![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Calendar | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 60
Thanks: 7
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
Where else would you like us to look to find the latest news on this event. Many people close to this situation are memebers of this forum, and we depend on them to post info when they get it. So, when this thread pops up with a new post, it's frustrating to click in, scoll all the way down to only find THE SAME EXACT THING OVER AND OVER AGAIN. OFTEN DIFFERENT WORDS, BUT THE SAME THINGS. POINT, COUNTER POINT, POINT, COUNTER POINT. We all get it... ok???? Speed, dark, light, rain, fog, drinking, not drinking, gps, radar, speed limits, no wake zone, Dr's. camp, IT'S ALL BEEN SAID! Why would you tell her to stop reading it???? I'm sure all she wants is some real info about the health of Erica, or the cause of the accident. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 92
Thanks: 23
Thanked 16 Times in 5 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
This tragedy is horrible regardless of any personal agendas. I don't think it is fair to assume anything about the situation or even if there is probable cause for any court involvement. We do not know what happened. We do not know if there will be charges or any court involvement and even if we did know, we are all innocent until proven guilty. This is not a good time for anyone involved or touched by this terrible accident.
__________________
~ Joe Kerr |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 446
Thanks: 70
Thanked 57 Times in 40 Posts
|
![]()
I always just hit the > character in the lower right corner of the last post box and no matter how many posts or pages it brings me to the last post. Then I go up from there.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central CT
Posts: 90
Thanks: 19
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Better yet, click on the button to the left of the thread title, it takes you directly to the first post since the last time you viewed the forum.
|
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 115
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
This was photographed on the line of trajectory, with the white area being the impact site. The anchor strike is directly in line, having hit just below the window.
What appears as white in color is light pink. The outer, circular, margins show how the hull collapsed upon impact. This is obviously NOT a 5 foot wall as speculated on here earlier. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 329
Thanks: 28
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,495
Thanks: 221
Thanked 812 Times in 488 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
|
![]()
Based on my caculations from the picture on my screen that wall would be about 4 ft 8 1/2 inches at it's highest point.The granite wall measures 13/16ths on my screen and the house wall measures 1 3/8ths.Divide those 2 numbers and you get the granite being.59% of the house.Based on an 8 ft house wall x .59 that = 4 ft 8.6 inches.Is that so far from 5 ft?What the heck is your point anyway?
__________________
SIKSUKR |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 3,586
Thanks: 1,620
Thanked 1,638 Times in 842 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 115
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I'm sure the investigation has the height measured exactly. There's no better way to determine terminal velocity than that.
The amount of hull out of the water at collision can be easily measured based on the widest scuff marks on the ledge. Just compare that measurement to the widest comparable damage on the hull. A comparison-speed with the same amount of hull out of the water with an identical Formula performance cruiser can determine the speed when striking the island. The depth of the ledge below the waterline is immaterial. The 5 foot guess, posted earlier, was retracted by the author. For comparison, this cruiser collision appeared at Boat-Ed.com., having struck a berm. There were no injuries in this collision. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
Always important to add "Performance Cruiser" to the sentence. I'd suspect the water level was higher back then, so five feet may be a stretch. I think the boat would have sustained more bottom damage if it had struck at plowing speed, maybe even ran up on the wall a bit. Not really germaine to any argument, I think everyone has indicated the boat was somewhere on plane at the time of impact. The damage from the berm impact you show seems far worse to me.
I'd still guess 25 to 30. Any faster and I'd have to believe the damage would be far greater. But I'm not even close to having the knowledge to arrive at anything more than a WAG. I'm more focused on the why and how of it. I know you have other intentions. Now that I know there are adult adolescents that go about revving their engines, and bombing down waterways late at night after drinking, I'm against GFBL boats. Once the speed limit is put into place, there will no longer be drunken, obnoxious boaters on the lake. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 233
Thanks: 14
Thanked 16 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]() I'm neither for nor against a speed limit, but that was sarcasm, right?
__________________
Sail fast, live slow! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 140
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
![]()
__________________
"You ain't gonna learn what you don't want to know" |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 60
Thanks: 7
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 281
Thanks: 3
Thanked 21 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]()
When the Dr. Rock report was broadcast last night, the reporter said the driver of the boat died. I questioned what I thought I had heard, but she repeated it again at the end of the broadcast. Today's online posting reads a little differently, noting that a passenger died, but the final paragraph still reads as though the driver died in the crash.
I'm not splitting hairs here in terms of the reporting or writing -- I think she just made a mistake. But after seeing last night's broadcast, I was wondering if the reporter knew something the rest of us had yet to learn. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bow
Posts: 1,874
Thanks: 521
Thanked 308 Times in 162 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Poor reporting? Or perhaps the facts have been reported wrong from the start...who was really driving the boat?
__________________
Getting ready for winter! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hopkinton NH
Posts: 395
Thanks: 88
Thanked 80 Times in 46 Posts
|
![]()
To rephrase WMUR's old slogan, "No one knows New Hampshire like we do!", let me offer a new slogan for WMUR, "No one screws up news reporting in New Hampshire like we do!"
They are the worst when it comes to reporting the news with frequent typos in the on-screen banners, mis-pronounced names of people AND places, incorrect locations on their map of NH when talking about a particular city/town; the list goes on and on!! |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|