Milfoil in Moultonborough!

phoenix · 07-26-2010, 08:23 AM

The Moultonboro Milfoil Committee sent out a letter recently clarifying what happened. First the State body solely responsible for approval is the Dept of Agriculture. The approval was granted for June 22 treatment. On June 17th an employee Matthew Carpenter e mailed Lycott saying they could be sued for endangering the Shiners. Moultonboro didn't have enough time to get the State to indemnify the company so the treatment was stopped in some areas. Amazing to me that one employee could go around the State's approval process . They will try again in September.

07-26-2010, 08:23 AM	#34
phoenix Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: phoenix and moultonboro Posts: 1,551 Thanks: 60 Thanked 275 Times in 193 Posts	The Moultonboro Milfoil Committee sent out a letter recently clarifying what happened. First the State body solely responsible for approval is the Dept of Agriculture. The approval was granted for June 22 treatment. On June 17th an employee Matthew Carpenter e mailed Lycott saying they could be sued for endangering the Shiners. Moultonboro didn't have enough time to get the State to indemnify the company so the treatment was stopped in some areas. Amazing to me that one employee could go around the State's approval process . They will try again in September. __________________ it's tough to make predictions specially about the future

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode