to port.If it was the opposite,then everyone is on the wrong side in the Weirs channel.
__________________
SIKSUKR Last edited by SIKSUKR; 08-29-2007 at 08:18 AM. |
08-29-2007, 07:29 PM | #45 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fairfield, CT & island vacation
Posts: 97
Thanks: 8
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I forgot about the channel logic. I always passed port to port in a channel, but also at headway speeds so not a big problem. But I'll keep the red to red in open waters and be responsible. Thanks
|
08-30-2007, 05:59 AM | #46 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,560
Thanks: 149
Thanked 229 Times in 166 Posts
|
Jesus, who the heck can follow or remember all these specific rules? Personally I could see how they would not like the camera pointed at them. I do have my certificate but must admit I do not have every boating rule there is on the lake committed to memory. After all my brain is only so small.
|
08-30-2007, 04:40 PM | #47 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bear Island
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Common Courtesy
This is a great discussion and very informative on right of way, etc. However, this situation, in my opinion, is not about right of way. It's about being courteous on the lake and using common sense. The approaching boat should have passed behind RG & waved wishing him a nice afternoon! I love the limerick earlier. It sums it all up.
|
08-30-2007, 06:13 PM | #48 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,254
Thanks: 423
Thanked 366 Times in 175 Posts
|
Quote:
1)Yield to boats that are between 12 and 4.(and others that ignore rule 1 and 2) 2)Stay 150 feet away for everyone, even if they ignore rule 1 and 2. |
|
09-02-2007, 04:48 PM | #49 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 233
Thanks: 14
Thanked 16 Times in 12 Posts
|
I've got better advice: if you are on Lake Winnipesaukee (or any lake in Massachusetts), especially on the weekend, then YOU ARE THE GIVE-WAY BOAT.
__________________
Sail fast, live slow! |
09-02-2007, 05:48 PM | #50 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Thornton's Ferry
Posts: 1,296
Thanks: 67
Thanked 166 Times in 126 Posts
|
Quote:
Safety on the water is enhanced when eveybody uses the same rules. The skipper you wave past on your boat may be happy with you but the one behind you may have been planning their next move on your correct response as the stand-on vessel. Unexpectedly backing down could lead to confusion among the other boaters around you and someone else could be in jeopardy. You should learn the Rules and get your Safety Certficate if you have not already done so. Always try to be alert for those who arent following the Rules but dont assume that everybody else is going to be ignorant. Good luck! |
|
09-02-2007, 06:11 PM | #51 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Moultonborough, NH
Posts: 484
Thanks: 89
Thanked 138 Times in 72 Posts
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
09-02-2007, 09:27 PM | #52 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 233
Thanks: 14
Thanked 16 Times in 12 Posts
|
Absolutely. I have a few boating certificates (CG, US Sailing) and know all of the "rules of the road;' however, it seems when boating on the above lakes, no matter if you are the stand-on boat or not, you have to give way to the other guy who won't.
It's an anarchy.
__________________
Sail fast, live slow! |
09-03-2007, 02:40 AM | #53 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,788
Thanks: 2,085
Thanked 742 Times in 532 Posts
|
Holy Moly
Quote:
He's a history buff and when he arrived at the porch and looked out over the mayhem he pronounced, "It's the Normandy Invasion"! It did quiet down as the afternoon progressed, but I hadn't looked at it from a historical perspective before.
__________________
Every MP who enters Winter Harbor will pass by my porch of 67 years... |
|
09-03-2007, 07:27 AM | #54 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Suncook, NH, but at The Lake at Heart
Posts: 2,612
Thanks: 1,082
Thanked 433 Times in 209 Posts
|
Stand On and the 150' rule
I was on the lake for a short time yesterday and on 2 occassions "Captain Bonehead" appeared. I was clearly the "Stand On" boat on both occasions and I had to back down as "Captain Bonehead" ignored the right of my boat to continue on course. Both drivers never even looked my way.
I will say I saw a lot more boaters observing the 150' rule than ever before. Yes, a few did not observe the rule but the vast majority did and did so well in advance of our passing. Outside the Gilford docks the 150' rule appeared to be observed very well with all of boats in the area waiting to increasse speed until they were well away from all the other traffic. I did see one incident that I thought to be unsafe as a boat slowly crossed the bow of a sail boat at a distance slightly outside the 150' rule but too close for me. The sail boat was the stand on boat even if it had been a power boat. A curious thing though was I never once saw a Marine Patrol Boat in 2.5 hours on the lake. It is a busy weekend and the weather was excellent with lots of boat traffic.
__________________
Just Sold At the lake the stress of daily life just melts away. Pro Re Nata |
09-03-2007, 08:01 AM | #55 |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 49
Thanks: 1
Thanked 19 Times in 8 Posts
|
Where are the MP's?
Yesterday, coming from the Gov. Island bridge heading towards Meredith and crossing the "highway" between Paugus bay and Eagle Island I had no less that 4 buttheads coming from Paugus fail to alter their course to allow me to pass as the "stand-on" boat As noted by Kamper, this caused as dangerous situation because several other boats behind me now had to stop or alter course to avoid me! Where were the MP's? Who knows. The area around Paugus Bay/Weirs beach was a complete zoo yesterday and not once did I see the MPs until I was having dinner on the Wiers Boulevard. Even then, it was one small baot and he did next to nothing. They complain about no funding, but if they were out in force citing all of these "captain boneheads", they could pay for the added officers and then some. Guess I will stick to boating during the week.
|
09-03-2007, 06:03 PM | #56 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Moultonborough, NH
Posts: 484
Thanks: 89
Thanked 138 Times in 72 Posts
|
Giving Credit to MP
I must say that I was happily surprised to see and hear them on several occasions Yesterday. First time was around noon as they had two Wave runner pulled over just off lil bear just outside the six markers. Second time, while anchored nearby the location mentioned above, I heard and saw them chase down a loudish go fast type boat. I must say I was happy to see them out there enforcing the rules in this busy area.
They can't be everywhere, but it was nice to see them in such a busy area besides the usual locations. |
09-08-2007, 03:05 PM | #57 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Moultonborough & CT
Posts: 2,535
Thanks: 1,059
Thanked 652 Times in 363 Posts
|
Stand on Boat?
Now, am I the stand on boat, ahhh I mean tube? Whatever, that guy better not puncture my tube. Heck, I don't even have a paddle!
|
09-08-2007, 04:27 PM | #58 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,943
Thanks: 23
Thanked 111 Times in 51 Posts
|
Hmmm....
Quote:
__________________
Mee'n'Mac "Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by simple stupidity or ignorance. The latter are a lot more common than the former." - RAH |
|
09-08-2007, 09:50 PM | #59 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Rochester, NH / Bartlett, NH
Posts: 322
Thanks: 228
Thanked 33 Times in 13 Posts
|
Glad the MPs weren't around. I don't see a PFD or other required safety equipment anywhere. Would a loud 'woofer' be an acceptable alternative to a horn or whistle? Maybe in the dog-days of August, but today?
|
09-09-2007, 09:21 AM | #60 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,254
Thanks: 423
Thanked 366 Times in 175 Posts
|
Quote:
If I don't yield then by all means do what you have to do. I am hoping that is what you mean in your later post. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|