View Single Post
Old 06-12-2011, 05:56 AM   #53
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,788
Thanks: 2,084
Thanked 742 Times in 532 Posts
Wink Mostly, I Appreciate LP's Posts...

Quote:
Originally Posted by lawn psycho View Post
Sorry but there are TONS of old septics around the lake.
1) The cleanest lakes in the Lakes Region have "Class-A" water: their islands have out-houses—go figure.

Maybe not so many dishwashers, greenest of lawns, and water-softeners using "forever" salt.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lawn psycho View Post
I no longer support the 150 ft rule for passing vessels. Why bring it up?
2) The 150'-Rule applies to just about every hazardous encounter one could have on a NH lake, and not just passing or skiing—but shorelines—and anywhere-near navigation markers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lawn psycho View Post
Don't think for a minute that a HP restriction would not remove existing boats off the lake in short order. It would be less than 10 years before most of the cruisers left the lake.
3) Like their name, "cruisers" are expected to cruise. Oversized cruisers are really second homes / tax shelters for some people.

Like The Mount, oversized cruisers could be locally re-powered—diesels, maybe—and continue as before.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lawn psycho View Post
Here's an idea. Ban any future home development on the lake.
4) Resulting in an economic "Armageddon" for New Hampshire?

Quote:
Originally Posted by lawn psycho View Post
However, the wakes from these boats are not the menace and the exaggerations are just silly. I know when I am out on my boat it does not match the pandemonium portrayed on this forum.
5) Bring your boat over to my dock tie up here—we can talk about any wakes you might care to discuss.
Attached Images
 
ApS is offline