|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Calendar | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
05-03-2017, 11:00 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,959
Thanks: 80
Thanked 975 Times in 436 Posts
|
WOW Trail Phase 3 Heating up...
Looks like a battle is looming for Phase 3 of the WOW trail... Seems like battling in court would be a waste of time and money for the Southdown folks as the rail property is state owned and Southdown was sold to the City with the premise of a Rail Trail. Doesn't sound like a win to me...
Perhaps they would be better served taking that war chest of $$ they raised to fight the trail, and use it to make the trail design acceptable as it runs through Southdown. http://www.laconiadailysun.com/newsx...32-wow-boycott Woodsy
__________________
The only way to eliminate ignorant behavior is through education. You can't fix stupid. |
05-03-2017, 11:54 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 2,896
Thanks: 469
Thanked 682 Times in 380 Posts
|
Actually boycotting businesses for a purpose like this can be quite effective and is done a lot. That said, these types of trails always have detractors but usually end up very well done and become great assets to communities and abutters. If you don't want to be near something like this then do your homework and don't move near right of ways.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ITD For This Useful Post: | ||
BroadHopper (05-04-2017) |
05-03-2017, 01:40 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,073
Thanks: 443
Thanked 1,017 Times in 423 Posts
|
WOW Trail
I grew up in Laconia and now live in SD/LB. Even though I now live in SD/LB, I wouldn't want any more federal or state money be "invested" in the WOW trail. Let's be real, I drive by the WOW trail several times a day, and hardly ever see anyone on it. And if you read the police blotter, the WOW trail appears to be a popular place to buy drugs and to commit robberies. Couple that with the fact that it is inaccessible 5 or 6 months of the year make it a complete waste of money. Laconia should do what it has done best over the past decade, invest in Section 8 housing so we can attract the type of people it wants as residents. I heard/read somewhere that SD/LB generates $32M in tax revenue. What the heck, Laconia can just make us pay more.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Major For This Useful Post: | ||
Longtimelurker (05-03-2017) |
05-04-2017, 07:20 AM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Laconia NH
Posts: 5,547
Thanks: 3,162
Thanked 1,094 Times in 788 Posts
|
Quote:
WOW trail is on the other side of the lake. Not sure where you got the idea that the WOW trail attract drugs.
__________________
Someday may never be an actual day. |
|
05-04-2017, 08:00 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 2,877
Thanks: 331
Thanked 1,662 Times in 581 Posts
|
Seems to me that those millions could be put to better use than a seasonal walking trail. Phase one of the trail seems to be used very little except during perfect weather.
|
Sponsored Links |
|
05-04-2017, 09:06 AM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,073
Thanks: 443
Thanked 1,017 Times in 423 Posts
|
WOW Trail
Quote:
http://www.necn.com/news/new-england...377055721.html |
|
05-04-2017, 09:06 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 741
Thanks: 4
Thanked 257 Times in 169 Posts
|
If the "M" is the standard abbreviation for "millia," Latin for thousand, then $32M would be barely anything. If the intent was to say $32 million, then I have to suspect what was "heard." Talking round numbers, if each property paid ten thousand per year in property tax, there would have to be 3200 properties so taxed for SD/LB to generate that much collectively. Whatever the total take is, how does the total tax take from SD/LB figure into the argument for or against the proposal?
|
05-04-2017, 09:12 AM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,073
Thanks: 443
Thanked 1,017 Times in 423 Posts
|
Quote:
Both communities now have over 600 property owners from many geographic areas who can call the Lakes Region “home”. Many are vacation home owners & semi-retirees and others are year round, permanent residents. Davidson’s ‘vision’ and hard work paid off immensely for the City of Laconia. Today both communities are valued over $114,000,000 by the assessor’s office and they contribute over $3.2 million annually to the City of Laconia’s tax revenue. That’s a lot of income which has helped the city construct a new police station, fire department, schools, parks and other amenities. Not only that but think of the economic impact these 600+ families have contributed to the Lakes Region. Many businesses have prospered because of these communities including general contractors, landscapers, lumber yards, furniture stores, boat, car & golf cart dealers, restaurants and even us REALTORS®… Still, $3.2 million is nothing to sneeze at. |
|
05-04-2017, 09:16 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,073
Thanks: 443
Thanked 1,017 Times in 423 Posts
|
The point is . . .
My point is that the City has a spending problem, and looks to SD/LB as an important source of revenue to fund their "investments." In eight short years, my taxes have gone from $8K to $12.7K annually. Even with the tax cap, the City has a way of sticking it to the SD/LB residents.
|
05-04-2017, 11:09 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,959
Thanks: 80
Thanked 975 Times in 436 Posts
|
Major...
I do agree with Laconia needing to look at Municipal Spending.... In 2009 the tax rate was $16.97 per thousand/assessed value. In 2017 the rate is $22.20 per thousand/assessed value. The tax rate has gone up $5.23 over 8 years or approx. .65/per thousand/per year. However... SD/LB doesn't pay any more than any other property in Laconia when it comes to funding the city's projects! I pay the same $22.20 per thousand you do! Woodsy
__________________
The only way to eliminate ignorant behavior is through education. You can't fix stupid. |
05-04-2017, 11:46 AM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,073
Thanks: 443
Thanked 1,017 Times in 423 Posts
|
Taxes
Quote:
|
|
05-04-2017, 12:49 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,959
Thanks: 80
Thanked 975 Times in 436 Posts
|
No..... they do not assess SD/LB at a higher rate! Your property increased in value... The increase in value of the property, coupled with the increase in the tax rate gives you your 59%...
Go on the MLS and look.... the cheapest property for sale in SD/LB is a 1200 sq/ft condo for $235K. Not counting lots for sale.. I counted 12 properties that when averaged out (including the $235K property) equaled an average price of $436K... There are only 2 properties listed under $300K! So while I am happy for you that you got in a good price... I don't feel bad for you or anyone else when your property increases in value! Woodsy
__________________
The only way to eliminate ignorant behavior is through education. You can't fix stupid. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Woodsy For This Useful Post: | ||
MRD (05-04-2017) |
05-04-2017, 01:58 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,073
Thanks: 443
Thanked 1,017 Times in 423 Posts
|
Taxes
Quote:
I grew up here, and I have friends and family who own homes throughout Laconia. Our home and my neighbors' homes in SD/LB are assessed close to what we might be able to sell them for. I follow Vision Appraisal, and from what I can tell, family and friends outside of SD/LB are assessed 70-75% of sale values. I can provide you many examples. I get your point, but I think they have their thumb on the scale with respect to SD/LB. Just my opinion. |
|
05-04-2017, 02:40 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,959
Thanks: 80
Thanked 975 Times in 436 Posts
|
Major...
The math is pretty simple.... In 2009 Laconia's tax rate was $16.97 per thousand assessed. So If you paid $8000 in taxes in 2009 your house was valued at approx. $471,500. $8000/$16.97 = $471,420 In 2017 Laconia's tax rate is $22.20 per thousand assessed. So if your house value didn't change... 471.42 x 22.20 = $10,465.52 tax bill (31% increase) So if your taxes have gone up 59% ($8000 x .59 = $4720) they jumped from $8000 to $12,720. So the difference lies in your appraised value. $12,720/22.20 = $572,972 tax assessed value.... 21.5% increase in home value over the 8 years. If you think you are being unfairly assessed, you should definitely appeal to the town... (I certainly would) My guess is with median average for sale in Southdown being $436K, you probably aren't going to win. Southdown/Long Bay is a victim of its own success. PS... My condo in the Weirs is assessed at 90% value. Per the state laws. Woodsy
__________________
The only way to eliminate ignorant behavior is through education. You can't fix stupid. |
05-04-2017, 07:55 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Laconia NH
Posts: 5,547
Thanks: 3,162
Thanked 1,094 Times in 788 Posts
|
As I always say to folks....
that moves to Laconia and complain, there are plenty of estate to move elsewhere!
Laconia was here long before SD/LB. So don't go telling Laconia what they can or can not do!
__________________
Someday may never be an actual day. |
05-05-2017, 06:36 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,073
Thanks: 443
Thanked 1,017 Times in 423 Posts
|
Sd/lb
Last time I checked, I am a resident of Laconia and have the same right as other residents to express my displeasure about City money going towards the WOW trail. Make no mistake, even if Federal and State (and private) monies are provided to construct the trail, Laconia will be obligated to pay for its maintenance.
My hope is that the WOW trail proponents take SD/LB's offer to re-route the WOW trail around the periphery of the development. Otherwise, it appears that the WOW trail will be wasting a lot of its capital in fighting the issue in court. |
05-05-2017, 07:21 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,959
Thanks: 80
Thanked 975 Times in 436 Posts
|
Why should they re-route the trail around a development that was sold to the city with the rail trail as part of the plan?
The state owns the right of way.... Not SD/LB. Why not work with the WOW trail to pick out a nice fencing option? Woodsy
__________________
The only way to eliminate ignorant behavior is through education. You can't fix stupid. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Woodsy For This Useful Post: | ||
Reilly (05-07-2017) |
05-05-2017, 08:01 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,073
Thanks: 443
Thanked 1,017 Times in 423 Posts
|
The incentive for the proponents of the WOW trail to work with SD/LB is to avoid costly litigation. Who is right or wrong really has little impact on how disputes are resolved. (Things like monetary resources, stomach for litigation, etc., have as much influence on litigation results.) The proponents on the WOW trail can spend a lot of their capital on litigation to prove that it has the right of way, or instead work with the residents of SD/LB to re-route the trail. We'll see what happens. At the end of the day, whether the trail is built or not won't have a lot impact on my life. I just think it's a colossal waste of money.
|
05-05-2017, 08:18 AM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Center Harbor
Posts: 1,149
Thanks: 205
Thanked 424 Times in 242 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
05-05-2017, 05:17 PM | #20 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 825
Thanks: 113
Thanked 207 Times in 130 Posts
|
Quote:
Quote:
If privacy was an issue, why on earth would you build/buy in a community such as SD/LB? It's not like they are building a highway around your home. It is a bike path/walking trail. Instead of wasting money on litigation, BUILD A WALL. 30 feet high made of concrete should suffice! |
||
05-04-2017, 11:16 AM | #21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Waltham Ma./Meredith NH
Posts: 3,899
Thanks: 2,088
Thanked 1,128 Times in 712 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
05-08-2017, 08:22 AM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 302
Thanks: 85
Thanked 116 Times in 48 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
05-08-2017, 09:43 AM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,073
Thanks: 443
Thanked 1,017 Times in 423 Posts
|
WOW Trail
Quote:
Anyway, from the comments, it appears that SD/LB is not winning the vote of popular opinion. I'm against it not necessarily because of my affiliation with SD/LB, but because I think it's a waste of money. Even if funding is available from federal, state and private sources to build phase III, the City will ultimately have to maintain it. I think our money could be better spent on other things. |
|
05-08-2017, 10:23 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 302
Thanks: 85
Thanked 116 Times in 48 Posts
|
I don't have a Dog in the fight, however I DO agree it is/was/and will be a total waste of money. Just another feel good moment. No facts here just a common sense approach..... Dollars spent on the WOW trail ( from where ever ) vs The amount of people who use it. Just Financially doesn't make sense. Could have built a glass bridge over Paugus Bay and really had a view.
|
05-08-2017, 02:27 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maynard, MA & Paugus Bay
Posts: 2,532
Thanks: 749
Thanked 346 Times in 259 Posts
|
I Do not have a dog in the fight either, but I have proposed many times putting it on union ave with the businesses to generate foot traffic and use the already way to wide sidewalks then up lake street and down weirs blvd up the road to the weirs, most of this area having plenty of room for the space of a trial, it will generate much more use and be better for the town and all those involved, not to mention it will go right by the visitor center as well.
side note that will bring it right by my doorstep
__________________
Capt. of the "No Worries" |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to AC2717 For This Useful Post: | ||
05-08-2017, 02:28 PM | #26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,073
Thanks: 443
Thanked 1,017 Times in 423 Posts
|
This just in . . .
Quote:
I encourage anyone concerned about their safety on the WOW trail to contact the Laconia Police Department. I hope this helps. |
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Major For This Useful Post: | ||
05-04-2017, 07:46 AM | #27 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Gilford NH
Posts: 77
Thanks: 5
Thanked 21 Times in 15 Posts
|
Quote:
I don't think they're very serious about boycotting the O Steak and Seafood. I see a lot of South Down Shores people in there when we dine there. |
|
05-05-2017, 08:22 AM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 6,090
Thanks: 1,157
Thanked 2,011 Times in 1,239 Posts
|
This is where the law gets frustrating to me. If the SD properties were sold with a ROW--and ESPECIALLY if with the rail trail plans included--there shouldn't even be legal proceedings. If, on the other hand, the ROW was not disclosed, that's an issue.
Sent from my XT1528 using Tapatalk |
05-05-2017, 08:38 AM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,073
Thanks: 443
Thanked 1,017 Times in 423 Posts
|
Jeff, unfortunately, that's how litigation works. It may be a colossal waste of money for the SD/LB owners, but spread across 600 units, the cost isn't that much. If the goal is to have a trail that people can enjoy, why can't the WOW trail folks consider re-routing the trail? It seems like a win-win.
Thinking, I'm not sure when the rail trail was first proposed. The first units in SD/LB were built around 1985. Anyway, I don't see much upside in debating the issue. I think we will all have to wait and see how it plays out. Either way, it won't be the end of the world if it's built or if it's not built. That said, I don't see either side giving in. |
05-05-2017, 08:39 AM | #30 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Center Harbor
Posts: 1,149
Thanks: 205
Thanked 424 Times in 242 Posts
|
Quote:
The typical action to getting caught out with unexpected problems is legal action. You may not have a leg to stand on but it doesn't mean you can't create a legal blizzard, especially if you band together with others who share your interest. And, I can truly share the SD folks concern. I owned a property along the Merrimack in Hudson, NH. The deed provided a ROW for a walking path if the town ever got around to building it. I accepted the reality of it and decided if they did build it, I would push for a barrier (bushes?) to be constructed as well to provide a bit of separation from my property. It never came to pass but the possibility was there. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jeffk For This Useful Post: | ||
noreast (05-05-2017) |
05-05-2017, 08:55 AM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,959
Thanks: 80
Thanked 975 Times in 436 Posts
|
The original plans for SD way back in the 80's had the rail trail in the plans.... Now its coming to fruition and SD/LB is taking a NIMBY approach... Not too cool in my book but whatever, like Major said bury them with lawyers!
That being said.... it go really bad for SD/LB. 1st... any lawsuit could be rejected by a judge because of the state owned ROW and it was included in original plans... SD/LB ends up spending a bunch of money for nothing and may have to pay the WOW lawyers. 2nd.... Nuclear option... State plays hardball and doesn't renew lease to cross Railroad ROW... yup SD/LB lease that land. SD/LB loses water access, and loses a bunch of property value and $$$ spent. (The state is under no legal obligation to renew any lease for any reason) IMHO, SD/LB should take the money they are going to use to fight the WOW trail and instead use it to make the WOW trail more acceptable to them (fence design, trail materials, shrubbery, landscaping etc) Woodsy
__________________
The only way to eliminate ignorant behavior is through education. You can't fix stupid. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Woodsy For This Useful Post: | ||
BroadHopper (05-05-2017), Just Sold (05-05-2017) |
05-05-2017, 02:21 PM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Moultonborough, NH
Posts: 1,515
Thanks: 394
Thanked 527 Times in 269 Posts
|
I live on a 4 acre wooded lot. I love it because it is so private. Our neighbor's are having 40 trees cut down on their lot. They can cut right up to our property line. So much for privacy!!! People move to the country from the suburbs and they still want the suburbs.
|
05-05-2017, 02:23 PM | #33 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Center Harbor
Posts: 1,149
Thanks: 205
Thanked 424 Times in 242 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to jeffk For This Useful Post: | ||
05-08-2017, 05:45 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,220
Thanks: 1,214
Thanked 1,007 Times in 648 Posts
|
Phase 1 and 2 are already along Winnisquam and Winnipesaukee River and DES obviously had no issues there so why would they with Pagaus Bay?
Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app |
05-08-2017, 06:07 PM | #35 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,073
Thanks: 443
Thanked 1,017 Times in 423 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
05-08-2017, 08:28 PM | #36 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,220
Thanks: 1,214
Thanked 1,007 Times in 648 Posts
|
Quote:
Really? The paving and fencing was along the river prior to "construction " of the WOW Trail? News to me. Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app |
|
05-09-2017, 07:14 AM | #37 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,073
Thanks: 443
Thanked 1,017 Times in 423 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
05-09-2017, 07:37 AM | #38 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,220
Thanks: 1,214
Thanked 1,007 Times in 648 Posts
|
Quote:
Yes it does go along Opeechee and Winnisquam I have been down both phases so again the DES had no issues with these so I don't think they will be a stumbling block for phase 3. That will come from the abutting communities. Although I know someone mentioned Meredith Bay was against the trail but I know for a fact they have not taken any public or official opinion on the trail. Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app |
|
05-09-2017, 07:47 AM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,073
Thanks: 443
Thanked 1,017 Times in 423 Posts
|
To the best of my knowledge, the only community that has made a public stand against the WOW trail is SD/LB.
|
06-01-2017, 12:10 PM | #40 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 6,090
Thanks: 1,157
Thanked 2,011 Times in 1,239 Posts
|
According to the article, the associations were instituted with the understanding that the path would be built? And now they'll not only burn their owners' and taxpayers' funds in litigation but maybe risk the continued ROW access? Very interesting case for sure.
Sent from my XT1528 using Tapatalk |
06-01-2017, 01:28 PM | #41 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,177
Thanks: 664
Thanked 943 Times in 368 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
06-02-2017, 02:50 PM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 302
Thanks: 85
Thanked 116 Times in 48 Posts
|
I believe everything will be shown very clearly on the maps or charts ( I'm so confused LOL ) that the State owns. This will be in court for some time. Good for south Down shores for sticking to their guns on this. As I have mentioned earlier IMO this is a TOTAL waste of money. Seems everyone is fine with it UNLESS it's in your backyard. Out of site...out of mind.
Last edited by topwater; 06-03-2017 at 09:20 AM. |
06-03-2017, 09:29 AM | #43 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 2,877
Thanks: 331
Thanked 1,662 Times in 581 Posts
|
The thought of a waterfront fence from Lakeport to the Weirs absolutely gives me the chills.
I don't understand how anyone who cares about the stewardship of our lakes would want to do that........but why stop there. Lets go on to Squam. |
06-05-2017, 10:09 AM | #44 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South Down Shores
Posts: 1,942
Thanks: 541
Thanked 570 Times in 335 Posts
|
Quote:
Do you think the state and/or city of Laconia want to immediately decrease the value of every property in there by 10-20%? Additionally, if access was rescinded in what seemed to be a matter of spite it could give South Down a stronger position in the end (though at a higher legal cost).
__________________
[insert witty phrase here] |
|
06-05-2017, 11:46 AM | #45 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,073
Thanks: 443
Thanked 1,017 Times in 423 Posts
|
WOW Trail
Quote:
It is my understanding from two separate sources that the WOW Trail powerbrokers are putting pressure on the railroad to shut it down between Lakeport and the Weirs. Insuring the safety of the WOW Trail users could be a very expensive proposition, and it isn't clear as to who is responsible. |
|
06-05-2017, 12:04 PM | #46 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,959
Thanks: 80
Thanked 975 Times in 436 Posts
|
Obv, the state limiting SD/LB waterfront access would be the nuclear option, not preferable to anyone. However, A tax devaluation would take years to see as its based on sales comps. I seriously doubt you would see a 20% reduction in values and a likewise reduction in Laconia's tax base.
The lawsuit, IMHO is fragile at best. The gist of the lawsuit is SD/LB are trying to tell the state what it can/cannot do with state owned property. That is a very slippery slope and a win by SD/LB would set a HUGE legal precedent that would ripple thru the state. I don't see any judge signing off on a private citizens association telling the state what it can or cannot do... I don't think the lawsuit will be allowed to go too far forward. If this was an eminent domain lawsuit you would have a much better chance. IMHO SD/LB would be better off using their $$ to negotiate an acceptable fence and path design. Woodsy
__________________
The only way to eliminate ignorant behavior is through education. You can't fix stupid. |
06-05-2017, 12:11 PM | #47 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,959
Thanks: 80
Thanked 975 Times in 436 Posts
|
here is a link that shows the RR ROW for those who want to see what is in question... you will have to zoom in on Paugus Bay. As you can see SD/LB/various yacht clubs owns very little of the waterfront and they have to cross the state RR ROW to get there....
https://www.axisgis.com/LaconiaNH/ Woodsy
__________________
The only way to eliminate ignorant behavior is through education. You can't fix stupid. |
06-05-2017, 04:07 PM | #48 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Gunstock Acres
Posts: 50
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
That's much different than the land being owned by various property owners along the route and the RR having a ROW. So if the state owns the land and the properties along the RR have specific ROWs, then there isn't much anyone can do on either side. If the state did put up a fence it would have to have access to those ROWs. Given that it seems money better spent would be on both parties agreeing on the aesthetics/maintenance of access to ROWs/etc. Only winner here is going to be the lawyers. |
|
06-05-2017, 04:48 PM | #49 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,220
Thanks: 1,214
Thanked 1,007 Times in 648 Posts
|
Absolutely Agree
Quote:
|
|
06-06-2017, 08:35 AM | #50 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South Down Shores
Posts: 1,942
Thanks: 541
Thanked 570 Times in 335 Posts
|
Quote:
Personally (IANAL), I think the very long delay on getting the trail built works in South Down's favor, it is like the inverse of Adverse Possession concepts. Yes, there was a stated plan for a trail when the ROW was granted, but after a certain amount of time (30 years!) goes by with no trail, and certain aspects of the community, and its draw for owners, develops around the fact that there is no trail/fence/access hindrance, you can understand why people are opposed to it. It would be different, IMO, if SD were attempting to block access to a proposed emergency services road construction, or a similar thing that would have clear, proven benefit to the community at large. You also cannot deny some of the crime and other issues around Laconia, again, making resistance to easy access into the community understandable. The WOW trail is at least partly being presented as something that will give "the people" freer access to the lakes/shoreline, and that is a noble cause, however the state effectively allowed the current situation where much of the shoreline is privately owned (and, not getting into side-debates about technical access to shorline areas, just saying that much of the property abutting the shore is privately owned). Trying to now compensate for selling off access by implementing a walking trail with undetermined impact on some communities is really not a balanced approach.
__________________
[insert witty phrase here] |
|
06-06-2017, 09:10 AM | #51 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Center Harbor
Posts: 1,149
Thanks: 205
Thanked 424 Times in 242 Posts
|
I'm not sure a ROW for public use purposes has a time limit.
If it was for private use, say me using a property for access and never exercising it, maybe an argument could be made for forfeiting my access right. I doubt the same would be true for public purposes which often stretch out over decades. Further, the possible damages are speculative, possibly even unlikely. A well planned and tasteful path and fencing need not have significant impact on the adjacent properties. Other area on the WOW trail don't have problems with criminal activity. Unproven worries are not a basis for solid decision making. If I lived there, I would certainly want a place at the table as decisions are made but I don't think NO! is a workable answer. |
06-06-2017, 09:17 AM | #52 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,220
Thanks: 1,214
Thanked 1,007 Times in 648 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
06-06-2017, 09:18 AM | #53 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,073
Thanks: 443
Thanked 1,017 Times in 423 Posts
|
Quote:
Publicly, the Laconia Police will take the position that the WOW Trail has minimal criminal activity. Privately, they will tell you otherwise. The WOW Trail is an avenue of egress to crimes occurring in downtown Laconia. Crime is definitely prevalent. SD/LB concerns about crime are not unproven or unfounded, but based on facts. |
|
06-06-2017, 10:05 AM | #54 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,220
Thanks: 1,214
Thanked 1,007 Times in 648 Posts
|
Disagree
Quote:
|
|
06-06-2017, 11:25 AM | #55 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,959
Thanks: 80
Thanked 975 Times in 436 Posts
|
The whole purpose of a Rail Trail is to separate people from vehicles as much as possible. They are hugely successful in other parts of NH and many, many other states!
Rerouting the rail trail to city streets just accommodate some private development seems silly to me and sets a dangerous precedent. Especially when that private development was sold to the city with the rail trail as part of the plan... This is a case of NIMBY pure and simple. The winners here will be the lawyers. The reality is, the general public isn't going to feel bad for people who own homes in a wealthy gated community who want to limit public access to publicly owned land. SD/LB will ultimately lose the lawsuit, but like the speed limit it will cause some serious divisions. It already is and that is kind of sad. Woodsy
__________________
The only way to eliminate ignorant behavior is through education. You can't fix stupid. |
06-06-2017, 12:07 PM | #56 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,073
Thanks: 443
Thanked 1,017 Times in 423 Posts
|
Sd/lb
Jeff, to quote a great American presidential candidate "at this point in time what difference does this make." Whether crime was more or less prior to the WOW Trail has no impact on what it is now. We know that between 2010 and 2016, a six year period, there were 132 reported incidents that required police investigation. Some were very serious. My suspicion is that crime was less prior to the WOW Trail since the use of opioids has exploded the last several years. However, this is just a guess.
Woodsy, you think SD/LB is a "wealthy" community? I agree it's very nice, but for the most part the condos are very modest and most of the homes are modest. No one is going to confuse SD/LB with Governor's Island or Grouse Point for that matter. The primary reason why SD/LB is gated is because the residents like to drive golf carts. That's one of the reasons why the roads were never turned over to the City. |
06-06-2017, 01:11 PM | #57 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Center Harbor
Posts: 1,149
Thanks: 205
Thanked 424 Times in 242 Posts
|
Crime?
I would suggest that there may be more questionable activity in parts of the trail that go through some areas of Laconia but not others just like there is more crime in general in some areas of Laconia rather than others. If the trail is fully completed one day will the crime in Laconia transfer to Meredith just because a trail connects them? I rather doubt it. Do criminals in Laconia make a habit of driving over to South Down? It's not all that far. I suspect they don't. They prefer to stay on their own turf and in areas that are not as wide open where their activity might be seen. South Down is pretty wide open and not easy to hide in. I suspect the people there know their neighbors and would quickly report any strangers hanging around. It wouldn't be a welcoming area for criminals and they would know it.
|
06-06-2017, 01:43 PM | #58 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,220
Thanks: 1,214
Thanked 1,007 Times in 648 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
06-06-2017, 01:47 PM | #59 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South Down Shores
Posts: 1,942
Thanks: 541
Thanked 570 Times in 335 Posts
|
So then your position is that since there is already crime no concern should be given to changes that might INCREASE crime? If I have misinterpreted your comment please clarify, thanks!
__________________
[insert witty phrase here] |
06-06-2017, 01:59 PM | #60 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,073
Thanks: 443
Thanked 1,017 Times in 423 Posts
|
Sd/lb
Quote:
Much like politics, I don't think either side is going to win over the other side. From my perspective, I hope funding for Phase III never materializes. I think the WOW Trail's $5-10 million estimate is absurdly low. There are issues with the stretch between Pickerel and Perch Ponds, as well with navigating under the Weirs Beach Bridge. Who knows, maybe the litigation will force a compromise. Stranger things have happened. |
|
06-06-2017, 02:07 PM | #61 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,220
Thanks: 1,214
Thanked 1,007 Times in 648 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
06-06-2017, 02:11 PM | #62 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,073
Thanks: 443
Thanked 1,017 Times in 423 Posts
|
Sd/lb
Quote:
|
|
06-06-2017, 02:17 PM | #63 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,220
Thanks: 1,214
Thanked 1,007 Times in 648 Posts
|
|
06-06-2017, 01:56 PM | #64 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South Down Shores
Posts: 1,942
Thanks: 541
Thanked 570 Times in 335 Posts
|
Statistically speaking, I don't think it has a time limit either. It would not be to the state's benefit to put auto-expiration clauses on ROW grants, or similar exceptions based on future use potential.
However, like many things legal, events over time often cause things to be reevaluated and for parties to realize that language was not specific enough, other precedents or decisions in tangential lawsuits come into play, etc. SD/LB has changed a lot in character over time. Look at some of the early buildings vs. later ones, it appears, to me, that it started as more of a simple/affordable community and morphed over time into one that contains more and more higher-valued properties. Some of those property owners may have built elsewhere or chosen to alter their plans had they anticipated a 30 year old dormant easement to suddenly be put to use. I am not saying that fully justifies the opposition, but it does impact things (IMO). When we purchased in South Down (2006), I do not recall seeing any clauses, deed restrictions, etc. that mentioned this ROW existing and being earmarked for a public trail and associated fences to be built through the community. Should potential buyers have been made aware of how the common area property, and the community at large, could be impacted? Are there other precedents in similar circumstances?
__________________
[insert witty phrase here] |
06-06-2017, 02:18 PM | #65 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Center Harbor
Posts: 1,149
Thanks: 205
Thanked 424 Times in 242 Posts
|
Quote:
Sometimes it's not what can happen on YOUR property that you need to be aware of; it's what can happen on your NEIGHBOR'S property. Suppose a neighbor's property was zoned commercial (yours is not) and poof, suddenly they sell and a business is being built in your back yard and there is not a lot you can do about it except maybe to get some buffering put in. Unless you really dug into the real estate situation in the area, you probably would never see it coming. Most of us just aren't that careful. I think that is what is happening here. |
|
06-06-2017, 02:38 PM | #66 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,220
Thanks: 1,214
Thanked 1,007 Times in 648 Posts
|
When we purchased in South Down (2006), I do not recall seeing any clauses, deed restrictions, etc. that mentioned this ROW existing and being earmarked for a public trail and associated fences to be built through the community. Should potential buyers have been made aware of how the common area property, and the community at large, could be impacted? Are there other precedents in similar circumstances?[/QUOTE]
When I purchased in 2006 in SD before moving to LB, my broker provided me with copies of the original declaration along with the SD by-laws. The ROW is in there but also my broker discussed it with us before signing our purchase contract. Your broker at the time should have made you aware or at least provided all the HOA documents |
06-06-2017, 03:05 PM | #67 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,959
Thanks: 80
Thanked 975 Times in 436 Posts
|
I think the due diligence unfortunately falls on the buyer...
The buyer(s) in SD/LB probably knew about the RR ROW, as it is a physical landmark. I seriously doubt that most buyers were aware or were made aware that the RR ROW extends to the water for most of the shoreline, and that property did not belong to SD/LB. The only way to know would be to look at the plot plans/tax map for SD/LB that I listed above. I am sure no RE Agent would point that out and possibly lose a sale. Its a pretty crappy situation for sure! I can see SD/LB taking issue with the fencing, I wouldn't want a 6' high chain link fence there either. However that's a negotiation, not a lawsuit. Especially where there is some very nice low post & beam fencing in other areas of the WOW trail. In the winter, the state allows snowmobiles/cross country skiers/hikers etc. to use the RR ROW as a connecting corridor trail. Public use/access utilizing the RR ROW thru SD/LB is already approved by the state. I am sure that was a surprise to some unsuspecting buyers too. So arguing against further public access is probably pretty futile as the state has ALWAYS allowed it. Woodsy
__________________
The only way to eliminate ignorant behavior is through education. You can't fix stupid. |
06-07-2017, 05:44 AM | #68 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gilford, NH and Florida
Posts: 2,949
Thanks: 667
Thanked 2,177 Times in 914 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
06-07-2017, 09:30 AM | #69 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South Down Shores
Posts: 1,942
Thanks: 541
Thanked 570 Times in 335 Posts
|
Good point
__________________
[insert witty phrase here] |
06-07-2017, 11:30 AM | #70 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 273
Thanks: 119
Thanked 62 Times in 40 Posts
|
I have watched this back and forth, pro and con on this thread and know this is a very decisive issue. I have experience with the Minuteman bike trail that runs from Bedford MA, thru Lexington, Arlington and ends at Alewife in Cambridge.
First off, as others have said, many people did not want the trail built, or saw a need for it. Now, it is a selling point for neighborhoods all along the trail and it is a major recreation and commuter way and has spurred multiple Retail stops along the way. Whether we do not want the trail in our back yard or think it is a waste of money, we have to understand that many people want these trails and are willing to pay for them. Yes this means in most cases we all pay for them through our taxes. The Minuteman trail ends near the middle of Bedford MA, but the old railroad bed continues to Concord and a National Wildlife refuge. Concord and the Feds have little desire for the paved trail to continue in their jurisdiction, so it was a surprise to some of us when it was proposed at town meeting to enhance the trail and pave it the rest of the way to the Concord line. I personally had an issue with dumping a lot of people on a busy road with only mountain bikes and walkers able to continue along the old dirt RR bed. I was on a committee that could block the primary proposed Funding from even reaching the Town Meeting floor; but we realized that many people wanted this so we voted to allow it to go to Town Meeting. There was discussion at TM but it passed with 2/3rds vote. It is still a long process as funds were approved for partial design and that has been going on for over 5 years. Is it expensive, YES, but I think the trail will be good for the area like these trails have been across the region and the country. My advice to the 2 communities in opposition to the trail would be to save your money and use it to work with the WOW trail for better fencing, screening and access options. We have done this with other municipal projects and it can be done with benefits to everyone. It could be as simple as covering the extra cost for a darker or better style fence. |
06-07-2017, 01:18 PM | #71 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 62
Thanks: 8
Thanked 14 Times in 8 Posts
|
Golf carts
They should allow golf carts on the trail, might sway some opinion, being able to drive from south down the weirs to Meredith on a cart sounds like fun. Kind of shrink the community's and tie them together. Just a thought.
|
06-07-2017, 01:50 PM | #72 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,220
Thanks: 1,214
Thanked 1,007 Times in 648 Posts
|
That's what they do in many over 55 villages in Florida, such as The Villages that is a huge community where the main mode of transportation is the golf cart, but in this case I do not think it would be very safe for the walkers, cyclists and runners
|
06-07-2017, 02:33 PM | #73 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 62
Thanks: 8
Thanked 14 Times in 8 Posts
|
Quote:
I would also say like you said in Florida it is very common to mix carts with everything else, even on the street with cars. Even here south down, Meredith Bay, Grosse point, they mix the two. The cart path from Meredith Bay to Akwa mixes the two at a very steep grade and is still safe for pedestrians. Don't get me wrong I know it will never happen but if the wow trail had to happen this would make it cool. Fun to talk about. (side note, still wish the tracks had a pedestrian trolley) |
|
06-07-2017, 02:54 PM | #74 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,073
Thanks: 443
Thanked 1,017 Times in 423 Posts
|
Grouse Point
Grouse Point has steep grades too. When my parents lived there, a 12-year old girl died rolling a golf cart down a steep embankment. Kind of off topic, but golf carts, while fun, can be dangerous on steep hills.
|
06-07-2017, 03:23 PM | #75 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,220
Thanks: 1,214
Thanked 1,007 Times in 648 Posts
|
Quote:
I think it would be awesome to take the golf cart to the weirs or Meredith. Wishful thinking. Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app |
|
06-08-2017, 08:42 AM | #76 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maynard, MA & Paugus Bay
Posts: 2,532
Thanks: 749
Thanked 346 Times in 259 Posts
|
I just wanted to be the 100th post on this thread
__________________
Capt. of the "No Worries" |
06-16-2017, 07:39 AM | #77 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 100
Thanks: 76
Thanked 50 Times in 19 Posts
|
Why does the WOW trail have to be seasonal? It would make a great snowmobile trail as well.
|
06-09-2017, 01:04 PM | #78 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 695
Thanks: 187
Thanked 531 Times in 227 Posts
|
Quote:
I wouldn't be surprised by it if the trail gets built and bikers encounter big rocks placed on the trail. I think the trail organizers seriously need to consider this in their maintenance and upkeep projections. |
|
06-09-2017, 03:02 PM | #79 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Center Harbor
Posts: 1,149
Thanks: 205
Thanked 424 Times in 242 Posts
|
I would think this is not just a maintenance issue. If someone was injured due to people deliberately placing rocks on the WOW trail it could become a criminal issue.
|
06-10-2017, 12:25 AM | #80 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 695
Thanks: 187
Thanked 531 Times in 227 Posts
|
Quote:
You are absolutely right, terrible things could come from, and easily be classified criminal from, some maliciously placed boulders. A reality is: how do you catch the culprit? Yes people could get hurt and a lot of money would be wasted on removing the boulders in the interim. In a previous post I mention a potential alternative of bringing the trail down Elm Street to Parade Road and up to Severance Rd, then down to the tracks on what I referred to as the snowmobile trail through the state forest. That post was apposed by two seemingly legitimate views. The first states that the state would be foolish to allow easement. I've since remembered that the snowmobile trail I referenced is actually a class 6 Town Rd. I would hope that is something to work with. The second states that the WOW trail federal funding only applies to construction on the rail road track. To this I encourage we take a closer look and get creative for another source of funding for an alternate portion of the trail. A large percentage of the alternate trail I propose is already paved therefore there would not be as significant of an expenditure to create a rideable surface. If the calculation turns out that the expense to connect Severance back to the tracks is more than what is saved with the alternate route pre-paved surface, and the trail organizers find a shortfall from the government funding, I have this solution. Work out a deal with us to create the WOW Welcome Center on the corner of Severance and Parade. We have the land and I'm certain that if Alan Beetle and I sat down at a table and talked about it, we could come up with a strategy that gave this WOW welcome center a foundation for profit through food and beverage. Those profits or a potion of, can be dedicated to the trail to offset the expense. Please understand that to help make this happen, we would likely lose some of our realestate. I would hope that in appreciation of said sacrifice the SD/LB community would find a permanent way for golf cart access to The Mystic Meadows. There we have it. The trail gets built, SD/LB don't have to deal with a fence and other concerns. Trail riders have a great welcome center and nobody crashes into a boulder. |
|
06-10-2017, 05:45 AM | #81 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 6,090
Thanks: 1,157
Thanked 2,011 Times in 1,239 Posts
|
Quote:
Sent from my XT1528 using Tapatalk |
|
06-10-2017, 05:47 AM | #82 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Center Harbor
Posts: 1,149
Thanks: 205
Thanked 424 Times in 242 Posts
|
Quote:
To be clear, I really don't care if an alternative trail route is decided on. If all are happy about it, great. I applaud offering this alternative solution. I REALLY DON'T like making decisions based on veiled threats and intimidation. Court fights are one thing. That is how society works out it's differences. Threatened boulders in the trail are a whole different thing. It's like walking into a discussion with a blatantly obvious weapon with the clear intention of intimidating the other people in the room. Cowering before criminals is NOT a good plan to deal with the situation. Talk about a WRONG message. |
|
06-21-2017, 07:01 AM | #83 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Long Bay/ Paugus bay
Posts: 115
Thanks: 127
Thanked 13 Times in 9 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
06-04-2017, 07:02 AM | #84 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,220
Thanks: 1,214
Thanked 1,007 Times in 648 Posts
|
This morning for the first time I ran the complete WOW Trail. Full disclosure I was a resident of Long Bay for 10 years and pretty much against the trail. It was extremely nice with several access points and the split rail fencing towards the Belmont line was esthetically pleasing. Very well kept and only saw 4 pieces of trash along the whole way. If done correctly it may not be as bad as most think.
Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app |
06-04-2017, 10:06 PM | #85 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Lakes, Central NH. and Dallas/Fort Worth TX.
Posts: 3,694
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: 3,069
Thanked 472 Times in 236 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
trfour Always Remember, The Best Safety Device In The Boat, or on a PWC Snowmobile etc., Is YOU! Safe sledding tips and much more; http://www.snowmobile.org/snowmobiling-safety.html |
|
06-05-2017, 06:32 AM | #86 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,220
Thanks: 1,214
Thanked 1,007 Times in 648 Posts
|
WOW Trail Phase 3 Heating up...
Quote:
Speaking about "most" as far as those opposing the next phase including those in South Down and Long Bay. Also have mixed feeling about suing the DOT. Going to make future cooperation with the DOT and city of Laconia when other issues in those communities arise and their assistance is needed Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app |
|
06-06-2017, 09:18 AM | #87 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 695
Thanks: 187
Thanked 531 Times in 227 Posts
|
Alternate route
Wouldn't it save a lot of time money and aggravation if they were to alter the route to come up Elm Street, then bypass south down shores on Parade Road and turn down Severance Road to pick up the snowmobile trail that goes through the state forest back down to the lake. Everybody wins
|
06-06-2017, 09:22 AM | #88 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Laconia
Posts: 1,073
Thanks: 443
Thanked 1,017 Times in 423 Posts
|
Great Suggestion
Quote:
|
|
06-06-2017, 09:26 AM | #89 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Center Harbor
Posts: 1,149
Thanks: 205
Thanked 424 Times in 242 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
06-10-2017, 04:43 AM | #90 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,220
Thanks: 1,214
Thanked 1,007 Times in 648 Posts
|
Baygo that is an excellent viable solution and everyone wins in the end. I would think all parties would consider this alternative instead of wasting time in court and money on attorneys
Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app |
06-10-2017, 08:32 PM | #91 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Laconia
Posts: 109
Thanks: 65
Thanked 18 Times in 16 Posts
|
While I think some of the ideas to "go around" SDS/LB are great and even could work from the research I did the rails to trails fund must be on railroad tracks. So even if they would consider it would have to be self funded. I lived in SDS for four years and was on the board. At the time I left the stance was to fight it at whatever cost but as I read through this I see a spilt stance on the homeowners. Someone in SDS should do what's needed to put a vote together on the yearly meeting coming up so all the homeowners can vote to on what to do and if needed how much money to spend. Just my 2 cents and that about all it's worth.
Sent from my iPad using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app |
06-23-2017, 12:15 PM | #92 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 6,090
Thanks: 1,157
Thanked 2,011 Times in 1,239 Posts
|
Nicely worded letter. I especially like the subtle reminders about the state-owned ROW and development plan requirement for the path.
Sent from my XT1528 using Tapatalk |
08-12-2017, 09:41 PM | #93 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,220
Thanks: 1,214
Thanked 1,007 Times in 648 Posts
|
Sorry I completely disagree. The alternative plans do not eliminate all the bridges only one and no matter the route the federal funding is absolutely needed. All of the routes contain many obstacles it is certainly not as easy as your making it sound.
Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app |
08-13-2017, 06:53 PM | #94 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Reading, MA and South Down Shores
Posts: 850
Thanks: 57
Thanked 183 Times in 114 Posts
|
Quote:
I have been on the snowmobile trails through the woods and reviewed the maps....nothing onerous. Jetskier |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jetskier For This Useful Post: | ||
laketrout (05-18-2018) |
08-13-2017, 07:30 PM | #95 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Meredith Bay & LI, NY
Posts: 3,220
Thanks: 1,214
Thanked 1,007 Times in 648 Posts
|
Jetskier
Jetskier your views are extremely clouded by the fact that you are a south down resident and do not want the trail through the community. Conveniently forgetting the fact that the trail and ROW were all agreed to in the original community plan. Yes I am a former Long Bay resident, yes as long as it is constructed properly and is esthetically pleasing I am all for the trail and finally yes I do currently have ownership interest is south down property. It is also my opinion that long term the trail will have a substantial positive impact not only Laconia but all the communities along the trail.
|
08-13-2017, 08:11 PM | #96 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Reading, MA and South Down Shores
Posts: 850
Thanks: 57
Thanked 183 Times in 114 Posts
|
Just stating facts...
Quote:
I think that this discussion has reached larger heads...I am just presenting the facts. I have no control over what the WOW Org decides to do...and you now live in Meredith Bay not South Down. You are entitled to your opinion and I am entitled to mine. I would suggest that we simply leave it at that. Jetskier |
|
08-13-2017, 06:15 PM | #97 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 41
Thanks: 150
Thanked 10 Times in 5 Posts
|
^ haters gonna hate
|
Bookmarks |
|
|