Can someone please tell me any reason this law would be a bad idea?
It does not allow any louder boats than are allowed today, and it allows those boats to be quieter when they are running slowly. What am I missing?
I understood the speed limit proponents, even if I heartily disagreed with them. Same with rafting laws and no wake zones, I understand why some people want them.
Why would anyone be against this law? Am I missing a "slippery slope" argument? Is it "not far enough".
I'm for any law that makes the lake quieter without restricting anyone rights.
|