|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Calendar | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-16-2019, 09:37 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Gilford
Posts: 105
Thanks: 25
Thanked 163 Times in 52 Posts
|
CALL TO ACTION! - Merrymeeting Fish Hatchery Discharge Permit
Merrymeeting Lake outlets into Merrymeeting River which flows through New Durham into Lake Winnipesaukee at Alton Bay. In 2017, the Powder Mill State Fish Hatchery (PMSFH) was known to be a source of phosphorus pollution. Merrymeeting Lake provides the PMSFH with 7 million gallons of fresh water per day. The water leaving Merrymeeting Lake has an average phosphorus concentration of 5 µg/L while the PMSFH withdraws and discharges a near-constant water load containing phosphorus levels approximately 12 times higher than the outflow concentration from Merrymeeting Lake. PMSFH has been operating on an expired USEPA discharge permit since 2016 and NH Fish & Game has requested a new discharge permit. The EPA has given October 1 as their estimated time to publish a draft permit in the Federal Register.
To read more and how you can help, click http://www.winnipesaukee.org/2019/08...charge-permit/!
__________________
The Lake Winnipesaukee Association (LWA) is a non-profit organization dedicated to protecting the water quality and natural resources of Lake Winnipesaukee and its watershed. Through monitoring, education, stewardship, and science guided approaches for lake management, LWA works to ensure Winnipesaukee’s scenic beauty, wildlife habitat, water quality and recreational potential continues to provide enjoyment long into the future. http://www.winnipesaukee.org/ |
08-16-2019, 10:34 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kuna ID
Posts: 2,755
Thanks: 246
Thanked 1,942 Times in 802 Posts
|
Is there a reason why the fish hatchery is expelling such a high concentration of phosphorus? Is this common place for all fish hatcheries or just PMSFH? If the state is engaged in doing something that increases this output it seems to me this is a concern for ALL hatcheries and anything downstream from them.
That doesn't seem to be mentioned in this writeup. |
08-16-2019, 01:28 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Merrymeeting Lake, New Durham
Posts: 2,224
Thanks: 302
Thanked 798 Times in 367 Posts
|
Yes, this is an issue for all fish hatcheries. The output is a combination of uneaten food and eaten food coming out the other end of the fish. If this were a private business, they would have been shut down long ago.
Do a web search on "fish hatchery pollution" and you will find many examples in NH and around the country of the issue. Other than shuttering the facility, the solution is to build what is effectively a very expensive, waste water treatment facility, something that F&G and the state have been trying to avoid due to budget pressures. In the end, the taxpayers and sporting community will need to bear the cost of the facility. FYI: The Powder Mill hatchery is the largest one in the state. Here's one example: https://www.michiganradio.org/post/p...hery-pollution and further proof that it can be fixed https://www.outdoorhub.com/news/2011...ery-effluents/ |
08-16-2019, 06:29 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 529
Thanks: 83
Thanked 194 Times in 118 Posts
|
The hatchery has been there for decades and as usual some people are trying to shut it down!
|
08-16-2019, 08:20 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 2,308
Thanks: 1,211
Thanked 976 Times in 603 Posts
|
Yes, and it's been spewing an incredible amount of phosphorous into the lake--promoting cyanobacteria, milfoil, other algae and dark water in general. This stuff is terrible for the lake we all love. Before you complain about people trying to protect the lake you enjoy, you should read the links
|
The Following User Says Thank You to FlyingScot For This Useful Post: | ||
mishman (08-17-2019) |
Sponsored Links |
|
08-17-2019, 07:05 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 2,877
Thanks: 331
Thanked 1,662 Times in 581 Posts
|
This is why it's not good to eat farm raised shrimp and tilapia. The water in the retention ponds is filthy with the exception of salmon which is farmed in cages in open water. There are some exceptions with seafood that is farmed in the USA because there are USDA standards but Asian countries have no such restraints and the water is black and polluted by the time it is harvested.
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SAMIAM For This Useful Post: | ||
08-17-2019, 08:22 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Foxborough MA
Posts: 176
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 4
Thanked 50 Times in 31 Posts
|
Good for the Goose is Good for the Gander?
The State Government would be all over a private business for this pollution action and operating without a permit. Yet, the Government, once again is the bigger offender with a permit that has expired 3 years ago and not fixing a known problem. The taxpayers on NH inland water ways are paying big money for the seasonal lake/waterfront tax bills. It is TIME to put these dollars back into the lakes and rivers for future use. NH may not have a state income tax but the residents PAY in other ways and experience the same misuse of Government funding. It looks like the problem with cyanobacteria, filamentous, millfoil and other issues are not just the fault of lawn fertilizers. Thanks for this info and post.
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to WJT2 For This Useful Post: | ||
FlyingScot (08-17-2019), mishman (08-17-2019) |
08-17-2019, 08:31 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gilford, NH / Welch Island
Posts: 6,082
Thanks: 2,340
Thanked 5,105 Times in 1,984 Posts
|
Circular rearing tanks is the answer where the waste is easily filtered out and actually sold as fertilizer to farms and such. Other states have been using these successfully for years. These tanks will also raise a better quality of fish! It’s a proven fact....
Dan
__________________
It's Always Sunny On Welch Island!! |
08-17-2019, 08:37 AM | #9 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,892
Thanks: 2,154
Thanked 765 Times in 548 Posts
|
G. I. G. O. ?
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
08-17-2019, 08:40 AM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gilford, NH / Welch Island
Posts: 6,082
Thanks: 2,340
Thanked 5,105 Times in 1,984 Posts
|
Quote:
Dan
__________________
It's Always Sunny On Welch Island!! |
|
08-17-2019, 08:41 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Welch Island and West Alton
Posts: 3,259
Thanks: 1,202
Thanked 2,033 Times in 932 Posts
|
Suggest that you read the first post carefully relative to water entering from upstream.
|
08-17-2019, 09:37 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kuna ID
Posts: 2,755
Thanks: 246
Thanked 1,942 Times in 802 Posts
|
I don't see any problems with the state being forced to take REASONALBE measures to reduce output. Flat out closing the hatchery or imposing unrealistic requirements on them immediately is not the answer. Ideally what should happen is a look at what others have done, cost analysis and putting all the hatcheries on a time driven improvement plan. This would allow for a phased in approach and ease the funding hit to make it happen. I have to believe some federal money is available to offset this I mean hell how much did the Feds spend on those stupid HAWK signals in Meredith? How many dumb studies that provide zero public benefit occur annually? This actually is a useful and worthwhile cause.
These hatcheries are important to the F&G and more so from a tourism aspect to the state. For those who don't fish you may not understand that, but these are critical to maintain a good population of healthy fish in our lakes and ponds especially when it comes to trout and salmon. In fact the salmon only exist because of the hatcheries as they are unable to reproduce naturally. While I get the concern there needs to be a solution here, not call up your senator and tell them to say no. That solves nothing. |
08-17-2019, 01:58 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 519
Thanks: 227
Thanked 167 Times in 108 Posts
|
Well...
The hatchery is only responsible for 90% of the phosphorus in the river, so you are correct.
__________________
"I don't take responsibility at all." |
08-17-2019, 02:26 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Merrymeeting Lake, New Durham
Posts: 2,224
Thanks: 302
Thanked 798 Times in 367 Posts
|
Quote:
The reality is, phosphorus loading happens over time. It builds up in the sediment of the river until the river bed can't take any more, and then it flows downstream. Downstream is Alton Bay, and the river is at capacity now. Even if the phosphorus load was reduced to zero tomorrow, it would take decades for what's already in there to flush out. As you note, the time to start an action plan is now. And most involved recognize that just shutting it down isn't the answer either. If you need any indication of where things stand, http://www4.des.state.nh.us/WaterShe...N5-HmR4S0G7qCQ Marsh Pond is a section of the Merrymeeting River. It's heading your way. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Merrymeeting For This Useful Post: | ||
Slickcraft (08-17-2019) |
08-17-2019, 03:53 PM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 2,308
Thanks: 1,211
Thanked 976 Times in 603 Posts
|
Quote:
Also, as I noted above, you guys should read the links before you criticize with conjecture. Here's an excerpt from Lake Winnipesaukee Association (linked by the OP) which quantifies the inflow and outflow of the hatchery--water before hatchery is 3.5 ppb, water going is is 5, water going out is 43!: Merrymeeting Lake provides the Powder Mill State Fish Hatchery with 7 million gallons of fresh water per day. The water leaving Merrymeeting Lake has an average phosphorus concentration of 5 µg/L (micrograms per liter or parts per billion-ppb). The PMSFH withdraws and discharges a near-constant water load containing phosphorus levels approximately 12 times higher than the outflow concentration from Merrymeeting Lake. The discharge from the facility in summer during low baseflow conditions increases the concentration of phosphorus in the river and downstream waterbodies (leading to algae and cyanobacteria blooms and excessive plant growth)(Ref: Merrymeeting River & Lake Lake Loading Response Model Report, March 2019. FB Environmental & Associates and DK Water Resource Consulting.) Total phosphorus concentrations start at 3.5 ppb in Merrymeeting Lake, and increase to 43 ppb in Marsh Pond, the first waterbody downstream of the fish hatchery. |
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to FlyingScot For This Useful Post: | ||
Bookmarks |
|
|