Quote:
Originally Posted by 8gv
This discussion brings to light the concept of taxing the users of goverment services.
Some would argue that only those directly involved in the activity that generates government expense should pay.
Some might contend that it is one for all and all for one so spread out the expense to everyone.
My main concern is revenue and spending efficiency.
For each new dollar brought in, what was the administrative cost to get it?
For each dollar spent, what amount would be considered “waste”?
|
Lots of good points implied here. If you follow the reasoning, the conclusion would be to increase the fees on boats that currently require registration (this would include my own boat). First, these larger boats have a much bigger "footprint", so owners are bigger users of the lake and associated services. Second, it costs the state nothing to increase the price of a license it already sells.
Also, with respect to fees, the lake is unusual compared to similar resources such as state parks. To walk up Monandnock, just for example, I need to pay $10(?). But I can launch a boat, which has a much bigger impact in every way, for free.