1) 
Well, that is very interesting: it's previously been posted that only
one SBONH member has been shared with Erica's-own
NHRBA.
Fosters.com writes this excerpt:
http://www.fosters.com/apps/pbcs.dll...69/0/citnews02
Are those two among the missing?
2) In addition, below are items on
NHRBA's own mission-statement from the website
GraniteGrok.
3) In your consideration of the Erica's hugely-discredited
NHRBA, how do these "talking points" differ from those of the brand-new
SBONH?
______________________________
______________________________
NHRBA:
1) Issues of current laws not being followed or enforced (headway speeds, 150 foot passage rule),
2) lack of statistics showing [
speed] is a problem,
3) personal responsibility vs insistence on personal rights (kayaking in the middle of the Broads).
4) The role of mandatory boating education classes and certifications.
5) Freedom vs encroaching Nanny Statism.
6) Cost of enforcement.
7) Different boats are built for different speeds.
8) Class envy.
9) Would removal of performance boats cut down the chop experienced by small craft?
10) Noise problems
11) Accidents in the state wholly due to speed in the State (not alcohol related)? Zero.
______________________________
Other than jabbing sticks into quiet areas of New Hampshire law, I fail to see how
SBONH has accomplished any mission separation from Erica's hugely-discredited
NHRBA.