Mr. Wood:
When you joined this discussion yesterday, you said that you “would like to address everyone’s concerns… feel free to ask… we are open, honest and not afraid of any questions.” I applaud this attitude, and would like to give you the benefit of the doubt, but… you have not answered questions that I have directly and clearly asked, sometimes multiple times. The result is that I am beginning to wonder if you are being purposely evasive, perhaps because you are afraid that disclosing the true nature of your proposed business operations would paint a negative picture of commercial seaplane activity that relies on the publicly owned Union Wharf in Tuftonboro.
Please live up to the words in your first post and answer these questions:
“For tail clearance. It's not just for me. That's what I'm trying to convey.”
If it's not just for you, who else wants to have the wharf posts shortened?
How far will the tail project over the wharf when the aircraft is alongside?
When the aircraft is secured to the wharf, what will the aircraft's orientation be?
It sounds like the aft ends of the floats will be facing the wharf, is this correct?
"As low as possible down to deck height... leaving enough for boaters to tie to." What is the maximum post height that would be acceptable to you?
Do you want to shorten all posts, or only certain posts?
|