Quote:
Originally Posted by WinnisquamZ
Agree with most that the issue is not how or why he purchased a home on GI. The problem is he and his family have been a residents of Gilford over the past four months. While representing and making decisions for the city of Laconia and their residents. He should resign his position immediately or be removed by the city council. That brings up my other concern. Did the city council members know and kept it from the public? Hopefully, the LDS follows up on this story
Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app |
Generally, a person can maintain legal residency in one place if the person is temporarily absent. If Hosmer has been temporarily residing in Gilford while his property in Laconia is being prepared for sale and before buying a new property in Laconia and getting it ready for occupation, that would certainly qualify as a temporary absence from Laconia. How about giving him the benefit of the doubt and seeing how things play out, instead of making a demand that he immediately resign. If he doesn't end up moving back to Laconia in a new residence within a reasonable amount of time, then sure, take him to task.