View Single Post
Old 04-27-2010, 02:48 PM   #70
lawn psycho
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: On the move...
Posts: 987
Thanks: 113
Thanked 248 Times in 133 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KTO View Post
Plus it's good for the rest of your life...soooo

If you plan on coming back next year and the year after that and for the next 20+ years...then that's really 40+ weeks you're spending on the lake. Pretttyyyy significant.

I'm sure there was debate about the 150 rule when it was established, then rafting restrictions, then the boater certificate requirements, now a speed limit. So what is enough for the Depends wearing crowd?

I think a good battle to restrict any development on the lake shore on environmental grounds would go a long way to curbing the "legislative feature creeping"........ I think a lot of this stuff comes from retired nannies who sit around the lake and do nothing but belly ache that they don't have exclusivity with the view from their little shanty.
lawn psycho is offline   Reply With Quote