View Single Post
Old 05-14-2011, 11:49 AM   #76
lawn psycho
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: On the move...
Posts: 987
Thanks: 113
Thanked 248 Times in 133 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bear Islander View Post
After years of NO LIMITS this debate has degenerated to asking for a 10 mph increase on one relativity small area of the lake. And you are not going to get even that. Polls show support for speed limits in the 80 to 90 percent range.

Speed limits are here to stay. The next change will be to make them State-wide.

After being defeated three times in a row, you will have a hard time getting any politicians to put their name on another anti-speed limit bill.

I'm sorry if this sounds smug. But the anti-SL movement is dead, dead, dead.
OK, so if you believe the SL is here to stay then my next question is:

Which is easier to enforce, the 150 ft rule or the speed limit?

I don't think the lake will change one bit. The far, far majority of boats are basic bowriders. My guess is the 90% percentile of boats are in the 20-26 ft range and can't do the wild speeds that some of the pro-SL crowd has railed against and pretended as "the norm".

I still say the lake doesn't change one iota with or without a SL.

The helves, ELs, APS's of the world are still going to have high cortisol levels. LOL
lawn psycho is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to lawn psycho For This Useful Post: