View Single Post
Old 12-30-2019, 06:01 AM   #24
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,411
Thanks: 720
Thanked 1,381 Times in 957 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Descant View Post
Some years ago the gas tax refund form was changed to allow donations to these same two funds (Navigation safety and Lake preservation). As much as people whined then that these functions (Milfoil and MP) were underfunded, not many people stepped up with a (tax deductible) donation to support these issues. We could still use more MP and less milfoil, right?
As long as these two issues continue to be problematic, there will be attempts to find better funding, mostly from those who benefit, rather than the general taxpayer, which is mostly business taxes since individuals pay little or no state taxes as such (Yeah, Yeah. I know. Interest and dividends. And this year, they tried to add capital gains).
I agree, and I don't think any lake related taxes have decrease yet we seem to have less MP coverage on the lake. Money doesn't always get used for what is intended.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote