|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Calendar | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-18-2015, 11:42 AM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Looking for proof damming increased natural height of Lake Winnipesaukee.
Does anyone have proof/evidence of how many feet the damming at Lakeport raised the height of Lake Winnipesaukee?
I need historic photos showing land where there is now water, old newsprint describing the increased dam height, maps showing land where water now exists, any way it can shown damming raised the height of Lake Winnipesaukee. The first 3 dams were built and controlled by commercial business; the first of wood in 1766, replaced with wood in 1828, the third was rock in 1851, the current dam built in 1949; in 1958 the dam was taken over by the State of New Hampshire. Any help will be much appreciated. |
07-18-2015, 11:46 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cow Island
Posts: 914
Thanks: 602
Thanked 193 Times in 91 Posts
|
Discussed somewhere before
Didn't search for it, but do recall a forum discussion on this issue. I had the same question a while back and came to the conclusion that the height of the lake was pretty much driven by the amount of water that could pass through the original Weirs channel and the dam merely enlarged Paugus Bay while raising the lake only a few feet.
|
07-18-2015, 04:39 PM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,821
Thanks: 2,111
Thanked 753 Times in 538 Posts
|
Rocks Ahead!
Quote:
http://www.weirsbeach.com/topten/reason9frame.html At the original (low) level, the range of boats on the lake would have to have been very small. Rocks Ahead! BTW: Is this a legal matter? . |
|
07-19-2015, 09:17 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Thornton's Ferry
Posts: 1,296
Thanks: 67
Thanked 166 Times in 126 Posts
|
I believe the dam raised the normal elevation at that point by about 10 feet. The Weirs channel used to be a rapids now it is deep enough for any boat that can fit under the bridge. Elevation on the main body of the lake is something like 5 feet higher than before the dam was built.
Perhaps somebody who has the history book will chime in with the exact figure, if not there are several books you can peak into if you go in to a local bookstore. Surprisingly, this information is not listed on the Winnipesaukee page on Wikipedia. |
07-19-2015, 10:07 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Gilford, NH
Posts: 340
Thanks: 280
Thanked 90 Times in 62 Posts
|
Not to sure . . .
how far back you are referring to. I have a pic of a camp (Smith Cove) from 1940 and the water height is fairly the same as it is today. Baring the time of year, it varies about 1' to 2'. So I don't think that would help.
Go to the historical society. I'm certain they have tons of pics. Good luck in your research.
__________________
☮ _/♥\_ & (✿ˆ◡ˆ✿) |
Sponsored Links |
|
07-20-2015, 06:17 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
|
Here you go
Looks like 3-5 ft based on what RG posted many years back after her research in the Library of Congress.
http://www.winnipesaukee.com/forums/...read.php?t=931
__________________
SIKSUKR |
07-20-2015, 06:36 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
|
I had forgotten much of what was in that thread. An interesting article that McDude posted about the watershed outlet running through Alton instead of Lakeport states that the lake used to be about 35 ft higher.
__________________
SIKSUKR |
07-20-2015, 06:40 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
|
It was this thread that morphed into the first one and not surprisingly has FLL posts being scrutinized.
http://www.winnipesaukee.com/forums/...d.php?p=142795
__________________
SIKSUKR |
The Following User Says Thank You to SIKSUKR For This Useful Post: | ||
trfour (07-20-2015) |
07-20-2015, 07:01 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 99
Thanks: 0
Thanked 42 Times in 21 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
Robert Ames Webmaster WeirsBeach.com |
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Boardwalk Bluesboy For This Useful Post: | ||
07-21-2015, 09:03 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 501
Thanks: 12
Thanked 419 Times in 144 Posts
|
If you want to PM me your email address I will scan and email you copies of testimony I have from proceedings in the late 40's early 50's on this issue. They indicate that while Paugus Bay might have been raised the Lake itself was not raised by damming. The channel was dredged to allow the old mill companies to draw the lake down further than it naturally could have been. More drawdown capacity meant more hydropower for the mills. As the mills became less of an economic power and tourism became more of one the deep drawdowns became an issue and in the 40's the legislature stepped in and passed a law limiting the level to which the mill could lower the lake during the summer.
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Onshore For This Useful Post: | ||
07-21-2015, 09:19 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cow Island
Posts: 914
Thanks: 602
Thanked 193 Times in 91 Posts
|
Makes sense
That makes much more sense, Shore Things. The claim of 5-12' lower in the earlier article definitely conflicts with the description and existence of a natural waterfall at the Weirs and the later need for dredging of the channel.
|
07-23-2015, 05:24 AM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,821
Thanks: 2,111
Thanked 753 Times in 538 Posts
|
Amiright?
Quote:
Raised, apparently, two hundred-plus years ago. That might explain the present day shoreline's slow, but continuous "rain" of falling trees from relatively steeper shores. Two hundred years of rocks and boulders being moved against the shoreline by centuries of thick ice—a relatively short time of geological history. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|