View Single Post
Old 03-16-2016, 08:03 AM   #12
Lakegeezer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 1,657
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 342
Thanked 618 Times in 278 Posts
Default Not this time

The vote to defeat the bond article was likely. It didn't matter how much misinformation was advertised or that public discussion at the meeting was halted by a political parlor trick. There was plenty of correct information available to those that looked for it and many public meetings. If anyone thought the bond article was going to pass, they need better pollsters.

I don't recall the vote tally to squelch public discussion, but it was a majority. If it wasn't a 2/3 majority, as required to "call the question" by Roberts Rules of Order, then the moderator made an error.

Some at town meeting had prepared statements, and are disappointed they did not get a chance to present their views. The unintended consequences of the political parlor trick (and possible error by the moderator) is that the question will come up again. The trick also damaged any chance in the near future for interest in making M'boro a SB2 town, as it is clear that political tricksters are in town, willing and able to exploit SB2 procedures.

The select board did not sell its community center plan to the voters this time, but clearly believe the town needs more gym space and meeting rooms. A solution requiring a 6+ million bond was a bridge too far.
__________________
-lg
Lakegeezer is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Lakegeezer For This Useful Post: