Ridiculous "No Wake" Declaration

Orion · 05-27-2006, 06:02 AM

I believe this ruling is worse than the voluntary rule. It gives many the very false impression that their wakes are harmless if created more than 600' from shore. Nothing could be further from the truth. Anyone that has sat on a dock for any length of time could attest to that. Many times you'll get a huge wake hitting the dock and there is no boat in sight and there had not been one for some time. These wakes travel for miles with very little reduction over very long distances. More "feel good" legislation.

Cobalt · 05-27-2006, 07:30 AM

I guess the skeptics are right. "It's all about the dollars."

05-27-2006, 06:02 AM	#1
Orion Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Cow Island Posts: 914 Thanks: 602 Thanked 193 Times in 91 Posts	This is worse I believe this ruling is worse than the voluntary rule. It gives many the very false impression that their wakes are harmless if created more than 600' from shore. Nothing could be further from the truth. Anyone that has sat on a dock for any length of time could attest to that. Many times you'll get a huge wake hitting the dock and there is no boat in sight and there had not been one for some time. These wakes travel for miles with very little reduction over very long distances. More "feel good" legislation.

05-27-2006, 07:30 AM	#2
Cobalt Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 130 Thanks: 70 Thanked 33 Times in 25 Posts	Legislative Compromise I guess the skeptics are right. "It's all about the dollars."

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode