Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Calendar Register FAQDonate Members List Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-15-2013, 04:51 AM   #1
fatlazyless
Senior Member
 
fatlazyless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,525
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 295
Thanked 957 Times in 698 Posts
Default Meredith Colony Club prop taxes

"Meredith & Colony Club Reach Deal on Taxes" today's November 15, 2013, Laconia Daily Sun

With an assessed value of $13,145,500 it looks like the 5-selectmen and the Colony Club have made an agreement that allows the Colony Club to not pay any of the state or town school related taxes which is a huge amount.

If you are a property tax payer with no kids in the local schools, do you get a free pass on the school taxes.......well......the Colony Club just got a five year school freebie pass.

So, guess who ends up paying more for the schools?

Based on the town rate of 4.55, and the county rate of 1.51, the Colony Club will pay $79,661.73 for each of the next five years as a payment in lieu of taxes.

Both sides apparently decided to make this agreement as opposed to more continued litigation in the state courts.......which basically means that the lawyers from both sides got together and came up with this deal....not a good deal for the individual Meredith property tax payer like me who gets to pays for everything .....


Never settle for less!
__________________
... down and out, liv'n that Walmart side of the lake!

Last edited by fatlazyless; 11-15-2013 at 08:19 AM.
fatlazyless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 09:04 AM   #2
WakeboardMom
Senior Member
 
WakeboardMom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: NH X 2
Posts: 508
Thanks: 595
Thanked 113 Times in 92 Posts
Default

"I've never had a fire, so I don't want to pay the portion of my taxes that goes to the fire department. If I do have a fire, just let my house burn down...I'll rebuild using the money I didn't pay in taxes." (Being facetious here, I know there's a lot more to allowing my house to burn...neighbors' homes safety, etc.)

I don't quite understand the logic here. Would it be possible for someone to explain? Seems like if all over-55 housing colonies in the state did this, we'd be in big trouble.


I am sure that I'm missing some key piece of information. Is there a link to something more in depth than the link in the post above?
__________________
MarieM
WakeboardMom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 09:32 AM   #3
HellRaZoR004
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Litchfield/Gilford
Posts: 828
Thanks: 233
Thanked 224 Times in 131 Posts
Default

This seems to be coming up more lately. I recall seeing something in the news about a 55+ community in Nashua arguing against paying taxes that go towards the school system since kids are unlikely to live in the community.

The problem I see is they may not have any kids in the school system but if the school system fails you'll definitely see a drop in value of your property. Which would you prefer?
HellRaZoR004 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 09:40 AM   #4
chipj29
Senior Member
 
chipj29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bow
Posts: 1,874
Thanks: 521
Thanked 308 Times in 162 Posts
Default

I think this sets a bad precedent.
__________________
Getting ready for winter!
chipj29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 10:01 AM   #5
codeman671
Senior Member
 
codeman671's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,360
Thanks: 209
Thanked 764 Times in 448 Posts
Default

I can understand and sympathize with the concept. We send 3 kids to private catholic schools in the seacoast which costs us a lot per year, yet we still have to pay our property taxes, most of which goes to a school system we do not use. Same thing in Gilford, we have an island home and do not use Gilford schools but we pay just the same as anyone else.

It sucks and a better solution needs to be found.
codeman671 is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 11-15-2013, 10:23 AM   #6
sluggo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 168
Thanks: 13
Thanked 70 Times in 43 Posts
Default

All I can say is WOW ! Now my taxes will go up to cover what they don't pay and when that happens the businesses in the area will raise there costs to make up for their tax increases. Another perfect example of the full time resident taking it right up the #$% to keep the summer people happy ....
sluggo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 10:28 AM   #7
Pineedles
Senior Member
 
Pineedles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Moultonborough & CT
Posts: 2,535
Thanks: 1,058
Thanked 652 Times in 363 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sluggo View Post
All I can say is WOW ! Now my taxes will go up to cover what they don't pay and when that happens the businesses in the area will raise there costs to make up for their tax increases. Another perfect example of the full time resident taking it right up the #$% to keep the summer people happy ....
Although I am in Moultonborough not Meredith and not affected by this "deal", it does set bad precedent. However, summer home owners will also be affected in bearing more of the burden, not just full time resident owners.
Pineedles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 11:03 AM   #8
Happy Gourmand
Senior Member
 
Happy Gourmand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ruskin FL
Posts: 1,025
Thanks: 187
Thanked 322 Times in 179 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sluggo View Post
All I can say is WOW ! Now my taxes will go up to cover what they don't pay and when that happens the businesses in the area will raise there costs to make up for there tax increases. Another perfect example of the full time resident taking it right up the #$% to keep the summer people happy ....
I always it was kind of the other way around. Curious as to how you feel the full time residents are getting it stuck to them by the part time residents.
Happy Gourmand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 11:09 AM   #9
GTO
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,072
Thanks: 336
Thanked 342 Times in 158 Posts
Default huh

Quote:
Originally Posted by sluggo View Post
All I can say is WOW ! Now my taxes will go up to cover what they don't pay and when that happens the businesses in the area will raise there costs to make up for their tax increases. Another perfect example of the full time resident taking it right up the #$% to keep the summer people happy ....
I pay full taxes in Nashua just like I pay full taxes in Meredith
__________________
GTO
GTO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 11:14 AM   #10
sluggo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 168
Thanks: 13
Thanked 70 Times in 43 Posts
Default

Its just my opinion , I don't mean to spout off but the prices on everything just keep going up and up and no one is going to give me a break on any of my bills. As the saying goes it is what it is......
sluggo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 12:56 PM   #11
Lakegeezer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 1,657
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 342
Thanked 618 Times in 278 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HellRaZoR004 View Post
This seems to be coming up more lately. I recall seeing something in the news about a 55+ community in Nashua arguing against paying taxes that go towards the school system since kids are unlikely to live in the community.
In the Nashua case, I believe it was the impact fees they were trying to avoid, not the yearly taxes. I can see the logic to their argument. As a 55+ development, they don't put additional kids in the school, so there is little impact. However, yearly school tax is everyone's obligation. It is how NH funds the schools.
__________________
-lg
Lakegeezer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 01:17 PM   #12
HellRaZoR004
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Litchfield/Gilford
Posts: 828
Thanks: 233
Thanked 224 Times in 131 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lakegeezer View Post
In the Nashua case, I believe it was the impact fees they were trying to avoid, not the yearly taxes. I can see the logic to their argument. As a 55+ development, they don't put additional kids in the school, so there is little impact. However, yearly school tax is everyone's obligation. It is how NH funds the schools.
I stand corrected - thank you. In that case it certainly makes sense.
HellRaZoR004 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 02:40 PM   #13
Steveo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 523
Thanks: 47
Thanked 123 Times in 63 Posts
Default Oh come on!

Quote:
Originally Posted by sluggo View Post
All I can say is WOW ! Now my taxes will go up to cover what they don't pay and when that happens the businesses in the area will raise there costs to make up for their tax increases. Another perfect example of the full time resident taking it right up the #$% to keep the summer people happy ....
WHAT!!!

As a "summer person" I don't use the schools, or many of the town services. I don't get my credit for being a veteran off my property taxes because I'm not a "resident". I don't get resident rate for Gunstock, or fishing and hunting licenses. I live on private (dirt) road so town doesn't plow my road; only get fire protection because neighbor is asst chief. I have minimum impact on infrastructure since I'm only here about 60 days a year. Should I go on...

But I pay full taxes!!!

I have never complained about how the system works, I'm lucky to have a place on this beautiful lake but I will not be insulted by the complete fallacy that I am somehow "shoving it up the #$% of full time residents"

COME ON!
Steveo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Steveo For This Useful Post:
AmantiDelLago (11-15-2013), Chaselady (11-15-2013), codeman671 (11-15-2013), CTYankee (11-16-2013), Happy Gourmand (11-15-2013), Lakeboater (11-15-2013), PaugusBayFireFighter (11-19-2013), ronc4424 (11-15-2013), SPT13 (11-15-2013), Tired of Waiting (11-16-2013), WakeboardMom (11-18-2013)
Old 11-15-2013, 04:07 PM   #14
AmantiDelLago
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 82
Thanks: 4
Thanked 18 Times in 13 Posts
Default

So how are "full time residents" taking it up the #$% so that the "summer residents" get what they want? In this case wouldn't the potential be that all property taxes would increase?
AmantiDelLago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 07:34 PM   #15
Lakepilot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 446
Thanks: 70
Thanked 57 Times in 40 Posts
Default

I think the issue maybe that MBCC is a non-profit organization and as such don't have to pay any taxes. Like others before them, they have agreed to pay something in lieu of taxes. But if they pushed it to the wall they owe nothing.

In Wolfeboro we have a Huggins Hospital and Brewster Academy which are non-profits. They bring a lot of income to the town in terms of salaries. Do we want to see that go away?
Lakepilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 08:36 PM   #16
Lakeboater
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 391
Thanks: 20
Thanked 130 Times in 93 Posts
Default

I would also imagine that private schools like Brewster Academy have faculty living in Academy owned houses with children that go to the town schools with out contributing to the tax base.
Lakeboater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 10:18 PM   #17
ITD
Senior Member
 
ITD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 2,860
Thanks: 461
Thanked 666 Times in 366 Posts
Default

This is a problem as taxes get more and more confiscatory. A golf course in NH needs to make it's money in 4 or 5 months out of the year. That tax bill is a huge chunk of the profit, if a profit even exists. The 13.5 million valuation is probably mostly for the land. When it's a golf course the costs to the town are much lower than when the course goes out of business from the tax load and gets split into 100 lots, each bring 2 or so kids who must be educated for 13 years each.
ITD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2013, 04:04 AM   #18
wifi
Senior Member
 
wifi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lakes Region
Posts: 1,321
Thanks: 282
Thanked 287 Times in 169 Posts
Default

Each year we spend more and more to educate less children, we should start cutting the fat in school budgets. I've worked my entire life without the protection of a union, get rid of those and bring salaries and pensions back in line with a private sector person working 9 months a year. Get rid of those special classes that aren't back to the basic three R's (reading, righting and rithmatic ). For the money we spend, we should be better than this.

If course, this will never happen, so we have no one to blame but ourselves for allowing these school budgets to run away with themselves and it will just get worse.
wifi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2013, 07:43 AM   #19
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,405
Thanks: 719
Thanked 1,379 Times in 955 Posts
Default

THat is the one thing Brewster does pay taxes on is the apartments that are lived in. They pay very little in taxes considering all the property that they own and what would be paid if it were all privately owned.

You are right wifi, we spend a fortune on education now, compare that amount to when we were in school and all they do is complain about how they need more. Yet do you think the kids really learn any more or any better than when we were in school? I don't. I can see this getting political so I won't say any more.
tis is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2013, 09:33 AM   #20
sluggo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 168
Thanks: 13
Thanked 70 Times in 43 Posts
Default

Well everyone I didn't mean to put a finger in anyone's eye so for that I am sorry. I felt compelled to spout off because every time I turn around someone is looking for something for nothing without really wanting to earn it or saying they have a right to it. I should have never used the term summer people since we all do live here weather its for a few weeks or year round. I guess if I was lucky enough to own a second home I would do the same thing to help keep my costs in check. I fear that since this state is going more liberal each year that the tax codes will change where we will have an income and sales tax before long because of the burden of taxes alone on the home owner and in my eyes giving tax breaks to individuals or organizations push us all closer to that reality........
sluggo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sluggo For This Useful Post:
wifi (11-16-2013)
Old 11-16-2013, 02:30 PM   #21
upthesaukee
Senior Member
 
upthesaukee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alton Bay
Posts: 5,547
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 2,397
Thanked 1,918 Times in 1,061 Posts
Angry I find PILOT disgraceful.

The idea of PILOT (Payment In Lieu Of Taxes) to me is disgraceful. Their property is worth X amount of dollars, but they do not want to pay what the tax rate dictates, so they bargain with the municipality and come up with a price that suits them and the municipality. Of course, we cannot do that, not that it would matter in my personal case.

But using this original post info as a basis, their assessed value is $13,144,500. If they were in Alton, their tax rate would be $13.44 per thousand, for a tax of $176,662.

Using Bob Bahre, who I believe is Alton's largest taxpayer, property that is in his name only, not with others, not his son Gary's property, and not the commercial property where Hannaford is, that property totals $13,727,800. At the new rate of $13.44 per thousand, Mr. Bahre's tax burden on these properties is about $184,500.

Perhaps our state legislators need to take a better look at the PILOT program. Having an assessed value of over $13 million, and only paying just over $15K per year is just plain wrong.
__________________
I Live Here... I am always UPTHESAUKEE !!!!
upthesaukee is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to upthesaukee For This Useful Post:
CTYankee (11-16-2013), tis (11-16-2013)
Old 11-16-2013, 06:34 PM   #22
fatlazyless
Senior Member
 
fatlazyless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,525
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 295
Thanked 957 Times in 698 Posts
Default

$79,661.73 per each year, for each of the next five years, is what the Meredith Bay Colony Club will be paying and not just 15,000./year.

The Golden View nursing home and rehab which is located maybe 1/2 mile from the Meredith Bay Colony Club, and owned by the same owners as Meredith Bay Colony Club also has a similar payment in lieu of tax agreement with the Town of Meredith, so the Golden View basically pays for the town rate and county rate but is exempt from the town school and state school rates.

It seems to me that a nursing home and a rehab is much more like a medical facility than a age "+55 living" apartment building that includes an indoor swimming pool. Could well be that the exemption is appropriate for Golden View as a nursing home and rehab, but seems questionable for the Meredith Bay Colony Club.

Will try to post the article from the Nov 15, 2013, Laconia Daily Sun.

Also, Bea Lewis writing in the Laconia Citizen has been reporting about the on-going litigation between the Town of Meredith and the Meredith Bay Colony Club concerning their property taxes over the last couple of months.
__________________
... down and out, liv'n that Walmart side of the lake!
fatlazyless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2013, 09:07 PM   #23
upthesaukee
Senior Member
 
upthesaukee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alton Bay
Posts: 5,547
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 2,397
Thanked 1,918 Times in 1,061 Posts
Default hate to say it, but FLL is right...

You're right Les, it is $79K each year, but still a far cry from what they should be paying.
__________________
I Live Here... I am always UPTHESAUKEE !!!!
upthesaukee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2013, 09:37 PM   #24
ITD
Senior Member
 
ITD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 2,860
Thanks: 461
Thanked 666 Times in 366 Posts
Default

$80,000 a year, how many rounds of golf is that? No wonder businesses move overseas.....
ITD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2013, 01:22 AM   #25
TiltonBB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gilford, NH and Florida
Posts: 2,895
Thanks: 643
Thanked 2,153 Times in 900 Posts
Default What about yacht clubs?

If you want to talk about taxes on people who use very little in the way of services think about yacht clubs. Take Mountain View Yacht Club for example. 284 slips, individually owned, paying over $400,000 in taxes to the town of Gilford for what? The tax paying owners are not even allowed to use the Gilford Town Beach.
TiltonBB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2013, 06:16 PM   #26
Sandy Island fan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 64
Thanks: 81
Thanked 32 Times in 21 Posts
Default responsibility

I, for one, feel it is the responsibility of the entire community to support the education of the children. Think of it this way - as we age, do you want the nurses and doctors providing medical care to have a good education under their belts? Do you want the EMT's responding when you have a heart attack to have a good education?
Even if you don't have children in the local school, you benefit from the education provided in those schools.
Sandy Island fan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Sandy Island fan For This Useful Post:
Lakegeezer (11-17-2013), MariaNYC (11-19-2013), WakeboardMom (11-18-2013)
Old 11-17-2013, 06:57 PM   #27
Chaselady
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Melvin Village
Posts: 309
Thanks: 150
Thanked 105 Times in 73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandy Island fan View Post
I, for one, feel it is the responsibility of the entire community to support the education of the children. Think of it this way - as we age, do you want the nurses and doctors providing medical care to have a good education under their belts? Do you want the EMT's responding when you have a heart attack to have a good education?
Even if you don't have children in the local school, you benefit from the education provided in those schools.
I tend to agree. Aren't property values helped by high quality school systems?
Chaselady is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.31600 seconds