Thread: aquatic weeds
View Single Post
Old 10-02-2013, 03:32 PM   #32
Lakegeezer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 1,657
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 342
Thanked 618 Times in 278 Posts
Default know your system

Quote:
Originally Posted by SIKSUKR View Post
I question whether a failed septic is any harm to the lake if it stays contained in the system itself. When a septic fails its usually the leach field which clogs or collapses not allowing the effluent to leach into the ground. If the system doesn't leach at all and your tank becomes full and needs to be pumped frequently without overflowing, it would be my contention that the surrounding ground is LESS effected by waste water. It would work like a holding tank. Of course if the leaching media is clogged and the effluent tends to run somewhere else like towards the lake then that is an issue.
Yes, it makes sense that a frequently pumped septic system would contribute less phosphorus load than an ignored and failed system. However, the holding tank would have to be in good condition, and not a rotted out 55 gallon drum that never overflows. Systems over 50 years old are suspect. There is a test kit to check for leakage, but it would surprise me if many would take advantage of that.
__________________
-lg
Lakegeezer is offline   Reply With Quote