View Single Post
Old 09-19-2017, 04:08 PM   #18
Outdoorsman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 815
Thanks: 113
Thanked 193 Times in 126 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joey2665 View Post
I also agree this is an issue. Although I do not think that all these coves should be no wake zones, but much like the no rafting areas there can be areas that are no water sport zones (ie repeated wake boarding, tubing water skiing ect) for the areas most susceptible to shoreline damage from from repeated wakes.
Sorry but that is not something that should happen. If we make half the lake No Rafting and the other half NWS (No Water Sports) then those that chose to enjoy the lake for water sports purposes are forced onto the broads or other high traffic area, now we need to make those areas NWZ or risk hitting others that are enjoying the lake in their own way.

FWIW, 100% of the lake users will never be happy 100% of the time.
Outdoorsman is online now   Reply With Quote