Quote:
Originally Posted by Acres per Second
The RSA says "residents".
A renter is not only "a resident", but human beings who express concerns for their safety—and the safety of their family.
Here is the crux of the issue:
I see it as a technicality: the major NWZ proponents could grant tiny percentages of ownership to each of his tenants, "legalizing" those signatures as listed in Town records. But why bother? 
Among other quality of life issues—this is a safety issue—and temporary residents bleed the same as other residents.  |
Interestingly, on the Wolfeboro forum you start a thread titled "Visitors" will make July 4th weekend scary. By "visitors" you refer to people from MA and other out of staters and discuss them with disdain. But now when you need them on your side you are very welcoming of their presence on the Lake!
Do you grant a tiny percentage of your place to renters?
See you Saturday!!