Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Calendar Register FAQDonate Members List Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-20-2014, 07:55 AM   #1
Chickie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 368
Thanks: 0
Thanked 67 Times in 38 Posts
Default Hazardous Waste Collection Days

Hazardous waste collection days are coming up in towns surrounding the Lakes Region over the next few weekends. Yesterday's Citizen had a list of items accepted and those which are not. I note that unbroken CFL bulbs are accepted, but apparently broken ones are not. As you are not supposed to place them in your regular trash, what do you do with the broken ones? I don't understand the push for the country to go to CFL bulbs when they are apparently so dangerous and there appears to be no way to dispose of those that get broken.
Chickie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2014, 07:58 AM   #2
pjard
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gilford, NH
Posts: 636
Thanks: 492
Thanked 194 Times in 101 Posts
Default

CFL's are done! Nobody is pushing them any longer. They had a short life span from a market standpoint. LED's are the future (for now anyway).
pjard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2014, 08:19 AM   #3
MAXUM
Senior Member
 
MAXUM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kuna ID
Posts: 2,755
Thanks: 246
Thanked 1,942 Times in 802 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chickie View Post
Hazardous waste collection days are coming up in towns surrounding the Lakes Region over the next few weekends. Yesterday's Citizen had a list of items accepted and those which are not. I note that unbroken CFL bulbs are accepted, but apparently broken ones are not. As you are not supposed to place them in your regular trash, what do you do with the broken ones? I don't understand the push for the country to go to CFL bulbs when they are apparently so dangerous and there appears to be no way to dispose of those that get broken.
Another example of the Federal Government thinking for you - these CFLs never made any sense, there was no problem at all with incandescent light bulbs, yes they did consume more energy, but were not hazardous. Of course any way to conserve energy is a good thing, but to what end? I agree LEDs seem to be a good alternative without the hazards. However politicians these days just like to wave their legislative wand with feel good regulations not taking under consideration the repercussions of such decisions. Sadly the electorate continues to keep these bums in office so the nonsense continues with no accountability whatsoever.

Thankfully I stockpiled a ton of incandescent bulbs so with any luck I have enough to keep going with them until the cost of the LEDs comes down enough to make them somewhat reasonable in price.
MAXUM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2014, 09:58 AM   #4
Seaplane Pilot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,177
Thanks: 664
Thanked 943 Times in 368 Posts
Default

I would mail them to Al Gore. Let him deal with it.
Seaplane Pilot is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Seaplane Pilot For This Useful Post:
ApS (07-20-2014), Broken Glass (07-20-2014)
Old 07-20-2014, 11:04 AM   #5
thebix
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Down since 2009.
Posts: 100
Thanks: 2
Thanked 33 Times in 24 Posts
Default Fed Govenment never required CFL or any other specific technology

The government regs never specified what kind of bulbs to replace incandescent. All they did was require that light bulbs meet a specific level of increased efficiency. The existing incandescent bulbs could not be re-engineered to meet the standards so they were effectively banned. Initially the industry had only CFL and halogen technology that could meet the standards. Now, the LED technology has improved to meet the needs for general purpose domestic use, and the price / availability / styles increased to where LED is the 'way to go'.
thebix is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 07-20-2014, 04:02 PM   #6
Orion
Senior Member
 
Orion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cow Island
Posts: 914
Thanks: 602
Thanked 193 Times in 91 Posts
Default They didn't have to specify

Quote:
Originally Posted by thebix View Post
The government regs never specified what kind of bulbs to replace incandescent. All they did was require that light bulbs meet a specific level of increased efficiency. The existing incandescent bulbs could not be re-engineered to meet the standards so they were effectively banned. Initially the industry had only CFL and halogen technology that could meet the standards. Now, the LED technology has improved to meet the needs for general purpose domestic use, and the price / availability / styles increased to where LED is the 'way to go'.
Those that wrote the bill knew full well that the only practical alternative at the time the bill was passed was CFL. They didn't need to specify. More idiotic regulations from "those on high that know better than us".
Orion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2014, 07:59 PM   #7
Greene's Basin Girl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Moultonborough, NH
Posts: 1,515
Thanks: 394
Thanked 527 Times in 269 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MAXUM View Post
Another example of the Federal Government thinking for you - these CFLs never made any sense, there was no problem at all with incandescent light bulbs, yes they did consume more energy, but were not hazardous. Of course any way to conserve energy is a good thing, but to what end? I agree LEDs seem to be a good alternative without the hazards. However politicians these days just like to wave their legislative wand with feel good regulations not taking under consideration the repercussions of such decisions. Sadly the electorate continues to keep these bums in office so the nonsense continues with no accountability whatsoever.

Thankfully I stockpiled a ton of incandescent bulbs so with any luck I have enough to keep going with them until the cost of the LEDs comes down enough to make them somewhat reasonable in price.
I did the same thing. I couldn't stand the CFL's.
Greene's Basin Girl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.22009 seconds