Quote:
Originally Posted by Rusty
Would you please give me the pages of the power point presentation that references Items 1-5 and how the speed limit will help fix them.
Write it up like this if you would:
1. Violation of the 150 ft rule. Page ?
2. Cutting off other boaters. Page ?
3. Speeding through NWZ's at speeds above no wake speed. Page ?
4. BUI Page ?
5. Being a complete BONEHEAD! Page ?
I can't tie any of these items to the presentation...but hey..sometimes it takes a long time for things to sink in.  |
When you read the powerpoint, it is written in a way that suggests that the SL is the only way to solve items 1-5 while trying to marginalize that existing laws existing for all of them.
I also find is laughable that on page 3 they use an image that is not even from Winnipesaukee. That should be pointed out in the public hearing as that is an outright attempt to mislead if not dishonest.
1. Violation of the 150 ft rule.
Page 15
2. Cutting off other boaters.
Page ,13, 14, 16, 19
3. Speeding through NWZ's at speeds above no wake speed.
Page 16 Quote from WinnFlabs: "High speed magnifies the consequences of any rules violations." <- Sure sounds to me that the SL supporters are claiming that all other rules are meaningless without a SL tacked on.
Read this next quote from the WinnFlabs site and tell me how this doesn't sound like the SL is the answer for all that ills Lake W:
"Some initiatives such as boater licensing and education have already been implemented however until speed is one of the points of education there is dramatically less value in these efforts."
4. BUI
Page 16
5. Being a complete BONEHEAD!
Page 13, 14, 16, 19
The SL supporters were willing to say and do anything to pass. This includes embellishment of facts.
APS is a prime example of someone who has lost all objectively and would propose that anyone who drives 46 MPH be jailed.