View Single Post
Old 12-07-2018, 06:29 AM   #38
Seaplane Pilot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 827
Thanks: 283
Thanked 417 Times in 165 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bilproject View Post
No wake zones are about safety not erosion within the no wake zone. My observations are that no wake zones actually increase erosion in the shoreline adjacent to the areas just outside the no wake zone. Boats on plane generate a wake of X. Boats coming off or to plane create a wake of 4X. If it were about erosion we should have no areas where we cause 100 % of the boats traveling an area come off plane and return to cruising speed. Over the years boats on the lake have become progressively larger and faster. This makes tight areas smaller and more dangerous requiring the captain to be precise in navigating tight areas to maintain 150 feet. Mix that with a large variation of the captain's skill level and knowledge of the lake and you have a situation ripe for an accident. While no fan of no-wake zones they reflect the reality of what is required to keep us all safe.
I’m sure “SAFETY” was the primary reason for making that ridiculously huge no-wake zone in Meredith Bay.
Seaplane Pilot is offline   Reply With Quote