06-12-2011, 05:56 AM
|
#53
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,788
Thanks: 2,084
Thanked 742 Times in 532 Posts
|
Mostly, I Appreciate LP's Posts...
Quote:
Originally Posted by lawn psycho
Sorry but there are TONS of old septics around the lake.
|
1) The cleanest lakes in the Lakes Region have "Class-A" water: their islands have out-houses—go figure.
Maybe not so many dishwashers, greenest of lawns, and water-softeners using "forever" salt.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lawn psycho
I no longer support the 150 ft rule for passing vessels. Why bring it up?
|
2) The 150'-Rule applies to just about every hazardous encounter one could have on a NH lake, and not just passing or skiing—but shorelines—and anywhere-near navigation markers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lawn psycho
Don't think for a minute that a HP restriction would not remove existing boats off the lake in short order. It would be less than 10 years before most of the cruisers left the lake.
|
3) Like their name, "cruisers" are expected to cruise. Oversized cruisers are really second homes / tax shelters for some people.
Like The Mount, oversized cruisers could be locally re-powered—diesels, maybe—and continue as before.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lawn psycho
Here's an idea. Ban any future home development on the lake.
|
4) Resulting in an economic "Armageddon" for New Hampshire?
Quote:
Originally Posted by lawn psycho
However, the wakes from these boats are not the menace and the exaggerations are just silly. I know when I am out on my boat it does not match the pandemonium portrayed on this forum.
|
5) Bring your boat over to my dock tie up here—we can talk about any wakes you might care to discuss.
|
|
|