Quote:
Originally Posted by Sue Doe-Nym
Unfortunately, you seem to be missing the point of what Maxum said, in spite of his very well written post. To compare his logical and rationale stance to your comments about National Parks and Walmart is ludicrous.
The situation referred to in Moultonboro is well stated. Taxpayers are once again going to be asked to pay $6.4 million for a Rec. Center facility that is neither needed or justified.
My apologies for changing the initial subject of this thread.
|
Not missing the point at all--if everything was simply about taxes and ROI, America would have zero government-owner property paid for by everyone and enjoyed by everyone.
The part I agree with is whom would be better in terms of stewardship, the town or the state, but that conversation implies the realization that there's value in public lands--the middle ground discussion I referred to.
Sent from my XT1528 using Tapatalk