View Single Post
Old 07-30-2014, 06:50 AM   #18
PaugusBayFireFighter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 837
Thanks: 361
Thanked 674 Times in 264 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resident 2B View Post
I am a non-resident, lakefront property owner, so I have no vote here. However, I believe this is needed and I support this move.

The present MP HQ facility does not support what is needed. We need a professional MP on the lake and I believe this is a step towards that end.

R2B
Agreed. I support a new, modern MP facility. I wonder how much of the revenue needed will come from federal grants.
No sense in worrying about something I can't control.
PaugusBayFireFighter is offline